Kilifi County Integrated Development Plan 2023-2027, Accelerating Socioeconomic Transformation for Inclusive Growth, County Government of Kilifi, May 2023 (copy hosted by the Council of Governors’ Maarifa Centre). PDF page 51 reviews tourism achievements including sports tourism events; PDF page 61 lists an enabling water sports environment; PDF page 72 the tourism strategies; PDF page 186 the sports tourism programme (KSh 62 million); PDF page 227 the tourism indicators. Printed page numbers are 21 lower than PDF pages. Downloaded from https://maarifa.cog.go.ke/sites/default/files/2024-06/KILIFI%20CIDP%202023-2027.pdf

Contributed as a source for Kilifi Kitesurfing World Championship.

Contents of the file

Page 1

COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KILIFI COUNTY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2023-2027 THEME: Accelerating Socioeconomic Transformation for Inclusive Growth MAY 2023

Page 2

COUNTY VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS To be a leading, vibrant, highly productive, secure and prosperous county providing high quality life for all its inhabitants. To provide an enabling environment for efficient utilization of resources, industrial growth and effective provision of essential services for improved quality of life for all. CORE VALUES ● Integrity ● Transparency and Accountability ● Prudent use of Public Resources ● Inclusivity and Public Participation ● Environmental Sustainability ● Appreciation for Diversity i

| COUNTY VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS To be a leading, vibrant, highly productive, secure and prosperous county providing high quality life for all its inhabitants. To provide an enabling environment for efficient utilization of resources, industrial growth and effective provision of essential services for improved quality of life for all. CORE VALUES ● Integrity ● Transparency and Accountability ● Prudent use of Public Resources ● Inclusivity and Public Participation ● Environmental Sustainability ● Appreciation for Diversity i |

|---|

Page 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES … v LIST OF FIGURES … vii GLOSSARY OF COMMONLY USED TERMS … xi FOREWORD … xiv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT … xvi … xvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … xviii CHAPTER ONE … 1 1.0 COUNTY OVERVIEW … 1 1.1 Background … 1 1.2 Position and Size … 1 1.3. Physiographic and Natural Conditions … 2 1.3.1 Physical and Topographic Features … 2 1.3.2 Climatic Conditions … 3 1.3.3 Ecological Conditions … 4 1.4 Administrative and Political Units … 4 1.4.1 Administrative Units … 4 1.4.2 County Government Administrative wards by constituency … 5 1.4.3 Political Units (Constituencies and Wards) … 5 1.5 Demographic Features … 7 1.5.1 Population Size, Composition and Distribution … 7 1.5.2 Population Density and Distribution … 10 1.5.3 Population Projections by Broad Age Groups … 11 1.5.4 Population of Persons with Disabilities … 12 1.6 Demographic Dividend Potential … 13 1.7 Kilifi County Poverty Profile … 15 CHAPTER TWO … 18 2.0 PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS CIDP PERIOD … 18 2.1 Overview … 18 2.2 Analysis of the County Revenue Sources … 18 2.3 County Budget Expenditure Analysis … 18 2.4. Sector Programmes Performance Review … 19 2.4.1. Health Sector … 19 2.4.2. Education Sector … 22 2.4.3. Environmental Protection, Water, Sanitation and Natural Resources … 23 2.4.4. Public Administration & Intergovernmental Relations … 24 2.4.5. Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector … 24 2.4.6. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries … 26 2.4.7. Lands, Housing, physical Planning and Urban Development … 28 ii

| TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES … v LIST OF FIGURES … vii GLOSSARY OF COMMONLY USED TERMS … xi FOREWORD … xiv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT … xvi … xvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … xviii CHAPTER ONE … 1 1.0 COUNTY OVERVIEW … 1 1.1 Background … 1 1.2 Position and Size … 1 1.3. Physiographic and Natural Conditions … 2 1.3.1 Physical and Topographic Features … 2 1.3.2 Climatic Conditions … 3 1.3.3 Ecological Conditions … 4 1.4 Administrative and Political Units … 4 1.4.1 Administrative Units … 4 1.4.2 County Government Administrative wards by constituency … 5 1.4.3 Political Units (Constituencies and Wards) … 5 1.5 Demographic Features … 7 1.5.1 Population Size, Composition and Distribution … 7 1.5.2 Population Density and Distribution … 10 1.5.3 Population Projections by Broad Age Groups … 11 1.5.4 Population of Persons with Disabilities … 12 1.6 Demographic Dividend Potential … 13 1.7 Kilifi County Poverty Profile … 15 CHAPTER TWO … 18 2.0 PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS CIDP PERIOD … 18 2.1 Overview … 18 2.2 Analysis of the County Revenue Sources … 18 2.3 County Budget Expenditure Analysis … 18 2.4. Sector Programmes Performance Review … 19 2.4.1. Health Sector … 19 2.4.2. Education Sector … 22 2.4.3. Environmental Protection, Water, Sanitation and Natural Resources … 23 2.4.4. Public Administration & Intergovernmental Relations … 24 2.4.5. Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector … 24 2.4.6. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries … 26 2.4.7. Lands, Housing, physical Planning and Urban Development … 28 ii |

|---|

Page 4

2.4.8. Energy and Infrastructure Sector … 28 2.4.9. Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development … 30 2.5 Challenges … 31 2.6 Emerging Issues … 32 2.7. Lessons Learnt … 32 2.8 Natural Resource Assessment … 32 2.8 Development Issues … 34 CHAPTER THREE … 45 3.0 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK … 45 3.1 Introduction … 45 3.2 Spatial Development Framework … 46 CHAPTER FOUR … 73 4.0 DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES, STRATEGIES AND PROGRAMMES … 73 4.1. Overview … 73 4.2 Health Sector … 73 4.2.1 Sector Priorities and Strategies … 73 4.2.2 Health Sector Programmes … 74 4.2.3 Health Sector Flagship Projects… 91 4.2.4 Health Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 92 4.3. Education Sector… 93 4.3.1 Education Sector Priorities and Strategies … 94 4.3.2. Education Sector Programmes … 94 4.3.3 Education Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages… 97 4.4. Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management … 98 4.4.1. Water Sector Priorities and Strategies … 99 4.4.2 Water Sector Programmes … 99 4.4.3 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Flagship Projects . 106 4.4.4 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages… 107 4.5 Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations … 109 4.5.1 PAIR Sector Priorities and Strategies: … 109 4.5.2 PAIR Sector Programmes … 110 4.5.3 Public Administration and intergovernmental relations Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 114 4.6 Social Protection and Recreation Sector … 115 4.6.1 Social Protection Sector Development Priorities and Strategies … 116 4.6.2. Social Protection Sector Programmes … 116 4.6.3 Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 128 4.7. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries … 130 4.7.1 Agriculture Sector Priorities and Strategies … 130 4.7.2 Agriculture Sector Programmes … 132 4.7.3 Agriculture Sector Flagship Project … 142 4.7.4 Agriculture Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 142 4.8. Lands, Housing, Physical Planning and Urban Development … 145 4.8.1 Lands Sector Priorities and Strategies: … 146 4.8.2 Lands Sector Programmes … 146 4.8.3 Lands, Housing, Physical Planning and Urban Development Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 153 4.9. Energy and Infrastructure … 154 4.9.1 Energy Sector Priorities and Strategies: … 154 iii

| 2.4.8. Energy and Infrastructure Sector … 28 2.4.9. Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development … 30 2.5 Challenges … 31 2.6 Emerging Issues … 32 2.7. Lessons Learnt … 32 2.8 Natural Resource Assessment … 32 2.8 Development Issues … 34 CHAPTER THREE … 45 3.0 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK … 45 3.1 Introduction … 45 3.2 Spatial Development Framework … 46 CHAPTER FOUR … 73 4.0 DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES, STRATEGIES AND PROGRAMMES … 73 4.1. Overview … 73 4.2 Health Sector … 73 4.2.1 Sector Priorities and Strategies … 73 4.2.2 Health Sector Programmes … 74 4.2.3 Health Sector Flagship Projects… 91 4.2.4 Health Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 92 4.3. Education Sector… 93 4.3.1 Education Sector Priorities and Strategies … 94 4.3.2. Education Sector Programmes … 94 4.3.3 Education Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages… 97 4.4. Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management … 98 4.4.1. Water Sector Priorities and Strategies … 99 4.4.2 Water Sector Programmes … 99 4.4.3 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Flagship Projects . 106 4.4.4 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages… 107 4.5 Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations … 109 4.5.1 PAIR Sector Priorities and Strategies: … 109 4.5.2 PAIR Sector Programmes … 110 4.5.3 Public Administration and intergovernmental relations Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 114 4.6 Social Protection and Recreation Sector … 115 4.6.1 Social Protection Sector Development Priorities and Strategies … 116 4.6.2. Social Protection Sector Programmes … 116 4.6.3 Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 128 4.7. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries … 130 4.7.1 Agriculture Sector Priorities and Strategies … 130 4.7.2 Agriculture Sector Programmes … 132 4.7.3 Agriculture Sector Flagship Project … 142 4.7.4 Agriculture Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 142 4.8. Lands, Housing, Physical Planning and Urban Development … 145 4.8.1 Lands Sector Priorities and Strategies: … 146 4.8.2 Lands Sector Programmes … 146 4.8.3 Lands, Housing, Physical Planning and Urban Development Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 153 4.9. Energy and Infrastructure … 154 4.9.1 Energy Sector Priorities and Strategies: … 154 iii |

|---|

Page 5

4.9.2 Energy Sector Programmes … 155 4.9.3 Energy and Infrastructure Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 159 4.10 Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development … 160 4.10.1 Trade Sector Priorities and Strategies … 160 4.10.2 Trade Sector Programmes … 161 4.10.3 Trade Sector Flagship Project … 173 4.10.4 Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages… 173 4.11 County Assembly … 175 4.11.1 County Assembly Sector Priorities and Strategies … 175 4.11.2 County Assembly Programmes … 176 4.11.3 County Assembly Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 177 4.12 CIDP Linkages with National Development Agenda, Regional and International Development Frameworks … 177 4.12.1 Linkage of the CIDP with the UN Sustainable Development Goals … 177 4.12.2 Linkages between CIDP and Agenda 2063 … 179 4.12.3 Linkages between CIDP and EAC Vision 2050 … 182 4.12.4 Linkages between CIDP and Fourth MTP-Bottom Up Economic Transformation Agenda … 184 CHAPTER FIVE … 189 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK … 189 5.1 Overview … 189 5.2 Institutional Framework … 189 5.2.1 Stakeholders and their Roles … 190 5.3 Resource Mobilization and Management Framework … 191 5.3.1 Resource Requirements by Sector … 191 5.3.2 Revenue Projections … 192 5.3.3 Estimated Resource Gap… 193 5.3.4 Resource Mobilization Strategy … 193 5.4 Asset Management … 193 5.5 Risk Management … 194 CHAPTER SIX … 196 6.0 MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING … 196 6.1 Overview … 196 6.2 County Monitoring and Evaluation Structure … 196 6.3 M&E Capacity … 198 6.4 M&E Outcome Indicators … 198 6.5 Data Collection, Analysis and Reporting … 207 6.6 Dissemination, Feedback Mechanism, Citizen Engagement and Learning … 208 6.7 Evaluation Plan … 208 iv

| 4.9.2 Energy Sector Programmes … 155 4.9.3 Energy and Infrastructure Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 159 4.10 Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development … 160 4.10.1 Trade Sector Priorities and Strategies … 160 4.10.2 Trade Sector Programmes … 161 4.10.3 Trade Sector Flagship Project … 173 4.10.4 Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages… 173 4.11 County Assembly … 175 4.11.1 County Assembly Sector Priorities and Strategies … 175 4.11.2 County Assembly Programmes … 176 4.11.3 County Assembly Cross-Sectoral Linkages … 177 4.12 CIDP Linkages with National Development Agenda, Regional and International Development Frameworks … 177 4.12.1 Linkage of the CIDP with the UN Sustainable Development Goals … 177 4.12.2 Linkages between CIDP and Agenda 2063 … 179 4.12.3 Linkages between CIDP and EAC Vision 2050 … 182 4.12.4 Linkages between CIDP and Fourth MTP-Bottom Up Economic Transformation Agenda … 184 CHAPTER FIVE … 189 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK … 189 5.1 Overview … 189 5.2 Institutional Framework … 189 5.2.1 Stakeholders and their Roles … 190 5.3 Resource Mobilization and Management Framework … 191 5.3.1 Resource Requirements by Sector … 191 5.3.2 Revenue Projections … 192 5.3.3 Estimated Resource Gap… 193 5.3.4 Resource Mobilization Strategy … 193 5.4 Asset Management … 193 5.5 Risk Management … 194 CHAPTER SIX … 196 6.0 MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING … 196 6.1 Overview … 196 6.2 County Monitoring and Evaluation Structure … 196 6.3 M&E Capacity … 198 6.4 M&E Outcome Indicators … 198 6.5 Data Collection, Analysis and Reporting … 207 6.6 Dissemination, Feedback Mechanism, Citizen Engagement and Learning … 208 6.7 Evaluation Plan … 208 iv |

|---|

Page 6

LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Area (KM2) by Sub-County … 5 Table 1.2: County Government Administrative Wards … 5 Table 1.3: County’s Electoral Wards by Constituency … 6 Table 1.4: Population Projections (by Sub-County and Sex) … 8 Table 1.5: Population Projections by Age Cohort … 9 Table 1.6: Population Projections by Urban Area … 10 Table 1.7: Population distribution and density by Sub-County … 11 Table 1.8: Population Projections by Broad Age Groups … 11 Table 1.9: Population of Persons with Disability by Type, Age and Sex … 13 Table 1.10: Demographic Dividend Potential … 14 Table 2.1: Analysis of County Revenue Sources … 18 Table 2.2: County Expenditure Analysis … 19 Table 2.3: Natural Resource Assessment … 33 Table 2.4: Development Issues … 35 Table 3.1: Strategies in the Agriculture sector … 48 Table 3.2: Strategies in the Tourism sector … 52 Table 3.3: Proposed hierarchy of centers within Kilifi County and their strategies … 54 Table 3.4: Strategies in the Energy sector … 59 Table 3.5: Strategies in the education sector (Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030) … 62 Table 3.6: Proposed dispensaries within Kilifi County … 64 Table 3.7: Elements of waste management in Kilifi County … 67 Table 4.1: Health Sector Priorities and Strategies … 73 Table 4.2: Sector Programmes … 74 Table 4.3: Health Sector Flagship Project … 92 Table 4.4: Cross-sectoral impacts … 92 Table 4.5: Education Sector Priorities and Strategies … 94 Table 4.6: Sector Programmes … 94 Table 4.7: Cross-sectoral impacts … 97 Table 4.8: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 99 Table 4.9: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Programmes … 99 Table 4.10: : Flagship Projects… 107 Table 4.11: Cross-sectoral impacts … 107 Table 4.12: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 110 Table 4.13: Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations Sector Programmes … 110 v

| LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Area (KM2) by Sub-County … 5 Table 1.2: County Government Administrative Wards … 5 Table 1.3: County’s Electoral Wards by Constituency … 6 Table 1.4: Population Projections (by Sub-County and Sex) … 8 Table 1.5: Population Projections by Age Cohort … 9 Table 1.6: Population Projections by Urban Area … 10 Table 1.7: Population distribution and density by Sub-County … 11 Table 1.8: Population Projections by Broad Age Groups … 11 Table 1.9: Population of Persons with Disability by Type, Age and Sex … 13 Table 1.10: Demographic Dividend Potential … 14 Table 2.1: Analysis of County Revenue Sources … 18 Table 2.2: County Expenditure Analysis … 19 Table 2.3: Natural Resource Assessment … 33 Table 2.4: Development Issues … 35 Table 3.1: Strategies in the Agriculture sector … 48 Table 3.2: Strategies in the Tourism sector … 52 Table 3.3: Proposed hierarchy of centers within Kilifi County and their strategies … 54 Table 3.4: Strategies in the Energy sector … 59 Table 3.5: Strategies in the education sector (Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030) … 62 Table 3.6: Proposed dispensaries within Kilifi County … 64 Table 3.7: Elements of waste management in Kilifi County … 67 Table 4.1: Health Sector Priorities and Strategies … 73 Table 4.2: Sector Programmes … 74 Table 4.3: Health Sector Flagship Project … 92 Table 4.4: Cross-sectoral impacts … 92 Table 4.5: Education Sector Priorities and Strategies … 94 Table 4.6: Sector Programmes … 94 Table 4.7: Cross-sectoral impacts … 97 Table 4.8: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 99 Table 4.9: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Programmes … 99 Table 4.10: : Flagship Projects… 107 Table 4.11: Cross-sectoral impacts … 107 Table 4.12: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 110 Table 4.13: Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations Sector Programmes … 110 v |

|---|

Page 7

Table 4.14: Cross-sectoral impacts … 115 Table 4.15: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 116 Table 4.16: Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Programmes … 117 Table 4.17: Cross-sectoral impacts … 128 Table 4.18: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 131 Table 4.19: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sector Programme … 132 Table 4.20: Agriculture Sector Flagship Projects … 142 Table 4.21: Cross-sectoral impacts … 143 Table 4.22: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 146 Table 4.23: Lands, Housing, Physical Planning and Urban Development Sector Programmes 146 Table 4.24: Cross-sectoral impacts … 154 Table 4.25: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 155 Table 4.26: Energy and Infrastructure Sector Programmes … 155 Table 4.27: Cross-sectoral impacts … 159 Table 4.28: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 161 Table 4.29: Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperative Development Sector Programmes … 161 Table 4.30: Sector Flagship Projects … 173 Table 4.31: Cross-sectoral impacts … 173 Table 4.32: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 176 Table 4.33: County Assembly Programmes and Sub programmes … 176 Table 4.34: Cross sectorial Linkages … 177 Table 4.35: CIDP Linkages with SDGs … 177 Table 4.36: Linkages between CIDP and Agenda 2063 … 180 Table 4.37: Linkages between CIDP and EAC Vision 2050 … 182 Table 4.38: Linkages between CIDP and Bottom Up Economic Transformation Agenda … 184 Table 5.1: Stakeholder Analysis … 190 Table 5.2: Summary of Sector Financial Resource Requirements … 191 Table 5.3: Revenue Projections … 192 Table 5.4: Resource Gaps … 193 Table 5.5: Risk, Implication, Level and Mitigation Measures … 194 Table 6.1: Outcome Indicator Reporting … 198 Table 6.2: Evaluation Plan … 209 vi

| Table 4.14: Cross-sectoral impacts … 115 Table 4.15: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 116 Table 4.16: Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Programmes … 117 Table 4.17: Cross-sectoral impacts … 128 Table 4.18: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 131 Table 4.19: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sector Programme … 132 Table 4.20: Agriculture Sector Flagship Projects … 142 Table 4.21: Cross-sectoral impacts … 143 Table 4.22: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 146 Table 4.23: Lands, Housing, Physical Planning and Urban Development Sector Programmes 146 Table 4.24: Cross-sectoral impacts … 154 Table 4.25: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 155 Table 4.26: Energy and Infrastructure Sector Programmes … 155 Table 4.27: Cross-sectoral impacts … 159 Table 4.28: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 161 Table 4.29: Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperative Development Sector Programmes … 161 Table 4.30: Sector Flagship Projects … 173 Table 4.31: Cross-sectoral impacts … 173 Table 4.32: Sector Priorities and Strategies … 176 Table 4.33: County Assembly Programmes and Sub programmes … 176 Table 4.34: Cross sectorial Linkages … 177 Table 4.35: CIDP Linkages with SDGs … 177 Table 4.36: Linkages between CIDP and Agenda 2063 … 180 Table 4.37: Linkages between CIDP and EAC Vision 2050 … 182 Table 4.38: Linkages between CIDP and Bottom Up Economic Transformation Agenda … 184 Table 5.1: Stakeholder Analysis … 190 Table 5.2: Summary of Sector Financial Resource Requirements … 191 Table 5.3: Revenue Projections … 192 Table 5.4: Resource Gaps … 193 Table 5.5: Risk, Implication, Level and Mitigation Measures … 194 Table 6.1: Outcome Indicator Reporting … 198 Table 6.2: Evaluation Plan … 209 vi |

|---|

Page 8

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Location of the County in Kenya … 2 Figure 5.1: CIDP Implementation Framework … 189 Figure 6.1: County Monitoring and Evaluation Structure … 197 vii

| LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Location of the County in Kenya … 2 Figure 5.1: CIDP Implementation Framework … 189 Figure 6.1: County Monitoring and Evaluation Structure … 197 vii |

|---|

Page 9

viii

| viii |

|---|

Page 10

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADPs: Annual Development Plans AIDs: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AMREF: African Medical Research Foundation ANC: Ante-Natal Care ATC: Agricultural Training Centre BMUs: Beach Management Units CADPs: County Annual Development plans CHC: Community Health Committee CIDP: County Integrated Development Plan CIMES: County Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation System CRC: Nodules and Cobalt-rich Crusts CSOs: Civic Society Organizations CSWB: Coast Services Water Board DHIS: District Health Information System DQA: Data Quality Audit EAC: East African Community ECDE: Early Childhood Development Education EEZ: Exclusive Economic Zone EMRS: Electronic Medical Records ENT: Ear Nose and Throat EPZ: Export Processing Zone ESP: Economic Stimulus Programme FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization FFS: Farmers Field Schools FOSAs: Front Office Savings GK: Government of Kenya HDI: Human Development Index HiNi: High impact Nutrition impact HIV: Human Immune Deficiency Virus HMIS: Health Management Information Systems HRH: Human Resources for Health HTC: HIV testing and counselling ICDC: International Centre for Disease Control ICT: Information Communication Technology ICU: Intensive Care Unit IFAS: Iron Folic Acid Supplementation ix

| ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADPs: Annual Development Plans AIDs: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AMREF: African Medical Research Foundation ANC: Ante-Natal Care ATC: Agricultural Training Centre BMUs: Beach Management Units CADPs: County Annual Development plans CHC: Community Health Committee CIDP: County Integrated Development Plan CIMES: County Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation System CRC: Nodules and Cobalt-rich Crusts CSOs: Civic Society Organizations CSWB: Coast Services Water Board DHIS: District Health Information System DQA: Data Quality Audit EAC: East African Community ECDE: Early Childhood Development Education EEZ: Exclusive Economic Zone EMRS: Electronic Medical Records ENT: Ear Nose and Throat EPZ: Export Processing Zone ESP: Economic Stimulus Programme FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization FFS: Farmers Field Schools FOSAs: Front Office Savings GK: Government of Kenya HDI: Human Development Index HiNi: High impact Nutrition impact HIV: Human Immune Deficiency Virus HMIS: Health Management Information Systems HRH: Human Resources for Health HTC: HIV testing and counselling ICDC: International Centre for Disease Control ICT: Information Communication Technology ICU: Intensive Care Unit IFAS: Iron Folic Acid Supplementation ix |

|---|

Page 11

IRK: Islamic Relief Kenya ITN: Insecticide Mosquito Nets KCB: Kenya Commercial Bank KCDP: Kenya Coast Development Programme KEMFRI: Kenya Fisheries Marine Research Institute KFS: Kenya Forestry Service KIMAWASCO: Kilifi Mariakani Water and Sewerage Company. KNBS: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics KTB: Kenya Tourism Board LLITN: Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets ME: Monitoring and Evaluation MAWASCO: Malindi Water and Sewerage Company MICE: Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions MoU: Memorandum of Understanding MTP: Medium Term Plan NCDs: Non-Communicable Diseases NDMA: National Drought Management Authority NGOs: Non-Governmental Organizations NIMES: National Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation OVCs: Orphans and Vulnerable children PDMO: Public Debt Management Office PLHV: People Living with HIV/AIDS PLWDs: People Living with Disabilities QAS: Quality Assurance Standards SACCOs: Savings and Credit Cooperatives SEZs: Special Economic Zones SHGs: Self Helps Groups SMEP: Small Micro Enterprises Programme TB: Tuberculosis TVET: Technical Vocational Education and Training UNDP: United Nations Development Programme UNICEF: United Nations Children’s Fund USAID: United States Agency for International Development VSLAs: Village Savings and Loans Associations VTCs: Vocational Training Centers WASH: Water Sanitation and Hygiene WEF: Women Enterprise Development Fund WVK: World Vision Kenya YEDF: Youth Enterprise Development Fund x

| IRK: Islamic Relief Kenya ITN: Insecticide Mosquito Nets KCB: Kenya Commercial Bank KCDP: Kenya Coast Development Programme KEMFRI: Kenya Fisheries Marine Research Institute KFS: Kenya Forestry Service KIMAWASCO: Kilifi Mariakani Water and Sewerage Company. KNBS: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics KTB: Kenya Tourism Board LLITN: Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets ME: Monitoring and Evaluation MAWASCO: Malindi Water and Sewerage Company MICE: Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions MoU: Memorandum of Understanding MTP: Medium Term Plan NCDs: Non-Communicable Diseases NDMA: National Drought Management Authority NGOs: Non-Governmental Organizations NIMES: National Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation OVCs: Orphans and Vulnerable children PDMO: Public Debt Management Office PLHV: People Living with HIV/AIDS PLWDs: People Living with Disabilities QAS: Quality Assurance Standards SACCOs: Savings and Credit Cooperatives SEZs: Special Economic Zones SHGs: Self Helps Groups SMEP: Small Micro Enterprises Programme TB: Tuberculosis TVET: Technical Vocational Education and Training UNDP: United Nations Development Programme UNICEF: United Nations Children’s Fund USAID: United States Agency for International Development VSLAs: Village Savings and Loans Associations VTCs: Vocational Training Centers WASH: Water Sanitation and Hygiene WEF: Women Enterprise Development Fund WVK: World Vision Kenya YEDF: Youth Enterprise Development Fund x |

|---|

Page 12

GLOSSARY OF COMMONLY USED TERMS Activities: Actions taken or work performed during which inputs are used to produce outputs. Baseline: An analysis describing the initial state of an indicator before the start of a project/programme, against which progress can be assessed or comparisons made. Blue Economy: The sustainable use and economic development of both aquatic and marine spaces including oceans, seas, coasts, lakes, rivers, and underground water. Beneficiaries: A group among the stakeholders, who will directly or indirectly benefit from the Project. Capital Projects: A long term, capital- intensive investment with a purpose to add or improve a capital asset. Demographic Dividend: The demographic dividend is the accelerated economic growth that may result from a decline in a country’s mortality and fertility and the subsequent change in the age structure of the population. Development Issue: The key constraint/emerging issue concerning a sector that needs to be addressed or tapped into through various interventions and programmes. Evaluation: Planned and periodic assessment of program or project to assess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and impacts it has had on the intended population Flagship/Transformative Projects: These are projects with high impact in terms of employment creation, increasing county competitiveness, revenue generation etc Green Economy: An economy that aims at reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities as well as enhancing sustainable development without degrading the environment. Impacts: The long-term consequences of the program or project, may be positive or negative. Indicators: A measure that can be used to monitor or evaluate an intervention. Indicators can be quantitative (derived from measurements associated with the intervention) or qualitative (entailing verbal feedback from beneficiaries). Inputs: All the financial, human and material resources used for the development intervention Integrated Development Planning: The process of coordinating the efforts of national and devolved levels of government and other relevant stakeholders to bring together economic, social, environmental, legal and spatial aspects of development so as to produce a plan that meets the needs and sets the targets for the benefit of local communities. xi

| GLOSSARY OF COMMONLY USED TERMS Activities: Actions taken or work performed during which inputs are used to produce outputs. Baseline: An analysis describing the initial state of an indicator before the start of a project/programme, against which progress can be assessed or comparisons made. Blue Economy: The sustainable use and economic development of both aquatic and marine spaces including oceans, seas, coasts, lakes, rivers, and underground water. Beneficiaries: A group among the stakeholders, who will directly or indirectly benefit from the Project. Capital Projects: A long term, capital- intensive investment with a purpose to add or improve a capital asset. Demographic Dividend: The demographic dividend is the accelerated economic growth that may result from a decline in a country’s mortality and fertility and the subsequent change in the age structure of the population. Development Issue: The key constraint/emerging issue concerning a sector that needs to be addressed or tapped into through various interventions and programmes. Evaluation: Planned and periodic assessment of program or project to assess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and impacts it has had on the intended population Flagship/Transformative Projects: These are projects with high impact in terms of employment creation, increasing county competitiveness, revenue generation etc Green Economy: An economy that aims at reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities as well as enhancing sustainable development without degrading the environment. Impacts: The long-term consequences of the program or project, may be positive or negative. Indicators: A measure that can be used to monitor or evaluate an intervention. Indicators can be quantitative (derived from measurements associated with the intervention) or qualitative (entailing verbal feedback from beneficiaries). Inputs: All the financial, human and material resources used for the development intervention Integrated Development Planning: The process of coordinating the efforts of national and devolved levels of government and other relevant stakeholders to bring together economic, social, environmental, legal and spatial aspects of development so as to produce a plan that meets the needs and sets the targets for the benefit of local communities. xi |

|---|

Page 13

Monitoring: The continuous and systematic collection and analysis of information in relation to a program or project that provides an indication as to the extent of progress against stated objectives. Objectives: A measurable statement about the end result that an intervention is expected to accomplish within a given period of time. Outcome Indicators: They measure the quantity and quality of the results (change) achieved through the provision of services/cumulative outputs. Outcomes: The medium-term results for specific beneficiaries which is the consequence of achieving specific outputs. Outcomes are often further categorized into immediate/direct outcomes and intermediate outcomes. Output: Products, services or immediate results, tangible or intangible resulting directly from the implementation of activities or applying inputs. Performance indicator: A measurement that evaluate the success of an organization or of a particular activity (such as projects, programs, products and other initiatives) in which it engages. Programme: A grouping of similar projects and/or services performed by a sector or Department with scope cost and focus to achieve a specific objective. Project: A set of coordinated activities implemented to meet specific objectives within defined time, cost and performance parameters. Projects aimed at achieving a common goal form a Programme. Sectors: For the purposes of planning, the CIDP and CADP sectors shall be equivalent of the county departments Stakeholders – A group of people, organizations and institutions who have a direct or indirect interest, or a role, in the project, or who affect or are affected by it. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – The SDGs are a collection of 17 global goals set by the United Nations in 2015. Also known as “Global Goals for Sustainable Development”. The Blue Economy: Blue Economy means the use of the sea and its resources for sustainable. xii

| Monitoring: The continuous and systematic collection and analysis of information in relation to a program or project that provides an indication as to the extent of progress against stated objectives. Objectives: A measurable statement about the end result that an intervention is expected to accomplish within a given period of time. Outcome Indicators: They measure the quantity and quality of the results (change) achieved through the provision of services/cumulative outputs. Outcomes: The medium-term results for specific beneficiaries which is the consequence of achieving specific outputs. Outcomes are often further categorized into immediate/direct outcomes and intermediate outcomes. Output: Products, services or immediate results, tangible or intangible resulting directly from the implementation of activities or applying inputs. Performance indicator: A measurement that evaluate the success of an organization or of a particular activity (such as projects, programs, products and other initiatives) in which it engages. Programme: A grouping of similar projects and/or services performed by a sector or Department with scope cost and focus to achieve a specific objective. Project: A set of coordinated activities implemented to meet specific objectives within defined time, cost and performance parameters. Projects aimed at achieving a common goal form a Programme. Sectors: For the purposes of planning, the CIDP and CADP sectors shall be equivalent of the county departments Stakeholders – A group of people, organizations and institutions who have a direct or indirect interest, or a role, in the project, or who affect or are affected by it. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – The SDGs are a collection of 17 global goals set by the United Nations in 2015. Also known as “Global Goals for Sustainable Development”. The Blue Economy: Blue Economy means the use of the sea and its resources for sustainable. xii |

|---|

Page 14

xiii

| xiii |

|---|

Page 15

FOREWORD Our county’s development path hinges on the five-year integrated development plans as prescribed by law and policy. This is the third generation of the county integrated development plan (CIDP) and heralds the third phase of devolution in Kilifi County as well as in our nation Kenya. As such, it seeks to cement on the gains of the first decade of devolution as well as spur development into the new dawn. There has been considerable progress made in the first and second phases of devolution which include laying the foundation and setting up the institutions and county structures. Several achievements were made in the areas of healthcare, infrastructure development, agriculture, early childhood and vocational education, amongst other devolved functions. During this plan period, we aspire to build on these successes as well as layer up on the foundations set to map out a vibrant development trajectory that captures the aspirations and wishes of the people of Kilifi. This development model will aim at solving our society’s most pressing problems that range from poverty and impoverishment, lack of employment opportunities as well as food and nutrition poverty. The plan will be implemented with an eye keen on equity as well as improving the lives and livelihoods of the citizens within the county borders. In addition to these, we will make significant investments in the social sectors of health, education, water and social protection. On healthcare, there will be keen focus on quality health provision across the whole continuum of care. Focus will be on improving the health indicators more so with the rising disease burden and increase in non-communicable disease. Focus will be on the preventative health which will include implementation of a community health service model using community health volunteers and establishment of community health units. On education, we will focus on improving access as well as quality of education to the early learners as well as in the vocational training, with significant investments in automation and integration of ICT and digital learning. My administration will ensure that every citizen in the County has access to clean, safe and potable water within 5km distance. This will be complemented by sanitation services in the county that will see investments in infrastructure and solid waste disposal systems. Employment creation is at the heart of my administration. With a huge population within the productive age group of 19-49 years, there is need to ensure availability of decent jobs and opportunities to earn a living. Therefore, there will be efforts at scaling up the agricultural and livestock value chains and establishing complementary factories in the tannery, meat and dairy sectors. This will be achieved through improved farming and animal husbandry methods through increased provision of extension services as well as rolling out the cooperative model to the farmers to allow them market access as well as benefit from economies of scale and production. There will also be a resultant effect of improved food and nutrition security to the people of Kilifi. xiv

| FOREWORD Our county’s development path hinges on the five-year integrated development plans as prescribed by law and policy. This is the third generation of the county integrated development plan (CIDP) and heralds the third phase of devolution in Kilifi County as well as in our nation Kenya. As such, it seeks to cement on the gains of the first decade of devolution as well as spur development into the new dawn. There has been considerable progress made in the first and second phases of devolution which include laying the foundation and setting up the institutions and county structures. Several achievements were made in the areas of healthcare, infrastructure development, agriculture, early childhood and vocational education, amongst other devolved functions. During this plan period, we aspire to build on these successes as well as layer up on the foundations set to map out a vibrant development trajectory that captures the aspirations and wishes of the people of Kilifi. This development model will aim at solving our society’s most pressing problems that range from poverty and impoverishment, lack of employment opportunities as well as food and nutrition poverty. The plan will be implemented with an eye keen on equity as well as improving the lives and livelihoods of the citizens within the county borders. In addition to these, we will make significant investments in the social sectors of health, education, water and social protection. On healthcare, there will be keen focus on quality health provision across the whole continuum of care. Focus will be on improving the health indicators more so with the rising disease burden and increase in non-communicable disease. Focus will be on the preventative health which will include implementation of a community health service model using community health volunteers and establishment of community health units. On education, we will focus on improving access as well as quality of education to the early learners as well as in the vocational training, with significant investments in automation and integration of ICT and digital learning. My administration will ensure that every citizen in the County has access to clean, safe and potable water within 5km distance. This will be complemented by sanitation services in the county that will see investments in infrastructure and solid waste disposal systems. Employment creation is at the heart of my administration. With a huge population within the productive age group of 19-49 years, there is need to ensure availability of decent jobs and opportunities to earn a living. Therefore, there will be efforts at scaling up the agricultural and livestock value chains and establishing complementary factories in the tannery, meat and dairy sectors. This will be achieved through improved farming and animal husbandry methods through increased provision of extension services as well as rolling out the cooperative model to the farmers to allow them market access as well as benefit from economies of scale and production. There will also be a resultant effect of improved food and nutrition security to the people of Kilifi. xiv |

|---|

Page 16

In the next five years, we will put in place measures to attract and retain foreign direct investments in the various areas of the economy, translating into employment opportunities, more so in niche areas such as tourism and blue economy. To harness the synergies across the various sectors and better plan for development, we intend to increase our investment into the geospatial mapping of our county facilities and resources through the geographical information system (GIS). This will allow information in real time as well as a linkage between need and solutions regarding the population. While implementing this plan, the county government will focus on mainstreaming cross cutting issues such as gender, disability, youth and climate change. This will allow for an inclusive development that will leave nobody behind. To sustain the momentum for a vibrant development, there will be deliberate efforts to automate government services. Moreso in the areas of own source revenue collection, so as to ensure availability of funds as well as check on pilferage and revenue leaks. My administration will also focus on buttressing the government policies and actions on sound policies through legislation and policy development. This will in turn strengthen the institutional framework for running the government. I, therefore, call upon all citizens of Kilifi to support this noble mission aimed at transforming our county as well as our lives and livelihoods. I also urge each and everyone to diligently play their part in their respective areas as this plan is our shared responsibility, it is also our call towards shared prosperity. The County government will work within its mandate to deliver on the programs herein. There will also be concerted efforts towards working with development partners as well as other investors to catalyze the delivery of the development plan. It thus remains a crucial and deliberate effort to attain the targets of this plan to spur the socioeconomic prosperity of our people. H.E. GIDEON MAITHA MUNG’ARO, EBS THE GOVERNOR COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KILIFI xv

| In the next five years, we will put in place measures to attract and retain foreign direct investments in the various areas of the economy, translating into employment opportunities, more so in niche areas such as tourism and blue economy. To harness the synergies across the various sectors and better plan for development, we intend to increase our investment into the geospatial mapping of our county facilities and resources through the geographical information system (GIS). This will allow information in real time as well as a linkage between need and solutions regarding the population. While implementing this plan, the county government will focus on mainstreaming cross cutting issues such as gender, disability, youth and climate change. This will allow for an inclusive development that will leave nobody behind. To sustain the momentum for a vibrant development, there will be deliberate efforts to automate government services. Moreso in the areas of own source revenue collection, so as to ensure availability of funds as well as check on pilferage and revenue leaks. My administration will also focus on buttressing the government policies and actions on sound policies through legislation and policy development. This will in turn strengthen the institutional framework for running the government. I, therefore, call upon all citizens of Kilifi to support this noble mission aimed at transforming our county as well as our lives and livelihoods. I also urge each and everyone to diligently play their part in their respective areas as this plan is our shared responsibility, it is also our call towards shared prosperity. The County government will work within its mandate to deliver on the programs herein. There will also be concerted efforts towards working with development partners as well as other investors to catalyze the delivery of the development plan. It thus remains a crucial and deliberate effort to attain the targets of this plan to spur the socioeconomic prosperity of our people. H.E. GIDEON MAITHA MUNG’ARO, EBS THE GOVERNOR COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KILIFI xv |

|---|

Page 17

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Preparation of the Third Generation County Integrated Development Plan III for Kilifi County is anchored on the provisions of the County Government Act of 2012 Section 104 that states that ‘a county government shall plan for the county and no public funds shall be appropriated outside a planning framework developed by the county executive committee and approved by the county assembly. County development planning includes the development of 5 year plans with clear programmes, objectives and targets. These are anchored into the 9 sectors that map out the core functions of government. Formulation of this CIDP III was spearheaded by the CIDP secretariat and coordinated by the County Division of Economic Planning with guidance from the County Executive Committee Member for Finance and Economic Planning. Delivery of this plan was attained through intensive consultation as well as rigorous data collections from the county departments as well as the public. We acknowledge the central role played by the core team from the County Division of Economic Planning, led by Economists who worked round the clock to ensure that the document was sound, comprehensive and up to date. Stakeholder input into the CIDP III was achieved through the specific sector working group teams as well as technical officers from the various sectors. These teams worked on the initial data collection as well as the drafting of the CIDP III and setting the priorities and programs for the plan period. We duly appreciate your dedicated efforts that have seen the success of this document. We celebrate the efforts of our development partners who provided the technical and financial support to deliver on the document; more so for UNICEF Kenya and FAO Kenya, who worked with the CIDP secretariat at various juncture of the CIDP III formulation. We also laud the efforts by the State Department for Economic Planning who availed us with the technical support to finalize the document. We appreciate the guidance and policy direction offered by the County leadership; H.E. Governor Gideon Mung’aro, the County Executive Committee and the County chief Officers whose insights shaped most of the plan’s priorities, strategies as well as the flagship projects. xvi

| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Preparation of the Third Generation County Integrated Development Plan III for Kilifi County is anchored on the provisions of the County Government Act of 2012 Section 104 that states that ‘a county government shall plan for the county and no public funds shall be appropriated outside a planning framework developed by the county executive committee and approved by the county assembly. County development planning includes the development of 5 year plans with clear programmes, objectives and targets. These are anchored into the 9 sectors that map out the core functions of government. Formulation of this CIDP III was spearheaded by the CIDP secretariat and coordinated by the County Division of Economic Planning with guidance from the County Executive Committee Member for Finance and Economic Planning. Delivery of this plan was attained through intensive consultation as well as rigorous data collections from the county departments as well as the public. We acknowledge the central role played by the core team from the County Division of Economic Planning, led by Economists who worked round the clock to ensure that the document was sound, comprehensive and up to date. Stakeholder input into the CIDP III was achieved through the specific sector working group teams as well as technical officers from the various sectors. These teams worked on the initial data collection as well as the drafting of the CIDP III and setting the priorities and programs for the plan period. We duly appreciate your dedicated efforts that have seen the success of this document. We celebrate the efforts of our development partners who provided the technical and financial support to deliver on the document; more so for UNICEF Kenya and FAO Kenya, who worked with the CIDP secretariat at various juncture of the CIDP III formulation. We also laud the efforts by the State Department for Economic Planning who availed us with the technical support to finalize the document. We appreciate the guidance and policy direction offered by the County leadership; H.E. Governor Gideon Mung’aro, the County Executive Committee and the County chief Officers whose insights shaped most of the plan’s priorities, strategies as well as the flagship projects. xvi |

|---|

Page 18

Special thanks to the residents of Kilifi County for whom this plan is about. For the sacrifice of time and resources to ensure that your aspirations and commitment to development were captured in the CIDP III. To all of us, thank you very much. HON. YAYE SHOSI AHMED, COUNTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER, FINANCE AND ECONOMIC PLANNING. xvii

| Special thanks to the residents of Kilifi County for whom this plan is about. For the sacrifice of time and resources to ensure that your aspirations and commitment to development were captured in the CIDP III. To all of us, thank you very much. HON. YAYE SHOSI AHMED, COUNTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER, FINANCE AND ECONOMIC PLANNING. xvii |

|---|

Page 19

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Preparation of County Development Plans hinge on specific legal provisions. Article 220 of the constitution States requires that national legislation prescribes the structure of the development plans and budgets of counties. Section 126 of the PFM Act 2012 requires County Governments to prepare development plans in line with Article 220 (2) of the Constitution. The plans shall include strategic priorities for the medium term that reflect the county government’s priorities and plans. Section 108 of the County Government Act, 2012, requires county governments to prepare 5-year County Integrated Development Plan and annual county budgets to implement them. In Section 104 (1) of the CG Act states that, “a county government shall plan for the county and no public funds shall be appropriated without a planning framework developed by the county executive committee and approved by the county assembly”. It also states that the county planning framework shall integrate economic, physical, social, environmental and spatial planning. The Kilifi County Third Generation CIDP (2023-2027) has been prepared taking into considerations of the successes and lessons learnt during the implementation of the first and second generation CIDPs. It also takes into consideration the review of the implementation of the previous CIDP as well as incorporating the Governors manifesto into the Plan. It is aimed at improving the livelihood of Kilifi Citizens through investments in social sectors as well as economic transformation by investing in productive sectors. The plan integrates the existing national development agenda (Vision 2030 and MTP IV) as well as regional and international frameworks such as the SDGs, East Africa Vision 2050 as well as Africa’s Union Agenda 2063. The plan is organized into six chapters whose content is stated below: - Chapter One gives the background information including inhabitants (dominant, marginalized, minority communities), location of its headquarters, major economic activities as well as administrative and political units, demographic features with projections, Human Development Index and County Poverty profile. Chapter Two provides a review on implementation of the previous CIDP 2018-22. It presents an analysis of county performance in terms of revenues, expenditures and key outcomes as well as the major challenges, emerging issues and lessons leant in the implementation of the plan. It also discusses the major natural resources found within the county as well as key sector development issues and their causes as identified during data collection and analysis stage. It also looks at the constraints and opportunities that exist within the sector. Chapter Three provides the spatial framework within which development projects and programmes will be implemented. It explains a structure plan is anchored on industrialization, xviii

| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Preparation of County Development Plans hinge on specific legal provisions. Article 220 of the constitution States requires that national legislation prescribes the structure of the development plans and budgets of counties. Section 126 of the PFM Act 2012 requires County Governments to prepare development plans in line with Article 220 (2) of the Constitution. The plans shall include strategic priorities for the medium term that reflect the county government’s priorities and plans. Section 108 of the County Government Act, 2012, requires county governments to prepare 5-year County Integrated Development Plan and annual county budgets to implement them. In Section 104 (1) of the CG Act states that, “a county government shall plan for the county and no public funds shall be appropriated without a planning framework developed by the county executive committee and approved by the county assembly”. It also states that the county planning framework shall integrate economic, physical, social, environmental and spatial planning. The Kilifi County Third Generation CIDP (2023-2027) has been prepared taking into considerations of the successes and lessons learnt during the implementation of the first and second generation CIDPs. It also takes into consideration the review of the implementation of the previous CIDP as well as incorporating the Governors manifesto into the Plan. It is aimed at improving the livelihood of Kilifi Citizens through investments in social sectors as well as economic transformation by investing in productive sectors. The plan integrates the existing national development agenda (Vision 2030 and MTP IV) as well as regional and international frameworks such as the SDGs, East Africa Vision 2050 as well as Africa’s Union Agenda 2063. The plan is organized into six chapters whose content is stated below: - Chapter One gives the background information including inhabitants (dominant, marginalized, minority communities), location of its headquarters, major economic activities as well as administrative and political units, demographic features with projections, Human Development Index and County Poverty profile. Chapter Two provides a review on implementation of the previous CIDP 2018-22. It presents an analysis of county performance in terms of revenues, expenditures and key outcomes as well as the major challenges, emerging issues and lessons leant in the implementation of the plan. It also discusses the major natural resources found within the county as well as key sector development issues and their causes as identified during data collection and analysis stage. It also looks at the constraints and opportunities that exist within the sector. Chapter Three provides the spatial framework within which development projects and programmes will be implemented. It explains a structure plan is anchored on industrialization, xviii |

|---|

Page 20

tourism, infrastructure, human settlement, agriculture, conservation and identification of resource potential growth areas. Chapter Four provides sector composition, and their key roles, sector vision, mission and goal(s). The development priorities that the sectors will focus on and the strategies to be used towards realization of the priorities. It also shows the sector programmes, their objectives and outcomes, sub-programmes, their outputs, Key performance indicators as well as yearly targets with their estimated cost and cumulative estimated cost for the entire plan period. This chapter also contains flagship/ transformative projects that are planned for implementation, The Chapter also look at how the CIDP is contributing towards achievement of the Kenya Vision 2030, SDGs and other regional and international frameworks. The Chapter also explores Cross-Sectoral linkages looking at ways of harnessing cross-sector synergies and mitigating adverse cross-sector impacts. Chapter Five shows the county institutional framework and how the county will work towards achieving the objectives of the CIDP. It looks at the resource requirement for the county versus the actual and ways of bridging the revenue gap through mobilization of other development partners. It also states the measures that the county has put in place to manage it assets and finally looks at various risk that might hinder implementation of the plan and ways of mitigating them. Chapter Six provides the mechanisms that county plans to use carry out Monitoring and Evaluation of the plan- This includes strengthening the county M& E capacity. It also provides the main methods and tools that will be used for data collection, archiving, analysis and reporting arrangements in line with the National M&E Norms and Standards various reports to be produced to assess progress. It also provides for a mechanism for mid-term and end term review of the plan to assess progress. Lastly the chapter explains how data will be disseminated, the feedback mechanism, citizen engagement and learning. xix

| tourism, infrastructure, human settlement, agriculture, conservation and identification of resource potential growth areas. Chapter Four provides sector composition, and their key roles, sector vision, mission and goal(s). The development priorities that the sectors will focus on and the strategies to be used towards realization of the priorities. It also shows the sector programmes, their objectives and outcomes, sub-programmes, their outputs, Key performance indicators as well as yearly targets with their estimated cost and cumulative estimated cost for the entire plan period. This chapter also contains flagship/ transformative projects that are planned for implementation, The Chapter also look at how the CIDP is contributing towards achievement of the Kenya Vision 2030, SDGs and other regional and international frameworks. The Chapter also explores Cross-Sectoral linkages looking at ways of harnessing cross-sector synergies and mitigating adverse cross-sector impacts. Chapter Five shows the county institutional framework and how the county will work towards achieving the objectives of the CIDP. It looks at the resource requirement for the county versus the actual and ways of bridging the revenue gap through mobilization of other development partners. It also states the measures that the county has put in place to manage it assets and finally looks at various risk that might hinder implementation of the plan and ways of mitigating them. Chapter Six provides the mechanisms that county plans to use carry out Monitoring and Evaluation of the plan- This includes strengthening the county M& E capacity. It also provides the main methods and tools that will be used for data collection, archiving, analysis and reporting arrangements in line with the National M&E Norms and Standards various reports to be produced to assess progress. It also provides for a mechanism for mid-term and end term review of the plan to assess progress. Lastly the chapter explains how data will be disseminated, the feedback mechanism, citizen engagement and learning. xix |

|---|

Page 21

xx

| xx |

|---|

Page 22

CHAPTER ONE 1.0 COUNTY OVERVIEW 1.1 Background Kilifi County lies between latitude 2020” and 400” south, and between longitude 39005” and 40014” East and covers an area of 12,370.8km2. It has 4 major topographic features which are the narrow belt, the foot plateau, the coastal range and the Nyika Plateau. The county experiences a bimodal rainfall pattern with an average annual precipitation ranging between 300mm and 1300mm. The annual temperatures range between 210C and 300C in the coastal belt and between 300C and 340C in the hinterland. The county is divided into five Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZ). These are; Coconut-Cassava Zone, Cashew nut-Coconut zone, Livestock-Millet Zone, Lowland Ranching and Coconut Cashew Nut – Cassava Zone. As far as political and administrative units are concerned, there are seven sub-counties, 35 divisions, 35 county government administrative as well as electoral wards, 62 locations and 165 sub-locations. All these, lie within an area of 12,552km2. Magarini sub-county is the largest with an area of 5,229 km2 while Rabai is the smallest sub county covering an area of 208km2. According to the KNBS Census in 2019, Kilifi County had a total population of 1,453,787 made of 704, 089 males and 655,673 females. Naturally, the younger population is higher than the older population. Additionally, out of the 1,453,787, the urban population stood at 338,359 in 2019 with Kilifi South having the most populated urban areas (713 people per square km) while Magarini is the least populated with a population density of 37 people per square km. Currently (2022), the population has been projected to be at 1,517,824 representing a population density of 121 per square km. As per the broad age groups, the labor force has the highest population of 570,262 and the infant population at 37,882 is the lowest. Additionally, there were 20,044 people with disabilities in the county in 2019. 1.2 Position and Size Kilifi County is one of the six counties in the Coast region of Kenya. The County lies between latitude 2020” and 400” south, and between longitude 39005” and 40014” East. It borders Kwale County to the South West, Taita Taveta County to the West, Tana River County to the North, Mombasa County to the South, and Indian Ocean to the East. The county covers an area of 12,370.8km2. Figure 1.1 shows location of the county in Kenya. 1

| CHAPTER ONE 1.0 COUNTY OVERVIEW 1.1 Background Kilifi County lies between latitude 2020” and 400” south, and between longitude 39005” and 40014” East and covers an area of 12,370.8km2. It has 4 major topographic features which are the narrow belt, the foot plateau, the coastal range and the Nyika Plateau. The county experiences a bimodal rainfall pattern with an average annual precipitation ranging between 300mm and 1300mm. The annual temperatures range between 210C and 300C in the coastal belt and between 300C and 340C in the hinterland. The county is divided into five Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZ). These are; Coconut-Cassava Zone, Cashew nut-Coconut zone, Livestock-Millet Zone, Lowland Ranching and Coconut Cashew Nut – Cassava Zone. As far as political and administrative units are concerned, there are seven sub-counties, 35 divisions, 35 county government administrative as well as electoral wards, 62 locations and 165 sub-locations. All these, lie within an area of 12,552km2. Magarini sub-county is the largest with an area of 5,229 km2 while Rabai is the smallest sub county covering an area of 208km2. According to the KNBS Census in 2019, Kilifi County had a total population of 1,453,787 made of 704, 089 males and 655,673 females. Naturally, the younger population is higher than the older population. Additionally, out of the 1,453,787, the urban population stood at 338,359 in 2019 with Kilifi South having the most populated urban areas (713 people per square km) while Magarini is the least populated with a population density of 37 people per square km. Currently (2022), the population has been projected to be at 1,517,824 representing a population density of 121 per square km. As per the broad age groups, the labor force has the highest population of 570,262 and the infant population at 37,882 is the lowest. Additionally, there were 20,044 people with disabilities in the county in 2019. 1.2 Position and Size Kilifi County is one of the six counties in the Coast region of Kenya. The County lies between latitude 2020” and 400” south, and between longitude 39005” and 40014” East. It borders Kwale County to the South West, Taita Taveta County to the West, Tana River County to the North, Mombasa County to the South, and Indian Ocean to the East. The county covers an area of 12,370.8km2. Figure 1.1 shows location of the county in Kenya. 1 |

|---|

Page 23

Figure 1.1: Location of the County in Kenya 1.3. Physiographic and Natural Conditions 1.3.1 Physical and Topographic Features Kilifi County has four major topographic features. The first one is the narrow belt, which forms the coastal plain and varies in width from 3km to 20km. The coastal plain lies below 30m above sea level with a few prominent peaks on the western boundary such as the Mwembetungu hills. Across this plain are several creeks with excellent marine swamps that are richly endowed with mangrove forests and present great potential for marine culture. This zone is composed of marine 2

| Figure 1.1: Location of the County in Kenya 1.3. Physiographic and Natural Conditions 1.3.1 Physical and Topographic Features Kilifi County has four major topographic features. The first one is the narrow belt, which forms the coastal plain and varies in width from 3km to 20km. The coastal plain lies below 30m above sea level with a few prominent peaks on the western boundary such as the Mwembetungu hills. Across this plain are several creeks with excellent marine swamps that are richly endowed with mangrove forests and present great potential for marine culture. This zone is composed of marine 2 |

|---|

Page 24

sediments, including coral, limestone, marble, clay stones and alluvial deposits that support agriculture. The second topographical feature is the foot plateau that lies to the east of the coastal plain. It is characterized by a slightly undulating terrain that falls between 60m and 150m altitude and slopes towards the sea. A number of dry river courses transverse the surface with underlying Jurassic sediments consisting of shells, sandstones and clays. This zone is covered by grassland and stunted shrubs. The third feature is the coastal range, which falls beyond the foot plateau between 150m to 450m altitude and has distinct low-range sandstone hills. These hills include Simba, Kiwava, Daka, Wacha, Gaabo, Jibana, Mazeras and Mwangea. The fourth is the Nyika Plateau, which rises from 100m to 340m above sea level covering about two-thirds of the county area on its western side. This plateau is characterized by a low population density, thin vegetative cover, shallow depressions and gently undulating terrain. It constitutes the arid and semi-arid areas of the county, which are suitable for ranching. The drainage pattern of the county is formed by one permanent river, a number of ephemeral rivers and streams which drain into Indian Ocean. The permanent river is the Sabaki River while the seasonal rivers are Nzovuni, Rare, Goshi and Kombeni. The streams include Wimbi, Kanagoni, Masa, Muhomkulu and Mleji. 1.3.2 Climatic Conditions The county has a bimodal rainfall pattern with average annual precipitation ranging from 300mm in the hinterland to 1,300mm in the coastal belt. The coastal belt receives an average annual rainfall of about 900mm to 1,300mm while the hinterland receives average annual rainfall of about 300mm to 900mm. The short rain season is experienced in the months of October, November and December while the long rains are experienced in the months of March, April and May. The most important season to the hinterland is the short rains for pasture regeneration and water recharge while the long rain season is the most important season for the coastal area for crop production. Areas receiving highest average annual mean evaporation ranges from 1800mm along the coastal strip to 2200mm in the Nyika plateau in the hinterland. The highest evaporation rates are experienced during the months of January to March in the county. The annual temperatures range between 210C and 300C in the coastal belt and between 300C and 340C in the hinterland. The county experiences a very important wind field with relatively moderate wind speeds ranging from 4.8Km/h along the coastal strip to 12km/h in the hinterlands. 3

| sediments, including coral, limestone, marble, clay stones and alluvial deposits that support agriculture. The second topographical feature is the foot plateau that lies to the east of the coastal plain. It is characterized by a slightly undulating terrain that falls between 60m and 150m altitude and slopes towards the sea. A number of dry river courses transverse the surface with underlying Jurassic sediments consisting of shells, sandstones and clays. This zone is covered by grassland and stunted shrubs. The third feature is the coastal range, which falls beyond the foot plateau between 150m to 450m altitude and has distinct low-range sandstone hills. These hills include Simba, Kiwava, Daka, Wacha, Gaabo, Jibana, Mazeras and Mwangea. The fourth is the Nyika Plateau, which rises from 100m to 340m above sea level covering about two-thirds of the county area on its western side. This plateau is characterized by a low population density, thin vegetative cover, shallow depressions and gently undulating terrain. It constitutes the arid and semi-arid areas of the county, which are suitable for ranching. The drainage pattern of the county is formed by one permanent river, a number of ephemeral rivers and streams which drain into Indian Ocean. The permanent river is the Sabaki River while the seasonal rivers are Nzovuni, Rare, Goshi and Kombeni. The streams include Wimbi, Kanagoni, Masa, Muhomkulu and Mleji. 1.3.2 Climatic Conditions The county has a bimodal rainfall pattern with average annual precipitation ranging from 300mm in the hinterland to 1,300mm in the coastal belt. The coastal belt receives an average annual rainfall of about 900mm to 1,300mm while the hinterland receives average annual rainfall of about 300mm to 900mm. The short rain season is experienced in the months of October, November and December while the long rains are experienced in the months of March, April and May. The most important season to the hinterland is the short rains for pasture regeneration and water recharge while the long rain season is the most important season for the coastal area for crop production. Areas receiving highest average annual mean evaporation ranges from 1800mm along the coastal strip to 2200mm in the Nyika plateau in the hinterland. The highest evaporation rates are experienced during the months of January to March in the county. The annual temperatures range between 210C and 300C in the coastal belt and between 300C and 340C in the hinterland. The county experiences a very important wind field with relatively moderate wind speeds ranging from 4.8Km/h along the coastal strip to 12km/h in the hinterlands. 3 |

|---|

Page 25

1.3.3 Ecological Conditions The county is divided into five Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZ) defining areas with similar production related characteristics such as annual mean temperatures, vegetation and humidity. These zones include the following: - Coconut-Cassava Zone: This zone covers the coastal uplands and the low-level coastal plains and has the county’s highest potential for crop production. The major farming activities in this area includes fruit tree cropping (mango, citrus, cashew nut and coconut), vegetable farming (chili, brinjals, okra) and food cropping (maize, bananas, cowpeas, upland rice, green grams). Dairy farming also does well in this zone. The zone receives an average annual precipitation of 1,300mm per annum and a mean annual temperature of 240C. Cashew nut-Coconut zone: this zone stretches northwards along the coastal plain up to the Arabuko Sokoke forest. The zone receives an average precipitation of 900mm and mean annual temperature of 240C. It has agricultural potential with the same crop types as the coconut-cassava zone but with slightly less production. Livestock-Millet Zone: The zone is of lower agricultural potential with annual precipitation ranging from 700mm to 900mm. The area is suitable for dry land farming supporting drought tolerant crops and ranching activities. Lowland Ranching: This zone varies in altitude from 90m to 300m with annual mean temperature of 270 C and annual precipitation of 350mm to 700mm. The major activities within this zone are ranching and wildlife. Coconut Cashew Nut – Cassava Zone: this zone is mainly found in Kilifi South and North constituencies and is the smallest of all the zones. It lies at an altitude between 30m to 310m above mean sea level with mean temperature of 270 C and annual precipitation of 900mm per annum. The area has a similar potential for the crops found in the coconut-cassava and cashew nut-cassava zones. 1.4 Administrative and Political Units 1.4.1 Administrative Units There are seven sub-counties, 18 divisions, 61 locations and 182 sub-locations. All these lies within an area of 12178 km2. Magarini sub-county is the largest with an area of 5229km2 while Rabai is the smallest sub county covering an area of 208km2. There are 18 county government administrative and electoral wards and 1,912 villages in the county. This information is summarized in Table 1.1 and Table 1.2. The Kilifi County sub counties with number of divisions, locations and sub-locations as well as size is presented in Table 1.1. 4

| 1.3.3 Ecological Conditions The county is divided into five Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZ) defining areas with similar production related characteristics such as annual mean temperatures, vegetation and humidity. These zones include the following: - Coconut-Cassava Zone: This zone covers the coastal uplands and the low-level coastal plains and has the county’s highest potential for crop production. The major farming activities in this area includes fruit tree cropping (mango, citrus, cashew nut and coconut), vegetable farming (chili, brinjals, okra) and food cropping (maize, bananas, cowpeas, upland rice, green grams). Dairy farming also does well in this zone. The zone receives an average annual precipitation of 1,300mm per annum and a mean annual temperature of 240C. Cashew nut-Coconut zone: this zone stretches northwards along the coastal plain up to the Arabuko Sokoke forest. The zone receives an average precipitation of 900mm and mean annual temperature of 240C. It has agricultural potential with the same crop types as the coconut-cassava zone but with slightly less production. Livestock-Millet Zone: The zone is of lower agricultural potential with annual precipitation ranging from 700mm to 900mm. The area is suitable for dry land farming supporting drought tolerant crops and ranching activities. Lowland Ranching: This zone varies in altitude from 90m to 300m with annual mean temperature of 270 C and annual precipitation of 350mm to 700mm. The major activities within this zone are ranching and wildlife. Coconut Cashew Nut – Cassava Zone: this zone is mainly found in Kilifi South and North constituencies and is the smallest of all the zones. It lies at an altitude between 30m to 310m above mean sea level with mean temperature of 270 C and annual precipitation of 900mm per annum. The area has a similar potential for the crops found in the coconut-cassava and cashew nut-cassava zones. 1.4 Administrative and Political Units 1.4.1 Administrative Units There are seven sub-counties, 18 divisions, 61 locations and 182 sub-locations. All these lies within an area of 12178 km2. Magarini sub-county is the largest with an area of 5229km2 while Rabai is the smallest sub county covering an area of 208km2. There are 18 county government administrative and electoral wards and 1,912 villages in the county. This information is summarized in Table 1.1 and Table 1.2. The Kilifi County sub counties with number of divisions, locations and sub-locations as well as size is presented in Table 1.1. 4 |

|---|

Page 26

Table 1.1: Area (KM2) by Sub-County Sub-County No. of Divisions No. of Location No. of Sub-Location Area(Km2) Kilifi North 1 5 14 264 Kilifi South 1 3 11 291 Malindi 2 8 31 2,263 Kaloleni 3 8 20 706 Magarini 2 9 27 5,229 Ganze 4 14 45 3,218 Kauma 1 3 9 181 Chonyi 1 4 9 193 Rabai 3 7 16 208 Total 18 61 182 12,553 Source: KNBS, Census 2019 1.4.2 County Government Administrative wards by constituency The Kilifi County administrative wards and number of villages is presented in Table 1.2. Table 1.2: County Government Administrative Wards Sub County No. of Wards No of Villages Kilifi North 7 123 Kilifi South 5 140 Kaloleni 4 303 Malindi 5 305 Magarini 6 457 Ganze 4 531 Rabai 4 176 Total 35 2035 Source: County Government of Kilifi, 2022 1.4.3 Political Units (Constituencies and Wards) Table 1.3 presents the constituencies in Kilifi counties with the respective wards. 5

| Table 1.1: Area (KM2) by Sub-County Sub-County No. of Divisions No. of Location No. of Sub-Location Area(Km2) Kilifi North 1 5 14 264 Kilifi South 1 3 11 291 Malindi 2 8 31 2,263 Kaloleni 3 8 20 706 Magarini 2 9 27 5,229 Ganze 4 14 45 3,218 Kauma 1 3 9 181 Chonyi 1 4 9 193 Rabai 3 7 16 208 Total 18 61 182 12,553 Source: KNBS, Census 2019 1.4.2 County Government Administrative wards by constituency The Kilifi County administrative wards and number of villages is presented in Table 1.2. Table 1.2: County Government Administrative Wards Sub County No. of Wards No of Villages Kilifi North 7 123 Kilifi South 5 140 Kaloleni 4 303 Malindi 5 305 Magarini 6 457 Ganze 4 531 Rabai 4 176 Total 35 2035 Source: County Government of Kilifi, 2022 1.4.3 Political Units (Constituencies and Wards) Table 1.3 presents the constituencies in Kilifi counties with the respective wards. 5 |

|---|

| Sub-County | | | No. of Divisions | | | No. of Location | | No. of Sub-Location | | Area(Km2) | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Kilifi North | | | 1 | | 5 | | 14 | | 264 | |

| | Kilifi South | | | 1 | | 3 | | 11 | | 291 | |

| | Malindi | | | 2 | | 8 | | 31 | | 2,263 | |

| | Kaloleni | | | 3 | | 8 | | 20 | | 706 | |

| | Magarini | | | 2 | | 9 | | 27 | | 5,229 | |

| | Ganze | | | 4 | | 14 | | 45 | | 3,218 | |

| | Kauma | | | 1 | | 3 | | 9 | | 181 | |

| | Chonyi | | | 1 | | 4 | | 9 | | 193 | |

| | Rabai | | | 3 | | 7 | | 16 | | 208 | |

| | Total | | | 18 | | 61 | | 182 | | 12,553 | |

| | Sub County | | | No. of Wards | | | No of Villages | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Kilifi North | | | 7 | | | 123 | |

| | Kilifi South | | | 5 | | | 140 | |

| | Kaloleni | | | 4 | | | 303 | |

| | Malindi | | | 5 | | | 305 | |

| | Magarini | | | 6 | | | 457 | |

| | Ganze | | | 4 | | | 531 | |

| | Rabai | | | 4 | | | 176 | |

| | Total | | | 35 | | | 2035 | |

Page 27

Table 1.3: County’s Electoral Wards by Constituency Constituency County Assembly Wards Kilifi North Tezo Sokoni Kibarani Dabaso Watamu Matsangoni Mnarani Kilifi South Junju Mwarakaya Shimo la Tewa Chasimba Mtepeni Kaloleni Mariakani Kayafungo Kaloleni Mwanamwinga Rabai Mwawesa Ruruma Kambe/Ribe Rabai/Kisurutuni Ganze Ganze Bamba Jaribuni Sokoke Malindi Jilore Kakuyuni Ganda Malindi town Shella Magarini Maarafa Magarini Gongoni Adu Garashi Sabaki Source: IEBC, 2022 6

| Table 1.3: County’s Electoral Wards by Constituency Constituency County Assembly Wards Kilifi North Tezo Sokoni Kibarani Dabaso Watamu Matsangoni Mnarani Kilifi South Junju Mwarakaya Shimo la Tewa Chasimba Mtepeni Kaloleni Mariakani Kayafungo Kaloleni Mwanamwinga Rabai Mwawesa Ruruma Kambe/Ribe Rabai/Kisurutuni Ganze Ganze Bamba Jaribuni Sokoke Malindi Jilore Kakuyuni Ganda Malindi town Shella Magarini Maarafa Magarini Gongoni Adu Garashi Sabaki Source: IEBC, 2022 6 |

|---|

| | Constituency | | | County Assembly Wards | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Kilifi North | Kilifi North | | | Tezo | |

| | | | | Sokoni | |

| | | | | Kibarani | |

| | | | | Dabaso | |

| | | | | Watamu | |

| | | | | Matsangoni | |

| | | | | Mnarani | |

| Kilifi South | | | | Junju | |

| | | | | Mwarakaya | |

| | | | | Shimo la Tewa | |

| | | | | Chasimba | |

| | | | | Mtepeni | |

| Kaloleni | | | | Mariakani | |

| | | | | Kayafungo | |

| | | | | Kaloleni | |

| | | | | Mwanamwinga | |

| Rabai | | | | Mwawesa | |

| | | | | Ruruma | |

| | | | | Kambe/Ribe | |

| | | | | Rabai/Kisurutuni | |

| Ganze | | | | Ganze | |

| | | | | Bamba | |

| | | | | Jaribuni | |

| | | | | Sokoke | |

| Malindi | | | | Jilore | |

| | | | | Kakuyuni | |

| | | | | Ganda | |

| | | | | Malindi town | |

| | | | | Shella | |

| Magarini | | | | Maarafa | |

| | | | | Magarini | |

| | | | | Gongoni | |

| | | | | Adu | |

| | | | | Garashi | |

| | | | | Sabaki | |

Page 28

1.5 Demographic Features 1.5.1 Population Size, Composition and Distribution County Population Age Structure According to the Kenya Population and Housing Census 2019, Kilifi County had a total population of 1,453,787 made of 704,089 males and 655,673 females (See Table 1.4). The county has an average household size of 4.8 Malindi is the most populous sub-county while Chonyi and Kauma are the least populated. There is a reduction in the male population and an increase in the female population by the end of 2022. While the female population was lower than the male population in 2019, the projections for 2022, 2025 and 2027 show a higher female population in all sub counties and subsequently in the county. 7

| 1.5 Demographic Features 1.5.1 Population Size, Composition and Distribution County Population Age Structure According to the Kenya Population and Housing Census 2019, Kilifi County had a total population of 1,453,787 made of 704,089 males and 655,673 females (See Table 1.4). The county has an average household size of 4.8 Malindi is the most populous sub-county while Chonyi and Kauma are the least populated. There is a reduction in the male population and an increase in the female population by the end of 2022. While the female population was lower than the male population in 2019, the projections for 2022, 2025 and 2027 show a higher female population in all sub counties and subsequently in the county. 7 |

|---|

Page 29

Table 1.4: Population Projections (by Sub-County and Sex) County 2019(Census) 2022(Projection) 2025(Projection) 2027(Projection) Male Female Inter-sex Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Kilifi 704,089 749,673 25 1,453,787 769,120 778,627 1,547,747 813,735 822,775 1,636,510 843,651 852,575 1,696,226 Chonyi 29,527 32,807 1 62,335 32,254 34,074 66,364 34,125 36,006 70,170 35,380 37,310 72,730 Ganze 66,921 76,981 4 143,906 73,102 79,954 153,207 77,342 84,488 161,993 80,186 87,548 167,904 Kaloleni 92,614 101,063 3 193,682 101,168 104,966 206,200 107,037 110,918 218,025 110,972 114,935 225,981 Kauma 10,965 11,673 0 22,638 11,978 12,124 24,101 12,673 12,811 25,483 13,138 13,275 26,413 Kilifi North 86,986 91,836 2 178,824 95,020 95,383 190,382 100,532 100,791 201,300 104,228 104,442 208,645 Kilifi South 101,852 104,897 4 206,753 111,259 108,948 220,116 117,713 115,126 232,739 122,041 119,295 241,232 Magarini 93,302 98,308 2 191,610 101,920 102,105 203,994 107,832 107,894 215,693 111,796 111,802 223,564 Malindi 163,351 169,866 9 333,226 178,438 176,427 354,763 188,789 186,430 375,108 195,730 193,182 388,796 Rabai 58,571 62,242 0 120,813 63,981 64,646 128,621 67,692 68,311 135,998 70,181 70,785 140,960 Source: KNBS, 2019 The most populous sub-county in Kilifi County is Malindi with a population of 333,226 followed by Kaloleni, Magarini and Kauma sub-counties with populations of 193,682, 191,610 and 22,638 respectively. The female population for Kilifi County is higher than the male population in all the sub counties and an inter sex of 25 persons. NB: 17 persons did not state their age (6 males and 11 females) but they have been captured in their respective totals. Population Projections by Age Cohort Generally, the age structure captures the composition of a population in terms of the proportions of individuals of different ages. The age structure in Kilifi is presented in three broad age groups as is commonly done in demographics. These are; under 15 years old, 15-64 years and 65 years and older. However, for the purpose of better planning and a clearer understanding of the demographics in Kilifi County, several age groups of interest were considered. As expected, the younger population is higher than the older population indicating the natural growth of the population while the natural decline of the older population is being taken into consideration. The disaggregation of the population by age helps the county government to take cognizance of future potential revenue streams emanating from a younger population joining the workforce while at the same time taking care of expenditures associated with the older population that is exiting their productive years and the increased need for social protection associated with the elderly. The population for Kilifi County was then decomposed into different age cohorts as presented in Table 1.5. 8

| Table 1.4: Population Projections (by Sub-County and Sex) County 2019(Census) 2022(Projection) 2025(Projection) 2027(Projection) Male Female Inter-sex Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Kilifi 704,089 749,673 25 1,453,787 769,120 778,627 1,547,747 813,735 822,775 1,636,510 843,651 852,575 1,696,226 Chonyi 29,527 32,807 1 62,335 32,254 34,074 66,364 34,125 36,006 70,170 35,380 37,310 72,730 Ganze 66,921 76,981 4 143,906 73,102 79,954 153,207 77,342 84,488 161,993 80,186 87,548 167,904 Kaloleni 92,614 101,063 3 193,682 101,168 104,966 206,200 107,037 110,918 218,025 110,972 114,935 225,981 Kauma 10,965 11,673 0 22,638 11,978 12,124 24,101 12,673 12,811 25,483 13,138 13,275 26,413 Kilifi North 86,986 91,836 2 178,824 95,020 95,383 190,382 100,532 100,791 201,300 104,228 104,442 208,645 Kilifi South 101,852 104,897 4 206,753 111,259 108,948 220,116 117,713 115,126 232,739 122,041 119,295 241,232 Magarini 93,302 98,308 2 191,610 101,920 102,105 203,994 107,832 107,894 215,693 111,796 111,802 223,564 Malindi 163,351 169,866 9 333,226 178,438 176,427 354,763 188,789 186,430 375,108 195,730 193,182 388,796 Rabai 58,571 62,242 0 120,813 63,981 64,646 128,621 67,692 68,311 135,998 70,181 70,785 140,960 Source: KNBS, 2019 The most populous sub-county in Kilifi County is Malindi with a population of 333,226 followed by Kaloleni, Magarini and Kauma sub-counties with populations of 193,682, 191,610 and 22,638 respectively. The female population for Kilifi County is higher than the male population in all the sub counties and an inter sex of 25 persons. NB: 17 persons did not state their age (6 males and 11 females) but they have been captured in their respective totals. Population Projections by Age Cohort Generally, the age structure captures the composition of a population in terms of the proportions of individuals of different ages. The age structure in Kilifi is presented in three broad age groups as is commonly done in demographics. These are; under 15 years old, 15-64 years and 65 years and older. However, for the purpose of better planning and a clearer understanding of the demographics in Kilifi County, several age groups of interest were considered. As expected, the younger population is higher than the older population indicating the natural growth of the population while the natural decline of the older population is being taken into consideration. The disaggregation of the population by age helps the county government to take cognizance of future potential revenue streams emanating from a younger population joining the workforce while at the same time taking care of expenditures associated with the older population that is exiting their productive years and the increased need for social protection associated with the elderly. The population for Kilifi County was then decomposed into different age cohorts as presented in Table 1.5. 8 |

|---|

| County | 2019(Census) | | | | 2022(Projection) | | | 2025(Projection) | | | 2027(Projection) | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Male | Female | Inter-sex | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total |

| Kilifi | 704,089 | 749,673 | 25 | 1,453,787 | 769,120 | 778,627 | 1,547,747 | 813,735 | 822,775 | 1,636,510 | 843,651 | 852,575 | 1,696,226 |

| Chonyi | 29,527 | 32,807 | 1 | 62,335 | 32,254 | 34,074 | 66,364 | 34,125 | 36,006 | 70,170 | 35,380 | 37,310 | 72,730 |

| Ganze | 66,921 | 76,981 | 4 | 143,906 | 73,102 | 79,954 | 153,207 | 77,342 | 84,488 | 161,993 | 80,186 | 87,548 | 167,904 |

| Kaloleni | 92,614 | 101,063 | 3 | 193,682 | 101,168 | 104,966 | 206,200 | 107,037 | 110,918 | 218,025 | 110,972 | 114,935 | 225,981 |

| Kauma | 10,965 | 11,673 | 0 | 22,638 | 11,978 | 12,124 | 24,101 | 12,673 | 12,811 | 25,483 | 13,138 | 13,275 | 26,413 |

| Kilifi North | 86,986 | 91,836 | 2 | 178,824 | 95,020 | 95,383 | 190,382 | 100,532 | 100,791 | 201,300 | 104,228 | 104,442 | 208,645 |

| Kilifi South | 101,852 | 104,897 | 4 | 206,753 | 111,259 | 108,948 | 220,116 | 117,713 | 115,126 | 232,739 | 122,041 | 119,295 | 241,232 |

| Magarini | 93,302 | 98,308 | 2 | 191,610 | 101,920 | 102,105 | 203,994 | 107,832 | 107,894 | 215,693 | 111,796 | 111,802 | 223,564 |

| Malindi | 163,351 | 169,866 | 9 | 333,226 | 178,438 | 176,427 | 354,763 | 188,789 | 186,430 | 375,108 | 195,730 | 193,182 | 388,796 |

| Rabai | 58,571 | 62,242 | 0 | 120,813 | 63,981 | 64,646 | 128,621 | 67,692 | 68,311 | 135,998 | 70,181 | 70,785 | 140,960 |

Page 30

Table 1.5: Population Projections by Age Cohort Kilifi 2019(Census) 2022(Projection) 2025(Projection) 2027(Projection) Age Male Female Inter- Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total sex 0-4 100,919 99,912 1 200,832 95,116 95,619 190,734 99,067 98,557 197,624 100,118 99,604 199,723 5-9 103,727 102,458 1 206,186 88,180 90,548 178,728 90,936 94,099 185,036 93,545 96,065 189,609 10-14 103,579 103,193 3 206,775 85,315 86,766 172,082 85,444 87,796 173,240 87,281 90,178 177,459 15-19 87,265 85,085 3 172,353 81,433 81,215 162,649 85,308 85,415 170,723 85,396 86,123 171,519 20-24 63,687 71,704 1 135,392 72,847 71,785 144,632 78,671 77,772 156,443 81,254 80,587 161,841 25-29 51,335 60,525 2 111,862 63,734 62,170 125,904 68,805 67,105 135,910 72,700 71,125 143,826 30-34 41,577 54,385 3 95,965 52,895 52,343 105,238 60,192 58,039 118,230 63,579 61,334 124,913 35-39 31,026 32,187 1 63,214 43,502 42,884 86,386 47,681 47,224 94,905 52,530 50,976 103,505 40-44 29,246 33,860 2 63,108 38,664 37,817 76,482 39,708 38,374 78,083 42,452 41,211 83,663 45-49 23,908 22,598 0 46,506 34,013 32,777 66,790 36,358 35,389 71,747 37,048 35,803 72,851 50-54 17,809 18,232 1 36,042 29,469 29,501 58,970 30,641 28,906 59,547 32,143 30,600 62,743 55-59 14,330 15,716 1 30,047 24,387 26,216 50,604 26,392 27,438 53,830 27,164 27,152 54,316 60-64 11,712 17,882 1 29,595 19,438 21,630 41,067 20,553 23,015 43,568 21,776 23,833 45,609 65-69 9,900 11,435 0 21,335 15,074 17,886 32,960 16,042 18,570 34,612 16,718 19,437 36,155 70-74 6,441 8,860 2 15,303 10,699 13,407 24,106 11,765 15,365 27,130 12,337 15,808 28,145 75-79 3,726 5,000 0 8,726 6,591 7,685 14,276 7,692 10,289 17,982 8,273 11,429 19,702 80+ 3,896 6,630 3 10,529 7,763 8,377 16,140 8,479 9,422 17,900 9,337 11,310 20,647 All 704,089 749,673 25 1,453,787 769,120 778,627 1,547,747 813,735 822,775 1,636,510 843,651 852,575 1,696,226 Ages Source: KNBS, 2019 Population Projections by Urban Area Urban populations should also be enumerated to assist in urban planning. It is common for the younger populations to migrate to urban centers in search of a modern life and economic activities. Table 1.6 gives population projections for urban centers in Kilifi County. 9

| Table 1.5: Population Projections by Age Cohort Kilifi 2019(Census) 2022(Projection) 2025(Projection) 2027(Projection) Age Male Female Inter- Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total sex 0-4 100,919 99,912 1 200,832 95,116 95,619 190,734 99,067 98,557 197,624 100,118 99,604 199,723 5-9 103,727 102,458 1 206,186 88,180 90,548 178,728 90,936 94,099 185,036 93,545 96,065 189,609 10-14 103,579 103,193 3 206,775 85,315 86,766 172,082 85,444 87,796 173,240 87,281 90,178 177,459 15-19 87,265 85,085 3 172,353 81,433 81,215 162,649 85,308 85,415 170,723 85,396 86,123 171,519 20-24 63,687 71,704 1 135,392 72,847 71,785 144,632 78,671 77,772 156,443 81,254 80,587 161,841 25-29 51,335 60,525 2 111,862 63,734 62,170 125,904 68,805 67,105 135,910 72,700 71,125 143,826 30-34 41,577 54,385 3 95,965 52,895 52,343 105,238 60,192 58,039 118,230 63,579 61,334 124,913 35-39 31,026 32,187 1 63,214 43,502 42,884 86,386 47,681 47,224 94,905 52,530 50,976 103,505 40-44 29,246 33,860 2 63,108 38,664 37,817 76,482 39,708 38,374 78,083 42,452 41,211 83,663 45-49 23,908 22,598 0 46,506 34,013 32,777 66,790 36,358 35,389 71,747 37,048 35,803 72,851 50-54 17,809 18,232 1 36,042 29,469 29,501 58,970 30,641 28,906 59,547 32,143 30,600 62,743 55-59 14,330 15,716 1 30,047 24,387 26,216 50,604 26,392 27,438 53,830 27,164 27,152 54,316 60-64 11,712 17,882 1 29,595 19,438 21,630 41,067 20,553 23,015 43,568 21,776 23,833 45,609 65-69 9,900 11,435 0 21,335 15,074 17,886 32,960 16,042 18,570 34,612 16,718 19,437 36,155 70-74 6,441 8,860 2 15,303 10,699 13,407 24,106 11,765 15,365 27,130 12,337 15,808 28,145 75-79 3,726 5,000 0 8,726 6,591 7,685 14,276 7,692 10,289 17,982 8,273 11,429 19,702 80+ 3,896 6,630 3 10,529 7,763 8,377 16,140 8,479 9,422 17,900 9,337 11,310 20,647 All 704,089 749,673 25 1,453,787 769,120 778,627 1,547,747 813,735 822,775 1,636,510 843,651 852,575 1,696,226 Ages Source: KNBS, 2019 Population Projections by Urban Area Urban populations should also be enumerated to assist in urban planning. It is common for the younger populations to migrate to urban centers in search of a modern life and economic activities. Table 1.6 gives population projections for urban centers in Kilifi County. 9 |

|---|

| Kilifi | | | 2019(Census) | | | | | 2022(Projection) | | | 2025(Projection) | | | 2027(Projection) | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Age | | | Male | Female | Inter- sex | | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total |

| 0-4 | | | 100,919 | 99,912 | 1 | | 200,832 | 95,116 | 95,619 | 190,734 | 99,067 | 98,557 | 197,624 | 100,118 | 99,604 | 199,723 |

| 5-9 | | | 103,727 | 102,458 | 1 | | 206,186 | 88,180 | 90,548 | 178,728 | 90,936 | 94,099 | 185,036 | 93,545 | 96,065 | 189,609 |

| 10-14 | | | 103,579 | 103,193 | 3 | | 206,775 | 85,315 | 86,766 | 172,082 | 85,444 | 87,796 | 173,240 | 87,281 | 90,178 | 177,459 |

| 15-19 | | | 87,265 | 85,085 | 3 | | 172,353 | 81,433 | 81,215 | 162,649 | 85,308 | 85,415 | 170,723 | 85,396 | 86,123 | 171,519 |

| 20-24 | | | 63,687 | 71,704 | 1 | | 135,392 | 72,847 | 71,785 | 144,632 | 78,671 | 77,772 | 156,443 | 81,254 | 80,587 | 161,841 |

| 25-29 | | | 51,335 | 60,525 | 2 | | 111,862 | 63,734 | 62,170 | 125,904 | 68,805 | 67,105 | 135,910 | 72,700 | 71,125 | 143,826 |

| 30-34 | | | 41,577 | 54,385 | 3 | | 95,965 | 52,895 | 52,343 | 105,238 | 60,192 | 58,039 | 118,230 | 63,579 | 61,334 | 124,913 |

| 35-39 | | | 31,026 | 32,187 | 1 | | 63,214 | 43,502 | 42,884 | 86,386 | 47,681 | 47,224 | 94,905 | 52,530 | 50,976 | 103,505 |

| 40-44 | | | 29,246 | 33,860 | 2 | | 63,108 | 38,664 | 37,817 | 76,482 | 39,708 | 38,374 | 78,083 | 42,452 | 41,211 | 83,663 |

| 45-49 | | | 23,908 | 22,598 | 0 | | 46,506 | 34,013 | 32,777 | 66,790 | 36,358 | 35,389 | 71,747 | 37,048 | 35,803 | 72,851 |

| 50-54 | | | 17,809 | 18,232 | 1 | | 36,042 | 29,469 | 29,501 | 58,970 | 30,641 | 28,906 | 59,547 | 32,143 | 30,600 | 62,743 |

| 55-59 | | | 14,330 | 15,716 | 1 | | 30,047 | 24,387 | 26,216 | 50,604 | 26,392 | 27,438 | 53,830 | 27,164 | 27,152 | 54,316 |

| 60-64 | | | 11,712 | 17,882 | 1 | | 29,595 | 19,438 | 21,630 | 41,067 | 20,553 | 23,015 | 43,568 | 21,776 | 23,833 | 45,609 |

| 65-69 | | | 9,900 | 11,435 | 0 | | 21,335 | 15,074 | 17,886 | 32,960 | 16,042 | 18,570 | 34,612 | 16,718 | 19,437 | 36,155 |

| 70-74 | | | 6,441 | 8,860 | 2 | | 15,303 | 10,699 | 13,407 | 24,106 | 11,765 | 15,365 | 27,130 | 12,337 | 15,808 | 28,145 |

| 75-79 | | | 3,726 | 5,000 | 0 | | 8,726 | 6,591 | 7,685 | 14,276 | 7,692 | 10,289 | 17,982 | 8,273 | 11,429 | 19,702 |

| 80+ | | | 3,896 | 6,630 | 3 | | 10,529 | 7,763 | 8,377 | 16,140 | 8,479 | 9,422 | 17,900 | 9,337 | 11,310 | 20,647 |

| | All | | 704,089 | 749,673 | 25 | | 1,453,787 | 769,120 | 778,627 | 1,547,747 | 813,735 | 822,775 | 1,636,510 | 843,651 | 852,575 | 1,696,226 |

| | Ages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Page 31

Table 1.6: Population Projections by Urban Area 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) URBAN Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total AREA MTWAPA 43,890 46,786 90,676 46,032 49,070 95,102 48,672 51,884 100,556 50,448 53,777 104,226 MALINDI 58,113 61,742 119,855 60,950 64,756 125,706 64,445 68,470 132,915 66,797 70,968 137,765 KILIFI 35,790 38,479 74,269 37,537 40,357 77,894 39,690 42,672 82,362 41,138 44,229 85,367 WATAMU 14,030 13,827 27,857 14,715 14,502 29,217 15,559 15,334 30,892 16,126 15,893 32,020 MARIAKA NI 15,511 16,204 31,715 16,268 16,995 33,263 17,201 17,970 35,171 17,829 18,625 36,454 VIPINGO 6,150 6,033 12,183 6,450 6,327 12,778 6,820 6,690 13,510 7,069 6,935 14,003 MAZERAS 7,942 8,312 16,254 8,330 8,718 17,047 8,807 9,218 18,025 9,129 9,554 18,683 GONGONI 5,295 5,698 10,993 5,553 5,976 11,530 5,872 6,319 12,191 6,086 6,549 12,636 MARERENI 3,393 3,692 7,085 3,559 3,872 7,431 3,763 4,094 7,857 3,900 4,244 8,144 KALOLENI 3,319 3,697 7,016 3,481 3,877 7,358 3,681 4,100 7,780 3,815 4,249 8,064 BAMBA 918 1,097 2,015 963 1,151 2,113 1,018 1,217 2,235 1,055 1,261 2,316 TOTAL 194,351 205,567 399,918 203,838 215,601 419,439 215,528 227,966 443,494 223,393 236,285 459,677 Source: KNBS, 2019 The population for Malindi (125,706) is much higher than the population for other urban centres in Kilifi County. Population projections for the planning period should therefore guide in resource allocation which will assist in urban planning and resource distribution. 1.5.2 Population Density and Distribution Kilifi county has a total of population of 1,453.787. The population is currently estimated to be 1,517824 and is projected to 1,686,705 and 1,858,772 by 2025 and 2027 respectively. Currently, the total population density 116 persons per sq.km which is projected to have increased to 148 people per square km by 2027. The most densely populated sub county is Kilifi South with 713 people per square km while Magarini and Ganze are least densely populated with 37 and 45 people per square km respectively. In five years, Kilifi South and Kilifi North remain the most densely populated while Magarini and Ganze remain the least densely populated. The population density for different sub-counties in Kilifi is presented in Table 1.7. 10

| Table 1.6: Population Projections by Urban Area 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) URBAN Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total AREA MTWAPA 43,890 46,786 90,676 46,032 49,070 95,102 48,672 51,884 100,556 50,448 53,777 104,226 MALINDI 58,113 61,742 119,855 60,950 64,756 125,706 64,445 68,470 132,915 66,797 70,968 137,765 KILIFI 35,790 38,479 74,269 37,537 40,357 77,894 39,690 42,672 82,362 41,138 44,229 85,367 WATAMU 14,030 13,827 27,857 14,715 14,502 29,217 15,559 15,334 30,892 16,126 15,893 32,020 MARIAKA NI 15,511 16,204 31,715 16,268 16,995 33,263 17,201 17,970 35,171 17,829 18,625 36,454 VIPINGO 6,150 6,033 12,183 6,450 6,327 12,778 6,820 6,690 13,510 7,069 6,935 14,003 MAZERAS 7,942 8,312 16,254 8,330 8,718 17,047 8,807 9,218 18,025 9,129 9,554 18,683 GONGONI 5,295 5,698 10,993 5,553 5,976 11,530 5,872 6,319 12,191 6,086 6,549 12,636 MARERENI 3,393 3,692 7,085 3,559 3,872 7,431 3,763 4,094 7,857 3,900 4,244 8,144 KALOLENI 3,319 3,697 7,016 3,481 3,877 7,358 3,681 4,100 7,780 3,815 4,249 8,064 BAMBA 918 1,097 2,015 963 1,151 2,113 1,018 1,217 2,235 1,055 1,261 2,316 TOTAL 194,351 205,567 399,918 203,838 215,601 419,439 215,528 227,966 443,494 223,393 236,285 459,677 Source: KNBS, 2019 The population for Malindi (125,706) is much higher than the population for other urban centres in Kilifi County. Population projections for the planning period should therefore guide in resource allocation which will assist in urban planning and resource distribution. 1.5.2 Population Density and Distribution Kilifi county has a total of population of 1,453.787. The population is currently estimated to be 1,517824 and is projected to 1,686,705 and 1,858,772 by 2025 and 2027 respectively. Currently, the total population density 116 persons per sq.km which is projected to have increased to 148 people per square km by 2027. The most densely populated sub county is Kilifi South with 713 people per square km while Magarini and Ganze are least densely populated with 37 and 45 people per square km respectively. In five years, Kilifi South and Kilifi North remain the most densely populated while Magarini and Ganze remain the least densely populated. The population density for different sub-counties in Kilifi is presented in Table 1.7. 10 |

|---|

| | | | 2019 (Census) | | | | | | 2022 (Projection) | | | | | | 2025 (Projection) | | | | | | 2027 (Projection) | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | URBAN | | Male | | Female | | Total | | Male | | Female | | Total | | Male | | Female | | Total | | Male | | Female | | Total | |

| | AREA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| MTWAPA | MTWAPA | | 43,890 | | 46,786 | | 90,676 | | 46,032 | | 49,070 | | 95,102 | | 48,672 | | 51,884 | | 100,556 | | 50,448 | | 53,777 | | 104,226 | |

| MALINDI | | | 58,113 | | 61,742 | | 119,855 | | 60,950 | | 64,756 | | 125,706 | | 64,445 | | 68,470 | | 132,915 | | 66,797 | | 70,968 | | 137,765 | |

| KILIFI | | | 35,790 | | 38,479 | | 74,269 | | 37,537 | | 40,357 | | 77,894 | | 39,690 | | 42,672 | | 82,362 | | 41,138 | | 44,229 | | 85,367 | |

| WATAMU | | | 14,030 | | 13,827 | | 27,857 | | 14,715 | | 14,502 | | 29,217 | | 15,559 | | 15,334 | | 30,892 | | 16,126 | | 15,893 | | 32,020 | |

| | MARIAKA | | 15,511 | | 16,204 | | 31,715 | | 16,268 | | 16,995 | | 33,263 | | 17,201 | | 17,970 | | 35,171 | | 17,829 | | 18,625 | | 36,454 | |

| | NI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| VIPINGO | VIPINGO | | 6,150 | | 6,033 | | 12,183 | | 6,450 | | 6,327 | | 12,778 | | 6,820 | | 6,690 | | 13,510 | | 7,069 | | 6,935 | | 14,003 | |

| MAZERAS | | | 7,942 | | 8,312 | | 16,254 | | 8,330 | | 8,718 | | 17,047 | | 8,807 | | 9,218 | | 18,025 | | 9,129 | | 9,554 | | 18,683 | |

| GONGONI | | | 5,295 | | 5,698 | | 10,993 | | 5,553 | | 5,976 | | 11,530 | | 5,872 | | 6,319 | | 12,191 | | 6,086 | | 6,549 | | 12,636 | |

| MARERENI | | | 3,393 | | 3,692 | | 7,085 | | 3,559 | | 3,872 | | 7,431 | | 3,763 | | 4,094 | | 7,857 | | 3,900 | | 4,244 | | 8,144 | |

| KALOLENI | | | 3,319 | | 3,697 | | 7,016 | | 3,481 | | 3,877 | | 7,358 | | 3,681 | | 4,100 | | 7,780 | | 3,815 | | 4,249 | | 8,064 | |

| BAMBA | | | 918 | | 1,097 | | 2,015 | | 963 | | 1,151 | | 2,113 | | 1,018 | | 1,217 | | 2,235 | | 1,055 | | 1,261 | | 2,316 | |

| TOTAL | | | 194,351 | | 205,567 | | 399,918 | | 203,838 | | 215,601 | | 419,439 | | 215,528 | | 227,966 | | 443,494 | | 223,393 | | 236,285 | | 459,677 | |

Page 32

Table 1.7: Population distribution and density by Sub-County Sub-County 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) Area Population Density Area (KM2) Population Density Population Density Population Density (KM2) Kilifi north 264 178,824 677 264 190,382 721 201,300 763 208,645 790 Kilifi south 290 206,753 713 290 220,116 759 232,739 802 241,232 832 Malindi 2,263 333,226 147 2263 354,763 157 375,108 166 388,796 172 Kaloleni 706 193,682 274 706 206,200 292 218,025 309 225,981 320 Magarini 5,229 191,610 37 5,229 203,994 39 215,693 41 223,564 43 Ganze 3,218 143,906 129 3218 153,207 48 161,993 50 167,904 52 Kauma 181 22,638 125 181 24,101 133 25,483 181 26,413 146 Chonyi 193 62,335 323 193 66,364 344 70,170 364 72,730 377 Rabai 208 120,813 581 208 128,621 618 135,998 654 140,960 678 Source: KNBS, 2019 Kilifi South sub-county has the highest population density (713 persons per square kilometer) followed by Kilifi North (677 persons per square kilometer) then lastly Magarini (at 37 persons per square kilometer). 1.5.3 Population Projections by Broad Age Groups Population projection by broad age group is presented in Table 1.8. The table shows that, the labor force age group (15-64) of 784,084 constituting about 54% of the total population, reproductive age (15-49) of 601,123 is 41%. The under age (0-5) is 200,831 and schooling age (6-19) is 584,371 which is 40.2% of the total population. Table 1.8: Population Projections by Broad Age Groups Age Group 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) M F T M F T M F T M F T Infant Population 18,963 18,919 37,882 18,010 17,968 35,977 18,660 18,617 37,277 18,858 18,815 37,673 (<1 Year) Under 5 100,919 99,912 200,831 95,116 95,619 190,735 99,067 98,557 197,624 100,118 99,604 199,723 Years Pre-School 63,635 63,046 126,681 55,405 56,154 111,559 57,489 58,064 115,553 58,493 58,913 117,406 (3- 5 Years) Primary 164,817 165,979 330,796 138,918 141,833 280,751 141,424 145,599 287,024 144,848 148,974 293,822 School (6 – 13 Years) 127,806 125,769 253,575 81,433 81,215 162,648 85,308 85,415 170,723 85,396 86,123 171,519 11

| Table 1.7: Population distribution and density by Sub-County Sub-County 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) Area Population Density Area (KM2) Population Density Population Density Population Density (KM2) Kilifi north 264 178,824 677 264 190,382 721 201,300 763 208,645 790 Kilifi south 290 206,753 713 290 220,116 759 232,739 802 241,232 832 Malindi 2,263 333,226 147 2263 354,763 157 375,108 166 388,796 172 Kaloleni 706 193,682 274 706 206,200 292 218,025 309 225,981 320 Magarini 5,229 191,610 37 5,229 203,994 39 215,693 41 223,564 43 Ganze 3,218 143,906 129 3218 153,207 48 161,993 50 167,904 52 Kauma 181 22,638 125 181 24,101 133 25,483 181 26,413 146 Chonyi 193 62,335 323 193 66,364 344 70,170 364 72,730 377 Rabai 208 120,813 581 208 128,621 618 135,998 654 140,960 678 Source: KNBS, 2019 Kilifi South sub-county has the highest population density (713 persons per square kilometer) followed by Kilifi North (677 persons per square kilometer) then lastly Magarini (at 37 persons per square kilometer). 1.5.3 Population Projections by Broad Age Groups Population projection by broad age group is presented in Table 1.8. The table shows that, the labor force age group (15-64) of 784,084 constituting about 54% of the total population, reproductive age (15-49) of 601,123 is 41%. The under age (0-5) is 200,831 and schooling age (6-19) is 584,371 which is 40.2% of the total population. Table 1.8: Population Projections by Broad Age Groups Age Group 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) M F T M F T M F T M F T Infant Population 18,963 18,919 37,882 18,010 17,968 35,977 18,660 18,617 37,277 18,858 18,815 37,673 (<1 Year) Under 5 100,919 99,912 200,831 95,116 95,619 190,735 99,067 98,557 197,624 100,118 99,604 199,723 Years Pre-School 63,635 63,046 126,681 55,405 56,154 111,559 57,489 58,064 115,553 58,493 58,913 117,406 (3- 5 Years) Primary 164,817 165,979 330,796 138,918 141,833 280,751 141,424 145,599 287,024 144,848 148,974 293,822 School (6 – 13 Years) 127,806 125,769 253,575 81,433 81,215 162,648 85,308 85,415 170,723 85,396 86,123 171,519 11 |

|---|

| Sub-County | 2019 (Census) | | | | | 2022 (Projection) | | | 2025 (Projection) | | 2027 (Projection) | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | Area | | Population | Density | Area (KM2) | Population | Density | Population | Density | Population | Density |

| | | (KM2) | | | | | | | | | | |

| Kilifi north | 264 | 264 | | 178,824 | 677 | 264 | 190,382 | 721 | 201,300 | 763 | 208,645 | 790 |

| Kilifi south | 290 | | | 206,753 | 713 | 290 | 220,116 | 759 | 232,739 | 802 | 241,232 | 832 |

| Malindi | 2,263 | | | 333,226 | 147 | 2263 | 354,763 | 157 | 375,108 | 166 | 388,796 | 172 |

| Kaloleni | 706 | | | 193,682 | 274 | 706 | 206,200 | 292 | 218,025 | 309 | 225,981 | 320 |

| Magarini | 5,229 | | | 191,610 | 37 | 5,229 | 203,994 | 39 | 215,693 | 41 | 223,564 | 43 |

| Ganze | 3,218 | | | 143,906 | 129 | 3218 | 153,207 | 48 | 161,993 | 50 | 167,904 | 52 |

| Kauma | 181 | | | 22,638 | 125 | 181 | 24,101 | 133 | 25,483 | 181 | 26,413 | 146 |

| Chonyi | 193 | | | 62,335 | 323 | 193 | 66,364 | 344 | 70,170 | 364 | 72,730 | 377 |

| Rabai | 208 | | | 120,813 | 581 | 208 | 128,621 | 618 | 135,998 | 654 | 140,960 | 678 |

| Age Group | | | 2019 (Census) | | | 2022 (Projection) | | | 2025 (Projection) | | | | 2027 (Projection) | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | M | F | T | M | F | T | M | F | F | T | M | F | T |

| Infant Population (<1 Year) | | | 18,963 | 18,919 | 37,882 | 18,010 | 17,968 | 35,977 | 18,660 | 18,617 | | 37,277 | 18,858 | 18,815 | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | 18,617 | | | | 37,673 |

| | Under 5 | | 100,919 | 99,912 | 200,831 | 95,116 | 95,619 | 190,735 | 99,067 | 98,557 | 98,557 | 197,624 | 100,118 | 99,604 | 199,723 |

| | Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Pre-School (3- 5 Years) | Pre-School | | 63,635 | 63,046 | 126,681 | 55,405 | 56,154 | 111,559 | 57,489 | 58,064 | 58,064 | 115,553 | 58,493 | 58,913 | 117,406 |

| | (3- 5 Years) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Primary School (6 – 13 Years) | | | 164,817 | 165,979 | 330,796 | 138,918 | 141,833 | 280,751 | 141,424 | 145,599 | 145,599 | 287,024 | 144,848 | 148,974 | 293,822 |

| | | | 127,806 | 125,769 | 253,575 | 81,433 | 81,215 | 162,648 | 85,308 | 85,415 | 85,415 | 170,723 | 85,396 | 86,123 | 171,519 |

| Infant |

|---|

| Population |

| (<1 Year) |

| 17,968 |

|---|

| 35,977 |

|---|

| 18,660 |

|---|

| 18,815 |

|---|

| Primary |

|---|

| School (6 – |

| 13 Years) |

Page 33

Age Group 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) M F T M F T M F T M F T Secondary School (13 – 19 Years) Youth (15 – 328,044 217,314 545,358 218,015 215,170 433,185 232,784 230,292 463,076 249,350 237,835 477,185 29 Years) Reproductive 240,779 360,344 601,123 387,088 380,991 768,079 416,723 409,318 826,041 434,959 427,159 862,118 Age (15 – 49 Years) Labour 371,910 412,174 784,084 460,383 458,339 918,722 494,309 488,677 982,986 516,042 508,744 1,024,786 Force (15 – 64 Years) Aged (65+) 23,693 31,925 55,618 40,127 47,355 87,482 43,978 53,646 97,624 46,665 57,984 104,649 1.5.4 Population of Persons with Disabilities Table 1.9 presents the population of persons with disability by Type, Age and Sex. The table shows that, in Kilifi County, Mobility (Physical) type of disability is leading with 7,746 closely followed by Visual (6,353). And the least is speech (Communication) with 3,274 persons. 12

| Age Group 2019 (Census) 2022 (Projection) 2025 (Projection) 2027 (Projection) M F T M F T M F T M F T Secondary School (13 – 19 Years) Youth (15 – 328,044 217,314 545,358 218,015 215,170 433,185 232,784 230,292 463,076 249,350 237,835 477,185 29 Years) Reproductive 240,779 360,344 601,123 387,088 380,991 768,079 416,723 409,318 826,041 434,959 427,159 862,118 Age (15 – 49 Years) Labour 371,910 412,174 784,084 460,383 458,339 918,722 494,309 488,677 982,986 516,042 508,744 1,024,786 Force (15 – 64 Years) Aged (65+) 23,693 31,925 55,618 40,127 47,355 87,482 43,978 53,646 97,624 46,665 57,984 104,649 1.5.4 Population of Persons with Disabilities Table 1.9 presents the population of persons with disability by Type, Age and Sex. The table shows that, in Kilifi County, Mobility (Physical) type of disability is leading with 7,746 closely followed by Visual (6,353). And the least is speech (Communication) with 3,274 persons. 12 |

|---|

| Age Group | | | 2019 (Census) | | | 2022 (Projection) | | | 2025 (Projection) | | | 2027 (Projection) | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | M | F | T | M | F | T | M | F | T | M | F | T |

| | Secondary | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | School (13 – | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | 19 Years) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Youth (15 – 29 Years) | Youth (15 – | | 328,044 | 217,314 | 545,358 | 218,015 | 215,170 | 433,185 | 232,784 | 230,292 | 463,076 | 249,350 | 237,835 | 477,185 |

| | 29 Years) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Reproductive Age (15 – 49 Years) | | | 240,779 | 360,344 | 601,123 | 387,088 | 380,991 | 768,079 | 416,723 | 409,318 | 826,041 | 434,959 | 427,159 | 862,118 |

| Labour Force (15 – 64 Years) | | | 371,910 | 412,174 | 784,084 | 460,383 | 458,339 | 918,722 | 494,309 | 488,677 | 982,986 | 516,042 | 508,744 | 1,024,786 |

| Aged (65+) | | | 23,693 | 31,925 | 55,618 | 40,127 | 47,355 | 87,482 | 43,978 | 53,646 | 97,624 | 46,665 | 57,984 | 104,649 |

| Reproductive |

|---|

| Age (15 – 49 |

| Years) |

| Labour |

|---|

| Force (15 – |

| 64 Years) |

Page 34

Table 1.9: Population of Persons with Disability by Type, Age and Sex Source: KNBS, 2019 1.6 Demographic Dividend Potential The experience of the newly industrialized countries drastically transforming their economies for the better and improving the well-being of their population over a few decades gave rise to the demographic dividend concept. A demographic dividend is defined as the temporary opportunity to achieve rapid social economic development occasioned by a decline in fertility levels and strategic investment in key sectors namely: health, education, economics, and governance. The newly industrialized countries have made strategic social and economic investments that have led to increased incomes and better quality of life for their citizens. Therefore, to curb problems such as high unemployment levels, high incidence of poverty, forced migration by inhabitants in search of better opportunities, low education levels, high mortality, and morbidity incidences, and criminal activities among the youth, counties are encouraged to pursue the attainment of demographic dividend as an integral part of their overall development. The attainment of the demographic dividend in the country is in harmony ICPD25 Kenya Country Commitments which is a set of seventeen commitments made by the country to pursue and achieve the goals of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) Programme of Action (POA). Kilifi stands to experience temporary accelerated economic growth as a result of declining fertility levels alongside a reduction in dependency levels and an increase in the proportion of the population in the working ages (15-64 years). The changes in the age structure translate into fewer dependents and more savings for those of working age. The increased savings from the working age group if put into an investment can spur accelerated economic growth in the county and improved the well-being of the county’s residents. However, the attainment of a demographic dividend is temporary and not automatic. As fertility levels decline, the county needs to make simultaneous strategic investments in the health, education, economic, and governance sectors. Strategic investments in the four pillars are geared towards ensuring the county’s children and young people remain healthy and access education and training opportunities as they transition into the labor force. This should further be complemented with efforts by the county and other 13 Type V isual H earing M obility Self-care Cognition Com m unicating Total A Total 6,353 3,569 7,746 3,647 4,075 3,274 28,664 ge 5+(A LL) M ale 2,686 1,520 3,316 1,752 1,823 1,735 12,832 Fem ale 3,667 2,049 4,430 1,895 2,252 1,539 15,832 Total 585 737 829 1,125 764 1,116 5,156 5-14 M ale 331 377 478 611 416 592 2,805 Fem ale 254 360 351 514 348 524 2,351 Total 630 609 646 542 733 822 3,982 15-24 M ale 275 315 356 306 399 464 2,115 Fem ale 355 294 290 236 334 358 1,867 Total 500 403 507 298 520 490 2,718 25-34 M ale 186 178 230 150 272 273 1,289 Fem ale 314 225 277 148 248 217 1,429 Total 1,340 513 1,287 364 688 407 4,599 35-54 M ale 488 222 566 202 297 217 1,992 Fem ale 852 291 721 162 391 190 2,607 Total 3,298 1,307 4,477 1,318 1,370 439 12,209 55+ M ale 1,406 428 1,686 483 439 189 4,631 Fem ale 1,892 879 2,791 835 931 250 7,578

| Table 1.9: Population of Persons with Disability by Type, Age and Sex A ge 5+(A LL) 5-14 15-24 25-34 35-54 55+ Type Total M ale Fem ale Total M ale Fem ale Total M ale Fem ale Total M ale Fem ale Total M ale Fem ale Total M ale Fem ale V isual 6,353 2,686 3,667 585 331 254 630 275 355 500 186 314 1,340 488 852 3,298 1,406 1,892 H earing 3,569 1,520 2,049 737 377 360 609 315 294 403 178 225 513 222 291 1,307 428 879 M obility 7,746 3,316 4,430 829 478 351 646 356 290 507 230 277 1,287 566 721 4,477 1,686 2,791 Self-care 3,647 1,752 1,895 1,125 611 514 542 306 236 298 150 148 364 202 162 1,318 483 835 Cognition 4,075 1,823 2,252 764 416 348 733 399 334 520 272 248 688 297 391 1,370 439 931 Com m unicating 3,274 1,735 1,539 1,116 592 524 822 464 358 490 273 217 407 217 190 439 189 250 Total 28,664 12,832 15,832 5,156 2,805 2,351 3,982 2,115 1,867 2,718 1,289 1,429 4,599 1,992 2,607 12,209 4,631 7,578 Source: KNBS, 2019 1.6 Demographic Dividend Potential The experience of the newly industrialized countries drastically transforming their economies for the better and improving the well-being of their population over a few decades gave rise to the demographic dividend concept. A demographic dividend is defined as the temporary opportunity to achieve rapid social economic development occasioned by a decline in fertility levels and strategic investment in key sectors namely: health, education, economics, and governance. The newly industrialized countries have made strategic social and economic investments that have led to increased incomes and better quality of life for their citizens. Therefore, to curb problems such as high unemployment levels, high incidence of poverty, forced migration by inhabitants in search of better opportunities, low education levels, high mortality, and morbidity incidences, and criminal activities among the youth, counties are encouraged to pursue the attainment of demographic dividend as an integral part of their overall development. The attainment of the demographic dividend in the country is in harmony ICPD25 Kenya Country Commitments which is a set of seventeen commitments made by the country to pursue and achieve the goals of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) Programme of Action (POA). Kilifi stands to experience temporary accelerated economic growth as a result of declining fertility levels alongside a reduction in dependency levels and an increase in the proportion of the population in the working ages (15-64 years). The changes in the age structure translate into fewer dependents and more savings for those of working age. The increased savings from the working age group if put into an investment can spur accelerated economic growth in the county and improved the well-being of the county’s residents. However, the attainment of a demographic dividend is temporary and not automatic. As fertility levels decline, the county needs to make simultaneous strategic investments in the health, education, economic, and governance sectors. Strategic investments in the four pillars are geared towards ensuring the county’s children and young people remain healthy and access education and training opportunities as they transition into the labor force. This should further be complemented with efforts by the county and other 13 |

|---|

Page 35

stakeholders to create income-generating opportunities and a saving and investment culture to cater post-retirement phase. Consequently, such investments are only possible with good governance and full participation of the youth on governance matters affecting the county. Table 1.10 shows the key demographic indicators for Kilifi County. The Census 2019 enumerated the total population of Kilifi to be 1,453,762 people. At the beginning of the third generation CIDP (2023), the population is projected to be 1,577,335 people, and 1,696,226 at the end of the planned period (2027), an indication of continued population growth despite this, the county Total Fertility Rate is expected to decline over a similar period to reach 3.4 from 3.7 children per woman in 2023. As the county continues to experience a decline in fertility, the proportion of children below the age of 15 is expected to decline from 34.6 percent in 2023 to about 33.4 percent in 2027. This will result in a corresponding increase in the proportion of the population of working ages (15- 64 years) from 59.6 percent in 2023 to 60.4 percent in 2027, and the proportion of older persons above 64 years will increase from 5.8 percent to 6.2 percent. Therefore, as the proportion of those below the age of 15 years approaches 30 percent and the increase in the proportion of working ages with the proportion of those aged 64 years and above remains below 15 percent, a temporary demographic dividend window will open, estimated to be between 2036-2040 when the county will experience accelerated economic window albeit through strategic investments in the identified four pillars. Table 1.10: Demographic Dividend Potential Category 2019 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Population Size 1,453,778 1,532,820 1,599,036 1,637,223 169,155 1,783,934 Population 626,693 656,610 675,407 697,377 707,847 728,906 below 15 (%) Population 15 – 784,294 851,048 889,674 926,420 954,956 983,203 64 (%) Population 32,804 35,797 37,955 38,155 39,352 40,530 above 65 (%) Dependency 42.32 43.26 43.87 44.64 45.58 46.08 Ratio Fertility Rate 5.2 - - - - - Source: KNBS, 2019 Recommendations The County can fast-track the opening of the demographic window and subsequent realization of the demographic dividend through strategic investments in the following key areas; 14

| stakeholders to create income-generating opportunities and a saving and investment culture to cater post-retirement phase. Consequently, such investments are only possible with good governance and full participation of the youth on governance matters affecting the county. Table 1.10 shows the key demographic indicators for Kilifi County. The Census 2019 enumerated the total population of Kilifi to be 1,453,762 people. At the beginning of the third generation CIDP (2023), the population is projected to be 1,577,335 people, and 1,696,226 at the end of the planned period (2027), an indication of continued population growth despite this, the county Total Fertility Rate is expected to decline over a similar period to reach 3.4 from 3.7 children per woman in 2023. As the county continues to experience a decline in fertility, the proportion of children below the age of 15 is expected to decline from 34.6 percent in 2023 to about 33.4 percent in 2027. This will result in a corresponding increase in the proportion of the population of working ages (15- 64 years) from 59.6 percent in 2023 to 60.4 percent in 2027, and the proportion of older persons above 64 years will increase from 5.8 percent to 6.2 percent. Therefore, as the proportion of those below the age of 15 years approaches 30 percent and the increase in the proportion of working ages with the proportion of those aged 64 years and above remains below 15 percent, a temporary demographic dividend window will open, estimated to be between 2036-2040 when the county will experience accelerated economic window albeit through strategic investments in the identified four pillars. Table 1.10: Demographic Dividend Potential Category 2019 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Population Size 1,453,778 1,532,820 1,599,036 1,637,223 169,155 1,783,934 Population 626,693 656,610 675,407 697,377 707,847 728,906 below 15 (%) Population 15 – 784,294 851,048 889,674 926,420 954,956 983,203 64 (%) Population 32,804 35,797 37,955 38,155 39,352 40,530 above 65 (%) Dependency 42.32 43.26 43.87 44.64 45.58 46.08 Ratio Fertility Rate 5.2 - - - - - Source: KNBS, 2019 Recommendations The County can fast-track the opening of the demographic window and subsequent realization of the demographic dividend through strategic investments in the following key areas; 14 |

|---|

| Category | | | 2019 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Population Size | | | 1,453,778 | 1,532,820 | 1,599,036 | 1,637,223 | 169,155 | 1,783,934 |

| | Population | | 626,693 | 656,610 | 675,407 | 697,377 | 707,847 | 728,906 |

| | below 15 (%) | | | | | | | |

| | Population 15 – | | 784,294 | 851,048 | 889,674 | 926,420 | 954,956 | 983,203 |

| | 64 (%) | | | | | | | |

| | Population | | 32,804 | 35,797 | 37,955 | 38,155 | 39,352 | 40,530 |

| | above 65 (%) | | | | | | | |

| | Dependency | | 42.32 | 43.26 | 43.87 | 44.64 | 45.58 | 46.08 |

| | Ratio | | | | | | | |

| Fertility Rate | Fertility Rate | | 5.2 | - | - | - | - | - |

Page 36

Health and Wellbeing i. Mainstream Adolescents Sexual Reproductive Health (ASRH) policy in CIDPs and County annual work plans; ii. Ensure universal access to family planning services; iii. Review of the health sector strategic plan to increase the scope of youth and adolescent health; and iv. Promote policies and programs to improve child survival. Education and Skills Development i. Increase bursary allocation funds to support impoverished families; ii. Reduce the teacher-pupil ratio in ECDE centres; iii. Enhance infrastructure support for ECDE centres; iv. Enhance infrastructure support and modern equipment for TVET institutions; and v. Enhance subsidized vocational and technical training to increase access and participation of more youth in TVET. Employment and Entrepreneurship i. Improve ICT infrastructure coverage in rural areas; ii. Encourage and strengthen contract farming for youth to assure the marketing of their produce; and iii. Create enabling environment for business startups incentives and credit programs targeted at the Youth at the County level. Rights, Governance, and Youth Empowerment i. Establish a structured system of participation of the youth at all levels of government; ii. Involve the youth in the design, implementation, and evaluation of policies, programmes, and projects for youth; and iii. Establish and refurbish Youth Empowerment Centres in all constituencies and ensure that the existing ones are all functional/operational. 1.7 Kilifi County Poverty Profile The monetary poverty rate for Kilifi is 46.1% which is 10-percentage point higher than the national rate of 35.7% with approximately 670,448 people in Kilifi being monetarily poor. Kilifi has a multidimensional poverty rate of 59.9%, which is 12-percentage point higher than the monetary poverty rate of 47.7% with a total of 870,425 people being multidimensionally poor. When disaggregated by age groups, 57.1% of children in Kilifi are multidimensionally poor. This is 5-percentage points higher than the national average of 52.5%. Among the youths, 61.8% are 15

| Health and Wellbeing i. Mainstream Adolescents Sexual Reproductive Health (ASRH) policy in CIDPs and County annual work plans; ii. Ensure universal access to family planning services; iii. Review of the health sector strategic plan to increase the scope of youth and adolescent health; and iv. Promote policies and programs to improve child survival. Education and Skills Development i. Increase bursary allocation funds to support impoverished families; ii. Reduce the teacher-pupil ratio in ECDE centres; iii. Enhance infrastructure support for ECDE centres; iv. Enhance infrastructure support and modern equipment for TVET institutions; and v. Enhance subsidized vocational and technical training to increase access and participation of more youth in TVET. Employment and Entrepreneurship i. Improve ICT infrastructure coverage in rural areas; ii. Encourage and strengthen contract farming for youth to assure the marketing of their produce; and iii. Create enabling environment for business startups incentives and credit programs targeted at the Youth at the County level. Rights, Governance, and Youth Empowerment i. Establish a structured system of participation of the youth at all levels of government; ii. Involve the youth in the design, implementation, and evaluation of policies, programmes, and projects for youth; and iii. Establish and refurbish Youth Empowerment Centres in all constituencies and ensure that the existing ones are all functional/operational. 1.7 Kilifi County Poverty Profile The monetary poverty rate for Kilifi is 46.1% which is 10-percentage point higher than the national rate of 35.7% with approximately 670,448 people in Kilifi being monetarily poor. Kilifi has a multidimensional poverty rate of 59.9%, which is 12-percentage point higher than the monetary poverty rate of 47.7% with a total of 870,425 people being multidimensionally poor. When disaggregated by age groups, 57.1% of children in Kilifi are multidimensionally poor. This is 5-percentage points higher than the national average of 52.5%. Among the youths, 61.8% are 15 |

|---|

Page 37

multidimensionally poor compared to a national average of 48.1% while for the elderly population, 64.2% are multidimensionally poor compared to a national average of 55.7%. Among children aged 0-17, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are housing (71.1%), nutrition (68.4%), information (52.9%) and education (31.8%). For youths aged 18-34, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are nutrition (64.9%), education (64%), economic activity (34%), and sanitation (32.3%). Among adults aged 35-59, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are education (71.5%), housing (62.6%), economic activity (62.4%) and nutrition (59.8%). Among the elderly aged 60+, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are housing (79.3%), nutrition (69.8%), education (54.4%) and sanitation (39.7%). 16

| multidimensionally poor compared to a national average of 48.1% while for the elderly population, 64.2% are multidimensionally poor compared to a national average of 55.7%. Among children aged 0-17, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are housing (71.1%), nutrition (68.4%), information (52.9%) and education (31.8%). For youths aged 18-34, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are nutrition (64.9%), education (64%), economic activity (34%), and sanitation (32.3%). Among adults aged 35-59, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are education (71.5%), housing (62.6%), economic activity (62.4%) and nutrition (59.8%). Among the elderly aged 60+, the core drivers of multidimensional poverty are housing (79.3%), nutrition (69.8%), education (54.4%) and sanitation (39.7%). 16 |

|---|

Page 38

17

| 17 |

|---|

Page 39

CHAPTER TWO 2.0 PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS CIDP PERIOD 2.1 Overview This chapter provides a review on implementation of the previous CIDP 2018-22. It presents an analysis of county performance in terms of revenues, expenditures and key outcomes as well as the major challenges faced in the implementation of the plan. 2.2 Analysis of the County Revenue Sources This section provides annual projected revenues versus actual receipts within the period under review. The information is tabulated as in Table 2.1. Table 2.1: Analysis of County Revenue Sources Revenue Sources Revenue Projection (Ksh. million) Actual Revenue (Ksh. million) FY1 FY 2 FY3 FY 4 FY 5 FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4 FY5 a) Equitable Share 9,950.90 10,833.00 11,077.11 10,444.50 11,641.59 9,950.90 10,833.00 11,077.11 10,444.50 11,641.60 b) Conditional 911.00 564.23 513.22 554.01 - 550.70 793.07 331.31 - 473.64 grants (GoK) c) 262.60 1,130.33 1,500.52 1,253.23 - 114.67 261.96 906.33 - - Conditional grants (Development Partners) d) Own Source 929.66 1,400.00 1,150.00 925.00 522.33 864.32 793.71 829.72 955.9 Revenue e) Other Sources (specify) Total 12,054.16 13,927.56 13,090.85 13,401.74 12,566.59 11,138.60 12,752.35 13,997.59 11,274.22 13,071.14 Source: County Treasury A review of County revenue for the past 5 years indicates that the County Government of Kilifi received KES 11.138 billion in FY2018/19, KES 12.752 billion in FY2019/20, KES 13.997 billion in FY 2020/21, KES 11.274 billion in FY 2021/22 and KES 13.071 billion for the FY2022/23. 2.3 County Budget Expenditure Analysis Table 2.2 presents a summarized analysis of total budget allocation and actual expenditure 18

| CHAPTER TWO 2.0 PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS CIDP PERIOD 2.1 Overview This chapter provides a review on implementation of the previous CIDP 2018-22. It presents an analysis of county performance in terms of revenues, expenditures and key outcomes as well as the major challenges faced in the implementation of the plan. 2.2 Analysis of the County Revenue Sources This section provides annual projected revenues versus actual receipts within the period under review. The information is tabulated as in Table 2.1. Table 2.1: Analysis of County Revenue Sources Revenue Sources Revenue Projection (Ksh. million) Actual Revenue (Ksh. million) FY1 FY 2 FY3 FY 4 FY 5 FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4 FY5 a) Equitable Share 9,950.90 10,833.00 11,077.11 10,444.50 11,641.59 9,950.90 10,833.00 11,077.11 10,444.50 11,641.60 b) Conditional 911.00 564.23 513.22 554.01 - 550.70 793.07 331.31 - 473.64 grants (GoK) c) 262.60 1,130.33 1,500.52 1,253.23 - 114.67 261.96 906.33 - - Conditional grants (Development Partners) d) Own Source 929.66 1,400.00 1,150.00 925.00 522.33 864.32 793.71 829.72 955.9 Revenue e) Other Sources (specify) Total 12,054.16 13,927.56 13,090.85 13,401.74 12,566.59 11,138.60 12,752.35 13,997.59 11,274.22 13,071.14 Source: County Treasury A review of County revenue for the past 5 years indicates that the County Government of Kilifi received KES 11.138 billion in FY2018/19, KES 12.752 billion in FY2019/20, KES 13.997 billion in FY 2020/21, KES 11.274 billion in FY 2021/22 and KES 13.071 billion for the FY2022/23. 2.3 County Budget Expenditure Analysis Table 2.2 presents a summarized analysis of total budget allocation and actual expenditure 18 |

|---|

| Revenue Sources | | | Revenue Projection (Ksh. million) | | | | | Actual Revenue (Ksh. million) | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | FY1 | FY 2 | FY3 | FY 4 | FY 5 | FY1 | FY2 | FY3 | FY4 | FY5 |

| a) Equitable Share | | | 9,950.90 | 10,833.00 | 11,077.11 | 10,444.50 | 11,641.59 | 9,950.90 | 10,833.00 | 11,077.11 | 10,444.50 | 11,641.60 |

| | b) Conditional | | 911.00 | 564.23 | 513.22 | 554.01 | - | 550.70 | 793.07 | 331.31 | - | 473.64 |

| | grants (GoK) | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | c) | | 262.60 | 1,130.33 | 1,500.52 | 1,253.23 | - | 114.67 | 261.96 | 906.33 | - | - |

| | Conditional | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | grants | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | (Development | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Partners) | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | d) Own Source | | 929.66 | 1,400.00 | | 1,150.00 | 925.00 | 522.33 | 864.32 | 793.71 | 829.72 | 955.9 |

| | Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | e) Other Sources | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | (specify) | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Total | Total | | 12,054.16 | 13,927.56 | 13,090.85 | 13,401.74 | 12,566.59 | 11,138.60 | 12,752.35 | 13,997.59 | 11,274.22 | 13,071.14 |

Page 40

by sector. Table 2.2: County Expenditure Analysis Department Total Budget Total Actual Variance Absorption Allocations (Million Expenditures (Million KES) Rates KES) (Million KES) County Assembly 5,206.36 4,254.33 952.03 82% County Executive 2,586.28 1,890.37 695.91 73% Finance & Economic Planning 4,037.79 2,563.69 1,474.10 63% Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries 4,327.05 3,185.54 1,141.51 74% Water & Environment 7,510.49 5,930.90 1,579.59 79% Education & ICT 6,906.31 4,956.58 1,949.73 72% County Health Services 17,739.75 12,669.25 5,070.50 71% Roads, Transport & Public Works 8,274.10 7,677.11 596.99 93% Lands, Energy & Physical Planning 3,353.69 2,366.29 987.40 71% ICT, E-Govt, Culture & Social Serv. 250.56 137.85 112.71 55% Trade, Tourism & Cooperatives Dev. 1,710.35 1,365.35 345.00 80% County Public Service Board 375.72 238.80 136.92 64% Devolution, Disaster & Public Service Mgt 11,493.11 6,216.73 5,276.38 54% TOTAL 73,771.56 53,452.79 20,318.77 72% Source: County Treasury 2.4. Sector Programmes Performance Review The section presents a discussion of the overall sector performance looking at the outcomes and the key outputs against the target during the CIDP II implementation period. 2.4.1. Health Sector During the planned period, proportion of women attending at least 4 ANC visits increased from 32% to 57% while Iron Folic Acid Supplementation (IFAS) uptake among antenatal care mothers increased from 72% to 89%. The deliveries conducted by skilled birth attendants improved from 53% to 86%. This achievement was attributed to multiple interventions namely: maternity open days; Binti kwa Binti and mama groups; baby friendly community initiative; and operationalization of new maternity theatres. 19

| by sector. Table 2.2: County Expenditure Analysis Department Total Budget Total Actual Variance Absorption Allocations (Million Expenditures (Million KES) Rates KES) (Million KES) County Assembly 5,206.36 4,254.33 952.03 82% County Executive 2,586.28 1,890.37 695.91 73% Finance & Economic Planning 4,037.79 2,563.69 1,474.10 63% Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries 4,327.05 3,185.54 1,141.51 74% Water & Environment 7,510.49 5,930.90 1,579.59 79% Education & ICT 6,906.31 4,956.58 1,949.73 72% County Health Services 17,739.75 12,669.25 5,070.50 71% Roads, Transport & Public Works 8,274.10 7,677.11 596.99 93% Lands, Energy & Physical Planning 3,353.69 2,366.29 987.40 71% ICT, E-Govt, Culture & Social Serv. 250.56 137.85 112.71 55% Trade, Tourism & Cooperatives Dev. 1,710.35 1,365.35 345.00 80% County Public Service Board 375.72 238.80 136.92 64% Devolution, Disaster & Public Service Mgt 11,493.11 6,216.73 5,276.38 54% TOTAL 73,771.56 53,452.79 20,318.77 72% Source: County Treasury 2.4. Sector Programmes Performance Review The section presents a discussion of the overall sector performance looking at the outcomes and the key outputs against the target during the CIDP II implementation period. 2.4.1. Health Sector During the planned period, proportion of women attending at least 4 ANC visits increased from 32% to 57% while Iron Folic Acid Supplementation (IFAS) uptake among antenatal care mothers increased from 72% to 89%. The deliveries conducted by skilled birth attendants improved from 53% to 86%. This achievement was attributed to multiple interventions namely: maternity open days; Binti kwa Binti and mama groups; baby friendly community initiative; and operationalization of new maternity theatres. 19 |

|---|

| Department | | | Total Budget Allocations (Million KES) | | Total Actual Expenditures (Million KES) | | Variance (Million KES) | | Absorption Rates | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | County Assembly | | 5,206.36 | | 4,254.33 | | 952.03 | | 82% | |

| | County Executive | | 2,586.28 | | 1,890.37 | | 695.91 | | 73% | |

| | Finance & Economic Planning | | 4,037.79 | | 2,563.69 | | 1,474.10 | | 63% | |

| | Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries | | 4,327.05 | | 3,185.54 | | 1,141.51 | | 74% | |

| | Water & Environment | | 7,510.49 | | 5,930.90 | | 1,579.59 | | 79% | |

| | Education & ICT | | 6,906.31 | | 4,956.58 | | 1,949.73 | | 72% | |

| | County Health Services | | 17,739.75 | | 12,669.25 | | 5,070.50 | | 71% | |

| | Roads, Transport & Public Works | | 8,274.10 | | 7,677.11 | | 596.99 | | 93% | |

| | Lands, Energy & Physical Planning | | 3,353.69 | | 2,366.29 | | 987.40 | | 71% | |

| | ICT, E-Govt, Culture & Social Serv. | | 250.56 | | 137.85 | | 112.71 | | 55% | |

| | Trade, Tourism & Cooperatives Dev. | | 1,710.35 | | 1,365.35 | | 345.00 | | 80% | |

| | County Public Service Board | | 375.72 | | 238.80 | | 136.92 | | 64% | |

| | Devolution, Disaster & Public Service Mgt | | 11,493.11 | | 6,216.73 | | 5,276.38 | | 54% | |

| | TOTAL | | 73,771.56 | | 53,452.79 | | 20,318.77 | | 72% | |

Page 41

Lenga Dispensary Maternity Unit at Kambe Ribe Teenage pregnancies reduced from 26% to 14% against a target of 17%. This achievement was possible through campaigns targeting young people, religious leaders, Kaya Elders, women groups and local CSOs. Coverage of family planning services increased from 38% to 48% due to availability of commodities, innovations in uptake and advocacy activities. Coverage of under 1 year of age fully immunized increased from 67.2% to 78% while the proportion of neonates with low birthweight increased from 6.7% to 9%. This was attributed to scale up of immunization services, malaria in pregnancy and household food insecurity which affected maternal nutrition respectively. Out of the 150 public health facilities, the capacity to offer high impact nutrition interventions (HiNi) and integrated management of acute malnutrition (IMAM) increased from 69 to 111. This was as a result of availability of nutrition commodities and capacity scale up support by stakeholders. 20

| Lenga Dispensary Maternity Unit at Kambe Ribe Teenage pregnancies reduced from 26% to 14% against a target of 17%. This achievement was possible through campaigns targeting young people, religious leaders, Kaya Elders, women groups and local CSOs. Coverage of family planning services increased from 38% to 48% due to availability of commodities, innovations in uptake and advocacy activities. Coverage of under 1 year of age fully immunized increased from 67.2% to 78% while the proportion of neonates with low birthweight increased from 6.7% to 9%. This was attributed to scale up of immunization services, malaria in pregnancy and household food insecurity which affected maternal nutrition respectively. Out of the 150 public health facilities, the capacity to offer high impact nutrition interventions (HiNi) and integrated management of acute malnutrition (IMAM) increased from 69 to 111. This was as a result of availability of nutrition commodities and capacity scale up support by stakeholders. 20 |

|---|

Page 42

Jibana Sub-County Hospital Vitamin A supplementation coverage among children 12-59months increased from 69% to 100% while deworming coverage among the same age cohort increased from 23% to 100% as a result of the biannual Malezi Bora scale up programme. The number of community units established increased from 83 to 255, with 100 being functional against a target of 111. The number of community health assistants (CHAs) increased from 34 to 89 while community health volunteers (CHVs) increased from 2,100 to 3,795 respectively. This was attributed to the scale up of community health strategy through universal health coverage. The nutrition improvement through cash and health education (NICHE) program also assisted a total of 92 community units in Kaloleni, Magarini and Ganze to implement baby friendly community initiative (BFCI). HIV prevalence reduced from 4.2% to 3.5% due to interventions put in place in identification, diagnosis, initiation and retention to treatment. Among the general population the proportion diagnosed with malaria reduced from 7.2% to 4.7% against a target of 2% due to scale up of malaria prevention measures. On the other hand, Tuberculosis mortality rate increased from 8% to 11% against a target 3% attributed to reduced screening and active surveillance. During the review period, the number of health workers increased from 1,386 to 1,532 translating to an increase in population ratio from 9 to 10: 10,000. The health workforce is still heavily understaffed with the doctor population ratio at 1:10,000 and nurse population ratio at 4: 10,000 against 10: 10,000 and 25: 10,000 respectively as recommended by WHO. There was also increased availability and access to health products and technologies tracer commodities from 60% to 80% against a target of 100% as a result of gradual increase in budgetary 21

| Jibana Sub-County Hospital Vitamin A supplementation coverage among children 12-59months increased from 69% to 100% while deworming coverage among the same age cohort increased from 23% to 100% as a result of the biannual Malezi Bora scale up programme. The number of community units established increased from 83 to 255, with 100 being functional against a target of 111. The number of community health assistants (CHAs) increased from 34 to 89 while community health volunteers (CHVs) increased from 2,100 to 3,795 respectively. This was attributed to the scale up of community health strategy through universal health coverage. The nutrition improvement through cash and health education (NICHE) program also assisted a total of 92 community units in Kaloleni, Magarini and Ganze to implement baby friendly community initiative (BFCI). HIV prevalence reduced from 4.2% to 3.5% due to interventions put in place in identification, diagnosis, initiation and retention to treatment. Among the general population the proportion diagnosed with malaria reduced from 7.2% to 4.7% against a target of 2% due to scale up of malaria prevention measures. On the other hand, Tuberculosis mortality rate increased from 8% to 11% against a target 3% attributed to reduced screening and active surveillance. During the review period, the number of health workers increased from 1,386 to 1,532 translating to an increase in population ratio from 9 to 10: 10,000. The health workforce is still heavily understaffed with the doctor population ratio at 1:10,000 and nurse population ratio at 4: 10,000 against 10: 10,000 and 25: 10,000 respectively as recommended by WHO. There was also increased availability and access to health products and technologies tracer commodities from 60% to 80% against a target of 100% as a result of gradual increase in budgetary 21 |

|---|

Page 43

allocation for health products. The average order fill rate reduced from 70% to 65% due to irrational supply by KEMSA. Further, the sector geospatially mapped 391 health facilities against a target of 368 while the reporting rates increased from 87% to 99% as a result of the increase in the number of health facilities. In a bid to increase access to specialized services: an intensive care unit (ICU), theatres, general wards, private wing and accident and emergency at the Kilifi County medical complex; a renal dialysis unit; one blood transfusion satellite centre at Malindi sub county Hospital were established and operationalized. The number of public hospitals offering in-patient services increased from 5- 9, those offering primary laboratory services increased from 57 to 102 while 4 level 3 public facilities were upgraded to level 4. 2.4.2. Education Sector During the review period, gross enrollment, transition and retention rates increased from 95.8%, 45% and 63% to 96.2%, 90% and 87% against a target of 97.5%, 70% and 88% respectively. In addition, the teacher-pupil ratio increased from 1: 204 at the beginning of the plan period to 1:37 against a target of 1:45. This was attributed to the construction of 785 classrooms, employment of 1,284 ECD teachers and the provision of teaching and learning materials to all the public pre- primary schools in the county. Mbomboni Primary School ECD classrooms Enrollment in the vocational training centers increased from 3,291 students at the beginning of the plan to 7,600 at the closure of the plan against a target of 5,300. The VTC completion rate increased from 37% to 80% against a target of 87%. This came as a result of the construction of classrooms where 96 were completed and 43 ongoing across the 35 wards and increased publicity and awareness campaigns. The number of vocational training centers offering ICT curriculum 22

| allocation for health products. The average order fill rate reduced from 70% to 65% due to irrational supply by KEMSA. Further, the sector geospatially mapped 391 health facilities against a target of 368 while the reporting rates increased from 87% to 99% as a result of the increase in the number of health facilities. In a bid to increase access to specialized services: an intensive care unit (ICU), theatres, general wards, private wing and accident and emergency at the Kilifi County medical complex; a renal dialysis unit; one blood transfusion satellite centre at Malindi sub county Hospital were established and operationalized. The number of public hospitals offering in-patient services increased from 5- 9, those offering primary laboratory services increased from 57 to 102 while 4 level 3 public facilities were upgraded to level 4. 2.4.2. Education Sector During the review period, gross enrollment, transition and retention rates increased from 95.8%, 45% and 63% to 96.2%, 90% and 87% against a target of 97.5%, 70% and 88% respectively. In addition, the teacher-pupil ratio increased from 1: 204 at the beginning of the plan period to 1:37 against a target of 1:45. This was attributed to the construction of 785 classrooms, employment of 1,284 ECD teachers and the provision of teaching and learning materials to all the public pre- primary schools in the county. Mbomboni Primary School ECD classrooms Enrollment in the vocational training centers increased from 3,291 students at the beginning of the plan to 7,600 at the closure of the plan against a target of 5,300. The VTC completion rate increased from 37% to 80% against a target of 87%. This came as a result of the construction of classrooms where 96 were completed and 43 ongoing across the 35 wards and increased publicity and awareness campaigns. The number of vocational training centers offering ICT curriculum 22 |

|---|

Page 44

increased from 34 to 38 vocational training centers while 36 centers were equipped with modern tools and equipment up from 24 initially equipped. 2.4.3. Environmental Protection, Water, Sanitation and Natural Resources During the review period, the proportion of households with clean water increased from 50% to 70% against a target of 90%. This was attributed to interventions such as; drilling and rehabilitation of 40 and 41 boreholes respectively, installation of 16 solar powered pumps alongside construction of 3 dams, 5 water pans and 8 shallow wells. A total of 23.5 Km water pipelines were also rehabilitated with 331.4 Km new pipelines layed; 189 Kiosks constructed and 90 water tanks installed. To enhance sanitation, the sector undertook the following: Allocated 14 acres of land for the sluge treatment facility (4 acres in Mtwapa, 2 acres in Mtondia, 4 acres in Watamu and 4 acres in Malindi) alongside purchasing Four (4) “honey suckers”. To enhance environmental governance, the sector Conducted EIAs for county projects as well as sensitized 52% of the population on waste management against a target of 38% between 2017 and 2022, in addition compliance to environmental guidelines went up from 55% to 63% during the same period. Tsunguni-Kolongoni pipeline The County forest cover increased to 21% against a target of 20% between 2017 and 2022. This was attributed to the following: placing 15% of farmland under woodlots against a target of 36%; establishment of a county tree nursery that distributed free tree seedlings to farmers; Mangrove tree planting; Green schools program; development of two Acts i.e The Kilifi County Forest Conservation and Management Act, 2019 alongside The Kilifi County Environment (Regulation and control) Act, 2016. One policy was also developed; Kilifi County Forest Policy, 2016. Further, 500 Ha of degraded land was rehabilitated against a target of 640 Ha. 23

| increased from 34 to 38 vocational training centers while 36 centers were equipped with modern tools and equipment up from 24 initially equipped. 2.4.3. Environmental Protection, Water, Sanitation and Natural Resources During the review period, the proportion of households with clean water increased from 50% to 70% against a target of 90%. This was attributed to interventions such as; drilling and rehabilitation of 40 and 41 boreholes respectively, installation of 16 solar powered pumps alongside construction of 3 dams, 5 water pans and 8 shallow wells. A total of 23.5 Km water pipelines were also rehabilitated with 331.4 Km new pipelines layed; 189 Kiosks constructed and 90 water tanks installed. To enhance sanitation, the sector undertook the following: Allocated 14 acres of land for the sluge treatment facility (4 acres in Mtwapa, 2 acres in Mtondia, 4 acres in Watamu and 4 acres in Malindi) alongside purchasing Four (4) “honey suckers”. To enhance environmental governance, the sector Conducted EIAs for county projects as well as sensitized 52% of the population on waste management against a target of 38% between 2017 and 2022, in addition compliance to environmental guidelines went up from 55% to 63% during the same period. Tsunguni-Kolongoni pipeline The County forest cover increased to 21% against a target of 20% between 2017 and 2022. This was attributed to the following: placing 15% of farmland under woodlots against a target of 36%; establishment of a county tree nursery that distributed free tree seedlings to farmers; Mangrove tree planting; Green schools program; development of two Acts i.e The Kilifi County Forest Conservation and Management Act, 2019 alongside The Kilifi County Environment (Regulation and control) Act, 2016. One policy was also developed; Kilifi County Forest Policy, 2016. Further, 500 Ha of degraded land was rehabilitated against a target of 640 Ha. 23 |

|---|

Page 45

During the review period, the sector also developed the Kilifi County Climate Act. In addition, 80 awareness meetings on mitigation and adaptation to climate change were done out of a target of 140. The proportion of household adapting climate sensitive livelihoods in the review period grew from 38% to 40%. The adoption of localized climate change sensitive technology improved to 53% against a target of 60%. This was attributed to the operationalization of the Kilifi County Climate Change Act, 2021; allocation of 0.5% of development budget to climate change actions; and awareness creation on climate change through partnerships. 2.4.4. Public Administration & Intergovernmental Relations To improve economic planning and policy coordination, the sector prepared several statutory documents on time. Namely ADP, APR, CFSP and CBROP, in addition, the Sector developed Indicator handbook and draft M & E policy. To promote sound public financial management, the County prepared timely Budget estimates (PBB) in compliance with the CFSP, the county submitted financial and audit reports as per the statutory requirements. This enabled the county to maintain a qualified audit opinion. On revenue collection, the sector targeted to increase the percentage of own source revenue as a percentage of total budget from 5% to 50% through automation and diversification of revenue streams. However due to COVID 19 outbreak, late automation and dispute between the County and authorized revenue collector among others, the county managed only to increase by 0.2%. On expenditure performance, the county absorbed Kshs. 53.5 billion against Kshs. 73.8 billion during the plan period. Reflecting an absorption rate of 72%. This was due to late exchequer releases and shortfalls in own source revenue collection. To enhance public participation and civic education, the County formulated a public participation policy and drafted a Public Participation Bill. The County continued to engage its citizens in all matters affecting them through public participation forums. To improve service delivery, the sector placed top county officials (CECMs, Cos and Directors) under performance contract and all county staff under performance appraisal system. For effective delivery of services, the sector was able to recruit/employ 35 ward administrators. This was aimed at bringing services closer to the people. 2.4.5. Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector During the review period, reported cases of child pregnancies reduced from 156 to112. This was as a result of forums on Adolescent Youth Sexual Reproductive Health (AYSRH) that transformed the behavior of adolescents and teens. In addition, the sector distributed 3,000 dignity packs to school going children and drafted the Kilifi County Child Protection Policy. Further, 200 children 24

| During the review period, the sector also developed the Kilifi County Climate Act. In addition, 80 awareness meetings on mitigation and adaptation to climate change were done out of a target of 140. The proportion of household adapting climate sensitive livelihoods in the review period grew from 38% to 40%. The adoption of localized climate change sensitive technology improved to 53% against a target of 60%. This was attributed to the operationalization of the Kilifi County Climate Change Act, 2021; allocation of 0.5% of development budget to climate change actions; and awareness creation on climate change through partnerships. 2.4.4. Public Administration & Intergovernmental Relations To improve economic planning and policy coordination, the sector prepared several statutory documents on time. Namely ADP, APR, CFSP and CBROP, in addition, the Sector developed Indicator handbook and draft M & E policy. To promote sound public financial management, the County prepared timely Budget estimates (PBB) in compliance with the CFSP, the county submitted financial and audit reports as per the statutory requirements. This enabled the county to maintain a qualified audit opinion. On revenue collection, the sector targeted to increase the percentage of own source revenue as a percentage of total budget from 5% to 50% through automation and diversification of revenue streams. However due to COVID 19 outbreak, late automation and dispute between the County and authorized revenue collector among others, the county managed only to increase by 0.2%. On expenditure performance, the county absorbed Kshs. 53.5 billion against Kshs. 73.8 billion during the plan period. Reflecting an absorption rate of 72%. This was due to late exchequer releases and shortfalls in own source revenue collection. To enhance public participation and civic education, the County formulated a public participation policy and drafted a Public Participation Bill. The County continued to engage its citizens in all matters affecting them through public participation forums. To improve service delivery, the sector placed top county officials (CECMs, Cos and Directors) under performance contract and all county staff under performance appraisal system. For effective delivery of services, the sector was able to recruit/employ 35 ward administrators. This was aimed at bringing services closer to the people. 2.4.5. Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector During the review period, reported cases of child pregnancies reduced from 156 to112. This was as a result of forums on Adolescent Youth Sexual Reproductive Health (AYSRH) that transformed the behavior of adolescents and teens. In addition, the sector distributed 3,000 dignity packs to school going children and drafted the Kilifi County Child Protection Policy. Further, 200 children 24 |

|---|

Page 46

were sensitized on life skills in order to make better and informed decisions and grow into responsible adults. The county Disability Act was assented facilitating inclusion of PWDs in County affairs. Further, the county distributed 400 assistive devices to improve PWDs self-dependence and their ability to engage in economic activities. Notably, national government cash transfers to various special groups declined as follows: From 22,269 to 8,759 beneficiaries for orphans and vulnerable children; from 2,790 to 871 beneficiaries for PWDs; and from 45, 501 to 21,929 beneficiaries for the elderly. To complement the cash transfers to the elderly, the County government transferred Ksh. 29 million annually to 1,029 beneficiaries during the review period. In addition, several foodstuff and non-food items were distributed to victims of drought and famine; and 35 community managed Disaster risk reduction committees and disaster councils were established. Chonyi Amphitheater To improve access to development opportunities for girls, boys, men and women, the county trained 2,000 women on entrepreneurship skills and held 140 GBV awareness forums. Consequently, there was an increase in number of GBV cases reported from 700 cases in 2021 to over 1,000 cases in 2022. The county also mentored 5,000 youth in various aspects of personal development, assisted the formation and nurturing of 2,500 youth groups and saw 25,000 youths participating in civic responsibility. As a result of sensitization forums conducted, 3,000 youth received funding under YEDF, WEF and UWEZO while 3,000 youth benefited from AGPO. 25

| were sensitized on life skills in order to make better and informed decisions and grow into responsible adults. The county Disability Act was assented facilitating inclusion of PWDs in County affairs. Further, the county distributed 400 assistive devices to improve PWDs self-dependence and their ability to engage in economic activities. Notably, national government cash transfers to various special groups declined as follows: From 22,269 to 8,759 beneficiaries for orphans and vulnerable children; from 2,790 to 871 beneficiaries for PWDs; and from 45, 501 to 21,929 beneficiaries for the elderly. To complement the cash transfers to the elderly, the County government transferred Ksh. 29 million annually to 1,029 beneficiaries during the review period. In addition, several foodstuff and non-food items were distributed to victims of drought and famine; and 35 community managed Disaster risk reduction committees and disaster councils were established. Chonyi Amphitheater To improve access to development opportunities for girls, boys, men and women, the county trained 2,000 women on entrepreneurship skills and held 140 GBV awareness forums. Consequently, there was an increase in number of GBV cases reported from 700 cases in 2021 to over 1,000 cases in 2022. The county also mentored 5,000 youth in various aspects of personal development, assisted the formation and nurturing of 2,500 youth groups and saw 25,000 youths participating in civic responsibility. As a result of sensitization forums conducted, 3,000 youth received funding under YEDF, WEF and UWEZO while 3,000 youth benefited from AGPO. 25 |

|---|

Page 47

Takaye Social Hall In addition, 310 teams against a target of 260 teams took part in various tournaments enabling identification of several talents in different leagues. This was attributed to rehabilitation of 18 Sports facilities against a target of 23, procurement and distribution of sports items and equipment to 385 sports teams against a target of 285.training of 20 referees, 20 coaches and 20 first aiders against a target of 50 sports personnel. 2.4.6. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries The major objective in Agriculture was to increase crop, livestock and fisheries production. In crop production, there was an increase in production per acre in the major food crops i.e., Maize and cassava. During the review period, maize production per acre increased from 3bags to 14 bags, cassava from 3-5tonnes to 20 tonnes per acre. This increase could be attributed to several interventions implemented by the county. These include input subsidies for improved and certified crop varieties amounting to 256 tonnes of seed and 190,866 seedlings, 279,674 farmers trained on good agricultural practices including climate smart agriculture, 1142Ha under irrigation farming as well as adoption of mechanization. There was an increase in Hectarage in land under crop production from 528 to 865 over the planning period. In addition to the above interventions, staff capacities were also improved including recruitment of 45 new extension staff which improved extension service delivery. 26

| Takaye Social Hall In addition, 310 teams against a target of 260 teams took part in various tournaments enabling identification of several talents in different leagues. This was attributed to rehabilitation of 18 Sports facilities against a target of 23, procurement and distribution of sports items and equipment to 385 sports teams against a target of 285.training of 20 referees, 20 coaches and 20 first aiders against a target of 50 sports personnel. 2.4.6. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries The major objective in Agriculture was to increase crop, livestock and fisheries production. In crop production, there was an increase in production per acre in the major food crops i.e., Maize and cassava. During the review period, maize production per acre increased from 3bags to 14 bags, cassava from 3-5tonnes to 20 tonnes per acre. This increase could be attributed to several interventions implemented by the county. These include input subsidies for improved and certified crop varieties amounting to 256 tonnes of seed and 190,866 seedlings, 279,674 farmers trained on good agricultural practices including climate smart agriculture, 1142Ha under irrigation farming as well as adoption of mechanization. There was an increase in Hectarage in land under crop production from 528 to 865 over the planning period. In addition to the above interventions, staff capacities were also improved including recruitment of 45 new extension staff which improved extension service delivery. 26 |

|---|

Page 48

In livestock production, there was 46 percent increase in milk production from 6,335,156 litres of milk to 11,020,977 litres of milk due to improved dairy breeds as a result of scaled up provision of Artificial insemination services. A total of 16,409 inseminations were carried out in the county. A total of 729 dairy cattle were procured and distributed to the farmers’ county wide. The sector also recorded an increase in livestock export processing activities with a total of 15,000 goats and sheep processed and exported through Ngomeni port to Oman and middle east, and 30 hybrid galla goats from ADC Galana and Kisiwani were processed and exported to Bujumbura in Burundi. Dairy Units at ATC Mtwapa Further, there was 50 percent Increase in vaccinations activities with 2,055,522 animals reached with vaccines in the county. An estimated 23,366 metric tonnes of meat was inspected and passed as fit for human consumption at 15 slaughterhouses in the county. To increase access to livestock markets the sector established 5 livestock sale yards in the county thus leading to improved income for the farmers. Chevon and mutton production in the county increased by 39 percent due to procurement and distribution of 1,819 hybrid galla goats to farmers for breed improvement. During the review period, there was a decline in fish catch landings attributed to reduced marine fish production. Specifically, the production from the marine fisheries was 29,576 metric tonnes worth Kshs 2,750 billion. However, to encourage more marine fish production, there was provision of fishing gears to 283 fishermen. In addition, 5 fish landing facilities and 890 fish traders/BMUs members were trained on fish handling, quality and safety issues; 4 functional fisherman cooperative societies established; 4 functional policies and legislation were developed; and 4 spatial plans for fishing grounds were developed. societies were established. The sector also experienced an increase in Fish tonnage in aquaculture from 2,697kg to 3,171kgs annual production. This was attributed to the rehabilitation of 94 fish ponds and establishment 3 aquaculture hatcheries. 27

| In livestock production, there was 46 percent increase in milk production from 6,335,156 litres of milk to 11,020,977 litres of milk due to improved dairy breeds as a result of scaled up provision of Artificial insemination services. A total of 16,409 inseminations were carried out in the county. A total of 729 dairy cattle were procured and distributed to the farmers’ county wide. The sector also recorded an increase in livestock export processing activities with a total of 15,000 goats and sheep processed and exported through Ngomeni port to Oman and middle east, and 30 hybrid galla goats from ADC Galana and Kisiwani were processed and exported to Bujumbura in Burundi. Dairy Units at ATC Mtwapa Further, there was 50 percent Increase in vaccinations activities with 2,055,522 animals reached with vaccines in the county. An estimated 23,366 metric tonnes of meat was inspected and passed as fit for human consumption at 15 slaughterhouses in the county. To increase access to livestock markets the sector established 5 livestock sale yards in the county thus leading to improved income for the farmers. Chevon and mutton production in the county increased by 39 percent due to procurement and distribution of 1,819 hybrid galla goats to farmers for breed improvement. During the review period, there was a decline in fish catch landings attributed to reduced marine fish production. Specifically, the production from the marine fisheries was 29,576 metric tonnes worth Kshs 2,750 billion. However, to encourage more marine fish production, there was provision of fishing gears to 283 fishermen. In addition, 5 fish landing facilities and 890 fish traders/BMUs members were trained on fish handling, quality and safety issues; 4 functional fisherman cooperative societies established; 4 functional policies and legislation were developed; and 4 spatial plans for fishing grounds were developed. societies were established. The sector also experienced an increase in Fish tonnage in aquaculture from 2,697kg to 3,171kgs annual production. This was attributed to the rehabilitation of 94 fish ponds and establishment 3 aquaculture hatcheries. 27 |

|---|

Page 49

Installation of fish mill facilities at ATC Mtwapa 2.4.7. Lands, Housing, physical Planning and Urban Development To enhance access to clean, adequate, affordable and decent housing for the population in Kilifi County, the sector achieved the following: undertook feasibility studies and market surveys to inform strategy and plans; opened and upgraded 40 kilometres of access roads in settlement schemes against a target of 100 kilometres; and established a County housing mortgage facility amounting to KShs.120 million. To improve physical planning, the sector developed and approved a county spatial plan; prepared 30 urban centre plans out of which 4 were approved; and established 2 municipalities within the county against a target of 5. Security of tenure in Kilifi County remained a top priority. Towards this, the sector surveyed and valued 22,997 Hectares of land; facilitated allocation of 24,130 plots; surveyed and completed 6 settlement schemes and adjudicated sections; facilitated award of land title deeds to 78 public institutions and surveyed 10 urban and trading centres. To enhance accountability in utilisation of public assets, the sector developed and operationalized a Countywide valuation roll and generated a county assets value report. Further, to enhance access to land information the sector established and operationalized a GIS lab; and set up a Land Information Management System. 2.4.8. Energy and Infrastructure Sector During the review period, the proportion of households connected to electricity grid increased from 21% to 64%. This is due to Kenya power and Lightning Company having connected bigger number of people more than the target under the rural electrification programme. In addition, over 200 streetlights and over 100 high mast were installed. Proportion of electricity generated from renewable energy sources disaggregated by type and use (MW) increased from 3MW to 44MW. This is due to establishment of a 40MW Solar power generation plant in the county and the Gongoni salt ltd which developed two solar 28

| Installation of fish mill facilities at ATC Mtwapa 2.4.7. Lands, Housing, physical Planning and Urban Development To enhance access to clean, adequate, affordable and decent housing for the population in Kilifi County, the sector achieved the following: undertook feasibility studies and market surveys to inform strategy and plans; opened and upgraded 40 kilometres of access roads in settlement schemes against a target of 100 kilometres; and established a County housing mortgage facility amounting to KShs.120 million. To improve physical planning, the sector developed and approved a county spatial plan; prepared 30 urban centre plans out of which 4 were approved; and established 2 municipalities within the county against a target of 5. Security of tenure in Kilifi County remained a top priority. Towards this, the sector surveyed and valued 22,997 Hectares of land; facilitated allocation of 24,130 plots; surveyed and completed 6 settlement schemes and adjudicated sections; facilitated award of land title deeds to 78 public institutions and surveyed 10 urban and trading centres. To enhance accountability in utilisation of public assets, the sector developed and operationalized a Countywide valuation roll and generated a county assets value report. Further, to enhance access to land information the sector established and operationalized a GIS lab; and set up a Land Information Management System. 2.4.8. Energy and Infrastructure Sector During the review period, the proportion of households connected to electricity grid increased from 21% to 64%. This is due to Kenya power and Lightning Company having connected bigger number of people more than the target under the rural electrification programme. In addition, over 200 streetlights and over 100 high mast were installed. Proportion of electricity generated from renewable energy sources disaggregated by type and use (MW) increased from 3MW to 44MW. This is due to establishment of a 40MW Solar power generation plant in the county and the Gongoni salt ltd which developed two solar 28 |

|---|

Page 50

power plants of capacity 0.5MW each for their industrial use. The number of households using energy saving jikos and related technologies increased from 50 to 3,000. The sector signed an MoU with E4I to implement a GCF project funded by GIZ where a total of 3,000 Installation of floodlights in Shimo La Tewa households are benefiting from the project. The first phase of the project is complete. In addition, the county did an energy resource mapping where they identified areas which are potential for energy investments in the areas of wind, sun, biomass, municipal waste and oil and gas. During the review period, the county paved 50km of roads, improved, rehabilitated and maintained 1,556km road network against a target of 2,500km; maintained/rehabilitated 10foot bridges; and rehabilitated 8km of storm drainage against a target of 20km. Further, the sector expanded 2 existing bus parks and constructed 2 new bus parks and installed 200 streetlights and mass lights. 29

| power plants of capacity 0.5MW each for their industrial use. The number of households using energy saving jikos and related technologies increased from 50 to 3,000. The sector signed an MoU with E4I to implement a GCF project funded by GIZ where a total of 3,000 Installation of floodlights in Shimo La Tewa households are benefiting from the project. The first phase of the project is complete. In addition, the county did an energy resource mapping where they identified areas which are potential for energy investments in the areas of wind, sun, biomass, municipal waste and oil and gas. During the review period, the county paved 50km of roads, improved, rehabilitated and maintained 1,556km road network against a target of 2,500km; maintained/rehabilitated 10foot bridges; and rehabilitated 8km of storm drainage against a target of 20km. Further, the sector expanded 2 existing bus parks and constructed 2 new bus parks and installed 200 streetlights and mass lights. 29 |

|---|

Page 51

Upgrading to bitumen ndonya to mzambarauni road 2.4.9. Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development During the period under review the sector priorities included: promotion of trade and investments; SMEs funding, promotion and marketing of county tourism sites; promotion and strengthening of co-operative societies; consumer protection and protection of fair business practices. On market development the sector constructed 17 new markets and refurbished 5 markets, secured 6 markets with a wall fence, constructed 16 sanitary facilities, and drilled 2 bore holes. On trade development, Kshs 321,000,000 was disbursed to 2,426 groups and 34 co-operatives through the Kilifi County Micro Finance Fund which is mandated to provide seed capital to SMEs. The beneficiaries were also trained on financial management and entrepreneurship. On investment promotion, four key sector profiles and 12 bankable investment projects were developed. On consumer protection, the County unit of weights and measures calibrated 8,730 weighing machines, inspected 390 trade premises and developed working standards and tools. To enhance Tourism Development and promotion, the sector constructed Sabaki estuary visitor Banda; engaged in 6 Beach Cleanup Campaigns; conducted 8 media advertisements; and organized 3 Cultural tourism festivals and 10 sport tourism events. In addition, the sector trained 200 beach operators and 4 community based eco-tourism groups. To market Kilifi as a tourist destination the sector also participated in both local and international tourism fairs and exhibitions and facilitated destination marketing through digital marketing platform ‘This is Kilifi’ and to improve on tourism infrastructure the sector facilitated construction of Watamu Tourism market perimeter wall, guard house and ablution block 30

| Upgrading to bitumen ndonya to mzambarauni road 2.4.9. Trade, Tourism, Industrialization and Cooperatives Development During the period under review the sector priorities included: promotion of trade and investments; SMEs funding, promotion and marketing of county tourism sites; promotion and strengthening of co-operative societies; consumer protection and protection of fair business practices. On market development the sector constructed 17 new markets and refurbished 5 markets, secured 6 markets with a wall fence, constructed 16 sanitary facilities, and drilled 2 bore holes. On trade development, Kshs 321,000,000 was disbursed to 2,426 groups and 34 co-operatives through the Kilifi County Micro Finance Fund which is mandated to provide seed capital to SMEs. The beneficiaries were also trained on financial management and entrepreneurship. On investment promotion, four key sector profiles and 12 bankable investment projects were developed. On consumer protection, the County unit of weights and measures calibrated 8,730 weighing machines, inspected 390 trade premises and developed working standards and tools. To enhance Tourism Development and promotion, the sector constructed Sabaki estuary visitor Banda; engaged in 6 Beach Cleanup Campaigns; conducted 8 media advertisements; and organized 3 Cultural tourism festivals and 10 sport tourism events. In addition, the sector trained 200 beach operators and 4 community based eco-tourism groups. To market Kilifi as a tourist destination the sector also participated in both local and international tourism fairs and exhibitions and facilitated destination marketing through digital marketing platform ‘This is Kilifi’ and to improve on tourism infrastructure the sector facilitated construction of Watamu Tourism market perimeter wall, guard house and ablution block 30 |

|---|

Page 52

To promote and strengthen co-operatives, the co-operative directorate conducted co-operative awareness and publicity events, offered extension and advisory services and facilitated value addition of co-operative products that resulted in; registration of 54 new co-operative societies, completion of 334 co-operative statutory audits, completion of 66 co-operative inspections and impromptu checks, development of 8 strategic plans for agro-marketing co-operatives. A total of 65-member education days and 72 committee workshops for co-operative leaders were also held. Mtwapa Market and Loading Bay On matters research and development, the sector also conducted feasibility studies on revitalization of Dairy, Coconut and Cashew value Chains: conducted baseline survey on status of co-operatives in the county and SMEs in Kilifi and Malindi municipalities. In addition, sector 5-year strategic plans for Kilifi County Micro Finance Fund, Trade, Tourism and Co-operatives divisions were developed. 2.5 Challenges The County faced the following challenges during the implementation of the CIDP II: i. Inadequate budgetary allocations and delays in exchequer release for implementation of most of projects and programmes; ii. Inadequate human resource and technical skills in most of the sectors; iii. Inadequate statistics to inform policy formulation, planning, monitoring and evaluation; iv. Switching donor priorities due to global shocks; v. Reduction in donor funding caused a strain in the department’s budget especially in funding primary health care; vi. Lack of a proper framework to coordinate partners and stakeholders across sectors; and vii. Climate change related issues such as floods and droughts. 31

| To promote and strengthen co-operatives, the co-operative directorate conducted co-operative awareness and publicity events, offered extension and advisory services and facilitated value addition of co-operative products that resulted in; registration of 54 new co-operative societies, completion of 334 co-operative statutory audits, completion of 66 co-operative inspections and impromptu checks, development of 8 strategic plans for agro-marketing co-operatives. A total of 65-member education days and 72 committee workshops for co-operative leaders were also held. Mtwapa Market and Loading Bay On matters research and development, the sector also conducted feasibility studies on revitalization of Dairy, Coconut and Cashew value Chains: conducted baseline survey on status of co-operatives in the county and SMEs in Kilifi and Malindi municipalities. In addition, sector 5-year strategic plans for Kilifi County Micro Finance Fund, Trade, Tourism and Co-operatives divisions were developed. 2.5 Challenges The County faced the following challenges during the implementation of the CIDP II: i. Inadequate budgetary allocations and delays in exchequer release for implementation of most of projects and programmes; ii. Inadequate human resource and technical skills in most of the sectors; iii. Inadequate statistics to inform policy formulation, planning, monitoring and evaluation; iv. Switching donor priorities due to global shocks; v. Reduction in donor funding caused a strain in the department’s budget especially in funding primary health care; vi. Lack of a proper framework to coordinate partners and stakeholders across sectors; and vii. Climate change related issues such as floods and droughts. 31 |

|---|

Page 53

2.6 Emerging Issues The following were the emerging issues during the plan period: i. COVID-19 Pandemic; ii. Emerging pests and diseases; and iii. Policy shift especially imposition of VAT on agricultural machineries. 2.7. Lessons Learnt The following were the lessons learnt during the implementation of the previous CIDP: i. A resource mobilization strategy can supplement, support and sustain program implementation; ii. Early engagement of the county assembly in policy formulation and planning is critical; iii. Well-coordinated M&E and statistical systems is critical for implementation of the CIDP; iv. Automation of services can enhance service delivery; v. Anticipatory/risk informed planning is critical; vi. Multi-stakeholder approach to implementation of programs is critical; and vii. Public private partnership can support implementation of various mega projects. 2.8 Natural Resource Assessment This section discusses the major natural resources found within the county. The resources are summarized in Table 2.3. 32

| 2.6 Emerging Issues The following were the emerging issues during the plan period: i. COVID-19 Pandemic; ii. Emerging pests and diseases; and iii. Policy shift especially imposition of VAT on agricultural machineries. 2.7. Lessons Learnt The following were the lessons learnt during the implementation of the previous CIDP: i. A resource mobilization strategy can supplement, support and sustain program implementation; ii. Early engagement of the county assembly in policy formulation and planning is critical; iii. Well-coordinated M&E and statistical systems is critical for implementation of the CIDP; iv. Automation of services can enhance service delivery; v. Anticipatory/risk informed planning is critical; vi. Multi-stakeholder approach to implementation of programs is critical; and vii. Public private partnership can support implementation of various mega projects. 2.8 Natural Resource Assessment This section discusses the major natural resources found within the county. The resources are summarized in Table 2.3. 32 |

|---|

Page 54

Table 2.3: Natural Resource Assessment Natural Dependent Status, Level of Opportunities for Constraints to Existing Resource Sector utilization; scenario optimal utilization optimal sustainable for the future utilization management strategies Rivers Irrigation High sediment load Ecotourism High turbidity Protection of (Sabaki, Water leading to increased rates. riparian Galana) Agriculture turbidity due to soil Hydro- electric erosion. power Increased Institute contamination. mechanisms to High degradation of Waste treatment reduce soil water catchment areas facilities Limited financial erosion e.g. resources river bank Eutrophication due A d option of rehabilitation. to excessive use of modern irrigation Occasional inorganic fertilizers systems. floods, expensive Monitor water investment, quality Uncontrolled Improvement of regularly. abstraction leading to water distribution decline in networks. Undertake volumes catchment management and conservation Hills Water High degradation and Gazettement and Drought, charcoal Legal (mwanga) Tourism encroachment by undertaking active production and enforcement Forestry human beings rehabilitation encroachment Agriculture Community management teams Woodlands Tourism Degradation and Gazettement and Charcoal Community (Dakacha) Agriculture encroachment undertaking active production engagement Forestry rehabilitation Wildlife Encroachment by Energy local farmers Marine Fishery Marine litter Embrace of blue Water pollution, awareness Tourism economy Rising sea levels creation, Wildlife Upstream pollution, investment protection and Education and opportunities Coral bleaching management of research Declining of the the marine fishing and tourism ecosystem, industry, Kenya marine Encroachment of the action plan, beach shore BMU regulations 2007 33

| Table 2.3: Natural Resource Assessment Natural Dependent Status, Level of Opportunities for Constraints to Existing Resource Sector utilization; scenario optimal utilization optimal sustainable for the future utilization management strategies Rivers Irrigation High sediment load Ecotourism High turbidity Protection of (Sabaki, Water leading to increased rates. riparian Galana) Agriculture turbidity due to soil Hydro- electric erosion. power Increased Institute contamination. mechanisms to High degradation of Waste treatment reduce soil water catchment areas facilities Limited financial erosion e.g. resources river bank Eutrophication due A d option of rehabilitation. to excessive use of modern irrigation Occasional inorganic fertilizers systems. floods, expensive Monitor water investment, quality Uncontrolled Improvement of regularly. abstraction leading to water distribution decline in networks. Undertake volumes catchment management and conservation Hills Water High degradation and Gazettement and Drought, charcoal Legal (mwanga) Tourism encroachment by undertaking active production and enforcement Forestry human beings rehabilitation encroachment Agriculture Community management teams Woodlands Tourism Degradation and Gazettement and Charcoal Community (Dakacha) Agriculture encroachment undertaking active production engagement Forestry rehabilitation Wildlife Encroachment by Energy local farmers Marine Fishery Marine litter Embrace of blue Water pollution, awareness Tourism economy Rising sea levels creation, Wildlife Upstream pollution, investment protection and Education and opportunities Coral bleaching management of research Declining of the the marine fishing and tourism ecosystem, industry, Kenya marine Encroachment of the action plan, beach shore BMU regulations 2007 33 |

|---|

| Natural Resource | Dependent Sector | Status, Level of utilization; scenario for the future | Opportunities for optimal utilization | Constraints to optimal utilization | | | | Existing | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | | sustainable | |

| | | | | | | | | management | |

| | | | | | | | | strategies | |

| Rivers (Sabaki, Galana) | Irrigation Water Agriculture | High sediment load leading to increased turbidity due to soil erosion. High degradation of water catchment areas Eutrophication due to excessive use of inorganic fertilizers Uncontrolled abstraction leading to decline in volumes | Ecotourism Hydro- electric power Waste treatment facilities A d option of modern irrigation systems. Improvement of water distribution networks. | High turbidity rates. Increased contamination. Limited financial resources Occasional floods, expensive investment, | | | | Protection of | |

| | | | | | | | | riparian | |

| | | | | | | | | Institute | |

| | | | | | | | | mechanisms to | |

| | | | | | | | | reduce soil | |

| | | | | | | | | erosion e.g. | |

| | | | | | | | | river bank | |

| | | | | | | | | rehabilitation. | |

| | | | | | | | | Monitor water | |

| | | | | | | | | quality | |

| | | | | | | | | regularly. | |

| | | | | | | | | Undertake | |

| | | | | | | | | catchment | |

| | | | | | | | | management | |

| | | | | | | | | and | |

| | | | | | | | | conservation | |

| Hills (mwanga) | Water Tourism Forestry Agriculture | High degradation and encroachment by human beings | Gazettement and undertaking active rehabilitation | Drought, charcoal production and encroachment | | | | Legal | |

| | | | | | | | | enforcement | |

| | | | | | | | | Community | |

| | | | | | | | | management | |

| | | | | | | | | teams | |

| Woodlands (Dakacha) | Tourism Agriculture Forestry Wildlife Energy | Degradation and encroachment | Gazettement and undertaking active rehabilitation | | Charcoal | | Community engagement | Community | |

| | | | | | production | | | engagement | |

| | | | | | Encroachment by | | | | |

| | | | | | local farmers | | | | |

| Marine | Fishery Tourism Wildlife Education and research | Marine litter Upstream pollution, Declining of the fishing and tourism industry, Encroachment of the beach shore | Embrace of blue economy investment opportunities | Water pollution, Rising sea levels Coral bleaching | Water pollution, | | | awareness | |

| | | | | | Rising sea levels | | | creation, | |

| | | | | | | | | protection and | |

| | | | | | Coral bleaching | | | management of | |

| | | | | | | | | the marine | |

| | | | | | | | | ecosystem, | |

| | | | | | | | | Kenya marine | |

| | | | | | | | | action plan, | |

| | | | | | | | | BMU | |

| | | | | | | | | regulations | |

| | | | | | | | | 2007 | |

| Natural |

|---|

| Resource |

| Dependent |

|---|

| Sector |

| Status, Level of |

|---|

| utilization; scenario |

| for the future |

| Opportunities for |

|---|

| optimal utilization |

| Constraints to |

|---|

| optimal |

| utilization |

| Rivers |

|---|

| (Sabaki, |

| Galana) |

| Irrigation |

|---|

| Water |

| Agriculture |

| High sediment load |

|---|

| leading to increased |

| turbidity due to soil |

| erosion. |

| High degradation of |

| water catchment areas |

| Eutrophication due |

| to excessive use of |

| inorganic fertilizers |

| Uncontrolled |

| abstraction leading to |

| decline in |

| volumes |

| Ecotourism |

|---|

| Hydro- electric |

| power |

| Waste treatment |

| facilities |

| A d option of |

| modern irrigation |

| systems. |

| Improvement of |

| water distribution |

| networks. |

| High turbidity |

|---|

| rates. |

| Increased |

| contamination. |

| Limited financial |

| resources |

| Occasional |

| floods, expensive |

| investment, |

| Hills |

|---|

| (mwanga) |

| Water |

|---|

| Tourism |

| Forestry |

| Agriculture |

| High degradation and |

|---|

| encroachment by |

| human beings |

| Gazettement and |

|---|

| undertaking active |

| rehabilitation |

| Drought, charcoal |

|---|

| production and |

| encroachment |

| Woodlands |

|---|

| (Dakacha) |

| Tourism |

|---|

| Agriculture |

| Forestry |

| Wildlife |

| Energy |

| Degradation and |

|---|

| encroachment |

| Gazettement and |

|---|

| undertaking active |

| rehabilitation |

| Fishery |

|---|

| Tourism |

| Wildlife |

| Education and |

| research |

| Marine litter |

|---|

| Upstream pollution, |

| Declining of the |

| fishing and tourism |

| industry, |

| Encroachment of the |

| beach shore |

| Embrace of blue |

|---|

| economy |

| investment |

| opportunities |

Page 55

Natural Dependent Status, Level of Opportunities for Constraints to Existing Resource Sector utilization; scenario optimal utilization optimal sustainable for the future utilization management strategies Forest (Kaya, Agriculture Degradation of the Conserved for Negative Rehabilitation Mangrove, Fisheries forest, used for cultural tourism and perception that of the kaya Arabuko Tourism practices, cultural heritage, kaya forest is used forest by Saboke) Health sacred purpose for evil practices national Construction Overexploitation, museum of Forestry fragile ecosystem Establishment of Prolonged Kenya and nature-based drought county Sacred Kaya forests: enterprises, carbon government High levels of trading, fertile fish Inadequate legal deforestation and breeding ground frame work for National degradation carbon trading, mangrove illegal logging, management encroachment and plan, pollution of community mangrove forest engagement by salt firms, through the nature base Inadequate enterprise funding opportunities Strict enforcement of the National Environmental Acts (NEMA) along with other legislations. Mineral Manufacturing Unregulated mining, Availability of Inadequate data County mining resources Trade abundant raw on mineral consent. (Manganese, Construction Unrehabilitated materials for deposits and their iron ore, Health mining sites manufacturing and location. Review of EIA ballast, Coral construction. reports for blocks, Lack of policy on mining Titanium, Salt, mineral resource activities, Sand) exploitation and community Develop benefits. regulations for artisan mining. 2.8 Development Issues This section presents key sector development issues and their causes as identified during data collection and analysis stage. The information is provided as indicated in Table 2.4. 34

| Natural Dependent Status, Level of Opportunities for Constraints to Existing Resource Sector utilization; scenario optimal utilization optimal sustainable for the future utilization management strategies Forest (Kaya, Agriculture Degradation of the Conserved for Negative Rehabilitation Mangrove, Fisheries forest, used for cultural tourism and perception that of the kaya Arabuko Tourism practices, cultural heritage, kaya forest is used forest by Saboke) Health sacred purpose for evil practices national Construction Overexploitation, museum of Forestry fragile ecosystem Establishment of Prolonged Kenya and nature-based drought county Sacred Kaya forests: enterprises, carbon government High levels of trading, fertile fish Inadequate legal deforestation and breeding ground frame work for National degradation carbon trading, mangrove illegal logging, management encroachment and plan, pollution of community mangrove forest engagement by salt firms, through the nature base Inadequate enterprise funding opportunities Strict enforcement of the National Environmental Acts (NEMA) along with other legislations. Mineral Manufacturing Unregulated mining, Availability of Inadequate data County mining resources Trade abundant raw on mineral consent. (Manganese, Construction Unrehabilitated materials for deposits and their iron ore, Health mining sites manufacturing and location. Review of EIA ballast, Coral construction. reports for blocks, Lack of policy on mining Titanium, Salt, mineral resource activities, Sand) exploitation and community Develop benefits. regulations for artisan mining. 2.8 Development Issues This section presents key sector development issues and their causes as identified during data collection and analysis stage. The information is provided as indicated in Table 2.4. 34 |

|---|

| Natural Resource | Dependent Sector | Status, Level of utilization; scenario for the future | Opportunities for optimal utilization | Constraints to optimal utilization | | | | Existing | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | | sustainable | |

| | | | | | | | | management | |

| | | | | | | | | strategies | |

| Forest (Kaya, Mangrove, Arabuko Saboke) | Agriculture Fisheries Tourism Health Construction Forestry | Degradation of the forest, used for cultural practices, Overexploitation, fragile ecosystem Sacred Kaya forests: High levels of deforestation and degradation | Conserved for tourism and cultural heritage, sacred purpose Establishment of nature-based enterprises, carbon trading, fertile fish breeding ground | Negative perception that kaya forest is used for evil practices Prolonged drought Inadequate legal frame work for carbon trading, illegal logging, encroachment and pollution of mangrove forest by salt firms, Inadequate funding opportunities | | | | Rehabilitation | |

| | | | | | | | | of the kaya | |

| | | | | | | | | forest by | |

| | | | | | | | | national | |

| | | | | | | | | museum of | |

| | | | | | | | | Kenya and | |

| | | | | | | | | county | |

| | | | | | | | | government | |

| | | | | | | | | National | |

| | | | | | | | | mangrove | |

| | | | | | | | | management | |

| | | | | | | | | plan, | |

| | | | | | | | | community | |

| | | | | | | | | engagement | |

| | | | | | | | | through the | |

| | | | | | | | | nature base | |

| | | | | | | | | enterprise | |

| | | | | | | | | Strict | |

| | | | | | | | | enforcement of | |

| | | | | | | | | the National | |

| | | | | | | | | Environmental | |

| | | | | | | | | Acts (NEMA) | |

| | | | | | | | | along with other | |

| | | | | | | | | legislations. | |

| Mineral resources (Manganese, iron ore, ballast, Coral blocks, Titanium, Salt, Sand) | Manufacturing Trade Construction Health | Unregulated mining, Unrehabilitated mining sites | Availability of abundant raw materials for manufacturing and construction. | | Inadequate data | | | County mining | |

| | | | | | on mineral | | | consent. | |

| | | | | | deposits and their | | | | |

| | | | | | location. | | | Review of EIA | |

| | | | | | | | | reports for | |

| | | | | | Lack of policy on | | | mining | |

| | | | | | mineral resource | | | activities, | |

| | | | | | exploitation and | | | | |

| | | | | | community | | | Develop | |

| | | | | | benefits. | | | regulations for | |

| | | | | | | | | artisan mining. | |

| Natural |

|---|

| Resource |

| Dependent |

|---|

| Sector |

| Status, Level of |

|---|

| utilization; scenario |

| for the future |

| Opportunities for |

|---|

| optimal utilization |

| Constraints to |

|---|

| optimal |

| utilization |

| Forest (Kaya, |

|---|

| Mangrove, |

| Arabuko |

| Saboke) |

| Agriculture |

|---|

| Fisheries |

| Tourism |

| Health |

| Construction |

| Forestry |

| Degradation of the |

|---|

| forest, used for cultural |

| practices, |

| Overexploitation, |

| fragile ecosystem |

| Sacred Kaya forests: |

| High levels of |

| deforestation and |

| degradation |

| Conserved for |

|---|

| tourism and |

| cultural heritage, |

| sacred purpose |

| Establishment of |

| nature-based |

| enterprises, carbon |

| trading, fertile fish |

| breeding ground |

| Negative |

|---|

| perception that |

| kaya forest is used |

| for evil practices |

| Prolonged |

| drought |

| Inadequate legal |

| frame work for |

| carbon trading, |

| illegal logging, |

| encroachment and |

| pollution of |

| mangrove forest |

| by salt firms, |

| Inadequate |

| funding |

| opportunities |

| Mineral |

|---|

| resources |

| (Manganese, |

| iron ore, |

| ballast, Coral |

| blocks, |

| Titanium, Salt, |

| Sand) |

| Manufacturing |

|---|

| Trade |

| Construction |

| Health |

| Unregulated mining, |

|---|

| Unrehabilitated |

| mining sites |

| Availability of |

|---|

| abundant raw |

| materials for |

| manufacturing and |

| construction. |

Page 56

Table 2.4: Development Issues Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Education Low access to Inadequate infrastructural Inadequate resource Availability of trained quality vocational facilities allocation instructors in the job training and market education Inadequate vocational Lack of publicity and Availability of donors training instructors awareness campaigns and well wishers Lack of awareness about Inadequate trainings Availability of ready VT programs by the market for VTC hand community made products Obsolete trades and programs Inadequate modern training tools and equipment for the VTCs Low access to Inadequate infrastructural Inadequate budgetary Availability of land quality pre-primary facilities allocation education Availability of well- Inadequate ECDE Lack of capitation for wishers and donors teachers and skilled pre-primary schools personnel Inadequate trainings Availability of a large pool of well-trained Cultural and religious beliefs by the community ECDE citizenry Availability of ECD levies classrooms connected electricity Household food insecurity Inadequate teaching and learning materials In adequate furniture Lack of pre-primary education policy in the county Inadequate digital learning resources 35

| Table 2.4: Development Issues Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Education Low access to Inadequate infrastructural Inadequate resource Availability of trained quality vocational facilities allocation instructors in the job training and market education Inadequate vocational Lack of publicity and Availability of donors training instructors awareness campaigns and well wishers Lack of awareness about Inadequate trainings Availability of ready VT programs by the market for VTC hand community made products Obsolete trades and programs Inadequate modern training tools and equipment for the VTCs Low access to Inadequate infrastructural Inadequate budgetary Availability of land quality pre-primary facilities allocation education Availability of well- Inadequate ECDE Lack of capitation for wishers and donors teachers and skilled pre-primary schools personnel Inadequate trainings Availability of a large pool of well-trained Cultural and religious beliefs by the community ECDE citizenry Availability of ECD levies classrooms connected electricity Household food insecurity Inadequate teaching and learning materials In adequate furniture Lack of pre-primary education policy in the county Inadequate digital learning resources 35 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Education | Education | | Low access to quality vocational training and education | Low access to | | | Inadequate infrastructural | | Inadequate resource allocation Lack of publicity and awareness campaigns Inadequate trainings | Inadequate resource | | Availability of trained instructors in the job market Availability of donors and well wishers Availability of ready market for VTC hand made products | Availability of trained | |

| | | | | quality vocational | | | facilities | | | allocation | | | instructors in the job | |

| | | | | training and | | | | | | | | | market | |

| | | | | education | | | Inadequate vocational | | | Lack of publicity and | | | Availability of donors | |

| | | | | | | | training instructors | | | awareness campaigns | | | and well wishers | |

| | | | | | | | Lack of awareness about | | | Inadequate trainings | | | Availability of ready | |

| | | | | | | | VT programs by the | | | | | | market for VTC hand | |

| | | | | | | | community | | | | | | made products | |

| | | | | | | | Obsolete trades and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | programs | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate modern | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | training tools and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | equipment for the VTCs | | | | | | | |

| | | | Low access to quality pre-primary education | | | | Inadequate infrastructural | | Inadequate budgetary allocation Lack of capitation for pre-primary schools Inadequate trainings | | | Availability of land Availability of well- wishers and donors Availability of a large pool of well-trained ECDE citizenry Availability of classrooms connected electricity | | |

| | | | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate ECDE | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | teachers and skilled | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | personnel | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Cultural and religious | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | beliefs by the community | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | ECD levies | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Household food | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | insecurity | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate teaching and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | learning materials | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | In adequate furniture | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Lack of pre-primary | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | education policy in the | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | county | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate digital | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | learning resources | | | | | | | |

| Low access to |

|---|

| quality pre-primary |

| education |

| Inadequate budgetary |

|---|

| allocation |

| Lack of capitation for |

| pre-primary schools |

| Inadequate trainings |

| Availability of land |

|---|

| Availability of well- |

| wishers and donors |

| Availability of a large |

| pool of well-trained |

| ECDE citizenry |

| Availability of |

| classrooms connected |

| electricity |

Page 57

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Water, Inadequate access Inadequate water Inadequate funding Unexploited water environment to clean and safe infrastructure sources and natural water Inadequate legislative resources Weak water governance frameworks Development partners Inadequate maintenance Inadequate technical staff Existing legal of water infrastructure frameworks Over reliance on High salinity levels in Solar energy potential electricity to power water some parts of the County supply Inadequate Inadequate sanitation Poor urban planning availability of Land sanitation services infrastructure Inadequate legal Potential development Inadequate awareness on framework partners sanitation Inadequate funding County spatial plan Environmental Climate Change impacts Poor urban planning National and global degradation climate change financing Deforestation Inadequate policy and mechanism legal framework Weak environmental County climate change governance Inadequate budgetary fund allocation Inadequate waste Nature based projects management Weak coordination infrastructure framework on Potential for renewable environmental energy Inadequate conservation. Environmental Adequate land Awareness High poverty levels County spatial plan & Unsustainable natural GIS Lab. resource exploitation Circular Economy & Increased pollution Waste to energy. climate proofing technologies projects 36

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Water, Inadequate access Inadequate water Inadequate funding Unexploited water environment to clean and safe infrastructure sources and natural water Inadequate legislative resources Weak water governance frameworks Development partners Inadequate maintenance Inadequate technical staff Existing legal of water infrastructure frameworks Over reliance on High salinity levels in Solar energy potential electricity to power water some parts of the County supply Inadequate Inadequate sanitation Poor urban planning availability of Land sanitation services infrastructure Inadequate legal Potential development Inadequate awareness on framework partners sanitation Inadequate funding County spatial plan Environmental Climate Change impacts Poor urban planning National and global degradation climate change financing Deforestation Inadequate policy and mechanism legal framework Weak environmental County climate change governance Inadequate budgetary fund allocation Inadequate waste Nature based projects management Weak coordination infrastructure framework on Potential for renewable environmental energy Inadequate conservation. Environmental Adequate land Awareness High poverty levels County spatial plan & Unsustainable natural GIS Lab. resource exploitation Circular Economy & Increased pollution Waste to energy. climate proofing technologies projects 36 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Water, environment and natural resources | Water, | | Inadequate access to clean and safe water | Inadequate access | | | Inadequate water | | | Inadequate funding | | Unexploited water sources Development partners Existing legal frameworks Solar energy potential | Unexploited water | |

| | environment | | | to clean and safe | | | infrastructure | | | | | | sources | |

| | and natural | | | water | | | | | | Inadequate legislative | | | | |

| | resources | | | | | | Weak water governance | | | frameworks | | | Development partners | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate maintenance | | | Inadequate technical staff | | | Existing legal | |

| | | | | | | | of water infrastructure | | | | | | frameworks | |

| | | | | | | | Over reliance on | | | High salinity levels in | | | Solar energy potential | |

| | | | | | | | electricity to power water | | | some parts of the County | | | | |

| | | | | | | | supply | | | | | | | |

| | | | Inadequate sanitation services | | | | Inadequate sanitation | | | Poor urban planning | | | availability of Land | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Inadequate legal | | | Potential development | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate awareness on | | | framework | | | partners | |

| | | | | | | | sanitation | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Inadequate funding | | | County spatial plan | |

| | | | Environmental degradation | | | Climate Change impacts Deforestation Weak environmental governance Inadequate waste management infrastructure Inadequate Environmental Awareness Unsustainable natural resource exploitation Increased pollution | Climate Change impacts | | Poor urban planning Inadequate policy and legal framework Inadequate budgetary allocation Weak coordination framework on environmental conservation. High poverty levels | Poor urban planning | | | National and global | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | climate change financing | |

| | | | | | | | Deforestation | | | Inadequate policy and | | | mechanism | |

| | | | | | | | | | | legal framework | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak environmental | | | | | | County climate change | |

| | | | | | | | governance | | | Inadequate budgetary | | | fund | |

| | | | | | | | | | | allocation | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate waste | | | | | | Nature based projects | |

| | | | | | | | management | | | Weak coordination | | | | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | framework on | | | Potential for renewable | |

| | | | | | | | | | | environmental | | | energy | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate | | | conservation. | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Environmental | | | | | | Adequate land | |

| | | | | | | | Awareness | | | High poverty levels | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | County spatial plan & | |

| | | | | | | | Unsustainable natural | | | | | | GIS Lab. | |

| | | | | | | | resource exploitation | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Circular Economy & | |

| | | | | | | | Increased pollution | | | | | | Waste to energy. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | climate proofing | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | technologies projects | |

| Inadequate |

|---|

| sanitation services |

| Environmental |

|---|

| degradation |

Page 58

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Lands, Physical Inadequate decent Growth of informal Inadequate public space Availability of Planning, and affordable settlements and slums for housing development development partners Housing and housing Urban Inadequate affordable Lack of ownership Established Mortgage Development housing infrastructure documents for the scheme that can be existing county estates operationalized, Low investment in housing infrastructure High capital-intensive Housing development need strategy is available for Inadequate enforcement redevelopment of existing on development control Lack of proper planning estates regulations Availability of a County Absentee Landlord headquarters’ master plan Unsecured land tenure for adoption system Bankable housing project report Land Management Inadequate security of inadequate sector GIS Lab and technologies and Administration tenure financing Policy & Legal Inadequate access to land Inadequate County land framework by National information and services policy framework government Squatters and absentee landlords Inadequate Urban Community inadequate sector County spatial plan Planning and encroachments on road financing Development reserve and public spaces Existence of National Inadequate framework on Land Commission (NLC) Uncontrolled development control development in both Elaborate national policy urban and rural areas framework on Planning and Development Inadequate planning of settlement areas Agriculture Low Crop Reliance on traditional Inadequate financing Availability of land for production farming practices agriculture Inadequate extension Declining soil fertility Staff Availability of underground water Inadequate access to Inadequate research in sources affordable quality farm crop production inputs Climate smart agriculture Inadequate weather technologies Inadequate access to information extension services New appropriate Inadequate policy technologies on value Pests and diseases framework addition High post-harvest losses Inadequate legal Availability of Partners framework Weak marketing structures 37

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Lands, Physical Inadequate decent Growth of informal Inadequate public space Availability of Planning, and affordable settlements and slums for housing development development partners Housing and housing Urban Inadequate affordable Lack of ownership Established Mortgage Development housing infrastructure documents for the scheme that can be existing county estates operationalized, Low investment in housing infrastructure High capital-intensive Housing development need strategy is available for Inadequate enforcement redevelopment of existing on development control Lack of proper planning estates regulations Availability of a County Absentee Landlord headquarters’ master plan Unsecured land tenure for adoption system Bankable housing project report Land Management Inadequate security of inadequate sector GIS Lab and technologies and Administration tenure financing Policy & Legal Inadequate access to land Inadequate County land framework by National information and services policy framework government Squatters and absentee landlords Inadequate Urban Community inadequate sector County spatial plan Planning and encroachments on road financing Development reserve and public spaces Existence of National Inadequate framework on Land Commission (NLC) Uncontrolled development control development in both Elaborate national policy urban and rural areas framework on Planning and Development Inadequate planning of settlement areas Agriculture Low Crop Reliance on traditional Inadequate financing Availability of land for production farming practices agriculture Inadequate extension Declining soil fertility Staff Availability of underground water Inadequate access to Inadequate research in sources affordable quality farm crop production inputs Climate smart agriculture Inadequate weather technologies Inadequate access to information extension services New appropriate Inadequate policy technologies on value Pests and diseases framework addition High post-harvest losses Inadequate legal Availability of Partners framework Weak marketing structures 37 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Lands, Physical Planning, Housing and Urban Development | Lands, Physical | | Inadequate decent and affordable housing | Inadequate decent | | Growth of informal settlements and slums Inadequate affordable housing infrastructure Low investment in housing infrastructure Inadequate enforcement on development control | Growth of informal | | Inadequate public space for housing development Lack of ownership documents for the existing county estates High capital-intensive need Lack of proper planning regulations Absentee Landlord Unsecured land tenure system | Inadequate public space | | | Availability of | |

| | Planning, | | | and affordable | | | settlements and slums | | | for housing development | | | development partners | |

| | Housing and | | | housing | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Urban | | | | | | Inadequate affordable | | | Lack of ownership | | | Established Mortgage | |

| | Development | | | | | | housing infrastructure | | | documents for the | | | scheme that can be | |

| | | | | | | | | | | existing county estates | | | operationalized, | |

| | | | | | | | Low investment in | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | housing infrastructure | | | High capital-intensive | | | Housing development | |

| | | | | | | | | | | need | | | strategy is available for | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate enforcement | | | | | | redevelopment of existing | |

| | | | | | | | on development control | | | Lack of proper planning | | | estates | |

| | | | | | | | | | | regulations | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Availability of a County | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Absentee Landlord | | | headquarters’ master plan | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Unsecured land tenure | | | for adoption | |

| | | | | | | | | | | system | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bankable housing project | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | report | |

| | | | Land Management and Administration | | | | Inadequate security of | | inadequate sector financing Inadequate County land policy framework | | | GIS Lab and technologies Policy & Legal framework by National government | GIS Lab and technologies | |

| | | | | | | | tenure | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Policy & Legal | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate access to land | | | | | | framework by National | |

| | | | | | | | information and services | | | | | | government | |

| | | | | | | | Squatters and absentee | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | landlords | | | | | | | |

| | | | Inadequate Urban Planning and Development | | | | Community | | inadequate sector financing Inadequate framework on development control | | | County spatial plan Existence of National Land Commission (NLC) Elaborate national policy framework on Planning and Development | | |

| | | | | | | | encroachments on road | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | reserve and public spaces | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Uncontrolled | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | development in both | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | urban and rural areas | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate planning of | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | settlement areas | | | | | | | |

| Agriculture | | | Low Crop production | | | | Reliance on traditional | | Inadequate financing Inadequate extension Staff Inadequate research in crop production Inadequate weather information Inadequate policy framework Inadequate legal framework | | | Availability of land for agriculture Availability of underground water sources Climate smart agriculture technologies New appropriate technologies on value addition Availability of Partners | | |

| | | | | | | | farming practices | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Declining soil fertility | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate access to | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | affordable quality farm | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | inputs | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate access to | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | extension services | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Pests and diseases | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | High post-harvest losses | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak marketing | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | structures | | | | | | | |

| Land Management |

|---|

| and Administration |

| inadequate sector |

|---|

| financing |

| Inadequate County land |

| policy framework |

| Inadequate Urban |

|---|

| Planning and |

| Development |

| inadequate sector |

|---|

| financing |

| Inadequate framework on |

| development control |

| County spatial plan |

|---|

| Existence of National |

| Land Commission (NLC) |

| Elaborate national policy |

| framework on Planning |

| and Development |

| Low Crop |

|---|

| production |

| Inadequate financing |

|---|

| Inadequate extension |

| Staff |

| Inadequate research in |

| crop production |

| Inadequate weather |

| information |

| Inadequate policy |

| framework |

| Inadequate legal |

| framework |

| Availability of land for |

|---|

| agriculture |

| Availability of |

| underground water |

| sources |

| Climate smart agriculture |

| technologies |

| New appropriate |

| technologies on value |

| addition |

| Availability of Partners |

Page 59

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Availability of KIAMIS strategy by the national government Low Livestock Inadequate access to Inadequate sector funding Modern livestock farming production affordable quality animal technologies feeds Inadequate staff capacities Existence of veterinary Traditional livestock services farming practices Inadequate knowledge on livestock production Input subsidies strategy Inadequate access to livestock extension services Animal pests and diseases Weak marketing structures for livestock products Low fisheries Inadequate fishing Inadequate sector Modern aquaculture production infrastructure financing technologies Inadequate access to Inadequate legal and Long coastline with affordable quality fish policy framework access to Economic farming inputs Exclusive Zone (EEZ) Inadequate fisher folk Availability of a spatial capacity plan Inadequate extension Existence of national services fisheries policy framework High fish post-harvest losses Weak marketing structures for fish and fish products Weak governance in fisheries resources Trade, tourism Trade promotion Inadequate market Inadequate funding Potential market for and and development infrastructure goods and services Cooperatives Inadequate legal Inadequate Trade framework Existence of Kilifi promotion County Micro finance (Wezesha) fund Unfair trade practices Existence of Kilifi County Investment Policy Low investments Strategic location of County for blue economy and industrial development 38

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Availability of KIAMIS strategy by the national government Low Livestock Inadequate access to Inadequate sector funding Modern livestock farming production affordable quality animal technologies feeds Inadequate staff capacities Existence of veterinary Traditional livestock services farming practices Inadequate knowledge on livestock production Input subsidies strategy Inadequate access to livestock extension services Animal pests and diseases Weak marketing structures for livestock products Low fisheries Inadequate fishing Inadequate sector Modern aquaculture production infrastructure financing technologies Inadequate access to Inadequate legal and Long coastline with affordable quality fish policy framework access to Economic farming inputs Exclusive Zone (EEZ) Inadequate fisher folk Availability of a spatial capacity plan Inadequate extension Existence of national services fisheries policy framework High fish post-harvest losses Weak marketing structures for fish and fish products Weak governance in fisheries resources Trade, tourism Trade promotion Inadequate market Inadequate funding Potential market for and and development infrastructure goods and services Cooperatives Inadequate legal Inadequate Trade framework Existence of Kilifi promotion County Micro finance (Wezesha) fund Unfair trade practices Existence of Kilifi County Investment Policy Low investments Strategic location of County for blue economy and industrial development 38 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Availability of KIAMIS | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | strategy by the national | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | government | |

| | | | Low Livestock production | | | | Inadequate access to | | Inadequate sector funding Inadequate staff capacities Inadequate knowledge on livestock production | | | Modern livestock farming technologies Existence of veterinary services Input subsidies strategy | Modern livestock farming | |

| | | | | | | | affordable quality animal | | | | | | technologies | |

| | | | | | | | feeds | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Existence of veterinary | |

| | | | | | | | Traditional livestock | | | | | | services | |

| | | | | | | | farming practices | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Input subsidies strategy | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate access to | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | livestock extension | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | services | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Animal pests and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | diseases | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak marketing | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | structures for livestock | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | products | | | | | | | |

| | | | Low fisheries production | | | | Inadequate fishing | | Inadequate sector financing Inadequate legal and policy framework | | | Modern aquaculture technologies Long coastline with access to Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ) Availability of a spatial plan Existence of national fisheries policy framework | | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate access to | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | affordable quality fish | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | farming inputs | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate fisher folk | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | capacity | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate extension | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | services | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | High fish post-harvest | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | losses | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak marketing | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | structures for fish and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | fish products | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak governance in | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | fisheries resources | | | | | | | |

| Trade, tourism and Cooperatives | | | Trade promotion and development | | | Inadequate market infrastructure Inadequate Trade promotion Unfair trade practices Low investments | Inadequate market | | Inadequate funding Inadequate legal framework | | | | Potential market for | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | | | | goods and services | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate Trade | | | | | | Existence of Kilifi | |

| | | | | | | | promotion | | | | | | County Micro finance | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Wezesha) fund | |

| | | | | | | | Unfair trade practices | | | | | | Existence of Kilifi | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | County Investment Policy | |

| | | | | | | | Low investments | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Strategic location of | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | County for blue economy | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | and industrial | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | development | |

| Low Livestock |

|---|

| production |

| Inadequate sector funding |

|---|

| Inadequate staff |

| capacities |

| Inadequate knowledge on |

| livestock production |

| Low fisheries |

|---|

| production |

| Inadequate sector |

|---|

| financing |

| Inadequate legal and |

| policy framework |

| Modern aquaculture |

|---|

| technologies |

| Long coastline with |

| access to Economic |

| Exclusive Zone (EEZ) |

| Availability of a spatial |

| plan |

| Existence of national |

| fisheries policy |

| framework |

| Trade, tourism |

|---|

| and |

| Cooperatives |

| Trade promotion |

|---|

| and development |

| Inadequate funding |

|---|

| Inadequate legal |

| framework |

Page 60

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Existence of Coastal counties regional bloc (Jumuiya ya County za Pwani) Tourism promotion Inadequate tourism Inadequate funding Potential for MICE and development promotion and Marketing (meetings, incentives, Inadequate legal conferences and Inadequate training and framework exhibitions) tourism awareness High potential for niche Poor infrastructure at tourism tourist attraction sites Existence of a Kilifi Narrow range of Tourism Tourism digital market products platform The existence of a long coastline Co-operative Low uptake and Inadequate legal Existence of a National promotion and dormancy in co- framework Cooperative policy and Development operatives County Micro finance Inadequate funding fund. Weak governance in Co- operatives Existence of development partners and stakeholders Inadequate co-operative awareness education, Potential for joint Training and research ventures and Public Private Partnerships In adequate Co-operative marketing infrastructure for value addition. Energy and Inadequate road Inadequate roads Inadequate funding Technical expertise and Infrastructure network and maintenance goodwill from transport Uneven terrain in the stakeholders and partners infrastructure Inadequate road network county e.g., World Bank, KURA, infrastructure Vast and wide county KERA, KENHA landscape Inadequate transport infrastructure Low energy access Inadequate maintenance Inadequate funding Untapped renewable in the county and development of energy potential in the energy infrastructure Inadequate policy county framework Inadequate awareness on Availability of technical renewable energy expertise and potential partners Climate change mitigation/adaptation interventions 39

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Existence of Coastal counties regional bloc (Jumuiya ya County za Pwani) Tourism promotion Inadequate tourism Inadequate funding Potential for MICE and development promotion and Marketing (meetings, incentives, Inadequate legal conferences and Inadequate training and framework exhibitions) tourism awareness High potential for niche Poor infrastructure at tourism tourist attraction sites Existence of a Kilifi Narrow range of Tourism Tourism digital market products platform The existence of a long coastline Co-operative Low uptake and Inadequate legal Existence of a National promotion and dormancy in co- framework Cooperative policy and Development operatives County Micro finance Inadequate funding fund. Weak governance in Co- operatives Existence of development partners and stakeholders Inadequate co-operative awareness education, Potential for joint Training and research ventures and Public Private Partnerships In adequate Co-operative marketing infrastructure for value addition. Energy and Inadequate road Inadequate roads Inadequate funding Technical expertise and Infrastructure network and maintenance goodwill from transport Uneven terrain in the stakeholders and partners infrastructure Inadequate road network county e.g., World Bank, KURA, infrastructure Vast and wide county KERA, KENHA landscape Inadequate transport infrastructure Low energy access Inadequate maintenance Inadequate funding Untapped renewable in the county and development of energy potential in the energy infrastructure Inadequate policy county framework Inadequate awareness on Availability of technical renewable energy expertise and potential partners Climate change mitigation/adaptation interventions 39 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Existence of Coastal | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | counties regional bloc | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Jumuiya ya County za | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pwani) | |

| | | | Tourism promotion and development | | | Inadequate tourism promotion and Marketing Inadequate training and awareness Poor infrastructure at tourist attraction sites Narrow range of Tourism products | | | Inadequate funding Inadequate legal framework | | | | Potential for MICE | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (meetings, incentives, | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | conferences and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | exhibitions) tourism | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | High potential for niche | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | tourism | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Existence of a Kilifi | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tourism digital market | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | platform | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The existence of a long | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | coastline | |

| | | | Co-operative promotion and Development | | | | Low uptake and | | Inadequate legal framework Inadequate funding | | | Existence of a National Cooperative policy and County Micro finance fund. Existence of development partners and stakeholders Potential for joint ventures and Public Private Partnerships | Existence of a National | |

| | | | | | | | dormancy in co- | | | | | | Cooperative policy and | |

| | | | | | | | operatives | | | | | | County Micro finance | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | fund. | |

| | | | | | | | Weak governance in Co- | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | operatives | | | | | | Existence of development | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | partners and stakeholders | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate co-operative | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | awareness education, | | | | | | Potential for joint | |

| | | | | | | | Training and research | | | | | | ventures and Public | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Private Partnerships | |

| | | | | | | | In adequate Co-operative | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | marketing infrastructure | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | for value addition. | | | | | | | |

| Energy and Infrastructure | | | Inadequate road network and transport infrastructure | | | | Inadequate roads | | Inadequate funding Uneven terrain in the county Vast and wide county landscape | | | | Technical expertise and | |

| | | | | | | | maintenance | | | | | | goodwill from | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | stakeholders and partners | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate road network | | | | | | e.g., World Bank, KURA, | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | | | | KERA, KENHA | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate transport | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | | | | | |

| | | | Low energy access in the county | | | Inadequate maintenance and development of energy infrastructure Inadequate awareness on renewable energy | Inadequate maintenance | | Inadequate funding Inadequate policy framework | | | | Untapped renewable | |

| | | | | | | | and development of | | | | | | energy potential in the | |

| | | | | | | | energy infrastructure | | | | | | county | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate awareness on | | | | | | Availability of technical | |

| | | | | | | | renewable energy | | | | | | expertise and potential | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | partners | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Climate change | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | mitigation/adaptation | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | interventions | |

| Tourism promotion |

|---|

| and development |

| Inadequate tourism |

|---|

| promotion and Marketing |

| Inadequate training and |

| awareness |

| Poor infrastructure at |

| tourist attraction sites |

| Narrow range of Tourism |

| products |

| Inadequate funding |

|---|

| Inadequate legal |

| framework |

| Co-operative |

|---|

| promotion and |

| Development |

| Inadequate legal |

|---|

| framework |

| Inadequate funding |

| Energy and |

|---|

| Infrastructure |

| Inadequate road |

|---|

| network and |

| transport |

| infrastructure |

| Inadequate funding |

|---|

| Uneven terrain in the |

| county |

| Vast and wide county |

| landscape |

| Low energy access |

|---|

| in the county |

| Inadequate funding |

|---|

| Inadequate policy |

| framework |

Page 61

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Existence of a County Energy Plan Social Inadequate access Retrogressive cultural Inadequate County policy Existing development Protection, to social protection beliefs and practices framework partners Culture and services Recreation Inadequate child Inadequate budgetary Ongoing “uzee sio protection services allocation uchawi” campaign Inadequate social Complimentary “inua protection jamii” programme services/facilities (national government) Increase in GBV Inadequate Youth Inadequate capacity Inadequate policy High youth population empowerment / (skills, affordable credit) framework High youth among the youth unemployment Inadequate employment opportunities Drug and substance abuse / Inadequate rehabilitation services Inadequate Erosion of culture and Inadequate County policy Existence of a national preservation of heritage framework government policy culture and heritage Non-preservation of Inadequate budgetary Existence of a rich cultural sites allocation culture and heritage Destruction of cultural Inadequate sites documentation of cultural sites Inadequate advocacy and awareness creation Inadequate sports Inadequate sports Inadequate budgetary Existing KICOSCA Development facilities allocations development partners Sports talent potential Inadequate sports Inadequate county sports development capacity policy framework Enabling water sports environment Available land for sports facilities Weak disaster risks Inadequate disaster Inadequate financial Development partners management management resources infrastructure Existing DRM Inadequate human coordination structures Inadequate human and technical skills Illiteracy levels County disaster management and Weak disaster Poor integration of emergencies Act management governance disaster risk management system by sectors resource 40

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Existence of a County Energy Plan Social Inadequate access Retrogressive cultural Inadequate County policy Existing development Protection, to social protection beliefs and practices framework partners Culture and services Recreation Inadequate child Inadequate budgetary Ongoing “uzee sio protection services allocation uchawi” campaign Inadequate social Complimentary “inua protection jamii” programme services/facilities (national government) Increase in GBV Inadequate Youth Inadequate capacity Inadequate policy High youth population empowerment / (skills, affordable credit) framework High youth among the youth unemployment Inadequate employment opportunities Drug and substance abuse / Inadequate rehabilitation services Inadequate Erosion of culture and Inadequate County policy Existence of a national preservation of heritage framework government policy culture and heritage Non-preservation of Inadequate budgetary Existence of a rich cultural sites allocation culture and heritage Destruction of cultural Inadequate sites documentation of cultural sites Inadequate advocacy and awareness creation Inadequate sports Inadequate sports Inadequate budgetary Existing KICOSCA Development facilities allocations development partners Sports talent potential Inadequate sports Inadequate county sports development capacity policy framework Enabling water sports environment Available land for sports facilities Weak disaster risks Inadequate disaster Inadequate financial Development partners management management resources infrastructure Existing DRM Inadequate human coordination structures Inadequate human and technical skills Illiteracy levels County disaster management and Weak disaster Poor integration of emergencies Act management governance disaster risk management system by sectors resource 40 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Existence of a County | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Energy Plan | |

| Social Protection, Culture and Recreation | | | Inadequate access to social protection services | | | | Retrogressive cultural | | Inadequate County policy framework Inadequate budgetary allocation | | | Existing development partners Ongoing “uzee sio uchawi” campaign Complimentary “inua jamii” programme (national government) | Existing development | |

| | | | | | | | beliefs and practices | | | | | | partners | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate child | | | | | | Ongoing “uzee sio | |

| | | | | | | | protection services | | | | | | uchawi” campaign | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate social | | | | | | Complimentary “inua | |

| | | | | | | | protection | | | | | | jamii” programme | |

| | | | | | | | services/facilities | | | | | | (national government) | |

| | | | | | | | Increase in GBV | | | | | | | |

| | | | Inadequate Youth empowerment / High youth unemployment | | | | Inadequate capacity | | Inadequate policy framework | | | High youth population | | |

| | | | | | | | (skills, affordable credit) | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | among the youth | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate employment | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | opportunities | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Drug and substance | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | abuse / Inadequate | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | rehabilitation services | | | | | | | |

| | | | Inadequate preservation of culture and heritage | | | | Erosion of culture and | | | Inadequate County policy | | Existence of a national government policy Existence of a rich culture and heritage | | |

| | | | | | | | heritage | | | framework | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Non-preservation of | | | Inadequate budgetary | | | | |

| | | | | | | | cultural sites | | | allocation | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Destruction of cultural | | | Inadequate | | | | |

| | | | | | | | sites | | | documentation of cultural | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | sites | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate advocacy and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | awareness creation | | | | | | | |

| | | | Inadequate sports Development | | | Inadequate sports facilities Inadequate sports development capacity | Inadequate sports | | Inadequate budgetary allocations Inadequate county sports policy framework | Inadequate budgetary | | | Existing KICOSCA | |

| | | | | | | | facilities | | | allocations | | | development partners | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sports talent potential | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate sports | | | Inadequate county sports | | | | |

| | | | | | | | development capacity | | | policy framework | | | Enabling water sports | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | environment | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Available land for sports | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | facilities | |

| | | | Weak disaster risks management | | | | Inadequate disaster | | | Inadequate financial | | Development partners Existing DRM coordination structures County disaster management and emergencies Act | Development partners | |

| | | | | | | | management | | | resources | | | | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | | | | Existing DRM | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Inadequate human | | | coordination structures | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate human and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | technical skills | | | Illiteracy levels | | | County disaster | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | management and | |

| | | | | | | | Weak disaster | | | Poor integration of | | | emergencies Act | |

| | | | | | | | management governance | | | disaster risk management | | | | |

| | | | | | | | system | | | by sectors resource | | | | |

| Social |

|---|

| Protection, |

| Culture and |

| Recreation |

| Inadequate access |

|---|

| to social protection |

| services |

| Inadequate County policy |

|---|

| framework |

| Inadequate budgetary |

| allocation |

| Inadequate Youth |

|---|

| empowerment / |

| High youth |

| unemployment |

| Inadequate policy |

|---|

| framework |

| Inadequate |

|---|

| preservation of |

| culture and heritage |

| Existence of a national |

|---|

| government policy |

| Existence of a rich |

| culture and heritage |

| Inadequate sports |

|---|

| Development |

| Weak disaster risks |

|---|

| management |

Page 62

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities County disaster atlas/ Inadequate DRM map mechanism for early warning County emergency fund Inadequate awareness of disaster risks Weak Community resilience Health Inadequate access Inadequate RMNCAH Inadequate budgetary Goodwill from partners to Preventive and services allocation Promotive health Availability of competent services Low immunization Reduced donor funding health workforce coverage Existing policies, bills & Low nutritional services relevant legislation Inadequate screening Existence of research services (TB, HIV, facilities e.g. KEMRI cancer, diabetes, hypertension, mental and Availability of HSIF fund other vector borne diseases) Low coverage of community health services Inadequate access Insufficient curative to Curative and services Rehabilitative services Inadequate rehabilitative services. Inadequate specialized health services e.g., oncology, renal dialysis etc Weak referral system Health Inadequate Human Administration & resource capacity Support services Inadequate health infrastructure & Equipment Gap in management and coordination 41

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities County disaster atlas/ Inadequate DRM map mechanism for early warning County emergency fund Inadequate awareness of disaster risks Weak Community resilience Health Inadequate access Inadequate RMNCAH Inadequate budgetary Goodwill from partners to Preventive and services allocation Promotive health Availability of competent services Low immunization Reduced donor funding health workforce coverage Existing policies, bills & Low nutritional services relevant legislation Inadequate screening Existence of research services (TB, HIV, facilities e.g. KEMRI cancer, diabetes, hypertension, mental and Availability of HSIF fund other vector borne diseases) Low coverage of community health services Inadequate access Insufficient curative to Curative and services Rehabilitative services Inadequate rehabilitative services. Inadequate specialized health services e.g., oncology, renal dialysis etc Weak referral system Health Inadequate Human Administration & resource capacity Support services Inadequate health infrastructure & Equipment Gap in management and coordination 41 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | | | | | | County disaster atlas/ map County emergency fund | County disaster atlas/ | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate DRM | | | | | | map | |

| | | | | | | | mechanism for early | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | warning | | | | | | County emergency fund | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate awareness of | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | disaster risks | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak Community | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | resilience | | | | | | | |

| Health | | | Inadequate access to Preventive and Promotive health services | | | | Inadequate RMNCAH | | Inadequate budgetary allocation Reduced donor funding | | | Goodwill from partners Availability of competent health workforce Existing policies, bills & relevant legislation Existence of research facilities e.g. KEMRI Availability of HSIF fund | | |

| | | | | | | | services | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Low immunization | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | coverage | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Low nutritional services | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate screening | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | services (TB, HIV, | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | cancer, diabetes, | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | hypertension, mental and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | other vector borne | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | diseases) | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Low coverage of | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | community health | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | services | | | | | | | |

| | | | Inadequate access to Curative and Rehabilitative services | | | | Insufficient curative | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | services | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate rehabilitative | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | services. | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate specialized | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | health services e.g., | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | oncology, renal dialysis | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | etc | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak referral system | | | | | | | |

| | | | Health Administration & Support services | | | | Inadequate Human | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | resource capacity | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate health | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure & | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Equipment | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Gap in management and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | coordination | | | | | | | |

| Inadequate access |

|---|

| to Preventive and |

| Promotive health |

| services |

| Inadequate budgetary |

|---|

| allocation |

| Reduced donor funding |

| Goodwill from partners |

|---|

| Availability of competent |

| health workforce |

| Existing policies, bills & |

| relevant legislation |

| Existence of research |

| facilities e.g. KEMRI |

| Availability of HSIF fund |

| Inadequate access |

|---|

| to Curative and |

| Rehabilitative |

| services |

| Health |

|---|

| Administration & |

| Support services |

Page 63

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Inadequate health products and technologies Low universal health coverage PAIR Public financial Low absorption rate Delays in exchequer Development partners management releases IFMIS Low Own Source Delay in implementation Revenue of the valuation roll Untapped revenue streams Weak internal control systems Goodwill from stakeholders (Institute of Inadequate Budget Internal Auditors, formulation capacity National Treasury, World Bank) Weak Policy Weak M&E function Competing stakeholders’ Intergovernmental planning, interests relations coordination and M Inadequate Economic & E planning and Inadequate technical Existence of development coordination services skills partners Inadequate County Inadequate statistical data Existence of national M statistics capacity & E policies; CIMES Delays in policy guidelines; e-CIMES approvals Public service Inadequate public Inadequate Funding Support from delivery participation development partners. Weak intersectoral/ Inadequate technical multisectoral linkages Existence of public human resource capacity participation bill Inadequate legal Weak performance framework Support from management development partners Weak intergovernmental relations Low ICT connectivity Inadequate office infrastructure Inadequate County legal services County Legislation, Inadequate infrastructure Fairly knowledgeable Assembly representation and Weak structures for Insufficient financial crop of MCAs oversight public participation and resources civic education Existence of long-serving technical staff 42

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Inadequate health products and technologies Low universal health coverage PAIR Public financial Low absorption rate Delays in exchequer Development partners management releases IFMIS Low Own Source Delay in implementation Revenue of the valuation roll Untapped revenue streams Weak internal control systems Goodwill from stakeholders (Institute of Inadequate Budget Internal Auditors, formulation capacity National Treasury, World Bank) Weak Policy Weak M&E function Competing stakeholders’ Intergovernmental planning, interests relations coordination and M Inadequate Economic & E planning and Inadequate technical Existence of development coordination services skills partners Inadequate County Inadequate statistical data Existence of national M statistics capacity & E policies; CIMES Delays in policy guidelines; e-CIMES approvals Public service Inadequate public Inadequate Funding Support from delivery participation development partners. Weak intersectoral/ Inadequate technical multisectoral linkages Existence of public human resource capacity participation bill Inadequate legal Weak performance framework Support from management development partners Weak intergovernmental relations Low ICT connectivity Inadequate office infrastructure Inadequate County legal services County Legislation, Inadequate infrastructure Fairly knowledgeable Assembly representation and Weak structures for Insufficient financial crop of MCAs oversight public participation and resources civic education Existence of long-serving technical staff 42 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | Inadequate health | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | products and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | technologies | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Low universal health | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | coverage | | | | | | | |

| PAIR | | | Public financial management | | | Low absorption rate Low Own Source Revenue Weak internal control systems Inadequate Budget formulation capacity | Low absorption rate | | Delays in exchequer releases Delay in implementation of the valuation roll | | | | Development partners | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | IFMIS | |

| | | | | | | | Low Own Source | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Revenue | | | | | | Untapped revenue | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | streams | |

| | | | | | | | Weak internal control | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | systems | | | | | | Goodwill from | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | stakeholders (Institute of | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate Budget | | | | | | Internal Auditors, | |

| | | | | | | | formulation capacity | | | | | | National Treasury, World | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bank) | |

| | | | Weak Policy planning, coordination and M & E | | | Weak M&E function Inadequate Economic planning and coordination services Inadequate County statistics capacity | | | | Competing stakeholders’ | | | Intergovernmental | |

| | | | | | | | | | | interests | | | relations | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Inadequate technical | | | Existence of development | |

| | | | | | | | | | | skills | | | partners | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Inadequate statistical data | | | Existence of national M | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | & E policies; CIMES | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Delays in policy | | | guidelines; e-CIMES | |

| | | | | | | | | | | approvals | | | | |

| | | | Public service delivery | | | | Inadequate public | | Inadequate Funding Weak intersectoral/ multisectoral linkages Inadequate legal framework | Inadequate Funding | | Support from development partners. Existence of public participation bill Support from development partners | Support from | |

| | | | | | | | participation | | | | | | development partners. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Weak intersectoral/ | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate technical | | | multisectoral linkages | | | Existence of public | |

| | | | | | | | human resource capacity | | | | | | participation bill | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Inadequate legal | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Weak performance | | | framework | | | Support from | |

| | | | | | | | management | | | | | | development partners | |

| | | | | | | | Weak intergovernmental | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | relations | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Low ICT connectivity | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate office | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | infrastructure | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate County legal | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | services | | | | | | | |

| County Assembly | | | Legislation, representation and oversight | | | Inadequate infrastructure Weak structures for public participation and civic education | Inadequate infrastructure | | Insufficient financial resources | | | | Fairly knowledgeable | |

| | | | | | | | Weak structures for | | | | | | crop of MCAs | |

| | | | | | | | public participation and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | civic education | | | | | | Existence of long-serving | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | technical staff | |

| Public financial |

|---|

| management |

| Delays in exchequer |

|---|

| releases |

| Delay in implementation |

| of the valuation roll |

| Weak Policy |

|---|

| planning, |

| coordination and M |

| & E |

| Weak M&E function |

|---|

| Inadequate Economic |

| planning and |

| coordination services |

| Inadequate County |

| statistics capacity |

| Public service |

|---|

| delivery |

| County |

|---|

| Assembly |

| Legislation, |

|---|

| representation and |

| oversight |

| Insufficient financial |

|---|

| resources |

Page 64

Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Limited public awareness Multi media conference on the distinct roles of system county assembly and executive Incentives to Members Inadequate capacity of the MCAs and technical staff to effectively legislate, oversight and represent 43

| Sector Development Issue Cause(s) Constraint(s) Opportunities Limited public awareness Multi media conference on the distinct roles of system county assembly and executive Incentives to Members Inadequate capacity of the MCAs and technical staff to effectively legislate, oversight and represent 43 |

|---|

| | Sector | | | Development Issue | | | Cause(s) | | | Constraint(s) | | | Opportunities | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | Limited public awareness | | | | | Multi media conference system Incentives to Members | Multi media conference | |

| | | | | | | | on the distinct roles of | | | | | | system | |

| | | | | | | | county assembly and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | executive | | | | | | Incentives to Members | |

| | | | | | | | Inadequate capacity of | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | the MCAs and technical | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | staff to effectively | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | legislate, oversight and | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | represent | | | | | | | |

Page 65

44

| 44 |

|---|

Page 66

CHAPTER THREE 3.0 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 3.1 Introduction The preparation of the County Spatial Plan is an initiative of the county government as provided by the County Government Act 2012 and in the fourth schedule of the Constitution Part 2(8), in relation to devolved functions and overall County Planning and article 184(1) in relation to the governance and management of urban areas and cities. For devolution to be effective, it is necessary that each county formulates suitable frameworks to guide its investment agenda, as well as development initiatives of all County stakeholders. Kilifi is bordered by Mombasa County to the North, Kwale County, Tana River County and Indian Ocean. There population comprise of various ethnic groups with the Mijikenda, Arabs and Europeans being the major communities. Fishing is the main economic activity in Kilifi due to its proximity to the Indian Ocean; Tourism industry plays a major role also due to the presence of Wild life sanctuaries, Sandy beaches, and Historical sites. Agriculture is also practiced and the County is known for Sisal and Cashew nuts growing. Agro-based industries are also present making use of the fertile arable lands. Kilifi County has appreciable quantities of mineral resources (Titanium, iron ore and vast deposits of salt deposits) which are exploited to support the development of a strong regional industrial sector especially from iron sheet and cement manufacturing industries. There is provision of employment and generation of income. Commercial sector in Kilifi County is supported mainly by trade and tourism. The overall growth potential of the County is inhibited by inadequacies in the quantities, qualities and distribution of current physical and social infrastructure and services outlays necessity to activate potentials dormant in key productive sectors. This chapter provides the spatial framework within which development projects and programs will be implemented. 45

| CHAPTER THREE 3.0 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 3.1 Introduction The preparation of the County Spatial Plan is an initiative of the county government as provided by the County Government Act 2012 and in the fourth schedule of the Constitution Part 2(8), in relation to devolved functions and overall County Planning and article 184(1) in relation to the governance and management of urban areas and cities. For devolution to be effective, it is necessary that each county formulates suitable frameworks to guide its investment agenda, as well as development initiatives of all County stakeholders. Kilifi is bordered by Mombasa County to the North, Kwale County, Tana River County and Indian Ocean. There population comprise of various ethnic groups with the Mijikenda, Arabs and Europeans being the major communities. Fishing is the main economic activity in Kilifi due to its proximity to the Indian Ocean; Tourism industry plays a major role also due to the presence of Wild life sanctuaries, Sandy beaches, and Historical sites. Agriculture is also practiced and the County is known for Sisal and Cashew nuts growing. Agro-based industries are also present making use of the fertile arable lands. Kilifi County has appreciable quantities of mineral resources (Titanium, iron ore and vast deposits of salt deposits) which are exploited to support the development of a strong regional industrial sector especially from iron sheet and cement manufacturing industries. There is provision of employment and generation of income. Commercial sector in Kilifi County is supported mainly by trade and tourism. The overall growth potential of the County is inhibited by inadequacies in the quantities, qualities and distribution of current physical and social infrastructure and services outlays necessity to activate potentials dormant in key productive sectors. This chapter provides the spatial framework within which development projects and programs will be implemented. 45 |

|---|

Page 67

3.2 Spatial Development Framework A framing structure plan was developed which took cognizance of the available resources, opportunities and the desired end state. The structure plan is anchored on industrialization, tourism, infrastructure, human settlement, agriculture, conservation and identification of resource potential growth areas. The strategies to attain the vision of the plan are numerous and interconnected as discussed below: Agriculture Crops development The objective of this strategy is to increase agricultural productivity and outputs and to promote market access and product development. The strategy also aims at increasing the land under Irrigation to booster food security and local employment. 46

| 3.2 Spatial Development Framework A framing structure plan was developed which took cognizance of the available resources, opportunities and the desired end state. The structure plan is anchored on industrialization, tourism, infrastructure, human settlement, agriculture, conservation and identification of resource potential growth areas. The strategies to attain the vision of the plan are numerous and interconnected as discussed below: Agriculture Crops development The objective of this strategy is to increase agricultural productivity and outputs and to promote market access and product development. The strategy also aims at increasing the land under Irrigation to booster food security and local employment. 46 |

|---|

Page 68

Kilifi County being an ASAL area has soild suitable for Cassava production which is also drought resistance. The following map shows the suitable areas for cassava production. 47

| Kilifi County being an ASAL area has soild suitable for Cassava production which is also drought resistance. The following map shows the suitable areas for cassava production. 47 |

|---|

Page 69

Livestock development The objective of the livestock development strategy is to improve livestock production for wellbeing and wealth creation. This shall be achieved through improving the access to milk market and income to farmers. Other Livestock development strategies includes: a) Improvement of livestock production through the provision of veterinary services; b) Facilitation of Marketing of Livestock and Livestock Products; and c) Promotion, regulation and facilitation of livestock production for social economic development and industrialization. Fisheries The main objective of this strategy is to maximize contribution of fisheries to poverty reduction, food security and creation of wealth. Other objectives include: a) Enhance fisheries production; b) Promote the Utilization of appropriate technologies in fisheries; c) Facilitate marketing of fisheries; d) Strengthen departmental systems and processes; e) Develop appropriate infrastructure; f) Strengthen human resource capacity; g) Building of fish cooling plants within the proposed fish landing sites; h) Promote and Modernize Aquaculture and Mari culture Production and Management for Increased Productivity; and i) Management and sustainable development of fisheries. The strategies are a summarized in the table below: Table 3.1: Strategies in the Agriculture sector Strategy Issues concerned Modernizing of agricultural and a) Horticultural development. livestock production. b) Appropriate modern technologies in land preparation. c) Encouraging proper storage and timely harvesting. d) The use of disease resistant crop varieties. e) Facilitate access of clean and disease-free planting materials by encouraging farmers to form marketing groups. f) Encouraging small farm on value addition. Promoting and enhancing a) Intensification of extension services. capacity building to support b) Agricultural training institutes. agricultural activities. 48

| Livestock development The objective of the livestock development strategy is to improve livestock production for wellbeing and wealth creation. This shall be achieved through improving the access to milk market and income to farmers. Other Livestock development strategies includes: a) Improvement of livestock production through the provision of veterinary services; b) Facilitation of Marketing of Livestock and Livestock Products; and c) Promotion, regulation and facilitation of livestock production for social economic development and industrialization. Fisheries The main objective of this strategy is to maximize contribution of fisheries to poverty reduction, food security and creation of wealth. Other objectives include: a) Enhance fisheries production; b) Promote the Utilization of appropriate technologies in fisheries; c) Facilitate marketing of fisheries; d) Strengthen departmental systems and processes; e) Develop appropriate infrastructure; f) Strengthen human resource capacity; g) Building of fish cooling plants within the proposed fish landing sites; h) Promote and Modernize Aquaculture and Mari culture Production and Management for Increased Productivity; and i) Management and sustainable development of fisheries. The strategies are a summarized in the table below: Table 3.1: Strategies in the Agriculture sector Strategy Issues concerned Modernizing of agricultural and a) Horticultural development. livestock production. b) Appropriate modern technologies in land preparation. c) Encouraging proper storage and timely harvesting. d) The use of disease resistant crop varieties. e) Facilitate access of clean and disease-free planting materials by encouraging farmers to form marketing groups. f) Encouraging small farm on value addition. Promoting and enhancing a) Intensification of extension services. capacity building to support b) Agricultural training institutes. agricultural activities. 48 |

|---|

| | Strategy | | | Issues concerned | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Modernizing of agricultural and livestock production. | Modernizing of agricultural and | | | a) Horticultural development. | |

| | livestock production. | | | b) Appropriate modern technologies in land preparation. | |

| | | | | c) Encouraging proper storage and timely harvesting. | |

| | | | | d) The use of disease resistant crop varieties. | |

| | | | | e) Facilitate access of clean and disease-free planting materials by | |

| | | | | encouraging farmers to form marketing groups. | |

| | | | | f) Encouraging small farm on value addition. | |

| Promoting and enhancing capacity building to support agricultural activities. | | | | a) Intensification of extension services. | |

| | | | | b) Agricultural training institutes. | |

| Promoting and enhancing |

|---|

| capacity building to support |

| agricultural activities. |

Page 70

Strategy Issues concerned Improving production in all sub a) Improve on land ownership to allow owners develop their land for sectors to achieve food optimal utilization. sufficiency and income b) Increased output to stump out food deficiency and improve the socio- generation. economic status of the community. c) The cooperative sub-sector will be strengthened through revival of cooperative societies to offer farmers a channel for marketing of the County products. d) special programmes will be put in place to improve farming methods. e) Rehabilitation of tree crops. f) Education and training of committee members, society members and staff. To improve livelihoods of a) Formation of new and revival of cooperative societies. the people through promotion b) Growth of a viable cooperatives sub sector. of competitive agriculture. c) Equitable distribution of farm imputs. d) Promptness in service delivery and application of modern marketing techniques. Promotion of dairy and beef a) Intensification of veterinary services. farming. b) Development of Poultry farming. c) Strengthening the institutional framework for effective disease control. d) Creation of infrastructure to effectively support disease and pest control services delivery. e) Provision of water facilities for livestock keeping. f) Promotion of quality service and facilitate trade. g) Increased funding for livestock programmes. h) Value addition and creation of markets to support livestock sector. Research and Development. a) Development of drought and disease resistant crop and livestock varieties. b) Establish sustainable funding initiatives. c) Organizing more farmer field days in the County. d) Disseminating and educating farmers to adopt and grow researched crops. Improve fish production and a) Ensure sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources. marketing; b) Gazette new fish landing beaches. c) Carry out surveys to identify suitable areas for aquaculture. d) Provision of storage facilities. e) Increase funding for extension services. f) Venturing into commercial fishing to increase their production to satisfy the local demand. 49

| Strategy Issues concerned Improving production in all sub a) Improve on land ownership to allow owners develop their land for sectors to achieve food optimal utilization. sufficiency and income b) Increased output to stump out food deficiency and improve the socio- generation. economic status of the community. c) The cooperative sub-sector will be strengthened through revival of cooperative societies to offer farmers a channel for marketing of the County products. d) special programmes will be put in place to improve farming methods. e) Rehabilitation of tree crops. f) Education and training of committee members, society members and staff. To improve livelihoods of a) Formation of new and revival of cooperative societies. the people through promotion b) Growth of a viable cooperatives sub sector. of competitive agriculture. c) Equitable distribution of farm imputs. d) Promptness in service delivery and application of modern marketing techniques. Promotion of dairy and beef a) Intensification of veterinary services. farming. b) Development of Poultry farming. c) Strengthening the institutional framework for effective disease control. d) Creation of infrastructure to effectively support disease and pest control services delivery. e) Provision of water facilities for livestock keeping. f) Promotion of quality service and facilitate trade. g) Increased funding for livestock programmes. h) Value addition and creation of markets to support livestock sector. Research and Development. a) Development of drought and disease resistant crop and livestock varieties. b) Establish sustainable funding initiatives. c) Organizing more farmer field days in the County. d) Disseminating and educating farmers to adopt and grow researched crops. Improve fish production and a) Ensure sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources. marketing; b) Gazette new fish landing beaches. c) Carry out surveys to identify suitable areas for aquaculture. d) Provision of storage facilities. e) Increase funding for extension services. f) Venturing into commercial fishing to increase their production to satisfy the local demand. 49 |

|---|

| | Strategy | | | Issues concerned | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Improving production in all sub sectors to achieve food sufficiency and income generation. | Improving production in all sub | | | a) Improve on land ownership to allow owners develop their land for | |

| | sectors to achieve food | | | | |

| | | | | optimal utilization. | |

| | sufficiency and income | | | | |

| | | | | b) Increased output to stump out food deficiency and improve the socio- | |

| | generation. | | | | |

| | | | | economic status of the community. | |

| | | | | c) The cooperative sub-sector will be strengthened through revival of | |

| | | | | cooperative societies to offer farmers a channel for marketing of the | |

| | | | | County products. | |

| | | | | d) special programmes will be put in place to improve farming methods. | |

| | | | | e) Rehabilitation of tree crops. | |

| | | | | f) Education and training of committee members, society members and | |

| | | | | staff. | |

| To improve livelihoods of the people through promotion of competitive agriculture. | | | | a) Formation of new and revival of cooperative societies. | |

| | | | | b) Growth of a viable cooperatives sub sector. | |

| | | | | c) Equitable distribution of farm imputs. | |

| | | | | d) Promptness in service delivery and application of modern marketing | |

| | | | | techniques. | |

| Promotion of dairy and beef farming. | | | | a) Intensification of veterinary services. | |

| | | | | b) Development of Poultry farming. | |

| | | | | c) Strengthening the institutional framework for effective disease | |

| | | | | control. | |

| | | | | d) Creation of infrastructure to effectively support disease and pest | |

| | | | | control services delivery. | |

| | | | | e) Provision of water facilities for livestock keeping. | |

| | | | | f) Promotion of quality service and facilitate trade. | |

| | | | | g) Increased funding for livestock programmes. | |

| | | | | h) Value addition and creation of markets to support livestock sector. | |

| Research and Development. | | | | a) Development of drought and disease resistant crop and livestock | |

| | | | | varieties. | |

| | | | | b) Establish sustainable funding initiatives. | |

| | | | | c) Organizing more farmer field days in the County. | |

| | | | | d) Disseminating and educating farmers to adopt and grow researched | |

| | | | | crops. | |

| Improve fish production and marketing; | | | | a) Ensure sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources. | |

| | | | | b) Gazette new fish landing beaches. | |

| | | | | c) Carry out surveys to identify suitable areas for aquaculture. | |

| | | | | d) Provision of storage facilities. | |

| | | | | e) Increase funding for extension services. | |

| | | | | f) Venturing into commercial fishing to increase their production to | |

| | | | | satisfy the local demand. | |

| To improve livelihoods of |

|---|

| the people through promotion |

| of competitive agriculture. |

| Promotion of dairy and beef |

|---|

| farming. |

| Research and Development. |

|---|

| Improve fish production and |

|---|

| marketing; |

Page 71

Strategy Issues concerned land regularization a) Perform land audit in the County. b) Settle the landless and formalize land ownership. c) Ensure proper planning and utilization of land. d) Sustainable management of land resources. Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Tourism The goal of this strategy is to make Kilifi County a preferred tourist destination for a globally competitive and innovative trade and investment sector for socio-economic development. Its mission is to provide an enabling environment that facilitates investments and development of Tourism for wealth creation and sustainable growth. i. Optimization of existing tourist attraction sites for maximum benefits a) Carry out an audit of all existing tourist attraction sites; and b) Value addition to the existing sites by diversification of activities and provision of supporting services. 50

| Strategy Issues concerned land regularization a) Perform land audit in the County. b) Settle the landless and formalize land ownership. c) Ensure proper planning and utilization of land. d) Sustainable management of land resources. Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Tourism The goal of this strategy is to make Kilifi County a preferred tourist destination for a globally competitive and innovative trade and investment sector for socio-economic development. Its mission is to provide an enabling environment that facilitates investments and development of Tourism for wealth creation and sustainable growth. i. Optimization of existing tourist attraction sites for maximum benefits a) Carry out an audit of all existing tourist attraction sites; and b) Value addition to the existing sites by diversification of activities and provision of supporting services. 50 |

|---|

| | Strategy | | | Issues concerned | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| land regularization | land regularization | | | a) Perform land audit in the County. | |

| | | | | b) Settle the landless and formalize land ownership. | |

| | | | | c) Ensure proper planning and utilization of land. | |

| | | | | d) Sustainable management of land resources. | |

Page 72

ii. Preserving and conservation of historic and cultural tourist attraction sites a) Identification of all historic and cultural tourist attraction sites; b) Set up a strong historical, cultural sites management unit; and c) Allocating enough financial resources towards preservation and conservation of such sites. iii. Exploring new tourist attraction sites a) Identify new areas with tourist attraction potentials; b) Developing these areas to meet the requirements as tourist sites; and c) Introduction, development and enhancement of tourism activities. iv. Promoting production of basic requirement in hospitality sector a) Encourage adequate food production in the County to meet hospitality sector needs; b) Training and skill development for labor within hospitality sector; and c) Development and upgrading of County infrastructure to support tourism and hospitality sector. v. Aggressive branding and marketing of Kilifi County as a preferred tourist destination a) Establish a committee at a county level in charge of branding and marketing tourist sites; b) Set aside yearly budgetary allocation towards branding and marketing strategies; and c) Periodic benchmarking of tourist activities. vi. Creating and enhancing capacity building institution as a way of creating an enabling environment for tourism and hospitality sector. a) Establish training institutions to train locals in hospitality sector; b) Harmonize and coordinate various actors in this sector to ensure efficient running of tourism sector; and c) Integrating local participation in decision making and implementation of relevant tourism activities and initiative including sharing the benefits accrued from the tourism sector. The following map presents the Tourism and Conservation strategies 51

| ii. Preserving and conservation of historic and cultural tourist attraction sites a) Identification of all historic and cultural tourist attraction sites; b) Set up a strong historical, cultural sites management unit; and c) Allocating enough financial resources towards preservation and conservation of such sites. iii. Exploring new tourist attraction sites a) Identify new areas with tourist attraction potentials; b) Developing these areas to meet the requirements as tourist sites; and c) Introduction, development and enhancement of tourism activities. iv. Promoting production of basic requirement in hospitality sector a) Encourage adequate food production in the County to meet hospitality sector needs; b) Training and skill development for labor within hospitality sector; and c) Development and upgrading of County infrastructure to support tourism and hospitality sector. v. Aggressive branding and marketing of Kilifi County as a preferred tourist destination a) Establish a committee at a county level in charge of branding and marketing tourist sites; b) Set aside yearly budgetary allocation towards branding and marketing strategies; and c) Periodic benchmarking of tourist activities. vi. Creating and enhancing capacity building institution as a way of creating an enabling environment for tourism and hospitality sector. a) Establish training institutions to train locals in hospitality sector; b) Harmonize and coordinate various actors in this sector to ensure efficient running of tourism sector; and c) Integrating local participation in decision making and implementation of relevant tourism activities and initiative including sharing the benefits accrued from the tourism sector. The following map presents the Tourism and Conservation strategies 51 |

|---|

Page 73

Table 3.2 shows selected tourism strategies and how they shall be achieved. Table 3.2: Strategies in the Tourism sector Strategies Key Activities Expected Output Key Performance Indicators Promote and market Kilifi Re-brand and re-package Branding plans and Robust business County as a tourist tourism products strategy laid More revenue destination Increase no. visitors Packaged products and One stop shop/ decision services Enhanced value Develop and operationalize Clear route maps for Established tour routes Tourism Circuit visitors Satisfied clientele Tourist circuits Improved products and services Developed tourism products and services Improve auxiliary and Clear branding and Improved quality of produce and beautification program on identity services cities, building and Destination Identity Improved hygiene and facilities. attractiveness Develop online Tourism Access to online Improved inbound tourism marketing platforms markets both local and Improved service offering. international Improved incomes to the County Information sharing platforms 52

| Table 3.2 shows selected tourism strategies and how they shall be achieved. Table 3.2: Strategies in the Tourism sector Strategies Key Activities Expected Output Key Performance Indicators Promote and market Kilifi Re-brand and re-package Branding plans and Robust business County as a tourist tourism products strategy laid More revenue destination Increase no. visitors Packaged products and One stop shop/ decision services Enhanced value Develop and operationalize Clear route maps for Established tour routes Tourism Circuit visitors Satisfied clientele Tourist circuits Improved products and services Developed tourism products and services Improve auxiliary and Clear branding and Improved quality of produce and beautification program on identity services cities, building and Destination Identity Improved hygiene and facilities. attractiveness Develop online Tourism Access to online Improved inbound tourism marketing platforms markets both local and Improved service offering. international Improved incomes to the County Information sharing platforms 52 |

|---|

| Strategies | Key Activities | | Expected Output | | Key Performance Indicators | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Promote and market Kilifi County as a tourist destination | Re-brand and re-package tourism products | | Branding plans and | | Robust business More revenue Increase no. visitors One stop shop/ decision | |

| | | | strategy laid | | | |

| | | | Packaged products and | | | |

| | | | services | | | |

| | | | Enhanced value | | | |

| | Develop and operationalize Tourism Circuit | | Clear route maps for | | Established tour routes Satisfied clientele Improved products and services | |

| | | | visitors | | | |

| | | | Tourist circuits | | | |

| | | | Developed tourism | | | |

| | | | products and services | | | |

| | Improve auxiliary and beautification program on cities, building and facilities. | | Clear branding and | | Improved quality of produce and services Improved hygiene and attractiveness | |

| | | | identity | | | |

| | | | Destination Identity | | | |

| | Develop online Tourism marketing platforms | | Access to online | | Improved inbound tourism Improved service offering. Improved incomes to the County | |

| | | | markets both local and | | | |

| | | | international | | | |

| | | | Information sharing | | | |

| | | | platforms | | | |

| Promote and market Kilifi |

|---|

| County as a tourist |

| destination |

Page 74

Strategies Key Activities Expected Output Key Performance Indicators Design and implement a Carry out investment Identify Products and More investments county tourism master plan. portfolio services worthy More product and service investing offering Propose outdoor Interactive product Increase no. of local Tourists recreational activities mix High satisfaction index investment Improved local tourist uptake Develop an overall policy Develop favorable Investment policies High net worth investors in the framework for a sustainable legislations and policies Tourism Code of county tourism agenda in the County conduct for unethical Reduction on sex tourism behaviors Reduction of drug and subsistence abuse among other unethical behaviors Institutionalize Beach Improved safety and Increased safety safety Unit security Satisfied visitors Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Human Settlement This Strategy is aligned together with the infrastructural strategy. Industrial towns are proposed along the exterior corridor at Mariakani, Bamba, two new proposed towns at ADC irrigation scheme. New growth centers are also proposed where new target trade and commerce investments and initiatives are located. Supportive infrastructural services are proposed to trigger the necessary developments. The guiding principle in location of these proposed settlements is primarily to direct and redistribute development across the County. Rural settlements developments strategies aimed at reviving back the rural settlements as an important driver of the County development and growth. 53

| Strategies Key Activities Expected Output Key Performance Indicators Design and implement a Carry out investment Identify Products and More investments county tourism master plan. portfolio services worthy More product and service investing offering Propose outdoor Interactive product Increase no. of local Tourists recreational activities mix High satisfaction index investment Improved local tourist uptake Develop an overall policy Develop favorable Investment policies High net worth investors in the framework for a sustainable legislations and policies Tourism Code of county tourism agenda in the County conduct for unethical Reduction on sex tourism behaviors Reduction of drug and subsistence abuse among other unethical behaviors Institutionalize Beach Improved safety and Increased safety safety Unit security Satisfied visitors Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Human Settlement This Strategy is aligned together with the infrastructural strategy. Industrial towns are proposed along the exterior corridor at Mariakani, Bamba, two new proposed towns at ADC irrigation scheme. New growth centers are also proposed where new target trade and commerce investments and initiatives are located. Supportive infrastructural services are proposed to trigger the necessary developments. The guiding principle in location of these proposed settlements is primarily to direct and redistribute development across the County. Rural settlements developments strategies aimed at reviving back the rural settlements as an important driver of the County development and growth. 53 |

|---|

| | Strategies | | Key Activities | | Expected Output | | Key Performance Indicators | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Design and implement a county tourism master plan. | Design and implement a | | Carry out investment portfolio | | Identify Products and services worthy investing | | More investments More product and service offering | |

| | county tourism master plan. | | | | | | | |

| | | | Propose outdoor recreational activities investment | | Interactive product mix Improved local tourist uptake | | Increase no. of local Tourists High satisfaction index | |

| Develop an overall policy framework for a sustainable tourism agenda in the County | | | Develop favorable legislations and policies | | Investment policies Tourism Code of conduct for unethical behaviors | | High net worth investors in the county Reduction on sex tourism Reduction of drug and subsistence abuse among other unethical behaviors | |

| | | | Institutionalize Beach safety Unit | | Improved safety and security | | Increased safety Satisfied visitors | |

| Develop an overall policy |

|---|

| framework for a sustainable |

| tourism agenda in the County |

Page 75

Table 3.3: Proposed hierarchy of centers within Kilifi County and their strategies Proposed Name of centers Proposed strategies Tier 1 Malindi, Kilifi, Mariakani, Mtwapa ● An airstrip in Kilifi and Mtwapa. ● An airport at Langobaya ● Addition of education facilities ● Promoting tourism and commercial sectors ● Establishment of an elaborate sewer system ● Establishment of a business parks ● Establishment of a farmer’s markets ● Establishment of sports Complex ● Establishment of level V hospitals ● Transport and Commercial hub. ● Establishment of waste recycling plants. ● Establishment of industrial parks ● Transport and logistics hub (Mariakani) 2 Mazeras, Rabai, Kaloleni, Mkongani, ● Potential of upgrading to a municipality status. Tezo Matzangoni, Gede, Langobaya, ● Development of Kaloleni – Mariakani industrial Kakuyuni, Marafa, Ngongoni, development corridor Marereni, Ganze, Kakoneni, ● Establishment of industrial parks Kibaokiche, Vipingo, Midoina, ● Connection of centers with piped clean water. Matano, Mane, Baricho, Garashi, ● Upgrading of roads within and connecting centers. Jirole, GIS, center, Kaembeni, ● Establishment of a farmer market 54

| Table 3.3: Proposed hierarchy of centers within Kilifi County and their strategies Proposed Name of centers Proposed strategies Tier 1 Malindi, Kilifi, Mariakani, Mtwapa ● An airstrip in Kilifi and Mtwapa. ● An airport at Langobaya ● Addition of education facilities ● Promoting tourism and commercial sectors ● Establishment of an elaborate sewer system ● Establishment of a business parks ● Establishment of a farmer’s markets ● Establishment of sports Complex ● Establishment of level V hospitals ● Transport and Commercial hub. ● Establishment of waste recycling plants. ● Establishment of industrial parks ● Transport and logistics hub (Mariakani) 2 Mazeras, Rabai, Kaloleni, Mkongani, ● Potential of upgrading to a municipality status. Tezo Matzangoni, Gede, Langobaya, ● Development of Kaloleni – Mariakani industrial Kakuyuni, Marafa, Ngongoni, development corridor Marereni, Ganze, Kakoneni, ● Establishment of industrial parks Kibaokiche, Vipingo, Midoina, ● Connection of centers with piped clean water. Matano, Mane, Baricho, Garashi, ● Upgrading of roads within and connecting centers. Jirole, GIS, center, Kaembeni, ● Establishment of a farmer market 54 |

|---|

| | Proposed | | Name of centers | | Proposed strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Tier | | | | | |

| 1 | 1 | | Malindi, Kilifi, Mariakani, Mtwapa | | ● An airstrip in Kilifi and Mtwapa. | |

| | | | | | ● An airport at Langobaya | |

| | | | | | ● Addition of education facilities | |

| | | | | | ● Promoting tourism and commercial sectors | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of an elaborate sewer system | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of a business parks | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of a farmer’s markets | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of sports Complex | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of level V hospitals | |

| | | | | | ● Transport and Commercial hub. | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of waste recycling plants. | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of industrial parks | |

| | | | | | ● Transport and logistics hub (Mariakani) | |

| 2 | | | Mazeras, Rabai, Kaloleni, Mkongani, Tezo Matzangoni, Gede, Langobaya, Kakuyuni, Marafa, Ngongoni, Marereni, Ganze, Kakoneni, Kibaokiche, Vipingo, Midoina, Matano, Mane, Baricho, Garashi, Jirole, GIS, center, Kaembeni, | | ● Potential of upgrading to a municipality status. | |

| | | | | | ● Development of Kaloleni – Mariakani industrial | |

| | | | | | development corridor | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of industrial parks | |

| | | | | | ● Connection of centers with piped clean water. | |

| | | | | | ● Upgrading of roads within and connecting centers. | |

| | | | | | ● Establishment of a farmer market | |

Page 76

Proposed Name of centers Proposed strategies Tier Misupini, Adu, Ramada, Yethi, ● Establishment of a local market Watamu, Bamba, Chumani. 3 Ngomeni, Mambrui, Takaungu, ● Promotion of Health and education facilities. Dzitsoni, Shariani, Kikambala, ● Development of local markets Mjanaheri, Mtondia. ● Connection of centers with piped clean water ● Promotion of local industries ● Establishment of a local market 4 Kibaoni, Jaribuni, Chumani, Arabuko ● Promotion of Health and education facilities. Mida, Kwa Kamale, Mwambire, ● Development of local markets Msabaha, Fundisa, Mandunguni, ● Connection of centers with piped clean water Shauri Moyo Ganda, Kibaoni, Kwa ● Establishment of a local market Pumwani, Mandunguni. Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Environmental Conservation This strategy focuses on the conservation of ecologically important features within Kilifi. The strategy shows the combined set of special areas which need to be appropriately managed (included into conservation-focused zones in the County Spatial Plan to secure the County’s key Natural Capital assets for the future. CESA Categorization Features in the CESA map are prioritized and placed into 5 broad categories as outlined below: i. Protected Areas (PA): which are legally protected areas such as nature reserves and gazetted forests. Ecotourism is appropriate in these areas, along with limited facilities and infrastructure to support it. Sustainable resource use is acceptable if it is within management plans, is strictly controlled and subject to appropriate monitoring and evaluation. ii. Critical Ecologically Significant Areas One (CESA1): which are the most important ecological features outside of PAs such as wetlands, sacred forests and conservancies. These areas need to be kept in a natural or semi-natural condition, and only appropriate activities such as ecotourism and sustainable resource use (including grazing) should be allowed. iii. Critical Ecologically Significant Areas Two (CESA2): are other important ecological features such as the remaining forests. Similar to the previous category, these areas also need to be kept in a natural or semi-natural condition, and only appropriate activities such as ecotourism and sustainable resource use (including grazing) should be allowed. iv. Ecological Support Areas One (ESA1): are the key intact supporting areas, or areas important for services or ecological infrastructure. The areas include aquifers and river buffers. These need to be kept in a functional state. Urban, industrial, mining, large scale arable agriculture and large-scale infrastructure, as well as impacting activities such as dredging should be avoided in these areas. v. Ecological Support Areas Two (ESA2): are additional supporting areas, or areas important for services or ecological infrastructure, but which have been already significantly impacted. 55

| Proposed Name of centers Proposed strategies Tier Misupini, Adu, Ramada, Yethi, ● Establishment of a local market Watamu, Bamba, Chumani. 3 Ngomeni, Mambrui, Takaungu, ● Promotion of Health and education facilities. Dzitsoni, Shariani, Kikambala, ● Development of local markets Mjanaheri, Mtondia. ● Connection of centers with piped clean water ● Promotion of local industries ● Establishment of a local market 4 Kibaoni, Jaribuni, Chumani, Arabuko ● Promotion of Health and education facilities. Mida, Kwa Kamale, Mwambire, ● Development of local markets Msabaha, Fundisa, Mandunguni, ● Connection of centers with piped clean water Shauri Moyo Ganda, Kibaoni, Kwa ● Establishment of a local market Pumwani, Mandunguni. Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Environmental Conservation This strategy focuses on the conservation of ecologically important features within Kilifi. The strategy shows the combined set of special areas which need to be appropriately managed (included into conservation-focused zones in the County Spatial Plan to secure the County’s key Natural Capital assets for the future. CESA Categorization Features in the CESA map are prioritized and placed into 5 broad categories as outlined below: i. Protected Areas (PA): which are legally protected areas such as nature reserves and gazetted forests. Ecotourism is appropriate in these areas, along with limited facilities and infrastructure to support it. Sustainable resource use is acceptable if it is within management plans, is strictly controlled and subject to appropriate monitoring and evaluation. ii. Critical Ecologically Significant Areas One (CESA1): which are the most important ecological features outside of PAs such as wetlands, sacred forests and conservancies. These areas need to be kept in a natural or semi-natural condition, and only appropriate activities such as ecotourism and sustainable resource use (including grazing) should be allowed. iii. Critical Ecologically Significant Areas Two (CESA2): are other important ecological features such as the remaining forests. Similar to the previous category, these areas also need to be kept in a natural or semi-natural condition, and only appropriate activities such as ecotourism and sustainable resource use (including grazing) should be allowed. iv. Ecological Support Areas One (ESA1): are the key intact supporting areas, or areas important for services or ecological infrastructure. The areas include aquifers and river buffers. These need to be kept in a functional state. Urban, industrial, mining, large scale arable agriculture and large-scale infrastructure, as well as impacting activities such as dredging should be avoided in these areas. v. Ecological Support Areas Two (ESA2): are additional supporting areas, or areas important for services or ecological infrastructure, but which have been already significantly impacted. 55 |

|---|

| | Proposed | | Name of centers | | Proposed strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Tier | | | | | |

| | | | Misupini, Adu, Ramada, Yethi, Watamu, Bamba, Chumani. | | ● Establishment of a local market | |

| 3 | | | Ngomeni, Mambrui, Takaungu, Dzitsoni, Shariani, Kikambala, Mjanaheri, Mtondia. | | ● Promotion of Health and education facilities. ● Development of local markets ● Connection of centers with piped clean water ● Promotion of local industries ● Establishment of a local market | |

| 4 | | | Kibaoni, Jaribuni, Chumani, Arabuko Mida, Kwa Kamale, Mwambire, Msabaha, Fundisa, Mandunguni, Shauri Moyo Ganda, Kibaoni, Kwa Pumwani, Mandunguni. | | ● Promotion of Health and education facilities. ● Development of local markets ● Connection of centers with piped clean water ● Establishment of a local market | |

Page 77

These include river or wetland buffers which have been converted to agricultural fields. These areas need to be managed to maintain their remaining ecological functioning and avoid further loss. Existing land use (e.g., fields) needs to be kept stable, intensification should be avoided, and where possible areas should be rehabilitated. Infrastructure Transportation network The following map presents Kilifi County transport strategy This strategy focuses on developing transport infrastructural services. It also focuses on opening up the interior part of Kilifi, to decongest Mombasa-Lamu corridor and to open up more industrial, tourism and agricultural activities in the County so to increase the vibrancy of the economy. The specific objectives of the transportation strategy are as follows. i. Connecting production areas to potential markets; ii. Upgrading existing road networks to enhance accessibility; iii. Construction of new transportation corridors to open County hinterland; iv. Construction of a new international airport; and 56

| These include river or wetland buffers which have been converted to agricultural fields. These areas need to be managed to maintain their remaining ecological functioning and avoid further loss. Existing land use (e.g., fields) needs to be kept stable, intensification should be avoided, and where possible areas should be rehabilitated. Infrastructure Transportation network The following map presents Kilifi County transport strategy This strategy focuses on developing transport infrastructural services. It also focuses on opening up the interior part of Kilifi, to decongest Mombasa-Lamu corridor and to open up more industrial, tourism and agricultural activities in the County so to increase the vibrancy of the economy. The specific objectives of the transportation strategy are as follows. i. Connecting production areas to potential markets; ii. Upgrading existing road networks to enhance accessibility; iii. Construction of new transportation corridors to open County hinterland; iv. Construction of a new international airport; and 56 |

|---|

Page 78

v. Increase and expand existing infrastructural services such as water supply, power supply and sanitation services). The following map presents the road network system in Kilifi County. Water Sector. Kilifi County, which is considered a water scarce region, has a large percentage of its land area characterized by arid and semi-arid land conditions which are erratic, unreliable. The county also has unevenly distributed rainfall throughout the year. A large percentage of its population therefore relies on boreholes, shallow wells, water pans, seasonal streams and rivers, and piped water. This strategy therefore focuses on improving access to clean and safe drinking water. The main area of focus in Malindi sub county which has major urban nodes such as Malindi and Gede. The area also has the highest coverage of piped water. Based on 2019 population census report 22.2 percent of Malindi sub county population were connected to MAWASCO water system. Magarini sub county residents have the lowest coverage in terms of piped water. Only 1.1% of Magarini residents access piped water indicating a bias of service provision towards the urbanized areas. To improve accessibility to safe water the following policy actions have been recommended: i. Improve access to basic water supply 57

| v. Increase and expand existing infrastructural services such as water supply, power supply and sanitation services). The following map presents the road network system in Kilifi County. Water Sector. Kilifi County, which is considered a water scarce region, has a large percentage of its land area characterized by arid and semi-arid land conditions which are erratic, unreliable. The county also has unevenly distributed rainfall throughout the year. A large percentage of its population therefore relies on boreholes, shallow wells, water pans, seasonal streams and rivers, and piped water. This strategy therefore focuses on improving access to clean and safe drinking water. The main area of focus in Malindi sub county which has major urban nodes such as Malindi and Gede. The area also has the highest coverage of piped water. Based on 2019 population census report 22.2 percent of Malindi sub county population were connected to MAWASCO water system. Magarini sub county residents have the lowest coverage in terms of piped water. Only 1.1% of Magarini residents access piped water indicating a bias of service provision towards the urbanized areas. To improve accessibility to safe water the following policy actions have been recommended: i. Improve access to basic water supply 57 |

|---|

Page 79

The main high-volume pipes serving the Kilifi County runs along the main transport corridor targeting big urban nodes such as Kilifi, Malindi, Mtwapa and Mariakani. To improve the coverage of water provision, the County Government and the two service providers should expand the water distribution network to cover rural areas of Rabai, Malindi, Kilifi North, Kilifi South, Kaloleni, Ganze and Magarini sub counties. This will be attained by ensuring the storage capacity on the existing network is fully used. ii. Initiate Rural water supply projects There is a need to improve water provision in Magarini and Ganze sub counties. These two sub counties are sparsely populated and the water service providers should work together with other stakeholders to initiate community-based water projects including boreholes and water pans. More studies should be done to ensure that boreholes drilled has safe drinking water which is not saline. Solar pumps should be used in such areas since there is high potential for solar energy which is cheap. iii. Strengthen the capacity of institution in water supply sector To enhance the water sector and enhance water service provision there is a need to enhance the capacity of service providers. More staff needs to be hired and trained to get skills in handling the emergency issues in the water sector. The linkage between the community, the County water department and service providers should be strengthened. All new development applications passing through the County Planning Unit should have water harvesting proposals in order to tap rain water to complement provisions from MAWASCO and KIMAWASCO. This will only be possible if the County Government works hand in hand with the community and the water service providers. 58

| The main high-volume pipes serving the Kilifi County runs along the main transport corridor targeting big urban nodes such as Kilifi, Malindi, Mtwapa and Mariakani. To improve the coverage of water provision, the County Government and the two service providers should expand the water distribution network to cover rural areas of Rabai, Malindi, Kilifi North, Kilifi South, Kaloleni, Ganze and Magarini sub counties. This will be attained by ensuring the storage capacity on the existing network is fully used. ii. Initiate Rural water supply projects There is a need to improve water provision in Magarini and Ganze sub counties. These two sub counties are sparsely populated and the water service providers should work together with other stakeholders to initiate community-based water projects including boreholes and water pans. More studies should be done to ensure that boreholes drilled has safe drinking water which is not saline. Solar pumps should be used in such areas since there is high potential for solar energy which is cheap. iii. Strengthen the capacity of institution in water supply sector To enhance the water sector and enhance water service provision there is a need to enhance the capacity of service providers. More staff needs to be hired and trained to get skills in handling the emergency issues in the water sector. The linkage between the community, the County water department and service providers should be strengthened. All new development applications passing through the County Planning Unit should have water harvesting proposals in order to tap rain water to complement provisions from MAWASCO and KIMAWASCO. This will only be possible if the County Government works hand in hand with the community and the water service providers. 58 |

|---|

Page 80

Energy The key strategies and recommendation are outlined to ensure that energy access is improved in Kilifi County. The strategy for energy sector development is summarized in the table below Table 3.4: Strategies in the Energy sector Strategy Policy Issues Interventions Wind power ● Wind energy potential largely lays unexploited ● To develop wind energy as an alternative development ● Inadequate skilled human resource to develop renewable energy resource wind energy technologies ● Promoting collaboration and partnerships ● Limited data on wind regimes with learning institutions for sharing of ● Limited Research on Wind energy technologies quality data on wind energy technologies ● Providing appropriate incentives to producers, developers and consumers of wind power systems ● Kilifi County to have a 3MW windpower project at Rasngomeni. Solar energy ● High upfront cost for solar installation ● To develop and implement a public development ● Lack of public awareness on solar technologies. awareness creation campaign on the ● Lack of training and manpower. opportunities and benefit of solar ● Lack of markets for solar energy technologies. technologies. ● Promote training and manpower development 59

| Energy The key strategies and recommendation are outlined to ensure that energy access is improved in Kilifi County. The strategy for energy sector development is summarized in the table below Table 3.4: Strategies in the Energy sector Strategy Policy Issues Interventions Wind power ● Wind energy potential largely lays unexploited ● To develop wind energy as an alternative development ● Inadequate skilled human resource to develop renewable energy resource wind energy technologies ● Promoting collaboration and partnerships ● Limited data on wind regimes with learning institutions for sharing of ● Limited Research on Wind energy technologies quality data on wind energy technologies ● Providing appropriate incentives to producers, developers and consumers of wind power systems ● Kilifi County to have a 3MW windpower project at Rasngomeni. Solar energy ● High upfront cost for solar installation ● To develop and implement a public development ● Lack of public awareness on solar technologies. awareness creation campaign on the ● Lack of training and manpower. opportunities and benefit of solar ● Lack of markets for solar energy technologies. technologies. ● Promote training and manpower development 59 |

|---|

| | Strategy | | Policy Issues | | Interventions | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Wind power development | Wind power | | ● Wind energy potential largely lays unexploited ● Inadequate skilled human resource to develop wind energy technologies ● Limited data on wind regimes ● Limited Research on Wind energy technologies | | ● To develop wind energy as an alternative | |

| | development | | | | renewable energy resource | |

| | | | | | ● Promoting collaboration and partnerships | |

| | | | | | with learning institutions for sharing of | |

| | | | | | quality data on wind energy technologies | |

| | | | | | ● Providing appropriate incentives to | |

| | | | | | producers, developers and consumers of wind | |

| | | | | | power systems | |

| | | | | | ● Kilifi County to have a 3MW windpower | |

| | | | | | project at Rasngomeni. | |

| Solar energy development | | | ● High upfront cost for solar installation ● Lack of public awareness on solar technologies. ● Lack of training and manpower. ● Lack of markets for solar energy technologies. | | ● To develop and implement a public | |

| | | | | | awareness creation campaign on the | |

| | | | | | opportunities and benefit of solar | |

| | | | | | technologies. | |

| | | | | | ● Promote training and manpower development | |

| Solar energy |

|---|

| development |

Page 81

Strategy Policy Issues Interventions ● Promote collaboration, partnerships and linkages, research and learning institutions. ● County to vigorously pursue capabilities to utilize solar energy technologies ● To promote the use of solar energy as an alternative energy resource in rural and urban areas. ● To develop markets for solar energy technologies ● To develop solar conversion technologies locally Oil exploration project ● Lack of collaboration with the National ● To work closely with the National government on matters concerning oil Government to remove the existing VAT exploration. remission regime that is available to oil and gas. ● Need to work with speed to withhold tax on the gross proceeds on the assignment of rights and sale of assets by oil and gas companies and other companies in the solid mineral sector. ● To draft mineral resource policy that includes tax measures has been done with stakeholders input ongoing. Biomass Policy Issues Strategies Resource ● Overreliance of forests for fuel wood by ● Promote cultivation of fast-growing trees Projects rural communities. species in order to regeneration of forests. ● Inadequate energy efficiency and ● Promote the development of efficient wood conservation technologies. stoves. ● Low awareness of impacts of forests ● Promote educational campaigns to enlighten depletions. the public on the problems of desertification ● Inadequate knowledge of fast maturing tree and soil erosion resulting from deforestation. species. ● Ensure enforcement of forestry laws. ● The county to promote alternative energy resources to fuel wood ● The county to promote improved efficiency in the use of fuel wood ● The county to intensify its effort to increase the production of land under forest cover Biogas ● Under exploitation of biogas technologies as ● Develop and implement a public awareness Production an alternative energy source for rural creation strategy on the benefits and Proposals communities. potential of biogas technologies. ● Lack of access to biogas technologies to ● Work with local and national learning rural communities. institutions to support RD&D on biogas ● Lack of feasibility study for all sub counties energy technologies. on the possible households which qualify for ● Rollout biogas initiative to support biogas to biogas digesters. public institutions ● Establish and operationalize biogas demonstration centers in village polytechnic Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 60

| Strategy Policy Issues Interventions ● Promote collaboration, partnerships and linkages, research and learning institutions. ● County to vigorously pursue capabilities to utilize solar energy technologies ● To promote the use of solar energy as an alternative energy resource in rural and urban areas. ● To develop markets for solar energy technologies ● To develop solar conversion technologies locally Oil exploration project ● Lack of collaboration with the National ● To work closely with the National government on matters concerning oil Government to remove the existing VAT exploration. remission regime that is available to oil and gas. ● Need to work with speed to withhold tax on the gross proceeds on the assignment of rights and sale of assets by oil and gas companies and other companies in the solid mineral sector. ● To draft mineral resource policy that includes tax measures has been done with stakeholders input ongoing. Biomass Policy Issues Strategies Resource ● Overreliance of forests for fuel wood by ● Promote cultivation of fast-growing trees Projects rural communities. species in order to regeneration of forests. ● Inadequate energy efficiency and ● Promote the development of efficient wood conservation technologies. stoves. ● Low awareness of impacts of forests ● Promote educational campaigns to enlighten depletions. the public on the problems of desertification ● Inadequate knowledge of fast maturing tree and soil erosion resulting from deforestation. species. ● Ensure enforcement of forestry laws. ● The county to promote alternative energy resources to fuel wood ● The county to promote improved efficiency in the use of fuel wood ● The county to intensify its effort to increase the production of land under forest cover Biogas ● Under exploitation of biogas technologies as ● Develop and implement a public awareness Production an alternative energy source for rural creation strategy on the benefits and Proposals communities. potential of biogas technologies. ● Lack of access to biogas technologies to ● Work with local and national learning rural communities. institutions to support RD&D on biogas ● Lack of feasibility study for all sub counties energy technologies. on the possible households which qualify for ● Rollout biogas initiative to support biogas to biogas digesters. public institutions ● Establish and operationalize biogas demonstration centers in village polytechnic Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 60 |

|---|

| | Strategy | | Policy Issues | | Interventions | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | ● Promote collaboration, partnerships and | |

| | | | | | linkages, research and learning institutions. | |

| | | | | | ● County to vigorously pursue capabilities to | |

| | | | | | utilize solar energy technologies | |

| | | | | | ● To promote the use of solar energy as an | |

| | | | | | alternative energy resource in rural and urban | |

| | | | | | areas. | |

| | | | | | ● To develop markets for solar energy | |

| | | | | | technologies | |

| | | | | | ● To develop solar conversion technologies | |

| | | | | | locally | |

| Oil exploration project | | | ● Lack of collaboration with the National | | ● To work closely with the National | |

| | | | government on matters concerning oil | | Government to remove the existing VAT | |

| | | | exploration. | | remission regime that is available to oil and | |

| | | | | | gas. | |

| | | | | | ● Need to work with speed to withhold tax on | |

| | | | | | the gross proceeds on the assignment of rights | |

| | | | | | and sale of assets by oil and gas companies | |

| | | | | | and other companies in the solid mineral | |

| | | | | | sector. | |

| | | | | | ● To draft mineral resource policy that includes | |

| | | | | | tax measures has been done with stakeholders | |

| | | | | | input ongoing. | |

| Biomass Resource Projects | | | Policy Issues | | Strategies | |

| | | | ● Overreliance of forests for fuel wood by | | ● Promote cultivation of fast-growing trees | |

| | | | rural communities. | | species in order to regeneration of forests. | |

| | | | ● Inadequate energy efficiency and | | ● Promote the development of efficient wood | |

| | | | conservation technologies. | | stoves. | |

| | | | ● Low awareness of impacts of forests | | ● Promote educational campaigns to enlighten | |

| | | | depletions. | | the public on the problems of desertification | |

| | | | ● Inadequate knowledge of fast maturing tree | | and soil erosion resulting from deforestation. | |

| | | | species. | | ● Ensure enforcement of forestry laws. | |

| | | | | | ● The county to promote alternative energy | |

| | | | | | resources to fuel wood | |

| | | | | | ● The county to promote improved efficiency | |

| | | | | | in the use of fuel wood | |

| | | | | | ● The county to intensify its effort to increase | |

| | | | | | the production of land under forest cover | |

| Biogas Production Proposals | | | ● Under exploitation of biogas technologies as | | ● Develop and implement a public awareness | |

| | | | an alternative energy source for rural | | creation strategy on the benefits and | |

| | | | communities. | | potential of biogas technologies. | |

| | | | ● Lack of access to biogas technologies to | | ● Work with local and national learning | |

| | | | rural communities. | | institutions to support RD&D on biogas | |

| | | | ● Lack of feasibility study for all sub counties | | energy technologies. | |

| | | | on the possible households which qualify for | | ● Rollout biogas initiative to support biogas to | |

| | | | biogas digesters. | | public institutions | |

| | | | | | ● Establish and operationalize biogas | |

| | | | | | demonstration centers in village polytechnic | |

| Oil exploration |

|---|

| project |

| Biomass |

|---|

| Resource |

| Projects |

| Biogas |

|---|

| Production |

| Proposals |

Page 82

The wind energy and solar energy potentials are presented in the following maps. 61

| The wind energy and solar energy potentials are presented in the following maps. 61 |

|---|

Page 83

Education Facilities The goal of the education sector strategy is to be a leading responsive facilitator in improving the quality of Early Childhood Education, Vocational Training and Information Communication and Technology services through capacity building and responsiveness to societal needs. The mission is to provide and coordinate quality Education, training and enhance on integration of Information Technology systems for sustainable development. The table below summarizes some of the objectives and strategies in the education sector. Table 3.5: Strategies in the education sector (Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION OBJECTIVES STRATEGIES Early Childhood Education Improve infrastructure • Construction of ECD Centers Ensure Equity in Early Childhood Even distribution of • Construction of learning centers in Education learning centers all wards VOCATIONAL TRAINING To promote access and To improve • Infrastructure development and participation in vocational training enrolment equipping VTCs 62

| Education Facilities The goal of the education sector strategy is to be a leading responsive facilitator in improving the quality of Early Childhood Education, Vocational Training and Information Communication and Technology services through capacity building and responsiveness to societal needs. The mission is to provide and coordinate quality Education, training and enhance on integration of Information Technology systems for sustainable development. The table below summarizes some of the objectives and strategies in the education sector. Table 3.5: Strategies in the education sector (Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION OBJECTIVES STRATEGIES Early Childhood Education Improve infrastructure • Construction of ECD Centers Ensure Equity in Early Childhood Even distribution of • Construction of learning centers in Education learning centers all wards VOCATIONAL TRAINING To promote access and To improve • Infrastructure development and participation in vocational training enrolment equipping VTCs 62 |

|---|

| | EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | OBJECTIVES | | STRATEGIES | |

| | Early Childhood Education | | Improve infrastructure | | • Construction of ECD Centers | |

| | Ensure Equity in Early Childhood | | Even distribution of learning centers | | • Construction of learning centers in all wards | |

| | Education | | | | | |

| | VOCATIONAL TRAINING | | | | | |

| | To promote access and | | To improve enrolment | | • Infrastructure development and equipping VTCs | |

| | participation in vocational training | | | | | |

Page 84

• Rebranding and repositioning vocational training To promote access and To improve enrolment • Infrastructure development and participation in vocational training equipping VTCs • Rebranding and repositioning vocational training To strengthen strategic To strengthen institution Improve vocational training industry partnerships and linkages in collaboration in the linkage promotion of Vocational training management of vocational training Health Facilities The health services proposals aim at enhancing ease of access to health facilities by the residents of Kilifi County. Kilifi County is endowed with health services from level II to level VI as discussed below. i. Level II: Kilifi County is well covered with health facilities. Based on the 3km radius service area, there are some sections which are not covered adequately. These areas have less population but based on the principle of equity, new facilities have to ii. be constructed, equipped and staffed in accordance with the Ministry of health guidelines and standards. An extra 57 facilities were required to ensure the coverage of 1 facility for a population of 10,000 persons. To bring service close to people a total of 27 new dispensaries have been proposed in areas which do not meet the minimum population threshold of 10,000 persons per facility as per Ministry of Health Standards. Alternatively, the county can hire and train community health workers with ambulances services being availed for referral services 63

| • Rebranding and repositioning vocational training To promote access and To improve enrolment • Infrastructure development and participation in vocational training equipping VTCs • Rebranding and repositioning vocational training To strengthen strategic To strengthen institution Improve vocational training industry partnerships and linkages in collaboration in the linkage promotion of Vocational training management of vocational training Health Facilities The health services proposals aim at enhancing ease of access to health facilities by the residents of Kilifi County. Kilifi County is endowed with health services from level II to level VI as discussed below. i. Level II: Kilifi County is well covered with health facilities. Based on the 3km radius service area, there are some sections which are not covered adequately. These areas have less population but based on the principle of equity, new facilities have to ii. be constructed, equipped and staffed in accordance with the Ministry of health guidelines and standards. An extra 57 facilities were required to ensure the coverage of 1 facility for a population of 10,000 persons. To bring service close to people a total of 27 new dispensaries have been proposed in areas which do not meet the minimum population threshold of 10,000 persons per facility as per Ministry of Health Standards. Alternatively, the county can hire and train community health workers with ambulances services being availed for referral services 63 |

|---|

| | | | | | • Rebranding and repositioning | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | vocational training | |

| To promote access and participation in vocational training | To improve enrolment | | | | • Infrastructure development and | |

| | | | | | equipping VTCs | |

| | | | | | • Rebranding and repositioning | |

| | | | | | vocational training | |

| To strengthen strategic partnerships and linkages in promotion of Vocational training | | To strengthen institution | | Improve vocational training industry linkage | Improve vocational training industry | |

| | | collaboration in the | | | linkage | |

| | | management of | | | | |

| | | vocational training | | | | |

| To promote access and |

|---|

| participation in vocational training |

| To strengthen strategic |

|---|

| partnerships and linkages in |

| promotion of Vocational training |

Page 85

Table 3.6: Proposed dispensaries within Kilifi County Sublocation Population Demand Existing Deficit Comment

1. Kakuyuni 8316 1 3 -2 Add two
2. Mtsara-Wa-Tsatsu 19649 2 0 2 Add two
3. Milore 4334 0 1 -1 Add one
4. Mwambani 4686 0 1 -1 Add one
5. Mikuyuni 3406 0 1 -1 Add one
6. Makobeni 3619 0 1 -1 Add one
7. Ganze/Tsangalaweni 16038 2 1 1 Add one
8. Mitsedzini 1726 0 0 0 Add one for equity
9. Mnagoni 1497 0 0 0 Add one for equity
10. Kidemu 3352 0 0 0 Add one for equity
11. Mweza/Migodomani 2772 0 0 0 Add one for equity
12. Mikamini 1689 0 0 0 Add one for equity
13. Rare 1833 0 0 0 Add one for equity
14. Mitsemerini 3626 0 0 0 Add one for equity
15. Magogoni 7007 1 1 0 Add one for equity
16. Dangarini 3197 0 0 0 Add one for equity
17. Mwapula 2915 0 0 0 Add one for equity
18. Marere 2905 0 0 0 Add one for equity
19. Viragoni 11978 1 1 0 Add one for equity
20. Vyambani 3832 0 0 0 Add one for equity
21. Kibwabwani 6228 1 1 0 Add one for equity
22. Chasimba 8830 1 1 0 Add one for equity
23. Chala/Mihingoni 11009 1 1 0 Add one for equity
24. Mbwa/Kikkomani 10938 1 1 0 Add one for equity
25. Mleji 14195 1 1 0 Add one for equity
26. Pangangani/Maereni 6374 1 1 0 Add one for equity
27. Miyuki 7707 1 1 0 Add one for equity Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 iii. Level III: They include all health centers within Kilifi County. iv. Level IV: There are three sub county hospitals in Kilifi located at Mariakani, Malindi and Bamba. For effective operation of the health system within the County, each sub county should have level IV health facility. This will reduce referral time and also congestion at County Referral Hospitals. v. Level V: There is only one level V teaching and referral hospital in Kiliifi County. This is the Kilifi County Teaching and Referral hospital. The facilities are linked to Kenya Medical Training Institute. 64

| Table 3.6: Proposed dispensaries within Kilifi County Sublocation Population Demand Existing Deficit Comment 1. Kakuyuni 8316 1 3 -2 Add two 2. Mtsara-Wa-Tsatsu 19649 2 0 2 Add two 3. Milore 4334 0 1 -1 Add one 4. Mwambani 4686 0 1 -1 Add one 5. Mikuyuni 3406 0 1 -1 Add one 6. Makobeni 3619 0 1 -1 Add one 7. Ganze/Tsangalaweni 16038 2 1 1 Add one 8. Mitsedzini 1726 0 0 0 Add one for equity 9. Mnagoni 1497 0 0 0 Add one for equity 10. Kidemu 3352 0 0 0 Add one for equity 11. Mweza/Migodomani 2772 0 0 0 Add one for equity 12. Mikamini 1689 0 0 0 Add one for equity 13. Rare 1833 0 0 0 Add one for equity 14. Mitsemerini 3626 0 0 0 Add one for equity 15. Magogoni 7007 1 1 0 Add one for equity 16. Dangarini 3197 0 0 0 Add one for equity 17. Mwapula 2915 0 0 0 Add one for equity 18. Marere 2905 0 0 0 Add one for equity 19. Viragoni 11978 1 1 0 Add one for equity 20. Vyambani 3832 0 0 0 Add one for equity 21. Kibwabwani 6228 1 1 0 Add one for equity 22. Chasimba 8830 1 1 0 Add one for equity 23. Chala/Mihingoni 11009 1 1 0 Add one for equity 24. Mbwa/Kikkomani 10938 1 1 0 Add one for equity 25. Mleji 14195 1 1 0 Add one for equity 26. Pangangani/Maereni 6374 1 1 0 Add one for equity 27. Miyuki 7707 1 1 0 Add one for equity Source: Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 iii. Level III: They include all health centers within Kilifi County. iv. Level IV: There are three sub county hospitals in Kilifi located at Mariakani, Malindi and Bamba. For effective operation of the health system within the County, each sub county should have level IV health facility. This will reduce referral time and also congestion at County Referral Hospitals. v. Level V: There is only one level V teaching and referral hospital in Kiliifi County. This is the Kilifi County Teaching and Referral hospital. The facilities are linked to Kenya Medical Training Institute. 64 |

|---|

| Sublocation | | | Population | | Demand | | Existing | | Deficit | | Comment | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | 1. Kakuyuni | | 8316 | | 1 | | 3 | | -2 | | Add two | |

| | 2. Mtsara-Wa-Tsatsu | | 19649 | | 2 | | 0 | | 2 | | Add two | |

| | 3. Milore | | 4334 | | 0 | | 1 | | -1 | | Add one | |

| | 4. Mwambani | | 4686 | | 0 | | 1 | | -1 | | Add one | |

| | 5. Mikuyuni | | 3406 | | 0 | | 1 | | -1 | | Add one | |

| | 6. Makobeni | | 3619 | | 0 | | 1 | | -1 | | Add one | |

| | 7. Ganze/Tsangalaweni | | 16038 | | 2 | | 1 | | 1 | | Add one | |

| | 8. Mitsedzini | | 1726 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 9. Mnagoni | | 1497 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 10. Kidemu | | 3352 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 11. Mweza/Migodomani | | 2772 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 12. Mikamini | | 1689 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 13. Rare | | 1833 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 14. Mitsemerini | | 3626 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 15. Magogoni | | 7007 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 16. Dangarini | | 3197 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 17. Mwapula | | 2915 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 18. Marere | | 2905 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 19. Viragoni | | 11978 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 20. Vyambani | | 3832 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 21. Kibwabwani | | 6228 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 22. Chasimba | | 8830 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 23. Chala/Mihingoni | | 11009 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 24. Mbwa/Kikkomani | | 10938 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 25. Mleji | | 14195 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 26. Pangangani/Maereni | | 6374 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

| | 27. Miyuki | | 7707 | | 1 | | 1 | | 0 | | Add one for equity | |

Page 86

vi. Level VI: This specialized national facility; the whole of the North Coast region does not have one. Based on the analysis, Malindi is ideal since it is located on the main spine road that connects the whole region. The following maps presents the distribution of health facilities and health coverage potential in the county, 65

| vi. Level VI: This specialized national facility; the whole of the North Coast region does not have one. Based on the analysis, Malindi is ideal since it is located on the main spine road that connects the whole region. The following maps presents the distribution of health facilities and health coverage potential in the county, 65 |

|---|

Page 87

Waste Management The Kilifi County spatial plan envisions a clean and healthy environment where its residents can live, work comfortably and conveniently. Achievement of the vision requires development of an outstanding solid waste management system and infusion of significant change in the culture of handling waste. Solid Waste Management Strategy The Kilifi County Spatial plan proposes for major Towns Solid Waste Management Programme towards achieving zero waste disposals through separation at source, collection, recycling and materials processing. The main components of the proposed Kilifi County Solid Waste Management Programme are: i. Installation of adequate number of street litter bins on the streets of major towns and other major market centers; ii. Installation of containers for refuse storage at points of generation; 66

| Waste Management The Kilifi County spatial plan envisions a clean and healthy environment where its residents can live, work comfortably and conveniently. Achievement of the vision requires development of an outstanding solid waste management system and infusion of significant change in the culture of handling waste. Solid Waste Management Strategy The Kilifi County Spatial plan proposes for major Towns Solid Waste Management Programme towards achieving zero waste disposals through separation at source, collection, recycling and materials processing. The main components of the proposed Kilifi County Solid Waste Management Programme are: i. Installation of adequate number of street litter bins on the streets of major towns and other major market centers; ii. Installation of containers for refuse storage at points of generation; 66 |

|---|

Page 88

iii. Investment in modern solid waste management plants that incorporate sorting, recycling, composting and bio-digestion; iv. Enhancement of capacity of staff for effective solid waste management in Kilifi County; v. Enhancement of community awareness on a clean environment through effective solid waste management at household level; and vi. Development of a Solid Waste Management Policy for Kilifi County that addresses all the waste generated by the county including industrial waste. For effective realization of the Programme, the scope is divided into five key elements as described in the Table 3.7. Table 3.7: Elements of waste management in Kilifi County Element Policies Waste Separation at Source, ● Recyclables to be delivered to a recyclables station for sale to recyclers. Collection and Community ● The organic and mixed waste to be sorted at a materials processing Mobilization plant. ● Organic components to be composted and bio-digested to produce manure and generate biogas. ● Residue materials to be disposed off in a sanitary landfill ● Training of residents of Major towns on management of solid waste. ● Community mobilization through awareness programs on need for solid waste management and the separation of waste at source. Materials Processing Facilities ● Setting aside large sections of prime urban and land for landfilling or transporting of waste to distance disposal sites. ● Recovery of value in waste through recycling, processing to usable products and energy recovery. ● The provision of stations for recyclables and for materials processing facilities for sorting composting, bio-digestion and landfilling of residue materials. Source Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Management of Industrial Waste The objective of this strategy is the protection of human health and the environment. The plan proposes for the tailoring of industrial waste management practices to the risk associated with them. It advocates for the application of pollution prevention options when designing a waste management system. Pollution prevention will reduce waste disposal needs and can minimize impacts across all environmental media. Pollution prevention can also reduce the volume and toxicity of waste. Lastly, pollution prevention can ease some of the burdens, risks, and liabilities of waste management. Where pollution prevention is not applicable the following waste management strategies can be applied. 67

| iii. Investment in modern solid waste management plants that incorporate sorting, recycling, composting and bio-digestion; iv. Enhancement of capacity of staff for effective solid waste management in Kilifi County; v. Enhancement of community awareness on a clean environment through effective solid waste management at household level; and vi. Development of a Solid Waste Management Policy for Kilifi County that addresses all the waste generated by the county including industrial waste. For effective realization of the Programme, the scope is divided into five key elements as described in the Table 3.7. Table 3.7: Elements of waste management in Kilifi County Element Policies Waste Separation at Source, ● Recyclables to be delivered to a recyclables station for sale to recyclers. Collection and Community ● The organic and mixed waste to be sorted at a materials processing Mobilization plant. ● Organic components to be composted and bio-digested to produce manure and generate biogas. ● Residue materials to be disposed off in a sanitary landfill ● Training of residents of Major towns on management of solid waste. ● Community mobilization through awareness programs on need for solid waste management and the separation of waste at source. Materials Processing Facilities ● Setting aside large sections of prime urban and land for landfilling or transporting of waste to distance disposal sites. ● Recovery of value in waste through recycling, processing to usable products and energy recovery. ● The provision of stations for recyclables and for materials processing facilities for sorting composting, bio-digestion and landfilling of residue materials. Source Kilifi CSP 2021-2030 Management of Industrial Waste The objective of this strategy is the protection of human health and the environment. The plan proposes for the tailoring of industrial waste management practices to the risk associated with them. It advocates for the application of pollution prevention options when designing a waste management system. Pollution prevention will reduce waste disposal needs and can minimize impacts across all environmental media. Pollution prevention can also reduce the volume and toxicity of waste. Lastly, pollution prevention can ease some of the burdens, risks, and liabilities of waste management. Where pollution prevention is not applicable the following waste management strategies can be applied. 67 |

|---|

| | Element | | Policies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| Waste Separation at Source, Collection and Community Mobilization | Waste Separation at Source, | | ● Recyclables to be delivered to a recyclables station for sale to recyclers. | |

| | Collection and Community | | ● The organic and mixed waste to be sorted at a materials processing | |

| | Mobilization | | plant. | |

| | | | ● Organic components to be composted and bio-digested to produce | |

| | | | manure and generate biogas. | |

| | | | ● Residue materials to be disposed off in a sanitary landfill | |

| | | | ● Training of residents of Major towns on management of solid waste. | |

| | | | ● Community mobilization through awareness programs on need for | |

| | | | solid waste management and the separation of waste at source. | |

| Materials Processing Facilities | | | ● Setting aside large sections of prime urban and land for landfilling | |

| | | | or transporting of waste to distance disposal sites. | |

| | | | ● Recovery of value in waste through recycling, processing to usable | |

| | | | products and energy recovery. | |

| | | | ● The provision of stations for recyclables and for materials | |

| | | | processing facilities for sorting composting, bio-digestion and | |

| | | | landfilling of residue materials. | |

Page 89

i. Source Reduction; ii. Setting up of liquid waste management systems; iii. Setting up of solid waste management system; and iv. Management of liquid waste through sewage treatment. The development strategies for urban areas towards waste management is presented in the following map. Industrialization This strategy is deemed to have lots of low-hanging fruits. For agriculture to measure-up, it has to be modernized and mechanized. Value addition industries are set up strategically across the County based on available resources. Apart from the value-addition industries, extractive and other existing industries are earmarked for expansion. These industries will create direct and indirect benefits to locals and County government. The strategies include: i. Modernization of agricultural, livestock and fish production as sources of raw material for industrial development. i. Promoting large scale farming in different zones in the County; ii. Promoting intensive agriculture and livestock husbandry; iii. Promoting irrigated agriculture to supplement rain-fed agriculture; and iv. Promote mechanized farming technologies. ii. Optimization of land resources to enhance industrial development i. Land banking and land pooling for industrial development; 68

| i. Source Reduction; ii. Setting up of liquid waste management systems; iii. Setting up of solid waste management system; and iv. Management of liquid waste through sewage treatment. The development strategies for urban areas towards waste management is presented in the following map. Industrialization This strategy is deemed to have lots of low-hanging fruits. For agriculture to measure-up, it has to be modernized and mechanized. Value addition industries are set up strategically across the County based on available resources. Apart from the value-addition industries, extractive and other existing industries are earmarked for expansion. These industries will create direct and indirect benefits to locals and County government. The strategies include: i. Modernization of agricultural, livestock and fish production as sources of raw material for industrial development. i. Promoting large scale farming in different zones in the County; ii. Promoting intensive agriculture and livestock husbandry; iii. Promoting irrigated agriculture to supplement rain-fed agriculture; and iv. Promote mechanized farming technologies. ii. Optimization of land resources to enhance industrial development i. Land banking and land pooling for industrial development; 68 |

|---|

Page 90

ii. Adjudication and registration of land to enhance tenure security of the locals; iii. Resolving existing land conflicts in Kilifi County; iv. Zoning of land for various uses according to their potential; and v. Locating suitable industries within production areas. iii. Developing transport and infrastructural services to support industrialization i. Connecting production areas to potential markets; ii. Upgrading existing road networks to enhance accessibility; iii. Construction of new transportation corridors to open County hinterland; iv. Construction of a new international airport; and v. Increase and expand existing infrastructural services such as water supply. iv. Promoting urbanization and human settlement as a key sector in promoting industrial development i. Earmarking growth centers around industries; ii. Creating new urban centers in areas with proposed industrial developments; iii. Promote clustered settlements in rural areas; and iv. Promote good access to basic infrastructures, utilities and services. v. Promoting and enhancing capacity building to support industrialization i. Specific training for improving skilled labor for specialized industrialization; ii. Establishment of mid-level institutions for training to support industrial development; iii. Promote public private partnerships in sourcing for capital; and iv. Yearly budget allocation by County government to support industrial growth. The following map presents the industrial locations in the county 69

| ii. Adjudication and registration of land to enhance tenure security of the locals; iii. Resolving existing land conflicts in Kilifi County; iv. Zoning of land for various uses according to their potential; and v. Locating suitable industries within production areas. iii. Developing transport and infrastructural services to support industrialization i. Connecting production areas to potential markets; ii. Upgrading existing road networks to enhance accessibility; iii. Construction of new transportation corridors to open County hinterland; iv. Construction of a new international airport; and v. Increase and expand existing infrastructural services such as water supply. iv. Promoting urbanization and human settlement as a key sector in promoting industrial development i. Earmarking growth centers around industries; ii. Creating new urban centers in areas with proposed industrial developments; iii. Promote clustered settlements in rural areas; and iv. Promote good access to basic infrastructures, utilities and services. v. Promoting and enhancing capacity building to support industrialization i. Specific training for improving skilled labor for specialized industrialization; ii. Establishment of mid-level institutions for training to support industrial development; iii. Promote public private partnerships in sourcing for capital; and iv. Yearly budget allocation by County government to support industrial growth. The following map presents the industrial locations in the county 69 |

|---|

Page 91

Trade and Commerce: The economic development of Kilifi County is steered by trade and commerce. Due to widespread urbanization in Kilifi County, the existing urban areas are growing in size while new urban areas are growing in number. Kilifi has a potential of more trading activities that would help improve the economy of the county. Some of the strategies that can help boost the Trade and commerce sector include. i. Establishment of more urban centers; ii. Establishment of formal markets to give farmers a platform for their market produce; iii. Encouraging joining of Saccos and cooperatives, Creation of job opportunities and employment, More industries for export produce; and iv. Link between various transport networks to facilitate movement of goods and services and Optimization of the available resources. Other strategies are concerned with the improvement of small-scale business sector and they include i. Solicit for the entry and formation of organization which provide affordable credit; ii. Provision of appropriate and legal mechanisms to ensure fair business practices and level playing ground for the business actors; 70

| Trade and Commerce: The economic development of Kilifi County is steered by trade and commerce. Due to widespread urbanization in Kilifi County, the existing urban areas are growing in size while new urban areas are growing in number. Kilifi has a potential of more trading activities that would help improve the economy of the county. Some of the strategies that can help boost the Trade and commerce sector include. i. Establishment of more urban centers; ii. Establishment of formal markets to give farmers a platform for their market produce; iii. Encouraging joining of Saccos and cooperatives, Creation of job opportunities and employment, More industries for export produce; and iv. Link between various transport networks to facilitate movement of goods and services and Optimization of the available resources. Other strategies are concerned with the improvement of small-scale business sector and they include i. Solicit for the entry and formation of organization which provide affordable credit; ii. Provision of appropriate and legal mechanisms to ensure fair business practices and level playing ground for the business actors; 70 |

|---|

Page 92

iii. Encourage more players in the provision of training and business skills; iv. Promote aggressive marketing strategies by all the stake holders; v. Capacity builds small-scale businesses to manage their businesses professionally; vi. To establish a one stop center for trade and investment information in the County; and vii. To develop quality products for export. The following map presents the existing land potential. 71

| iii. Encourage more players in the provision of training and business skills; iv. Promote aggressive marketing strategies by all the stake holders; v. Capacity builds small-scale businesses to manage their businesses professionally; vi. To establish a one stop center for trade and investment information in the County; and vii. To develop quality products for export. The following map presents the existing land potential. 71 |

|---|

Page 93

72

| 72 |

|---|

Page 94

CHAPTER FOUR 4.0 DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES, STRATEGIES AND PROGRAMMES 4.1. Overview This Chapter presents sectors’ development priorities, strategies, programmes, flagship projects, and cross-sectoral linkages. 4.2 Health Sector The Health sector comprises of two directorates: medical services and public health. Vision: “A healthy and productive population in Kilifi County”. Mission: To provide quality healthcare services that are accessible, acceptable, sustainable and equitable to the population of Kilifi County and beyond. Goal: To enhance access to equitable, affordable and quality health care services for all. 4.2.1 Sector Priorities and Strategies The County’s long-term health sector goal is in line with the Kenya Health Policy 2014-2030. The Policy outlines the following six main objectives to be pursued: Elimination of Communicable diseases; Halting and reversing the rising trends of Non-Communicable Diseases; Addressing Violence and Injuries; Providing Essential Health Services; Minimizing exposure to health risk factors; Strengthening inter-sectoral collaboration. The sector development priorities and strategies are presented in Table 4.1. Table 4.1: Health Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To increase access to Preventive and Enhance Reproductive Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Adolescent Promotive health services Health (RMNCAH) services Scale up immunization coverage Enhance Nutrition Services Strengthen health screening services strengthen community health services To increase access to Curative & Strengthen curative services Rehabilitative services Strengthen rehabilitative services Enhance specialized services Strengthen referral system To improve Health administration and Strengthen Human resource support services Expand health infrastructure & Equipment 73

| CHAPTER FOUR 4.0 DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES, STRATEGIES AND PROGRAMMES 4.1. Overview This Chapter presents sectors’ development priorities, strategies, programmes, flagship projects, and cross-sectoral linkages. 4.2 Health Sector The Health sector comprises of two directorates: medical services and public health. Vision: “A healthy and productive population in Kilifi County”. Mission: To provide quality healthcare services that are accessible, acceptable, sustainable and equitable to the population of Kilifi County and beyond. Goal: To enhance access to equitable, affordable and quality health care services for all. 4.2.1 Sector Priorities and Strategies The County’s long-term health sector goal is in line with the Kenya Health Policy 2014-2030. The Policy outlines the following six main objectives to be pursued: Elimination of Communicable diseases; Halting and reversing the rising trends of Non-Communicable Diseases; Addressing Violence and Injuries; Providing Essential Health Services; Minimizing exposure to health risk factors; Strengthening inter-sectoral collaboration. The sector development priorities and strategies are presented in Table 4.1. Table 4.1: Health Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To increase access to Preventive and Enhance Reproductive Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Adolescent Promotive health services Health (RMNCAH) services Scale up immunization coverage Enhance Nutrition Services Strengthen health screening services strengthen community health services To increase access to Curative & Strengthen curative services Rehabilitative services Strengthen rehabilitative services Enhance specialized services Strengthen referral system To improve Health administration and Strengthen Human resource support services Expand health infrastructure & Equipment 73 |

|---|

| | Sector Priorities | | | Strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| To increase access to Preventive and Promotive health services | To increase access to Preventive and | | | Enhance Reproductive Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Adolescent | |

| | Promotive health services | | | Health (RMNCAH) services | |

| | | | | Scale up immunization coverage | |

| | | | | Enhance Nutrition Services | |

| | | | | Strengthen health screening services | |

| | | | | strengthen community health services | |

| To increase access to Curative & Rehabilitative services | | | | Strengthen curative services | |

| | | | | Strengthen rehabilitative services | |

| | | | | Enhance specialized services | |

| | | | | Strengthen referral system | |

| To improve Health administration and support services | | | Strengthen Human resource Expand health infrastructure & Equipment | Strengthen Human resource | |

| | | | | Expand health infrastructure & Equipment | |

| To increase access to Curative & |

|---|

| Rehabilitative services |

| To improve Health administration and |

|---|

| support services |

Page 95

Sector Priorities Strategies Strengthen sector governance (management and coordination) Increase health products and technologies Expand universal health coverage 4.2.2 Health Sector Programmes This section presents the Health sector programmes to be implemented within the CIDP III (2023-27) period and summarized in Tables 4.2. Table 4.2: Health Sector Programmes Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Programme: Preventive and promotive health services Programme Objective: To increase access to preventive and promotive health services Programme Outcome: Increased access to preventive and promotive health services Reprodu Materna No. of 3.1 150 7.4 150 7.4 150 7.4 150 7.4 150 7.4 37 ctive l and HCWs Materna neonatal trained on l health maternal, Neonata services neonatal l Child provide services and d No. of 3.1 28 2.9 28 2.9 28 2.9 28 2.9 28 2.9 14.8 Adolesc awareness 6 6 6 6 6 ent forums Health conducted (RMNC Family No. of 3.7 185, 22. 188, 22. 190, 22. 192, 22. 194, 16 106 AH) Plannin women 434 5 933 5 682 5 432 5 181 g receiving FP commodities services provide d Immuni No. of HCW 3.2 150 8.5 150 8.5 150 8.5 150 8.5 150 8.5 42.5 zation trained on services EPI provide operational d management facilities No. of 3.2 4 2.6 5 3.2 5 3.2 5 3.2 5 3.2 15.6 provide facilities 5 5 5 5 d with with function functional al KEPI KEPI Fridges Fridges 74

| Sector Priorities Strategies Strengthen sector governance (management and coordination) Increase health products and technologies Expand universal health coverage 4.2.2 Health Sector Programmes This section presents the Health sector programmes to be implemented within the CIDP III (2023-27) period and summarized in Tables 4.2. Table 4.2: Health Sector Programmes Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Programme: Preventive and promotive health services Programme Objective: To increase access to preventive and promotive health services Programme Outcome: Increased access to preventive and promotive health services Reprodu Materna No. of 3.1 150 7.4 150 7.4 150 7.4 150 7.4 150 7.4 37 ctive l and HCWs Materna neonatal trained on l health maternal, Neonata services neonatal l Child provide services and d No. of 3.1 28 2.9 28 2.9 28 2.9 28 2.9 28 2.9 14.8 Adolesc awareness 6 6 6 6 6 ent forums Health conducted (RMNC Family No. of 3.7 185, 22. 188, 22. 190, 22. 192, 22. 194, 16 106 AH) Plannin women 434 5 933 5 682 5 432 5 181 g receiving FP commodities services provide d Immuni No. of HCW 3.2 150 8.5 150 8.5 150 8.5 150 8.5 150 8.5 42.5 zation trained on services EPI provide operational d management facilities No. of 3.2 4 2.6 5 3.2 5 3.2 5 3.2 5 3.2 15.6 provide facilities 5 5 5 5 d with with function functional al KEPI KEPI Fridges Fridges 74 |

|---|

| | Sector Priorities | Strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|

| | | Strengthen sector governance (management and coordination) Increase health products and technologies Expand universal health coverage | |

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key | | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | Output | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | Programme: Preventive and promotive health services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To increase access to preventive and promotive health services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Increased access to preventive and promotive health services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Reprodu ctive Materna l Neonata l Child and Adolesc ent Health (RMNC AH) | Reprodu | Materna | | No. of | | 3.1 | 150 | 7.4 | | 150 | 7.4 | | 150 | 7.4 | | 150 | 7.4 | | 150 | 7.4 | | 37 | |

| | ctive | l and | | HCWs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Materna | neonatal | | trained on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | l | health | | maternal, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Neonata | services | | neonatal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | l Child | provide | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | and | d | | No. of | | 3.1 | 28 | 2.9 6 | | 28 | 2.9 6 | | 28 | 2.9 6 | | 28 | 2.9 6 | | 28 | 2.9 6 | | 14.8 | |

| | Adolesc | | | awareness | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ent | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Health | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | (RMNC | Family | | No. of | | 3.7 | 185, 434 | 22. 5 | | 188, 933 | 22. 5 | | 190, 682 | 22. 5 | | 192, 432 | 22. 5 | | 194, 181 | 16 | | 106 | |

| | AH) | Plannin | | women | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | g | | receiving FP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | commodities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | provide | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Immuni | | No. of HCW | | 3.2 | 150 | 8.5 | | 150 | 8.5 | | 150 | 8.5 | | 150 | 8.5 | | 150 | 8.5 | | 42.5 | |

| | | zation | | trained on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | services | | EPI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | provide | | operational | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | d | | management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | facilities | | No. of | | 3.2 | 4 | 2.6 | | 5 | 3.2 5 | | 5 | 3.2 5 | | 5 | 3.2 5 | | 5 | 3.2 5 | | 15.6 | |

| | | provide | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | d with | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | function | | functional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | al KEPI | | KEPI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Fridges | | Fridges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

Page 96

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Child No. of 3.2 30 3.3 30 3.3 30 3.3 30 3.3 30 3.3 16.5 health HCWs services trained child health services No. of 3.2 15 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 11.5 Community Units [CU] trained Adolesc No. of youth 3.7 5 35 5 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 ent friendly Youth centres Sexual established reprodu Proportion 3.7 13 14 11 14 9 14 7 14 5 14 70 ctive (%) of health adolescents services 10-19 years presenting with pregnancies SGB No. of SGB 3.7 5 42. 42.5 Centres Centres 5 establish established ed Nutritio HWs/C No. of 3.1, 640 8.5 383 23. 472 28. 555 29. 6,63 21. 113. n HVs HWs/CHVs 3.2 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 3 8 Services trained trained on on nutrition nutrition related aspects children Proportion 3.2 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 25 6- (%) of 59mont children 6- hs 59months supplem supplemente ented d with with vitamin A vitamin A ECDE No. of 3.4 155 34 155 34 68 teachers ECDE 0 0 sensitize teachers d on sensitized on nutrition nutrition 75

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Child No. of 3.2 30 3.3 30 3.3 30 3.3 30 3.3 30 3.3 16.5 health HCWs services trained child health services No. of 3.2 15 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 11.5 Community Units [CU] trained Adolesc No. of youth 3.7 5 35 5 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 ent friendly Youth centres Sexual established reprodu Proportion 3.7 13 14 11 14 9 14 7 14 5 14 70 ctive (%) of health adolescents services 10-19 years presenting with pregnancies SGB No. of SGB 3.7 5 42. 42.5 Centres Centres 5 establish established ed Nutritio HWs/C No. of 3.1, 640 8.5 383 23. 472 28. 555 29. 6,63 21. 113. n HVs HWs/CHVs 3.2 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 3 8 Services trained trained on on nutrition nutrition related aspects children Proportion 3.2 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 25 6- (%) of 59mont children 6- hs 59months supplem supplemente ented d with with vitamin A vitamin A ECDE No. of 3.4 155 34 155 34 68 teachers ECDE 0 0 sensitize teachers d on sensitized on nutrition nutrition 75 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | Performanc | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | e Indicators | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | Child health services | | | No. of | | 3.2 | | 30 | 3.3 | | 30 | 3.3 | | 30 | 3.3 | | 30 | 3.3 | | 30 | 3.3 | | 16.5 | |

| | | | | | HCWs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | trained child | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | No. of | | 3.2 | | 15 | 2.3 | | 15 | 2.3 | | 15 | 2.3 | | 15 | 2.3 | | 15 | 2.3 | | 11.5 | |

| | | | | | Community | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Units [CU] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Adolesc ent Youth Sexual reprodu ctive health services | | | No. of youth | | 3.7 | | 5 | 35 | | 5 | 14 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 49 | |

| | | | | | friendly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | centres | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Proportion | | 3.7 | | 13 | 14 | | 11 | 14 | | 9 | 14 | | 7 | 14 | | 5 | 14 | | 70 | |

| | | | | | (%) of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | adolescents | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | 10-19 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | presenting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | pregnancies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | SGB | | No. of SGB | | 3.7 | | | | | | | | 5 | 42. 5 | | | | | | | | 42.5 | |

| | | | Centres | | Centres | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | establish | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Nutritio n Services | | HWs/C HVs trained on nutrition | HWs/C | | No. of | | 3.1, 3.2 | | 640 | 8.5 | | 383 0 | 23. 1 | | 472 0 | 28. 1 | | 555 0 | 29. 7 | | 6,63 0 | 21. 3 | | 113. 8 | |

| | | | HVs | | HWs/CHVs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | trained | | trained on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | on | | nutrition | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | nutrition | | related | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | aspects | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | children | | Proportion | | 3.2 | | 100 | 5 | | 100 | 5 | | 100 | 5 | | 100 | 5 | | 100 | 5 | | 25 | |

| | | | 6- | | (%) of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | 59mont | | children 6- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | hs | | 59months | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | supplem | | supplemente | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ented | | d with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | with | | vitamin A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | vitamin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ECDE | | No. of | | 3.4 | | | | | 155 0 | 34 | | | | | 155 0 | 34 | | | | | 68 | |

| | | | teachers | | ECDE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | sensitize | | teachers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d on | | sensitized on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | nutrition | | nutrition | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Child |

|---|

| health |

| services |

| Adolesc |

|---|

| ent |

| Youth |

| Sexual |

| reprodu |

| ctive |

| health |

| services |

| Nutritio |

|---|

| n |

| Services |

Page 97

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) advocac No. of 3.4 8 0 12 3.0 12 2.4 12 2.4 12 1.6 8.8 y and county coordina MSP/NICH tion E/nutrition meeting advocacy s meetings conduct conducted ed MIYCN No. of 3.4 1 0 1 1.2 0 0 1.00 1.2 0 0 2.4 KABP MIYCN surveys KABP conduct surveys ed conducted HWs No. of HWs 3.4 0 0 150 2.6 150 2.6 150 2.6 0 0 7.8 sensitize sensitized on d on nutrition nutrition quantificatio quantifi n & LMIS cation & LMIS Disease Disease No. of 3d 28 0.9 28 0.9 28 0.9 28 1.1 28 1.1 5.04 Surveill detected outbreaks 1 1 8 2 2 ance and investigated and controll & responded Control ed to No. of 3d 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 trainings for CHMT, SCHMT, HCWs &CHVs conducted HIV Mother Proportion 3.3 100 6.8 100 6.8 100 6.8 100 6.8 100 6.8 34.4 Control to child HIV+ % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 Interven transmis pregnant tions sion mothers prevente receiving d preventive (PMTC ARV’s T) Proportion 3.3 90% 10. 92% 10. 93% 10. 94% 10. 95% 10. 53.2 of HIV 65 65 65 65 65 5 positive clients identified 76

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) advocac No. of 3.4 8 0 12 3.0 12 2.4 12 2.4 12 1.6 8.8 y and county coordina MSP/NICH tion E/nutrition meeting advocacy s meetings conduct conducted ed MIYCN No. of 3.4 1 0 1 1.2 0 0 1.00 1.2 0 0 2.4 KABP MIYCN surveys KABP conduct surveys ed conducted HWs No. of HWs 3.4 0 0 150 2.6 150 2.6 150 2.6 0 0 7.8 sensitize sensitized on d on nutrition nutrition quantificatio quantifi n & LMIS cation & LMIS Disease Disease No. of 3d 28 0.9 28 0.9 28 0.9 28 1.1 28 1.1 5.04 Surveill detected outbreaks 1 1 8 2 2 ance and investigated and controll & responded Control ed to No. of 3d 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 6 trainings for CHMT, SCHMT, HCWs &CHVs conducted HIV Mother Proportion 3.3 100 6.8 100 6.8 100 6.8 100 6.8 100 6.8 34.4 Control to child HIV+ % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 % 7 Interven transmis pregnant tions sion mothers prevente receiving d preventive (PMTC ARV’s T) Proportion 3.3 90% 10. 92% 10. 93% 10. 94% 10. 95% 10. 53.2 of HIV 65 65 65 65 65 5 positive clients identified 76 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | Performanc | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | e Indicators | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | advocac | | No. of | | 3.4 | | 8 | 0 | | 12 | 3.0 | | 12 | 2.4 | | 12 | 2.4 | | 12 | 1.6 | | 8.8 | |

| | | | y and | | county | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | coordina | | MSP/NICH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | tion | | E/nutrition | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | meeting | | advocacy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | s | | meetings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | conduct | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | MIYCN | | No. of | | 3.4 | | 1 | 0 | | 1 | 1.2 | | 0 | 0 | | 1.00 | 1.2 | | 0 | 0 | | 2.4 | |

| | | | KABP | | MIYCN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | surveys | | KABP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | conduct | | surveys | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | HWs | | No. of HWs | | 3.4 | | 0 | 0 | | 150 | 2.6 | | 150 | 2.6 | | 150 | 2.6 | | 0 | 0 | | 7.8 | |

| | | | sensitize | | sensitized on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d on | | nutrition | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | nutrition | | quantificatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | quantifi | | n & LMIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | cation & | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | LMIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Disease Surveill ance and Control | | Disease detected and controll ed | Disease | | No. of | | 3d | | 28 | 0.9 1 | | 28 | 0.9 1 | | 28 | 0.9 8 | | 28 | 1.1 2 | | 28 | 1.1 2 | | 5.04 | |

| | | | detected | | outbreaks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | investigated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | controll | | & responded | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed | | to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | No. of | | 3d | | 2 | 2 | | 2 | 2 | | 2 | 2 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 6 | |

| | | | | | trainings for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | CHMT, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | SCHMT, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | HCWs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | &CHVs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| HIV Control Interven tions | | Mother to child transmis sion prevente d (PMTC T) | | | Proportion | | 3.3 | | 100 % | 6.8 7 | | 100 % | 6.8 7 | | 100 % | 6.8 7 | | 100 % | 6.8 7 | | 100 % | 6.8 7 | | 34.4 | |

| | | | | | HIV+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | pregnant | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | mothers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | receiving | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | preventive | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | ARV’s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Proportion | | 3.3 | | 90% | 10. 65 | | 92% | 10. 65 | | 93% | 10. 65 | | 94% | 10. 65 | | 95% | 10. 65 | | 53.2 5 | |

| | | | | | of HIV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | positive | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | clients | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | identified | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Disease |

|---|

| Surveill |

| ance |

| and |

| Control |

| HIV |

|---|

| Control |

| Interven |

| tions |

| Mother |

|---|

| to child |

| transmis |

| sion |

| prevente |

| d |

| (PMTC |

| T) |

Page 98

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Proportion 3.3 95% 20. 95% 20. 95% 20. 95% 20. 95% 20. 100. of HIV 1 1 1 1 1 5 positive clients on ART Proportion 3.3 50 6.5 65 6.5 75 6.5 85 6.5 95 6.5 42.7 (%) of HIV 5 5 5 5 5 5 positive clients on ART virally suppressed TB TB case Percentage 3.3 82 6.4 84 12. 86 6.4 84 6.4 90 6.4 38.8 Control detected of TB 8 96 8 8 8 8 Interven and defaulters tions controll traced ed No. of 3.3 4 1.2 4 1.2 4 1.2 4 1.2 4 1.2 6 sensitization meetings on TB conducted No. of true 2 2.3 2.3 nut machines procured No. of 3.3 35 4.8 40 4.8 45 4.8 50 4.8 55 4.8 24 leprosy patients treated Malaria Malaria % of 3.3 70 5.8 78 1.7 86 1.5 92 1.5 100 1.5 12 Control disease children Interven interven under five tions ed years testing +ve treated for malaria % of 3.3 81 5.8 86 5.8 91 5.8 96 5.8 100 5.8 29 pregnant women receiving IPT % of 3.3 62 2.2 72 2.2 82 2.2 92 2.2 100 2.2 11.2 children 4 4 4 4 4 under 1Yr issued with LLIT nets 77

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Proportion 3.3 95% 20. 95% 20. 95% 20. 95% 20. 95% 20. 100. of HIV 1 1 1 1 1 5 positive clients on ART Proportion 3.3 50 6.5 65 6.5 75 6.5 85 6.5 95 6.5 42.7 (%) of HIV 5 5 5 5 5 5 positive clients on ART virally suppressed TB TB case Percentage 3.3 82 6.4 84 12. 86 6.4 84 6.4 90 6.4 38.8 Control detected of TB 8 96 8 8 8 8 Interven and defaulters tions controll traced ed No. of 3.3 4 1.2 4 1.2 4 1.2 4 1.2 4 1.2 6 sensitization meetings on TB conducted No. of true 2 2.3 2.3 nut machines procured No. of 3.3 35 4.8 40 4.8 45 4.8 50 4.8 55 4.8 24 leprosy patients treated Malaria Malaria % of 3.3 70 5.8 78 1.7 86 1.5 92 1.5 100 1.5 12 Control disease children Interven interven under five tions ed years testing +ve treated for malaria % of 3.3 81 5.8 86 5.8 91 5.8 96 5.8 100 5.8 29 pregnant women receiving IPT % of 3.3 62 2.2 72 2.2 82 2.2 92 2.2 100 2.2 11.2 children 4 4 4 4 4 under 1Yr issued with LLIT nets 77 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | Proportion | | 3.3 | | 95% | 20. 1 | | 95% | 20. 1 | | 95% | 20. 1 | | 95% | 20. 1 | | 95% | 20. 1 | | 100. 5 | |

| | | | | of HIV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | positive | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | clients on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ART | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Proportion | | 3.3 | | 50 | 6.5 5 | | 65 | 6.5 5 | | 75 | 6.5 5 | | 85 | 6.5 5 | | 95 | 6.5 5 | | 42.7 5 | |

| | | | | (%) of HIV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | positive | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | clients on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ART virally | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | suppressed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| TB Control Interven tions | | TB case detected and controll ed | | Percentage | | 3.3 | | 82 | 6.4 8 | | 84 | 12. 96 | | 86 | 6.4 8 | | 84 | 6.4 8 | | 90 | 6.4 8 | | 38.8 8 | |

| | | | | of TB | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | defaulters | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | traced | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.3 | | 4 | 1.2 | | 4 | 1.2 | | 4 | 1.2 | | 4 | 1.2 | | 4 | 1.2 | | 6 | |

| | | | | sensitization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | meetings on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | TB | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of true | | | | | | | 2 | 2.3 | | | | | | | | | | | 2.3 | |

| | | | | nut | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | machines | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.3 | | 35 | 4.8 | | 40 | 4.8 | | 45 | 4.8 | | 50 | 4.8 | | 55 | 4.8 | | 24 | |

| | | | | leprosy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | patients | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | treated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Malaria Control Interven tions | | Malaria disease interven ed | | % of | | 3.3 | | 70 | 5.8 | | 78 | 1.7 | | 86 | 1.5 | | 92 | 1.5 | | 100 | 1.5 | | 12 | |

| | | | | children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | under five | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | years testing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | +ve treated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | for malaria | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | % of | | 3.3 | | 81 | 5.8 | | 86 | 5.8 | | 91 | 5.8 | | 96 | 5.8 | | 100 | 5.8 | | 29 | |

| | | | | pregnant | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | women | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | receiving | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | IPT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | % of | | 3.3 | | 62 | 2.2 4 | | 72 | 2.2 4 | | 82 | 2.2 4 | | 92 | 2.2 4 | | 100 | 2.2 4 | | 11.2 | |

| | | | | children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | under 1Yr | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | issued with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | LLIT nets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| TB |

|---|

| Control |

| Interven |

| tions |

| TB case |

|---|

| detected |

| and |

| controll |

| ed |

| Malaria |

|---|

| Control |

| Interven |

| tions |

| Malaria |

|---|

| disease |

| interven |

| ed |

Page 99

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) % of 3.3 53 4.3 63 4.3 73 4.3 12.9 pregnant women consuming IPTP % of 3.3 78 1.3 90 1.3 100 1.3 3.9 pregnant women issued with LLIT nets Neglect NTD Proportion 3.3 5 3.7 5 3.7 15 7.4 20 14. 20 14. 44.6 ed interven of WRA 9 9 Tropical tions treated for Diseases Urogenital Control Schistosomi asis, % of Hhs 3.3 14 0.2 18 0.2 22 0.4 26 0.5 30 0.6 2.09 sprayed with 5 8 4 2 insecticides % of 3.3 3 0.9 5 0.9 7 1.1 8 1.2 10 1.8 5.9 population treated for jiggers No. of 3.3 400 4.8 600 7.2 600 7.2 650 7.8 650 7.8 34.8 hydrocelecto my surgeries No. of HCW 3.3 250 11. 250 11. 250 11. 250 11. 250 11. 59.7 trained on 95 95 95 95 95 5 Common NTDs (Snake bites, Schistosomi asis sickle cell disease) Non- NCD No. of 3.4 20,0 1.8 25,0 2.0 30,0 2.3 35,0 2.5 40,0 2.8 11.5 Commu interven Women of 00 00 5 00 00 5 00 nicable tions Reproductiv Disease e Age Control screened for cervical &breast cancer No. of 3.4 2,00 1.4 2,00 1.4 2,00 1.4 2,00 1.7 2,00 1.7 7.6 clients 0 0 0 0 0 screened for 78

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) % of 3.3 53 4.3 63 4.3 73 4.3 12.9 pregnant women consuming IPTP % of 3.3 78 1.3 90 1.3 100 1.3 3.9 pregnant women issued with LLIT nets Neglect NTD Proportion 3.3 5 3.7 5 3.7 15 7.4 20 14. 20 14. 44.6 ed interven of WRA 9 9 Tropical tions treated for Diseases Urogenital Control Schistosomi asis, % of Hhs 3.3 14 0.2 18 0.2 22 0.4 26 0.5 30 0.6 2.09 sprayed with 5 8 4 2 insecticides % of 3.3 3 0.9 5 0.9 7 1.1 8 1.2 10 1.8 5.9 population treated for jiggers No. of 3.3 400 4.8 600 7.2 600 7.2 650 7.8 650 7.8 34.8 hydrocelecto my surgeries No. of HCW 3.3 250 11. 250 11. 250 11. 250 11. 250 11. 59.7 trained on 95 95 95 95 95 5 Common NTDs (Snake bites, Schistosomi asis sickle cell disease) Non- NCD No. of 3.4 20,0 1.8 25,0 2.0 30,0 2.3 35,0 2.5 40,0 2.8 11.5 Commu interven Women of 00 00 5 00 00 5 00 nicable tions Reproductiv Disease e Age Control screened for cervical &breast cancer No. of 3.4 2,00 1.4 2,00 1.4 2,00 1.4 2,00 1.7 2,00 1.7 7.6 clients 0 0 0 0 0 screened for 78 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | % of | | 3.3 | | 53 | 4.3 | | | | | 63 | 4.3 | | | | | 73 | 4.3 | | 12.9 | |

| | | | | pregnant | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | women | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | consuming | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | IPTP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | % of | | 3.3 | | 78 | 1.3 | | | | | 90 | 1.3 | | | | | 100 | 1.3 | | 3.9 | |

| | | | | pregnant | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | women | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | issued with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | LLIT nets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Neglect ed Tropical Diseases Control | | NTD interven tions | | Proportion | | 3.3 | | 5 | 3.7 | | 5 | 3.7 | | 15 | 7.4 | | 20 | 14. 9 | | 20 | 14. 9 | | 44.6 | |

| | | | | of WRA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | treated for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Urogenital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Schistosomi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | asis, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | % of Hhs | | 3.3 | | 14 | 0.2 5 | | 18 | 0.2 8 | | 22 | 0.4 4 | | 26 | 0.5 2 | | 30 | 0.6 | | 2.09 | |

| | | | | sprayed with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | insecticides | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | % of | | 3.3 | | 3 | 0.9 | | 5 | 0.9 | | 7 | 1.1 | | 8 | 1.2 | | 10 | 1.8 | | 5.9 | |

| | | | | population | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | treated for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | jiggers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.3 | | 400 | 4.8 | | 600 | 7.2 | | 600 | 7.2 | | 650 | 7.8 | | 650 | 7.8 | | 34.8 | |

| | | | | hydrocelecto | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | my surgeries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of HCW | | 3.3 | | 250 | 11. 95 | | 250 | 11. 95 | | 250 | 11. 95 | | 250 | 11. 95 | | 250 | 11. 95 | | 59.7 5 | |

| | | | | trained on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Common | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | NTDs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | (Snake bites, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Schistosomi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | asis sickle | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | cell disease) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Non- Commu nicable Disease Control | | NCD interven tions | | No. of | | 3.4 | | 20,0 00 | 1.8 | | 25,0 00 | 2.0 5 | | 30,0 00 | 2.3 | | 35,0 00 | 2.5 5 | | 40,0 00 | 2.8 | | 11.5 | |

| | | | | Women of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Reproductiv | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | e Age | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | screened for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | cervical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | &breast | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | cancer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.4 | | 2,00 0 | 1.4 | | 2,00 0 | 1.4 | | 2,00 0 | 1.4 | | 2,00 0 | 1.7 | | 2,00 0 | 1.7 | | 7.6 | |

| | | | | clients | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | screened for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| Neglect |

|---|

| ed |

| Tropical |

| Diseases |

| Control |

| NTD |

|---|

| interven |

| tions |

| Non- |

|---|

| Commu |

| nicable |

| Disease |

| Control |

| NCD |

|---|

| interven |

| tions |

Page 100

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) HBP and Diabetes Colorectal cancer No. of NCD 3.4 140 0.7 140 0.7 140 0.7 140 0.7 140 0.7 3.5 kits purchased &distributed to CHVs No. of 3.4 400 12. 400 12. 400 12. 400 12. 400 12. 62 HCW/CHV 4 4 4 4 4 trained on Diabetes / Hypertensio n/NCD Environ WASH Water 3.9 249 1.4 249 1.4 249 1.4 249 1.4 249 1.4 7.47 mental Interven treatment 9 9 9 9 9 Health, tions commodities Water distributed and to HHs Sanitati No. of 3.9 49 0.3 50 0.3 50 0.3 50 0.3 50 0.3 1.95 on CHVs 9 9 9 9 9 Interven trained on tions ICCM No of 3.9 334 10. 337 11. 377 11. 377 11. 377 11. 57.1 villages 36 69 69 69 69 2 certified ODF School School No. of 3.9 180 2.8 180 2.8 180 2.8 180 2.8 180 2.8 14.4 Health Health schools with 8 8 8 8 8 Interven functional tions toilets Commu Commu No. of 3.8 43 34. 43 34. 43 34. 43 34. 43 34. 172 nity nity Community 4 4 4 4 4 Health – Health – Units Level 1 Level 1 functionaliz Interven ed tions No. of PCN 3.8 2 162 2 162 2 162 486 established No. of 3.8 112 56 155 77. 198 99 241 120 284 142 495 CHUs with 5 .5 all reporting tools No. of CHV 3.8 3,50 7 3,50 7 3,50 7 3,50 7 3,50 7 35 conducting 0 0 0 0 0 79

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) HBP and Diabetes Colorectal cancer No. of NCD 3.4 140 0.7 140 0.7 140 0.7 140 0.7 140 0.7 3.5 kits purchased &distributed to CHVs No. of 3.4 400 12. 400 12. 400 12. 400 12. 400 12. 62 HCW/CHV 4 4 4 4 4 trained on Diabetes / Hypertensio n/NCD Environ WASH Water 3.9 249 1.4 249 1.4 249 1.4 249 1.4 249 1.4 7.47 mental Interven treatment 9 9 9 9 9 Health, tions commodities Water distributed and to HHs Sanitati No. of 3.9 49 0.3 50 0.3 50 0.3 50 0.3 50 0.3 1.95 on CHVs 9 9 9 9 9 Interven trained on tions ICCM No of 3.9 334 10. 337 11. 377 11. 377 11. 377 11. 57.1 villages 36 69 69 69 69 2 certified ODF School School No. of 3.9 180 2.8 180 2.8 180 2.8 180 2.8 180 2.8 14.4 Health Health schools with 8 8 8 8 8 Interven functional tions toilets Commu Commu No. of 3.8 43 34. 43 34. 43 34. 43 34. 43 34. 172 nity nity Community 4 4 4 4 4 Health – Health – Units Level 1 Level 1 functionaliz Interven ed tions No. of PCN 3.8 2 162 2 162 2 162 486 established No. of 3.8 112 56 155 77. 198 99 241 120 284 142 495 CHUs with 5 .5 all reporting tools No. of CHV 3.8 3,50 7 3,50 7 3,50 7 3,50 7 3,50 7 35 conducting 0 0 0 0 0 79 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | Year 2 | | | | Year 3 | | | | Year 4 | | | | Year 5 | | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | | | HBP and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Diabetes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Colorectal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | cancer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of NCD | | 3.4 | | 140 | | 0.7 | | 140 | | 0.7 | | 140 | | 0.7 | | 140 | | 0.7 | | 140 | | 0.7 | | 3.5 | |

| | | | | | | kits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | purchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | &distributed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | to CHVs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | 3.4 | | 400 | | 12. 4 | | 400 | | 12. 4 | | 400 | | 12. 4 | | 400 | | 12. 4 | | 400 | | 12. 4 | | 62 | |

| | | | | | | HCW/CHV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trained on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Diabetes / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Hypertensio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | n/NCD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Environ mental Health, Water and Sanitati on Interven tions | | WASH Interven tions | | | | Water | | 3.9 | | 249 | | 1.4 9 | | 249 | | 1.4 9 | | 249 | | 1.4 9 | | 249 | | 1.4 9 | | 249 | | 1.4 9 | | 7.47 | |

| | | | | | | treatment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | commodities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | distributed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | to HHs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | 3.9 | | 49 | | 0.3 9 | | 50 | | 0.3 9 | | 50 | | 0.3 9 | | 50 | | 0.3 9 | | 50 | | 0.3 9 | | 1.95 | |

| | | | | | | CHVs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trained on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ICCM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No of | | 3.9 | | 334 | | 10. 36 | | 337 | | 11. 69 | | 377 | | 11. 69 | | 377 | | 11. 69 | | 377 | | 11. 69 | | 57.1 2 | |

| | | | | | | villages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | certified | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ODF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| School Health | | | School | | | No. of | | 3.9 | | 180 | | 2.8 8 | | 180 | | 2.8 8 | | 180 | | 2.8 8 | | 180 | | 2.8 8 | | 180 | | 2.8 8 | | 14.4 | |

| | | | Health | | | schools with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Interven | | | functional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | tions | | | toilets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Commu nity Health – Level 1 | | Commu nity Health – Level 1 Interven tions | Commu | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 43 | | 34. 4 | | 43 | | 34. 4 | | 43 | | 34. 4 | | 43 | | 34. 4 | | 43 | | 34. 4 | | 172 | |

| | | | nity | | | Community | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Health – | | | Units | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Level 1 | | | functionaliz | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Interven | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | tions | | | No. of PCN | | 3.8 | | | | | | | | | | 2 | | 162 | | 2 | | 162 | | 2 | | 162 | | 486 | |

| | | | | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 112 | | 56 | | 155 | | 77. 5 | | 198 | | 99 | | 241 | | 120 .5 | | 284 | | 142 | | 495 | |

| | | | | | | CHUs with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | all reporting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | tools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of CHV | | 3.8 | | 3,50 0 | | 7 | | 3,50 0 | | 7 | | 3,50 0 | | 7 | | 3,50 0 | | 7 | | 3,50 0 | | 7 | | 35 | |

| | | | | | | conducting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| Environ |

|---|

| mental |

| Health, |

| Water |

| and |

| Sanitati |

| on |

| Interven |

| tions |

| WASH |

|---|

| Interven |

| tions |

| School |

|---|

| Health |

| Commu |

|---|

| nity |

| Health – |

| Level 1 |

Page 101

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) indigent registration for NHIF No of 3.8 12 0.9 12 0.9 12 0.9 12 0.9 12 0.9 4.5 Community sensitization forums on UHC/ NHIF services Programme: Curative and Rehabilitative health services Programme Objective: To increase access to Curative and Rehabilitative health services Programme Outcome: Increased access to Curative and Rehabilitative health services Primary Curative No. of 3.1 to 44 257 46 269 48 280 50 292 52 304 1,40 Health services primary care 3.9 .54 .25 .95 .66 .37 4.77 Facility impleme level health Services nted facilities with basic laboratory services No. of 3.1 to 46,0 51. 46,9 51. 47,9 51. 48,8 51. 49,7 51. 259 patients 3.9 73 8 95 8 16 8 38 8 59 8 admitted for observation No. patients 3.1, 12,3 50 13,6 50 14,9 50 16,4 50 18,1 50 250 attended for 3.2, 82 20 82 80 28 minor 3.3, surgeries 3.4,3. 6,3.7 No. of 3.1 to 9 2.4 14 3.8 19 6.0 24 9.3 29 14. 32.9 facilities 3.9 9 7 4 8 6 with work improvemen t teams No. of 3.1 to 4,05 57. 4,45 57. 4,90 57. 5,39 57. 5,93 57. 287. referrals 3.7 1 53 6 53 2 53 2 53 2 53 65 from the community, received at the facility Hospital Improve No. of ENT 3.2, 156 9.9 156 9.9 156 9.9 156 9.9 156 9.9 49.7 level d surgeries 3.3, 4 4 4 4 4 services hospital done 3.4, Speciali 3.6, 3.9 80

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) indigent registration for NHIF No of 3.8 12 0.9 12 0.9 12 0.9 12 0.9 12 0.9 4.5 Community sensitization forums on UHC/ NHIF services Programme: Curative and Rehabilitative health services Programme Objective: To increase access to Curative and Rehabilitative health services Programme Outcome: Increased access to Curative and Rehabilitative health services Primary Curative No. of 3.1 to 44 257 46 269 48 280 50 292 52 304 1,40 Health services primary care 3.9 .54 .25 .95 .66 .37 4.77 Facility impleme level health Services nted facilities with basic laboratory services No. of 3.1 to 46,0 51. 46,9 51. 47,9 51. 48,8 51. 49,7 51. 259 patients 3.9 73 8 95 8 16 8 38 8 59 8 admitted for observation No. patients 3.1, 12,3 50 13,6 50 14,9 50 16,4 50 18,1 50 250 attended for 3.2, 82 20 82 80 28 minor 3.3, surgeries 3.4,3. 6,3.7 No. of 3.1 to 9 2.4 14 3.8 19 6.0 24 9.3 29 14. 32.9 facilities 3.9 9 7 4 8 6 with work improvemen t teams No. of 3.1 to 4,05 57. 4,45 57. 4,90 57. 5,39 57. 5,93 57. 287. referrals 3.7 1 53 6 53 2 53 2 53 2 53 65 from the community, received at the facility Hospital Improve No. of ENT 3.2, 156 9.9 156 9.9 156 9.9 156 9.9 156 9.9 49.7 level d surgeries 3.3, 4 4 4 4 4 services hospital done 3.4, Speciali 3.6, 3.9 80 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | indigent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | registration | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | for NHIF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No of | | 3.8 | | 12 | 0.9 | | 12 | 0.9 | | 12 | 0.9 | | 12 | 0.9 | | 12 | 0.9 | | 4.5 | |

| | | | | Community | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | sensitization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | forums on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | UHC/ NHIF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Curative and Rehabilitative health services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To increase access to Curative and Rehabilitative health services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Increased access to Curative and Rehabilitative health services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Primary Health Facility Services | Primary | Curative services impleme nted | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 44 | 257 .54 | | 46 | 269 .25 | | 48 | 280 .95 | | 50 | 292 .66 | | 52 | 304 .37 | | 1,40 4.77 | |

| | Health | | | primary care | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Facility | | | level health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Services | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with basic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | laboratory | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 46,0 73 | 51. 8 | | 46,9 95 | 51. 8 | | 47,9 16 | 51. 8 | | 48,8 38 | 51. 8 | | 49,7 59 | 51. 8 | | 259 | |

| | | | | patients | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | admitted for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | observation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. patients attended for minor surgeries | No. patients | | 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4,3. 6,3.7 | | 12,3 82 | 50 | | 13,6 20 | 50 | | 14,9 82 | 50 | | 16,4 80 | 50 | | 18,1 28 | 50 | | 250 | |

| | | | | attended for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | minor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | surgeries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 9 | 2.4 9 | | 14 | 3.8 7 | | 19 | 6.0 4 | | 24 | 9.3 8 | | 29 | 14. 6 | | 32.9 | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with work | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | improvemen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | t teams | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.7 | | 4,05 1 | 57. 53 | | 4,45 6 | 57. 53 | | 4,90 2 | 57. 53 | | 5,39 2 | 57. 53 | | 5,93 2 | 57. 53 | | 287. 65 | |

| | | | | referrals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | from the | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | community, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | received at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | the facility | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Hospital level services | | Improve d hospital Speciali | No. of ENT surgeries done | No. of ENT | | 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.9 | | 156 | 9.9 4 | | 156 | 9.9 4 | | 156 | 9.9 4 | | 156 | 9.9 4 | | 156 | 9.9 4 | | 49.7 | |

| | | | | surgeries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | done | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| Curative |

|---|

| services |

| impleme |

| nted |

| Hospital |

|---|

| level |

| services |

| Improve |

|---|

| d |

| hospital |

| Speciali |

Page 102

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) zed No. of 3.2, 847 9.9 1,01 9.9 1,22 9.9 1,46 9.9 1,75 9.9 49.7 services Cataract 3.3, 4 7 4 0 4 4 4 7 4 operations 3.6, done 3.9 No. of 3.1,3. 14,4 9.9 15,8 9.9 17,4 9.9 19,1 9.9 21,0 9.9 49.7 diabetes 2, 3.4 02 4 43 4 27 4 69 4 86 4 cases attended No. of 3.1, 96,9 21. 116, 21. 139, 21. 167, 21. 201, 21. 109. Hypertensio 3.2, 44 94 333 94 600 94 520 94 024 94 7 n cases 3.4 attended No. of 3.1, 540 19. 540 19. 540 19. 540 19. 540 19. 99.7 patients 3.2, 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 accessing 3.4 hemodialysi s No. of 3.1 to 1 105 1 105 211 facilities 3.9 .5 .5 with fully equipped palliative care unit Improve No. of 3.1, 5 13. 6 15. 7 18. 8 21. 9 24. 93.4 d facilities 3.2, 8 8 2 1 5 Theatre offering 3.6, Services theater 3.7 services Improve No. of 3.1 to 9 86. 12 114 15 143 18 172 20 191 708. d In- facilities 3.9 2 .9 .6 .4 .6 7 patient offering Services inpatient services Improve No. of 3.1 to 4 246 5 307 6 369 7 430 8 492 1,84 d facilities 3.9 .2 .8 .3 .9 .4 6.6 Laborat offering ory specialized services medical Lab services No. of blood 3.1 to 8,52 32. 11,0 42. 14,3 55. 18,7 72. 24,3 94 297. donor units 3.9 0 9 76 8 99 6 18 3 34 6 collected No. of 3.1 to 4 0.3 4 0.3 4 0.3 4 0.3 4 0.3 1.5 surgical 3.9 81

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) zed No. of 3.2, 847 9.9 1,01 9.9 1,22 9.9 1,46 9.9 1,75 9.9 49.7 services Cataract 3.3, 4 7 4 0 4 4 4 7 4 operations 3.6, done 3.9 No. of 3.1,3. 14,4 9.9 15,8 9.9 17,4 9.9 19,1 9.9 21,0 9.9 49.7 diabetes 2, 3.4 02 4 43 4 27 4 69 4 86 4 cases attended No. of 3.1, 96,9 21. 116, 21. 139, 21. 167, 21. 201, 21. 109. Hypertensio 3.2, 44 94 333 94 600 94 520 94 024 94 7 n cases 3.4 attended No. of 3.1, 540 19. 540 19. 540 19. 540 19. 540 19. 99.7 patients 3.2, 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 accessing 3.4 hemodialysi s No. of 3.1 to 1 105 1 105 211 facilities 3.9 .5 .5 with fully equipped palliative care unit Improve No. of 3.1, 5 13. 6 15. 7 18. 8 21. 9 24. 93.4 d facilities 3.2, 8 8 2 1 5 Theatre offering 3.6, Services theater 3.7 services Improve No. of 3.1 to 9 86. 12 114 15 143 18 172 20 191 708. d In- facilities 3.9 2 .9 .6 .4 .6 7 patient offering Services inpatient services Improve No. of 3.1 to 4 246 5 307 6 369 7 430 8 492 1,84 d facilities 3.9 .2 .8 .3 .9 .4 6.6 Laborat offering ory specialized services medical Lab services No. of blood 3.1 to 8,52 32. 11,0 42. 14,3 55. 18,7 72. 24,3 94 297. donor units 3.9 0 9 76 8 99 6 18 3 34 6 collected No. of 3.1 to 4 0.3 4 0.3 4 0.3 4 0.3 4 0.3 1.5 surgical 3.9 81 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | zed services | | No. of | | 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.9 | | 847 | 9.9 4 | | 1,01 7 | 9.9 4 | | 1,22 0 | 9.9 4 | | 1,46 4 | 9.9 4 | | 1,75 7 | 9.9 4 | | 49.7 | |

| | | | | Cataract | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | done | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1,3. 2, 3.4 | | 14,4 02 | 9.9 4 | | 15,8 43 | 9.9 4 | | 17,4 27 | 9.9 4 | | 19,1 69 | 9.9 4 | | 21,0 86 | 9.9 4 | | 49.7 | |

| | | | | diabetes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | cases | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | attended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1, 3.2, 3.4 | | 96,9 44 | 21. 94 | | 116, 333 | 21. 94 | | 139, 600 | 21. 94 | | 167, 520 | 21. 94 | | 201, 024 | 21. 94 | | 109. 7 | |

| | | | | Hypertensio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | n cases | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | attended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1, 3.2, 3.4 | | 540 0 | 19. 94 | | 540 0 | 19. 94 | | 540 0 | 19. 94 | | 540 0 | 19. 94 | | 540 0 | 19. 94 | | 99.7 | |

| | | | | patients | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | accessing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | hemodialysi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | | | | 1 | 105 .5 | | 1 | 105 .5 | | | | | | | | 211 | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with fully | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | equipped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | palliative | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | care unit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Improve d Theatre Services | | No. of | | 3.1, 3.2, 3.6, 3.7 | | 5 | 13. 8 | | 6 | 15. 8 | | 7 | 18. 2 | | 8 | 21. 1 | | 9 | 24. 5 | | 93.4 | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | offering | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | theater | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Improve d In- patient Services | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 9 | 86. 2 | | 12 | 114 .9 | | 15 | 143 .6 | | 18 | 172 .4 | | 20 | 191 .6 | | 708. 7 | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | offering | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | inpatient | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Improve d Laborat ory services | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 4 | 246 .2 | | 5 | 307 .8 | | 6 | 369 .3 | | 7 | 430 .9 | | 8 | 492 .4 | | 1,84 6.6 | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | offering | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | specialized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | medical Lab | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of blood | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 8,52 0 | 32. 9 | | 11,0 76 | 42. 8 | | 14,3 99 | 55. 6 | | 18,7 18 | 72. 3 | | 24,3 34 | 94 | | 297. 6 | |

| | | | | donor units | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | collected | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 4 | 0.3 | | 4 | 0.3 | | 4 | 0.3 | | 4 | 0.3 | | 4 | 0.3 | | 1.5 | |

| | | | | surgical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| zed |

|---|

| services |

| Improve |

|---|

| d |

| Theatre |

| Services |

| Improve |

|---|

| d In- |

| patient |

| Services |

| Improve |

|---|

| d |

| Laborat |

| ory |

| services |

Page 103

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) outreaches conducted Improve No. of 3.1 to 3 3.2 5 5.3 7 7.4 8 8.4 9 9.5 33.9 d hospitals 3.9 2 8 4 4 Quality with health functional care quality services improvemen t teams (QIT) No. of 3.1 to 3 0.2 5 0.4 7 0.5 12 0.6 9 0.7 2.56 hospitals 3.9 4 6 4 2 with functional Work improvemen t teams (WIT) No. of 3.1 to 3 6.9 4 9.2 5 11. 6 13. 7 16. 58.0 hospital 3.12 7 9 61 94 25 6 laboratory ISO 15189 Accredited Improve No. 3.1 to 9 11. 9 11. 9 11. 9 11. 9 11. 56.5 d staff IPC/OSH 3.9 3 3 3 3 3 Capacit trainings y on conducted IPC/OS annually H No. of 3.1 to 36 0.8 36 0.8 36 0.8 36 0.8 36 0.8 4 manage Audits 3.9 ment conducted at facility level County functional 3.1 to 1 120 120 incinerat County 3.9 or incinerator establish ed Improve No. of 3.1 to 1,12 20 1,12 20 1,12 20 1,12 20 1,12 20 100 d referrals 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 Referral No. of HWs 3.1 to 50 6.2 6.25 services trained on 3.9 5 referral strategy emergency 3.1 to 1 3 3 Call Centre 3.9 82

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) outreaches conducted Improve No. of 3.1 to 3 3.2 5 5.3 7 7.4 8 8.4 9 9.5 33.9 d hospitals 3.9 2 8 4 4 Quality with health functional care quality services improvemen t teams (QIT) No. of 3.1 to 3 0.2 5 0.4 7 0.5 12 0.6 9 0.7 2.56 hospitals 3.9 4 6 4 2 with functional Work improvemen t teams (WIT) No. of 3.1 to 3 6.9 4 9.2 5 11. 6 13. 7 16. 58.0 hospital 3.12 7 9 61 94 25 6 laboratory ISO 15189 Accredited Improve No. 3.1 to 9 11. 9 11. 9 11. 9 11. 9 11. 56.5 d staff IPC/OSH 3.9 3 3 3 3 3 Capacit trainings y on conducted IPC/OS annually H No. of 3.1 to 36 0.8 36 0.8 36 0.8 36 0.8 36 0.8 4 manage Audits 3.9 ment conducted at facility level County functional 3.1 to 1 120 120 incinerat County 3.9 or incinerator establish ed Improve No. of 3.1 to 1,12 20 1,12 20 1,12 20 1,12 20 1,12 20 100 d referrals 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 Referral No. of HWs 3.1 to 50 6.2 6.25 services trained on 3.9 5 referral strategy emergency 3.1 to 1 3 3 Call Centre 3.9 82 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | Year 2 | | | | Year 3 | | | | Year 4 | | | | Year 5 | | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | Tar get | | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | | | outreaches | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Improve d Quality health care services | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 3 | | 3.2 | | 5 | | 5.3 | | 7 | | 7.4 2 | | 8 | | 8.4 8 | | 9 | | 9.5 4 | | 33.9 4 | |

| | | | | | | hospitals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | functional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | quality | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | improvemen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | t teams | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | (QIT) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 3 | | 0.2 4 | | 5 | | 0.4 | | 7 | | 0.5 6 | | 12 | | 0.6 4 | | 9 | | 0.7 2 | | 2.56 | |

| | | | | | | hospitals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | functional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Work | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | improvemen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | t teams | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | (WIT) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.12 | | 3 | | 6.9 7 | | 4 | | 9.2 9 | | 5 | | 11. 61 | | 6 | | 13. 94 | | 7 | | 16. 25 | | 58.0 6 | |

| | | | | | | hospital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | laboratory | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ISO 15189 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Accredited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Improve d staff Capacit y on IPC/OS H manage ment | | | | No. | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 9 | | 11. 3 | | 9 | | 11. 3 | | 9 | | 11. 3 | | 9 | | 11. 3 | | 9 | | 11. 3 | | 56.5 | |

| | | | | | | IPC/OSH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trainings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | annually | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 36 | | 0.8 | | 36 | | 0.8 | | 36 | | 0.8 | | 36 | | 0.8 | | 36 | | 0.8 | | 4 | |

| | | | | | | Audits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | conducted at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | facility level | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | County | | functional County incinerator | functional | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | | | | | 1 | | 120 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 120 | |

| | | | incinerat | | | County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | or | | | incinerator | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | establish | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Improve d Referral services | Improve | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 1,12 0 | | 20 | | 1,12 0 | | 20 | | 1,12 0 | | 20 | | 1,12 0 | | 20 | | 1,12 0 | | 20 | | 100 | |

| | | | d | | | referrals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Referral | | | No. of HWs | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | | | | | 50 | | 6.2 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6.25 | |

| | | | services | | | trained on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | referral | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | strategy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | emergency | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | | | | | 1 | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 | |

| | | | | | | Call Centre | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| Improve |

|---|

| d |

| Quality |

| health |

| care |

| services |

| Improve |

|---|

| d staff |

| Capacit |

| y on |

| IPC/OS |

| H |

| manage |

| ment |

Page 104

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Mortuar No. of 3.1 to 3 17. 17.4 y Hospitals 3.9 47 7 services offering mortuary services Programme: General Administration, Planning and Support Service Services Programme Objective: To improve health administration and support services Programme Outcome: Improved health administration and support services Human HRH HRH 3c 1 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 Resourc strategic strategic e plan plan Manage develop ment ed HRH No, of HRH 3c 157 17. 161 17. 135 15. 133 13. 114 11. 75.5 /CHVs recruited 66 28 58 14 91 7 recruite No. of 3.8 4,00 144 4,00 144 4,00 144 4,00 144 4,00 144 720 d CHVs 0 0 0 0 0 Contracted HRH Proportion 3c 30 26. 30 25. 30 25. 30 26. 30 26. 149. trained on HRH 6 89 73 63 15 04 (CPD) trained / capacity built on various aspects Staff/fac No. of 3c 52 1.3 52 1.3 52 1.3 52 1.3 52 1.3 6.5 ilities staff/facilitie awarded s awarded Constru Constru No. of 9.1 66 400 40 880 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,28 ctions ction / ongoing 0 and Upgradi construction Mainten ng projects ance of projects completed Building undertak s en Kitchen No. of 9.1 1 60 2 90 2 90 240 &laundr Kitchen y blocks &laundry construc blocks ted constructed OPD No. of OPD 9.1 1 50 2 120 2 120 1 50 340 construc with ted Accident and 83

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Mortuar No. of 3.1 to 3 17. 17.4 y Hospitals 3.9 47 7 services offering mortuary services Programme: General Administration, Planning and Support Service Services Programme Objective: To improve health administration and support services Programme Outcome: Improved health administration and support services Human HRH HRH 3c 1 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 Resourc strategic strategic e plan plan Manage develop ment ed HRH No, of HRH 3c 157 17. 161 17. 135 15. 133 13. 114 11. 75.5 /CHVs recruited 66 28 58 14 91 7 recruite No. of 3.8 4,00 144 4,00 144 4,00 144 4,00 144 4,00 144 720 d CHVs 0 0 0 0 0 Contracted HRH Proportion 3c 30 26. 30 25. 30 25. 30 26. 30 26. 149. trained on HRH 6 89 73 63 15 04 (CPD) trained / capacity built on various aspects Staff/fac No. of 3c 52 1.3 52 1.3 52 1.3 52 1.3 52 1.3 6.5 ilities staff/facilitie awarded s awarded Constru Constru No. of 9.1 66 400 40 880 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,28 ctions ction / ongoing 0 and Upgradi construction Mainten ng projects ance of projects completed Building undertak s en Kitchen No. of 9.1 1 60 2 90 2 90 240 &laundr Kitchen y blocks &laundry construc blocks ted constructed OPD No. of OPD 9.1 1 50 2 120 2 120 1 50 340 construc with ted Accident and 83 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | Performanc | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | e Indicators | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | Mortuar y services | | | No. of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | | | | 3 | 17. 47 | | | | | | | | | | | 17.4 7 | |

| | | | | | Hospitals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | offering | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | mortuary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: General Administration, Planning and Support Service Services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To improve health administration and support services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Improved health administration and support services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Human Resourc e Manage ment | Human | | HRH | | HRH | | 3c | | 1 | 1.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 1.1 | |

| | Resourc | | strategic | | strategic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | e | | plan | | plan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Manage | | develop | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ment | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | HRH /CHVs recruite d | HRH | | No, of HRH | | 3c | | 157 | 17. 66 | | 161 | 17. 28 | | 135 | 15. 58 | | 133 | 13. 14 | | 114 | 11. 91 | | 75.5 7 | |

| | | | /CHVs | | recruited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | recruite | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 4,00 0 | 144 | | 4,00 0 | 144 | | 4,00 0 | 144 | | 4,00 0 | 144 | | 4,00 0 | 144 | | 720 | |

| | | | d | | CHVs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Contracted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | HRH trained (CPD) | | | Proportion | | 3c | | 30 | 26. 6 | | 30 | 25. 89 | | 30 | 25. 73 | | 30 | 26. 63 | | 30 | 26. 15 | | 149. 04 | |

| | | | | | on HRH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | trained / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | capacity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | built on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | various | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | aspects | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Staff/fac | | No. of | | 3c | | 52 | 1.3 | | 52 | 1.3 | | 52 | 1.3 | | 52 | 1.3 | | 52 | 1.3 | | 6.5 | |

| | | | ilities | | staff/facilitie | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | awarded | | s awarded | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Constru ctions and Mainten ance of Building s | | | Constru | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 66 | 400 | | 40 | 880 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 1,28 0 | |

| | | | ction / | | ongoing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Upgradi | | construction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ng | | projects | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | projects | | completed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | undertak | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | en | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Kitchen | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 1 | 60 | | 2 | 90 | | 2 | 90 | | | | | | | | 240 | |

| | | | &laundr | | Kitchen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | y blocks | | &laundry | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | construc | | blocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | OPD construc ted | OPD | | No. of OPD | | 9.1 | | | | | 1 | 50 | | 2 | 120 | | 2 | 120 | | 1 | 50 | | 340 | |

| | | | construc | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | Accident | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Mortuar |

|---|

| y |

| services |

| HRH |

|---|

| trained |

| (CPD) |

| Constru |

|---|

| ctions |

| and |

| Mainten |

| ance of |

| Building |

| s |

Page 105

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Emergency blocks constructed Modern 9.1 1 250 250 maternity home constructed No. of 9.1 1 40 1 35 75 modern Mortuaries constructed No. of 9.1 1 30 2 60 2 60 2 60 1 30 240 Vaccine stores constructed No of 9.1 0 0 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Maternity and Theatre blocks constructed No. of 9.1 0 0 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 County Pathology Laboratories constructed No. of 9.1 0 0 2 90 2 90 0 0 0 0 180 Radiology &laboratory blocks constructed No. of NBU 9.1 1 30 2 60 1 30 1 30 1 30 180 Units constructed No. of wards 9.1 1 50 1 50 1 50 150 Constructed No. of 9.1 33 106 34 175 33 166 29 152 27 100 699 various health facilities infrastructur e constructed Upgrading 9.1 0 0 1 60 0 0 0 60 of Chasimba Dispensary 84

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Emergency blocks constructed Modern 9.1 1 250 250 maternity home constructed No. of 9.1 1 40 1 35 75 modern Mortuaries constructed No. of 9.1 1 30 2 60 2 60 2 60 1 30 240 Vaccine stores constructed No of 9.1 0 0 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Maternity and Theatre blocks constructed No. of 9.1 0 0 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 County Pathology Laboratories constructed No. of 9.1 0 0 2 90 2 90 0 0 0 0 180 Radiology &laboratory blocks constructed No. of NBU 9.1 1 30 2 60 1 30 1 30 1 30 180 Units constructed No. of wards 9.1 1 50 1 50 1 50 150 Constructed No. of 9.1 33 106 34 175 33 166 29 152 27 100 699 various health facilities infrastructur e constructed Upgrading 9.1 0 0 1 60 0 0 0 60 of Chasimba Dispensary 84 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | Performanc | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | e Indicators | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | Emergency | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | blocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Modern | | 9.1 | | | | | | | | 1 | 250 | | | | | | | | 250 | |

| | | | maternity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | home | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. of | | 9.1 | | | | | 1 | 40 | | | | | 1 | 35 | | | | | 75 | |

| | | | modern | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Mortuaries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 1 | 30 | | 2 | 60 | | 2 | 60 | | 2 | 60 | | 1 | 30 | | 240 | |

| | | | Vaccine | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | stores | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No of | | 9.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 1 | 50 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 50 | |

| | | | Maternity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and Theatre | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | blocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 1 | 40 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 40 | |

| | | | County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Pathology | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Laboratories | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 2 | 90 | | 2 | 90 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 180 | |

| | | | Radiology | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | &laboratory | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | blocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. of NBU | | 9.1 | | 1 | 30 | | 2 | 60 | | 1 | 30 | | 1 | 30 | | 1 | 30 | | 180 | |

| | | | Units | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. of wards | | 9.1 | | | | | 1 | 50 | | 1 | 50 | | 1 | 50 | | | | | 150 | |

| | | | Constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 33 | 106 | | 34 | 175 | | 33 | 166 | | 29 | 152 | | 27 | 100 | | 699 | |

| | | | various | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | infrastructur | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | e | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Upgrading | | 9.1 | | 0 | 0 | | 1 | 60 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | 60 | |

| | | | of Chasimba | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Dispensary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

Page 106

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) No. of 3.3, 1 29. 1 29. 1 29. 1 29. 1 29. 149. mental 3.4, 94 94 94 94 94 7 health unit 3.5 established No. of 3.3, 1 23. 1 23. 46.1 Medically 3.4, 08 08 6 assisted 3.5 therapy clinics established Comprehens 3.1 to 1 15 15 ive eye unit 3.9 at KCH No. of 9.1 20 50 20 50 20 50 20 50 20 50 250 health facilities Buildings maintained/r enovated Medical No. of 3.8 139 567 117 538 122 654 119 555 110 355 2674 Equipm various/asso .3 .5 .6 .6 ent and rted medical plants equipment Procure procured d No. of 3.8 284 593 194 552 199 668 189 566 180 365 2751 assorted .95 .85 .95 .2 .5 .8 beds (ICU, Delivery, hospital, orthopaedic) procured No. of other 3.8, 7 70 10 65. 8 56. 4 28. 3 20. 241. assorted 11.6 2 8 8 8 6 (waste management , kitchen, laundry, mortuary) equipment procured No. of 3.8 94 61 106 56 118 60 131 64 146 68 281 equipment/ machines under service/main 85

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) No. of 3.3, 1 29. 1 29. 1 29. 1 29. 1 29. 149. mental 3.4, 94 94 94 94 94 7 health unit 3.5 established No. of 3.3, 1 23. 1 23. 46.1 Medically 3.4, 08 08 6 assisted 3.5 therapy clinics established Comprehens 3.1 to 1 15 15 ive eye unit 3.9 at KCH No. of 9.1 20 50 20 50 20 50 20 50 20 50 250 health facilities Buildings maintained/r enovated Medical No. of 3.8 139 567 117 538 122 654 119 555 110 355 2674 Equipm various/asso .3 .5 .6 .6 ent and rted medical plants equipment Procure procured d No. of 3.8 284 593 194 552 199 668 189 566 180 365 2751 assorted .95 .85 .95 .2 .5 .8 beds (ICU, Delivery, hospital, orthopaedic) procured No. of other 3.8, 7 70 10 65. 8 56. 4 28. 3 20. 241. assorted 11.6 2 8 8 8 6 (waste management , kitchen, laundry, mortuary) equipment procured No. of 3.8 94 61 106 56 118 60 131 64 146 68 281 equipment/ machines under service/main 85 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 | | 1 | 29. 94 | | 1 | 29. 94 | | 1 | 29. 94 | | 1 | 29. 94 | | 1 | 29. 94 | | 149. 7 | |

| | | | | mental | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | health unit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 | | | | | 1 | 23. 08 | | | | | 1 | 23. 08 | | | | | 46.1 6 | |

| | | | | Medically | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | assisted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | therapy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | clinics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Comprehens | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 1 | 15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15 | |

| | | | | ive eye unit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | at KCH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 20 | 50 | | 20 | 50 | | 20 | 50 | | 20 | 50 | | 20 | 50 | | 250 | |

| | | | | health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Buildings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | maintained/r | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | enovated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Medical Equipm ent and plants Procure d | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 139 | 567 .3 | | 117 | 538 .5 | | 122 | 654 .6 | | 119 | 555 | | 110 | 355 | | 2674 .6 | |

| | | | | various/asso | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | rted medical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 284 | 593 .95 | | 194 | 552 .85 | | 199 | 668 .95 | | 189 | 566 .2 | | 180 | 365 .5 | | 2751 .8 | |

| | | | | assorted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | beds (ICU, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Delivery, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | hospital, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | orthopaedic) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of other | | 3.8, 11.6 | | 7 | 70 | | 10 | 65. 2 | | 8 | 56. 8 | | 4 | 28. 8 | | 3 | 20. 8 | | 241. 6 | |

| | | | | assorted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | (waste | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | , kitchen, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | laundry, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | mortuary) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 94 | 61 | | 106 | 56 | | 118 | 60 | | 131 | 64 | | 146 | 68 | | 281 | |

| | | | | equipment/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | machines | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | under | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | service/main | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| Medical |

|---|

| Equipm |

| ent and |

| plants |

| Procure |

| d |

Page 107

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) tenance contracts No. of 9.1 2 0.7 2 0.7 2 0.7 2 0.7 2 0.7 3.75 Complex 5 5 5 5 5 Lifts maintained Manage Monitor No. of sub 3.8 7 8.4 7 8.4 7 8.4 7 8.4 42 ment ing counties and Evaluati with Annual coordina on done Work Plans tion of No. of 3.8 3 120 3 120 3 120 0 0 360 Health facilities Services with comprehensi ve EMR No. of 3.8 21 10. 26 10. 21 10. 21 10. 21 10. 50.8 review/data 17 57 17 17 17 5 quality audits reports prepared No. of 3.3, 206 5.1 206 5.1 206 5.1 206 5.1 206 5.1 25.7 supervisions 3.8 49 49 49 49 49 45 (joint/suppor t/HMIS) supervisions conducted No. of 3.8 8,00 50 8,00 50 8,00 50 8,00 50 8,00 50 250 indigents 0 0 0 0 0 covered under NHIF No. of 3.8 30 0.1 30 0.1 0.3 health 5 5 facilities mapped (GIS) No of 3.8 150 18 150 18 150 18 150 18 72 facilities with all HMIS tools No. of 3.8 3 0.6 5 0.8 9 1.1 13 1.5 14 1.6 13.9 operational 6 2 8 4 researches conducted 86

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) tenance contracts No. of 9.1 2 0.7 2 0.7 2 0.7 2 0.7 2 0.7 3.75 Complex 5 5 5 5 5 Lifts maintained Manage Monitor No. of sub 3.8 7 8.4 7 8.4 7 8.4 7 8.4 42 ment ing counties and Evaluati with Annual coordina on done Work Plans tion of No. of 3.8 3 120 3 120 3 120 0 0 360 Health facilities Services with comprehensi ve EMR No. of 3.8 21 10. 26 10. 21 10. 21 10. 21 10. 50.8 review/data 17 57 17 17 17 5 quality audits reports prepared No. of 3.3, 206 5.1 206 5.1 206 5.1 206 5.1 206 5.1 25.7 supervisions 3.8 49 49 49 49 49 45 (joint/suppor t/HMIS) supervisions conducted No. of 3.8 8,00 50 8,00 50 8,00 50 8,00 50 8,00 50 250 indigents 0 0 0 0 0 covered under NHIF No. of 3.8 30 0.1 30 0.1 0.3 health 5 5 facilities mapped (GIS) No of 3.8 150 18 150 18 150 18 150 18 72 facilities with all HMIS tools No. of 3.8 3 0.6 5 0.8 9 1.1 13 1.5 14 1.6 13.9 operational 6 2 8 4 researches conducted 86 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | tenance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 9.1 | | 2 | 0.7 5 | | 2 | 0.7 5 | | 2 | 0.7 5 | | 2 | 0.7 5 | | 2 | 0.7 5 | | 3.75 | |

| | | | | Complex | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Lifts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | maintained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Manage ment and coordina tion of Health Services | | Monitor ing Evaluati on done | | No. of sub | | 3.8 | | | | | 7 | 8.4 | | 7 | 8.4 | | 7 | 8.4 | | 7 | 8.4 | | 42 | |

| | | | | counties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with Annual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Work Plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | | | | 3 | 120 | | 3 | 120 | | 3 | 120 | | 0 | 0 | | 360 | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | comprehensi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ve EMR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 21 | 10. 17 | | 26 | 10. 57 | | 21 | 10. 17 | | 21 | 10. 17 | | 21 | 10. 17 | | 50.8 5 | |

| | | | | review/data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | quality | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | audits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | reports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | prepared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.3, 3.8 | | 206 | 5.1 49 | | 206 | 5.1 49 | | 206 | 5.1 49 | | 206 | 5.1 49 | | 206 | 5.1 49 | | 25.7 45 | |

| | | | | supervisions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | (joint/suppor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | t/HMIS) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | supervisions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 8,00 0 | 50 | | 8,00 0 | 50 | | 8,00 0 | 50 | | 8,00 0 | 50 | | 8,00 0 | 50 | | 250 | |

| | | | | indigents | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | covered | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | under NHIF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 30 | 0.1 5 | | 30 | 0.1 5 | | | | | | | | | | | 0.3 | |

| | | | | health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | mapped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | (GIS) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No of | | 3.8 | | 150 | 18 | | 150 | 18 | | 150 | 18 | | 150 | 18 | | | | | 72 | |

| | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with all | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | HMIS tools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 3 | 0.6 6 | | 5 | 0.8 2 | | 9 | 1.1 8 | | 13 | 1.5 4 | | 14 | 1.6 | | 13.9 | |

| | | | | operational | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | researches | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| Manage |

|---|

| ment |

| and |

| coordina |

| tion of |

| Health |

| Services |

| Monitor |

|---|

| ing |

| Evaluati |

| on done |

Page 108

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Contract No. of 3.8 9 26. 9 26. 9 26. 9 26. 9 26. 133. ed health 69 69 69 69 69 45 services facilities with outsourced cleaning & security services Provisio No. of 6.1, 168 85 168 85 168 85 168 85 168 85 425 n of Health 7.1 Utilities facilities with water & electricity No. of solar 7.1 1 50 1 50 1 50 150 Plants purchased for KCH, Complex and Malindi Hospital No. of 7.1 2 14 2 14 2 14 42 Power Generators procured Stakehol No. of 3.4, 380 12. 380 12. 380 12. 380 12. 380 12. 62.0 der Stakeholder 3.8, 508 508 508 508 508 4 engage fora/days/m 17.1 ments eetings held held No. of 3.8 148 0.8 168 0.1 168 0 168 0 168 0 0.97 health 5 15 facilities with updated service charters No. of staff 3.8 320 1.2 320 1.2 320 1.2 320 1.2 320 1.2 6.46 sensitized on 92 92 92 92 92 Mental Health Other Number of 3.1 to 3 31. 6 63 9 94. 12 126 15 157 472. Operatio level 3&l4 3.9 5 5 .5 5 n & facilities Support with fully Services equipped Implem functional ented ambulance 87

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Contract No. of 3.8 9 26. 9 26. 9 26. 9 26. 9 26. 133. ed health 69 69 69 69 69 45 services facilities with outsourced cleaning & security services Provisio No. of 6.1, 168 85 168 85 168 85 168 85 168 85 425 n of Health 7.1 Utilities facilities with water & electricity No. of solar 7.1 1 50 1 50 1 50 150 Plants purchased for KCH, Complex and Malindi Hospital No. of 7.1 2 14 2 14 2 14 42 Power Generators procured Stakehol No. of 3.4, 380 12. 380 12. 380 12. 380 12. 380 12. 62.0 der Stakeholder 3.8, 508 508 508 508 508 4 engage fora/days/m 17.1 ments eetings held held No. of 3.8 148 0.8 168 0.1 168 0 168 0 168 0 0.97 health 5 15 facilities with updated service charters No. of staff 3.8 320 1.2 320 1.2 320 1.2 320 1.2 320 1.2 6.46 sensitized on 92 92 92 92 92 Mental Health Other Number of 3.1 to 3 31. 6 63 9 94. 12 126 15 157 472. Operatio level 3&l4 3.9 5 5 .5 5 n & facilities Support with fully Services equipped Implem functional ented ambulance 87 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | Performanc | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | e Indicators | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | Contract ed services | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 9 | 26. 69 | | 9 | 26. 69 | | 9 | 26. 69 | | 9 | 26. 69 | | 9 | 26. 69 | | 133. 45 | |

| | | | | | health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | outsourced | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | cleaning & | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | security | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Provisio n of Utilities | | | No. of | | 6.1, 7.1 | | 168 | 85 | | 168 | 85 | | 168 | 85 | | 168 | 85 | | 168 | 85 | | 425 | |

| | | | | | Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | with water | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | & electricity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | No. of solar | | 7.1 | | | | | 1 | 50 | | 1 | 50 | | 1 | 50 | | | | | 150 | |

| | | | | | Plants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | purchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | for KCH, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Complex | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | and Malindi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Hospital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | No. of | | 7.1 | | 2 | 14 | | 2 | 14 | | 2 | 14 | | | | | | | | 42 | |

| | | | | | Power | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Generators | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Stakehol der engage ments held | | | No. of | | 3.4, 3.8, 17.1 | | 380 | 12. 508 | | 380 | 12. 508 | | 380 | 12. 508 | | 380 | 12. 508 | | 380 | 12. 508 | | 62.0 4 | |

| | | | | | Stakeholder | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | fora/days/m | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | eetings held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 148 | 0.8 5 | | 168 | 0.1 15 | | 168 | 0 | | 168 | 0 | | 168 | 0 | | 0.97 | |

| | | | | | health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | with updated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | service | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | charters | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | No. of staff | | 3.8 | | 320 | 1.2 92 | | 320 | 1.2 92 | | 320 | 1.2 92 | | 320 | 1.2 92 | | 320 | 1.2 92 | | 6.46 | |

| | | | | | sensitized on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Mental | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Other | | Number of | | 3.1 to 3.9 | | 3 | 31. 5 | | 6 | 63 | | 9 | 94. 5 | | 12 | 126 | | 15 | 157 .5 | | 472. 5 | |

| | | | Operatio | | level 3&l4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | n & | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Support | | with fully | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Services | | equipped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Implem | | functional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ented | | ambulance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Contract |

|---|

| ed |

| services |

| Provisio |

|---|

| n of |

| Utilities |

| Stakehol |

|---|

| der |

| engage |

| ments |

| held |

Page 109

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Number of 3.8 1 5 2 10 2 10 2 10 2 10 45 Utility Vehicles procured No. of 3.8 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 35 bicycles for CHVs procured No. of 3.8 5 3.7 20 15 25 18. 25 18. 25 18. 74.9 motorcycles 5 75 75 75 5 for CHEWs procured Number of 3.8 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 10 specialized refrigerated vaccine truck procured Number of 3.8 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 10 specialized refrigerated Truck for blood and blood products procured Number of 3.8 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Specialized refrigerated Truck for Health products procured Number of 11.6 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 10 Specialized Truck for Biomedical waste transportatio n procured Number of 11.6 2 0.0 2 0.0 2 0.0 2 0.0 2 0.0 0.15 Waste 3 3 3 3 3 disposal vehicles 88

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Number of 3.8 1 5 2 10 2 10 2 10 2 10 45 Utility Vehicles procured No. of 3.8 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 35 bicycles for CHVs procured No. of 3.8 5 3.7 20 15 25 18. 25 18. 25 18. 74.9 motorcycles 5 75 75 75 5 for CHEWs procured Number of 3.8 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 10 specialized refrigerated vaccine truck procured Number of 3.8 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 10 specialized refrigerated Truck for blood and blood products procured Number of 3.8 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Specialized refrigerated Truck for Health products procured Number of 11.6 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 10 Specialized Truck for Biomedical waste transportatio n procured Number of 11.6 2 0.0 2 0.0 2 0.0 2 0.0 2 0.0 0.15 Waste 3 3 3 3 3 disposal vehicles 88 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 1 | 5 | | 2 | 10 | | 2 | 10 | | 2 | 10 | | 2 | 10 | | 45 | |

| | | | | Utility | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Vehicles | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 700 | 7 | | 700 | 7 | | 700 | 7 | | 700 | 7 | | 700 | 7 | | 35 | |

| | | | | bicycles for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | CHVs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 5 | 3.7 5 | | 20 | 15 | | 25 | 18. 75 | | 25 | 18. 75 | | 25 | 18. 75 | | 74.9 5 | |

| | | | | motorcycles | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | for CHEWs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | | | | 0 | 0 | | 1 | 10 | | 0 | | | 0 | 0 | | 10 | |

| | | | | specialized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | refrigerated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | vaccine | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | truck | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | | | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 1 | 10 | | 0 | 0 | | 10 | |

| | | | | specialized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | refrigerated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Truck for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | blood and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | blood | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | products | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 1 | 7 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | 0 | | 7 | |

| | | | | Specialized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | refrigerated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Truck for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | products | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | 11.6 | | | | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 1 | 10 | | 0 | 0 | | 10 | |

| | | | | Specialized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Truck for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Biomedical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | waste | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | transportatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | n procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | 11.6 | | 2 | 0.0 3 | | 2 | 0.0 3 | | 2 | 0.0 3 | | 2 | 0.0 3 | | 2 | 0.0 3 | | 0.15 | |

| | | | | Waste | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | disposal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | vehicles | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

Page 110

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) licensed with NEMA Number of 3.8 1 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 7.5 incinerators licensed Number of 3.8 182 30 182 30 182 30 182 30 182 30 150 motor vehicles and cycles maintained Number of 3.8 184 15 184 15 184 15 184 15 184 15 75 Computers maintained Number of 3.8 148 10 148 10 148 10 148 10 148 10 50 facilities furniture’s maintained Number of 3.8 0 0.0 32 5 32 5 32 5 0 0.0 15 computers. 0 0 laptops and accessories Number of 3.8 0 0.0 1 20 1 20 1 20 0 0 Health 00 60 facilities installed with CCTVs & Maintained Number of 3.8 0 0.0 1 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 internal 0 0 0 0 Communicat ion telephones installed Number of 3.8 9 16. 9 16. 9 16. 9 16. 9 16. 84 facilities 8 8 8 8 8 procuring cooking gas Number of 3.8 9 10. 9 10. 9 10. 9 10. 9 10. 54 facilities 8 8 8 8 8 procuring medical gas Governa Number of 3.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 14.4 nce Policy, 8 8 8 8 8 Structur regulations 89

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) licensed with NEMA Number of 3.8 1 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 1 1.5 7.5 incinerators licensed Number of 3.8 182 30 182 30 182 30 182 30 182 30 150 motor vehicles and cycles maintained Number of 3.8 184 15 184 15 184 15 184 15 184 15 75 Computers maintained Number of 3.8 148 10 148 10 148 10 148 10 148 10 50 facilities furniture’s maintained Number of 3.8 0 0.0 32 5 32 5 32 5 0 0.0 15 computers. 0 0 laptops and accessories Number of 3.8 0 0.0 1 20 1 20 1 20 0 0 Health 00 60 facilities installed with CCTVs & Maintained Number of 3.8 0 0.0 1 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 internal 0 0 0 0 Communicat ion telephones installed Number of 3.8 9 16. 9 16. 9 16. 9 16. 9 16. 84 facilities 8 8 8 8 8 procuring cooking gas Number of 3.8 9 10. 9 10. 9 10. 9 10. 9 10. 54 facilities 8 8 8 8 8 procuring medical gas Governa Number of 3.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 2 2.8 14.4 nce Policy, 8 8 8 8 8 Structur regulations 89 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | | | licensed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | with NEMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 1 | 1.5 | | 1 | 1.5 | | 1 | 1.5 | | 1 | 1.5 | | 1 | 1.5 | | 7.5 | |

| | | | | | | incinerators | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | licensed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 182 | 30 | | 182 | 30 | | 182 | 30 | | 182 | 30 | | 182 | 30 | | 150 | |

| | | | | | | motor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | vehicles and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | cycles | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | maintained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 184 | 15 | | 184 | 15 | | 184 | 15 | | 184 | 15 | | 184 | 15 | | 75 | |

| | | | | | | Computers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | maintained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 148 | 10 | | 148 | 10 | | 148 | 10 | | 148 | 10 | | 148 | 10 | | 50 | |

| | | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | furniture’s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | maintained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 0 | 0.0 0 | | 32 | 5 | | 32 | 5 | | 32 | 5 | | 0 | 0.0 0 | | 15 | |

| | | | | | | computers. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | laptops and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | accessories | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 0 | 0.0 00 | | 1 | 20 | | 1 | 20 | | 1 | 20 | | 0 | 0 | | 60 | |

| | | | | | | Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | installed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | with CCTVs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | & | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Maintained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 0 | 0.0 0 | | 1 | 5 | | 0 | 0.0 0 | | 0 | 0.0 0 | | 0 | 0.0 0 | | 5 | |

| | | | | | | internal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Communicat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | telephones | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | installed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 9 | 16. 8 | | 9 | 16. 8 | | 9 | 16. 8 | | 9 | 16. 8 | | 9 | 16. 8 | | 84 | |

| | | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | procuring | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | cooking gas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 9 | 10. 8 | | 9 | 10. 8 | | 9 | 10. 8 | | 9 | 10. 8 | | 9 | 10. 8 | | 54 | |

| | | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | procuring | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | medical gas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Governa | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 2 | 2.8 8 | | 2 | 2.8 8 | | 2 | 2.8 8 | | 2 | 2.8 8 | | 2 | 2.8 8 | | 14.4 | |

| | | | nce | | | Policy, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Structur | | | regulations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

Page 111

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) es and bills Strength enacted ened Number of 3.8 9 1.9 9 0 9 0 9 1.9 9 0 3.94 Hospital 7 7 Boards Trained and Gazetted Number of 3.8 30 7.2 30 7.2 30 7.2 30 7.2 30 7.2 36.0 Primary 1 1 1 1 1 5 Level Health Facilities Managemen t Committees trained and gazetted Number of 3.8 2 0.8 1 0.2 1.12 strategies 4 8 developed (Resource mobilization ,HPT and communicat ion) Health Commo Number of 3.8 220 5.9 220 5.9 220 5.9 220 5.9 220 5.9 29.9 Products dity staff trained 8 8 8 8 8 and manage on Technol ment commodity ogies security management Number of 3.8 170 3.3 170 0 170 0 170 0 170 0 3.3 facilities with SOPs for HPT management Number of 3.8 4 0.5 4 0.5 4 0.5 4 0.5 4 0.5 2.7 CMTC 4 4 4 4 4 meetings held Number of 3.8 36 4.5 36 4.5 36 4.5 36 4.5 36 4.5 22.5 MTC meetings held in the major hospitals 90

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) es and bills Strength enacted ened Number of 3.8 9 1.9 9 0 9 0 9 1.9 9 0 3.94 Hospital 7 7 Boards Trained and Gazetted Number of 3.8 30 7.2 30 7.2 30 7.2 30 7.2 30 7.2 36.0 Primary 1 1 1 1 1 5 Level Health Facilities Managemen t Committees trained and gazetted Number of 3.8 2 0.8 1 0.2 1.12 strategies 4 8 developed (Resource mobilization ,HPT and communicat ion) Health Commo Number of 3.8 220 5.9 220 5.9 220 5.9 220 5.9 220 5.9 29.9 Products dity staff trained 8 8 8 8 8 and manage on Technol ment commodity ogies security management Number of 3.8 170 3.3 170 0 170 0 170 0 170 0 3.3 facilities with SOPs for HPT management Number of 3.8 4 0.5 4 0.5 4 0.5 4 0.5 4 0.5 2.7 CMTC 4 4 4 4 4 meetings held Number of 3.8 36 4.5 36 4.5 36 4.5 36 4.5 36 4.5 22.5 MTC meetings held in the major hospitals 90 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | Performanc | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | e Indicators | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | es Strength ened | and bills | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | enacted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 9 | 1.9 7 | | 9 | 0 | | 9 | 0 | | 9 | 1.9 7 | | 9 | 0 | | 3.94 | |

| | | | Hospital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Boards | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Trained and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Gazetted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 30 | 7.2 1 | | 30 | 7.2 1 | | 30 | 7.2 1 | | 30 | 7.2 1 | | 30 | 7.2 1 | | 36.0 5 | |

| | | | Primary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Level Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Managemen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | t | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Committees | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | trained and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | gazetted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | | | | 2 | 0.8 4 | | 1 | 0.2 8 | | | | | | | | 1.12 | |

| | | | strategies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | (Resource | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | mobilization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ,HPT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | communicat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ion) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Health Products and Technol ogies | | Commo dity manage ment security | Number of | | 3.8 | | 220 | 5.9 8 | | 220 | 5.9 8 | | 220 | 5.9 8 | | 220 | 5.9 8 | | 220 | 5.9 8 | | 29.9 | |

| | | | staff trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | commodity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 170 | 3.3 | | 170 | 0 | | 170 | 0 | | 170 | 0 | | 170 | 0 | | 3.3 | |

| | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | with SOPs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | for HPT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 4 | 0.5 4 | | 4 | 0.5 4 | | 4 | 0.5 4 | | 4 | 0.5 4 | | 4 | 0.5 4 | | 2.7 | |

| | | | CMTC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | meetings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 36 | 4.5 | | 36 | 4.5 | | 36 | 4.5 | | 36 | 4.5 | | 36 | 4.5 | | 22.5 | |

| | | | MTC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | meetings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | held in the | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | major | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | hospitals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| es |

|---|

| Strength |

| ened |

| Health |

|---|

| Products |

| and |

| Technol |

| ogies |

| Commo |

|---|

| dity |

| manage |

| ment |

| security |

Page 112

Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Number of 3.8 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.7 3.9 CASIC 8 8 8 8 8 meetings held Improve Annual HPT 3.8 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 4.65 d HPT’s Forecasting 6 6 6 6 6 inventor and y quantificatio manage n ment of Number of 3.8 1 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 all County 3 commod Drug ities Formulary Lists and manuals in place Procure Percentage 3.8 100 960 100 960 100 960 100 960 100 960 4,80 ment of of HPTs 0 HPTs procured Procure No. of 3.8 9 98 9 98 9 98 9 98 9 98 490 ment of facilities food procuring and food and rations rations for patients pharmac No. of 3.8 3 0.0 3 1 3 1 3 1 9 0.0 3 eutical facilities 0 0 grade provided refrigera with tors pharmaceuti purchas cal grade ed refrigerators medical No. of 3.8 2 80 4 160 3 120 3 120 4 160 640 supplies appropriate stores medical construc supplies ted stores Constructed 4.2.3 Health Sector Flagship Projects The health sector flagship projects to be implemented during the plan period is presented in Table 4.3. 91

| Sector: Health Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Progra Output Performanc ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l mme e Indicators to Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Tar Cos Bud SDG get t get t get t get t get t get targe Ksh. ts M) Number of 3.8 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.7 4 0.7 3.9 CASIC 8 8 8 8 8 meetings held Improve Annual HPT 3.8 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 4.65 d HPT’s Forecasting 6 6 6 6 6 inventor and y quantificatio manage n ment of Number of 3.8 1 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 all County 3 commod Drug ities Formulary Lists and manuals in place Procure Percentage 3.8 100 960 100 960 100 960 100 960 100 960 4,80 ment of of HPTs 0 HPTs procured Procure No. of 3.8 9 98 9 98 9 98 9 98 9 98 490 ment of facilities food procuring and food and rations rations for patients pharmac No. of 3.8 3 0.0 3 1 3 1 3 1 9 0.0 3 eutical facilities 0 0 grade provided refrigera with tors pharmaceuti purchas cal grade ed refrigerators medical No. of 3.8 2 80 4 160 3 120 3 120 4 160 640 supplies appropriate stores medical construc supplies ted stores Constructed 4.2.3 Health Sector Flagship Projects The health sector flagship projects to be implemented during the plan period is presented in Table 4.3. 91 |

|---|

| | Sector: Health | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performanc e Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota l Bud get Ksh. M) | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | Year 2 | | | Year 3 | | | Year 4 | | | Year 5 | | | | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | Tar get | Cos t | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | 4 | 0.7 8 | | 4 | 0.7 8 | | 4 | 0.7 8 | | 4 | 0.7 8 | | 4 | 0.7 8 | | 3.9 | |

| | | | | | | CASIC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | meetings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Improve d HPT’s inventor y manage ment of all commod ities | | | | Annual HPT | | 3.8 | | 1 | 0.9 6 | | 1 | 0.9 6 | | 1 | 0.9 6 | | 1 | 0.9 6 | | 1 | 0.9 6 | | 4.65 | |

| | | | | | | Forecasting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | quantificatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number of | | 3.8 | | | | | 1 | 1.8 3 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | | 1.83 | |

| | | | | | | County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Drug | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Formulary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Lists and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | manuals in | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | place | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Procure | | | Percentage | | 3.8 | | 100 | 960 | | 100 | 960 | | 100 | 960 | | 100 | 960 | | 100 | 960 | | 4,80 0 | |

| | | | ment of | | | of HPTs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | HPTs | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Procure ment of food and rations | Procure | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 9 | 98 | | 9 | 98 | | 9 | 98 | | 9 | 98 | | 9 | 98 | | 490 | |

| | | | ment of | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | food | | | procuring | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | food and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | rations | | | rations for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | patients | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | pharmac | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 3 | 0.0 0 | | 3 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | | 9 | 0.0 0 | | 3 | |

| | | | eutical | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | grade | | | provided | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | refrigera | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | tors | | | pharmaceuti | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | purchas | | | cal grade | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed | | | refrigerators | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | medical supplies stores construc ted | medical | | | No. of | | 3.8 | | 2 | 80 | | 4 | 160 | | 3 | 120 | | 3 | 120 | | 4 | 160 | | 640 | |

| | | | supplies | | | appropriate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | stores | | | medical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | construc | | | supplies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | | stores | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Constructed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performanc |

| e Indicators |

| Improve |

|---|

| d HPT’s |

| inventor |

| y |

| manage |

| ment of |

| all |

| commod |

| ities |

Page 113

Table 4.3: Health Sector Flagship Project Project Location Objective Description Key Time Est. Source of Lead Name of Key Output(s) Frame* cost Funds Agency Activities (KSh. M) Construction Kilifi To provide • Construction • Reduced • Phase 1: FY 800 KCG, & KCG of Kilifi North Sub quality of multi- morbidity 2023/24 Development County County, affordable specialty • Reduced • Phase 2: FY partners Hospital Sokoni specialized medical disability 2024/25 Teaching Ward health care blocks • Reduced • Phase 3: FY and referral services to • Equipping mortality 2025/26 Hospital the Kilifi • Staffing • Reduced • Phase 4: County • Digitalization referrals FyY2026/27 residents of services and beyond. Health Products & Technologies 4.2.4 Health Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.4 presents the summary for the health sector. Table 4.4: Health Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Linked Cross-sector Impact Measures to Mitigate the Impact Name Sector(s) Synergies* Adverse impact General Roads, Public Access to health Pulling down of health Develop a spatial plan administration Works and facilities facilities/structures on and planning Transport road reserve services Lands and Land ownership Interrupted health Strengthen land tribunal and County Attorney and security services and decreased arbitration courts access to health services Water Provision of safe Disease outbreaks/ill Drilling of and desalination of and clean water health boreholes Provision of piped water County Public Provision of Poor service Engaging adequate and skilled Service Board human resource healthcare workforce (CPSB) for health Preventive and Agriculture Food security Malnutrition and ill Encourage Food diversity and promotive health cultivation of drought resistant crops health services Environment and Sanitation Disease outbreaks Develop ecofriendly and recycled NEMA related to the materials environment 92

| Table 4.3: Health Sector Flagship Project Project Location Objective Description Key Time Est. Source of Lead Name of Key Output(s) Frame* cost Funds Agency Activities (KSh. M) Construction Kilifi To provide • Construction • Reduced • Phase 1: FY 800 KCG, & KCG of Kilifi North Sub quality of multi- morbidity 2023/24 Development County County, affordable specialty • Reduced • Phase 2: FY partners Hospital Sokoni specialized medical disability 2024/25 Teaching Ward health care blocks • Reduced • Phase 3: FY and referral services to • Equipping mortality 2025/26 Hospital the Kilifi • Staffing • Reduced • Phase 4: County • Digitalization referrals FyY2026/27 residents of services and beyond. Health Products & Technologies 4.2.4 Health Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.4 presents the summary for the health sector. Table 4.4: Health Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Linked Cross-sector Impact Measures to Mitigate the Impact Name Sector(s) Synergies* Adverse impact General Roads, Public Access to health Pulling down of health Develop a spatial plan administration Works and facilities facilities/structures on and planning Transport road reserve services Lands and Land ownership Interrupted health Strengthen land tribunal and County Attorney and security services and decreased arbitration courts access to health services Water Provision of safe Disease outbreaks/ill Drilling of and desalination of and clean water health boreholes Provision of piped water County Public Provision of Poor service Engaging adequate and skilled Service Board human resource healthcare workforce (CPSB) for health Preventive and Agriculture Food security Malnutrition and ill Encourage Food diversity and promotive health cultivation of drought resistant crops health services Environment and Sanitation Disease outbreaks Develop ecofriendly and recycled NEMA related to the materials environment 92 |

|---|

| Project Name | Location | Objective | Description of Key Activities | | | Key Output(s) | Time Frame* | | Est. | | Source of Funds | Lead Agency |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | | | | | | cost | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | (KSh. | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | M) | | | |

| Construction of Kilifi County Hospital Teaching and referral Hospital | Kilifi North Sub County, Sokoni Ward | To provide quality affordable specialized health care services to the Kilifi County residents and beyond. | | • Construction | | • Reduced morbidity • Reduced disability • Reduced mortality • Reduced referrals | • Phase 1: FY 2023/24 • Phase 2: FY 2024/25 • Phase 3: FY 2025/26 • Phase 4: FyY2026/27 | 800 | 800 | | KCG, & Development partners | KCG |

| | | | | of multi- | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | specialty | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | medical | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | blocks | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | • Equipping | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | • Staffing | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | • Digitalization | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | of services | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Health | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Products & | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Technologies | | | | | | | | |

| Project |

|---|

| Name |

| Description |

|---|

| of Key |

| Activities |

| Key |

|---|

| Output(s) |

| Time |

|---|

| Frame* |

| Source of |

|---|

| Funds |

| Lead |

|---|

| Agency |

| Construction |

|---|

| of Kilifi |

| County |

| Hospital |

| Teaching |

| and referral |

| Hospital |

| Kilifi |

|---|

| North Sub |

| County, |

| Sokoni |

| Ward |

| To provide |

|---|

| quality |

| affordable |

| specialized |

| health care |

| services to |

| the Kilifi |

| County |

| residents |

| and beyond. |

| • Reduced |

|---|

| morbidity |

| • Reduced |

| disability |

| • Reduced |

| mortality |

| • Reduced |

| referrals |

| • Phase 1: FY |

|---|

| 2023/24 |

| • Phase 2: FY |

| 2024/25 |

| • Phase 3: FY |

| 2025/26 |

| • Phase 4: |

| FyY2026/27 |

| KCG, & |

|---|

| Development |

| partners |

| Programme Name | Linked Sector(s) | | | | Cross-sector Impact | | | | | Measures to Mitigate the Impact | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | | | Synergies* | Synergies* | | | Adverse | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | impact | | | | |

| General administration and planning services | | Roads, Public | | Access to health facilities | | | | Pulling down of health | | Develop a spatial plan | | |

| | | Works and | | | | | | facilities/structures on | | | | |

| | | Transport | | | | | | road reserve | | | | |

| | Lands and County Attorney | Lands and | | Land ownership and security | | | | Interrupted health | | Strengthen land tribunal and arbitration courts | | |

| | | County Attorney | | | | | | services and decreased | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | access to health | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | services | | | | |

| | Water | | | Provision of safe and clean water | | | Disease outbreaks/ill health | Disease outbreaks/ill | | | Drilling of and desalination of | |

| | | | | | | | | health | | | boreholes | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | Provision of piped water | |

| | | County Public | | | Provision of | | Poor service | | | Engaging adequate and skilled healthcare workforce | Engaging adequate and skilled | |

| | | Service Board | | | human resource | | | | | | healthcare workforce | |

| | | (CPSB) | | | for health | | | | | | | |

| Preventive and promotive health services | Agriculture | Agriculture | | Food security | Food security | | Malnutrition and ill health | | | Encourage Food diversity and cultivation of drought resistant crops | | |

| | Environment and NEMA | | | Sanitation | | | | Disease outbreaks | | Develop ecofriendly and recycled materials | | |

| | | | | | | | | related to the | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | environment | | | | |

| Programme |

|---|

| Name |

| Linked |

|---|

| Sector(s) |

| General |

|---|

| administration |

| and planning |

| services |

| Access to health |

|---|

| facilities |

| Land ownership |

|---|

| and security |

| Strengthen land tribunal and |

|---|

| arbitration courts |

| Provision of safe |

|---|

| and clean water |

| Preventive and |

|---|

| promotive |

| health services |

| Malnutrition and ill |

|---|

| health |

| Encourage Food diversity and |

|---|

| cultivation of drought resistant crops |

| Environment and |

|---|

| NEMA |

| Develop ecofriendly and recycled |

|---|

| materials |

Page 114

Programme Linked Cross-sector Impact Measures to Mitigate the Impact Name Sector(s) Synergies* Adverse impact Develop energy policies to maintain a safe environment Disaster Health Disease outbreaks Set up an emergency fund Management emergencies and Displacement Civic education on preventive and disaster risk Limited access to promotive measures of risk management health services management Gender and Joint Health and Inequalities in health Advocacy on GBV social services Gender committee Gender based violence Social protection for the vulnerable in the society Education Joint Health and Disease outbreaks in Establishing school health programs Education schools committee Curative and ICT Internet Inefficient health Collaboratively develop a TOR for an rehabilitative connectivity service delivery and EMR system for use in the health health services Efficient outdated manual facilities electronic medical systems records system Roads, Public Development of Compromised integrity Collaboratively construct health Works and Health and quality of the facilities in line with international Transport infrastructural infrastructure standards designs, Bills of negatively impacting quantities and on health care service project delivery management Quality Implementation of Poor health outcomes Collaborative implementation of assurance and quality quality management systems and standards management international standards systems and standards 4.3. Education Sector This sector comprises Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Department of Education, Teachers Service Commission and affiliated institutions. Its focus on the sub-sectors of Pre- Primary Education, Primary, Secondary, Adult Education, vocational Training, Tertiary and University Education. Vision: The vision for this sector is to have a globally competitive education, training and innovation for sustainable development. Mission: The mission for this sector is to provide, promote and coordinate quality education and training, integration of science, technology and innovation in the sustainable socio-economic development process. Goal: To provide access to quality education and training for innovation and competitive in global society. 93

| Programme Linked Cross-sector Impact Measures to Mitigate the Impact Name Sector(s) Synergies* Adverse impact Develop energy policies to maintain a safe environment Disaster Health Disease outbreaks Set up an emergency fund Management emergencies and Displacement Civic education on preventive and disaster risk Limited access to promotive measures of risk management health services management Gender and Joint Health and Inequalities in health Advocacy on GBV social services Gender committee Gender based violence Social protection for the vulnerable in the society Education Joint Health and Disease outbreaks in Establishing school health programs Education schools committee Curative and ICT Internet Inefficient health Collaboratively develop a TOR for an rehabilitative connectivity service delivery and EMR system for use in the health health services Efficient outdated manual facilities electronic medical systems records system Roads, Public Development of Compromised integrity Collaboratively construct health Works and Health and quality of the facilities in line with international Transport infrastructural infrastructure standards designs, Bills of negatively impacting quantities and on health care service project delivery management Quality Implementation of Poor health outcomes Collaborative implementation of assurance and quality quality management systems and standards management international standards systems and standards 4.3. Education Sector This sector comprises Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Department of Education, Teachers Service Commission and affiliated institutions. Its focus on the sub-sectors of Pre- Primary Education, Primary, Secondary, Adult Education, vocational Training, Tertiary and University Education. Vision: The vision for this sector is to have a globally competitive education, training and innovation for sustainable development. Mission: The mission for this sector is to provide, promote and coordinate quality education and training, integration of science, technology and innovation in the sustainable socio-economic development process. Goal: To provide access to quality education and training for innovation and competitive in global society. 93 |

|---|

| Programme Name | Linked Sector(s) | | Cross-sector Impact | | | | | Measures to Mitigate the Impact | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | Synergies* | Synergies* | | | Adverse | | | | |

| | | | | | | impact | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | Develop energy policies to maintain a | |

| | | | | | | | | | safe environment | |

| | Disaster Management | | Health | | | Disease outbreaks | | | Set up an emergency fund | |

| | | | emergencies and | | | Displacement | | | Civic education on preventive and | |

| | | | disaster risk | | | Limited access to | | | promotive measures of risk | |

| | | | management | | | health services | | | management | |

| | Gender and social services | Joint Health and Gender committee | Joint Health and | | Inequalities in health Gender based violence | Inequalities in health | | | Advocacy on GBV | |

| | | | Gender committee | | | Gender based violence | | | Social protection for the vulnerable in | |

| | | | | | | | | | the society | |

| | Education | | Joint Health and | | | Disease outbreaks in | | Establishing school health programs | Establishing school health programs | |

| | | | Education | | | schools | | | | |

| | | | committee | | | | | | | |

| Curative and rehabilitative health services | ICT | | Internet | | Inefficient health service delivery and outdated manual systems | Inefficient health | | Collaboratively develop a TOR for an EMR system for use in the health facilities | | |

| | | | connectivity | | | service delivery and | | | | |

| | | | Efficient | | | outdated manual | | | | |

| | | | electronic medical | | | systems | | | | |

| | | | records system | | | | | | | |

| | Roads, Public Works and Transport | | Development of | | Compromised integrity and quality of the infrastructure negatively impacting on health care service delivery | | | Collaboratively construct health facilities in line with international standards | | |

| | | | Health | | | | | | | |

| | | | infrastructural | | | | | | | |

| | | | designs, Bills of | | | | | | | |

| | | | quantities and | | | | | | | |

| | | | project | | | | | | | |

| | | | management | | | | | | | |

| | Quality assurance and standards | | Implementation of | | Poor health outcomes | | | Collaborative implementation of quality management systems and international standards | | |

| | | | quality | | | | | | | |

| | | | management | | | | | | | |

| | | | systems and | | | | | | | |

| | | | standards | | | | | | | |

| Programme |

|---|

| Name |

| Linked |

|---|

| Sector(s) |

| Disaster |

|---|

| Management |

| Gender and |

|---|

| social services |

| Curative and |

|---|

| rehabilitative |

| health services |

| Collaboratively develop a TOR for an |

|---|

| EMR system for use in the health |

| facilities |

| Roads, Public |

|---|

| Works and |

| Transport |

| Compromised integrity |

|---|

| and quality of the |

| infrastructure |

| negatively impacting |

| on health care service |

| delivery |

| Collaboratively construct health |

|---|

| facilities in line with international |

| standards |

| Quality |

|---|

| assurance and |

| standards |

| Collaborative implementation of |

|---|

| quality management systems and |

| international standards |

Page 115

4.3.1 Education Sector Priorities and Strategies The sector development needs, priorities and strategies are summarised in Table 4.5. Table 4.5: Education Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To enhance access to quality vocational training and Infrastructure development; education Provision of modern tools and equipment; Introduce modern trades and programs; Create awareness of VT programs; Employment of vocational training instructors Training of instructors To enhance access to quality pre-primary education Infrastructural development ; Employment of ECDE teachers; Sensitization of community on the importance of ECDE programs; Introduction of capitation to public ECDE centers; Introduction of school feeding program to public ECDEs; Provision of teaching and learning materials; Provision of pre-school furniture; Formulation of the pre-primary school policy Training of ECDE teachers and ECD coordinators Introduction of Digital literacy to pre-primary schools 4.3.2. Education Sector Programmes Table 4.6 presents the Education sector programmes to be implemented within the CIDP III (2023-27) period. Table 4.6: Education Sector Programmes Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) Programme: Vocational Training and Education Programme Objective: To enhance access to quality vocational training and education Programme Outcome: Enhanced access to quality vocational training and education Infrastruc ICT Number SDG4(4. 4 40 6 60 8 80 8 80 5 50 310 ture Laborato of ICT 3and 4.4) ries labs 94

| 4.3.1 Education Sector Priorities and Strategies The sector development needs, priorities and strategies are summarised in Table 4.5. Table 4.5: Education Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To enhance access to quality vocational training and Infrastructure development; education Provision of modern tools and equipment; Introduce modern trades and programs; Create awareness of VT programs; Employment of vocational training instructors Training of instructors To enhance access to quality pre-primary education Infrastructural development ; Employment of ECDE teachers; Sensitization of community on the importance of ECDE programs; Introduction of capitation to public ECDE centers; Introduction of school feeding program to public ECDEs; Provision of teaching and learning materials; Provision of pre-school furniture; Formulation of the pre-primary school policy Training of ECDE teachers and ECD coordinators Introduction of Digital literacy to pre-primary schools 4.3.2. Education Sector Programmes Table 4.6 presents the Education sector programmes to be implemented within the CIDP III (2023-27) period. Table 4.6: Education Sector Programmes Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) Programme: Vocational Training and Education Programme Objective: To enhance access to quality vocational training and education Programme Outcome: Enhanced access to quality vocational training and education Infrastruc ICT Number SDG4(4. 4 40 6 60 8 80 8 80 5 50 310 ture Laborato of ICT 3and 4.4) ries labs 94 |

|---|

| | Sector Priorities | | Strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| To enhance access to quality vocational training and education | To enhance access to quality vocational training and | | Infrastructure development; | |

| | education | | Provision of modern tools and equipment; | |

| | | | Introduce modern trades and programs; | |

| | | | Create awareness of VT programs; | |

| | | | Employment of vocational training instructors | |

| | | | Training of instructors | |

| To enhance access to quality pre-primary education | To enhance access to quality pre-primary education | | Infrastructural development ; | |

| | | | Employment of ECDE teachers; | |

| | | | Sensitization of community on the importance of ECDE | |

| | | | programs; | |

| | | | Introduction of capitation to public ECDE centers; | |

| | | | Introduction of school feeding program to public ECDEs; | |

| | | | Provision of teaching and learning materials; | |

| | | | Provision of pre-school furniture; | |

| | | | Formulation of the pre-primary school policy | |

| | | | Training of ECDE teachers and ECD coordinators | |

| | | | Introduction of Digital literacy to pre-primary schools | |

| | Sector: Education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub- program | Sub- | Key Output | | | Key Perform ance Indicato rs | | | Linkage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | Programme: Vocational Training and Education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To enhance access to quality vocational training and education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Enhanced access to quality vocational training and education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Infrastruc ture | Infrastruc | | ICT | | | Number | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 4 | | 40 | | | 6 | 60 | | | 8 | | 80 | | | 8 | | 80 | | | 5 | | 50 | | | 310 | 310 | |

| | ture | | Laborato | | | of ICT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ries | | | labs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Perform |

| ance |

| Indicato |

| rs |

| Linkage |

|---|

| s to SDG |

| targets |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

Page 116

Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) developm Construc construct ent ted ed Training Number SDG4(4. 2 24 4 48 7 84 8 96 6 72 324 worksho of 3and 4.4) ps modern Construc worksho ted ps construct ed Hostels Number SDG4(4. 2 24 3 39 4 52 5 65 2 26 206 Construc of hostels 3and 4.4) ted construct ed Toilets Number SDG6(6. 12 12 18 18 24 24 30 30 12 12 96 Construc of toilets 2) ted construct ed. Tools and Tools No. of SDG4(4. 8 40 10 80 12 10 15 15 8 40 410 equipmen and vocation 3and 4.4) 0 0 Equipme al t; nt training provided centers equipped Modern Modern Number SDG4(4. 3 15 4 17 5 20 6 24 8 32 108 trades and trades of 3and 4.4) programs and Modern program trades s and introduc programs ed introduce d Capacity Sensitiza No. of SDG4(4. 35 24. 35 24. 35 24. 35 24. 35 24. 122. building tion of sensitizat 3and 4.4) 5 5 5 5 5 5 VT ion program forums s held conducte d Instructo No. of SDG4(4. 54 25 50 20 50 20 50 20 50 20 105 rs instructor 3and 4.4) employe s d employe d 95

| Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) developm Construc construct ent ted ed Training Number SDG4(4. 2 24 4 48 7 84 8 96 6 72 324 worksho of 3and 4.4) ps modern Construc worksho ted ps construct ed Hostels Number SDG4(4. 2 24 3 39 4 52 5 65 2 26 206 Construc of hostels 3and 4.4) ted construct ed Toilets Number SDG6(6. 12 12 18 18 24 24 30 30 12 12 96 Construc of toilets 2) ted construct ed. Tools and Tools No. of SDG4(4. 8 40 10 80 12 10 15 15 8 40 410 equipmen and vocation 3and 4.4) 0 0 Equipme al t; nt training provided centers equipped Modern Modern Number SDG4(4. 3 15 4 17 5 20 6 24 8 32 108 trades and trades of 3and 4.4) programs and Modern program trades s and introduc programs ed introduce d Capacity Sensitiza No. of SDG4(4. 35 24. 35 24. 35 24. 35 24. 35 24. 122. building tion of sensitizat 3and 4.4) 5 5 5 5 5 5 VT ion program forums s held conducte d Instructo No. of SDG4(4. 54 25 50 20 50 20 50 20 50 20 105 rs instructor 3and 4.4) employe s d employe d 95 |

|---|

| | Sector: Education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub- program | Sub- | Key Output | | | Key Perform ance Indicato rs | | | Linkage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| developm ent | | | Construc | | | construct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Training worksho ps Construc ted | Training | | | Number | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 2 | | 24 | | | 4 | | 48 | | | 7 | | 84 | | | 8 | | 96 | | | 6 | | 72 | | | 324 | | |

| | | | worksho | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ps | | | modern | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Construc | | | worksho | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | | ps | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | construct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Hostels Construc ted | | | | Number | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 2 | | 24 | | | 3 | | 39 | | | 4 | | 52 | | | 5 | | 65 | | | 2 | | 26 | | | 206 | | |

| | | | | | | of hostels | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | construct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Toilets Construc ted | | | | Number | | SDG6(6. 2) | 12 | | 12 | | | 18 | | 18 | | | 24 | | 24 | | | 30 | | 30 | | | 12 | | 12 | | | 96 | | |

| | | | | | | of toilets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | construct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ed. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Tools and equipmen t; | | Tools and Equipme nt provided | | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 8 | | 40 | | | 10 | | 80 | | | 12 | | 10 0 | | | 15 | | 15 0 | | | 8 | | 40 | | | 410 | | |

| | | | | | | vocation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | al | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | training | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | equipped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Modern trades and programs | | Modern trades and program s introduc ed | | | | Number | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 3 | | 15 | | | 4 | | 17 | | | 5 | | 20 | | | 6 | | 24 | | | 8 | | 32 | | | 108 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Modern | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trades | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | programs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | introduce | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Capacity building | | | Sensitiza | | No. of sensitizat ion forums held | No. of | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 35 | | 24. 5 | | | 35 | | 24. 5 | | | 35 | | 24. 5 | | | 35 | | 24. 5 | | | 35 | | 24. 5 | | | 122. 5 | | |

| | | | tion of | | | sensitizat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | VT | | | ion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | program | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | s | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | conducte | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Instructo rs employe d | Instructo | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 54 | | 25 | | | 50 | | 20 | | | 50 | | 20 | | | 50 | | 20 | | | 50 | | 20 | | | 105 | | |

| | | | rs | | | instructor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | employe | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d | | | employe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Perform |

| ance |

| Indicato |

| rs |

| Linkage |

|---|

| s to SDG |

| targets |

| developm |

|---|

| ent |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

| Hostels |

|---|

| Construc |

| ted |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

| Toilets |

|---|

| Construc |

| ted |

| SDG6(6. |

|---|

| 2) |

| Tools and |

|---|

| equipmen |

| t; |

| Tools |

|---|

| and |

| Equipme |

| nt |

| provided |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Modern |

|---|

| trades and |

| programs |

| Modern |

|---|

| trades |

| and |

| program |

| s |

| introduc |

| ed |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

| Capacity |

|---|

| building |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

| 24. |

|---|

| 5 |

| 24. |

|---|

| 5 |

| 24. |

|---|

| 5 |

| 24. |

|---|

| 5 |

| 24. |

|---|

| 5 |

| 122. |

|---|

| 5 |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

Page 117

Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) Instructo No. of SDG4(4. 70 6 100 7 120 8 150 10 80 6.5 37.5 rs instructor 3and 4.4) trained s trained Program: Pre-primary Education Program Objective: To enhance access to quality pre-primary education Program Outcome: Enhanced access to quality pre-primary education Infrastruc ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 90 47 90 47 90 47 90 47 90 47 2375 tural centers ECDE 24a and 5 5 5 5 5 construc centers 6.2) developm ted, construct ent Equippe ed and d Equipped Capacity ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 305 10 300 10 300 10 300 10 300 10 523 building teachers ECDE 2) 7 4 4 4 4 and teachers coordina and tors coordinat employe ors d employe d ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 800 5 300 3 800 5 600 4 600 4 21 teachers ECDE 2) and teachers coordina and tors coordinat trained ors trained Commu No. of SDG4(4. 35 1.7 35 1.7 35 1.7 35 1.7 35 1.7 8.75 nity sensitizat 2) 5 5 5 5 5 sensitize ion d on forums ECDE held program s Pre- Policy on SDG4(4. 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 primary pre- 2) school primary policy school develope develope d d Teaching Teachin No. of SDG4(4. 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 50 and g and schools 2) learning learning provided material material with teaching 96

| Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) Instructo No. of SDG4(4. 70 6 100 7 120 8 150 10 80 6.5 37.5 rs instructor 3and 4.4) trained s trained Program: Pre-primary Education Program Objective: To enhance access to quality pre-primary education Program Outcome: Enhanced access to quality pre-primary education Infrastruc ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 90 47 90 47 90 47 90 47 90 47 2375 tural centers ECDE 24a and 5 5 5 5 5 construc centers 6.2) developm ted, construct ent Equippe ed and d Equipped Capacity ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 305 10 300 10 300 10 300 10 300 10 523 building teachers ECDE 2) 7 4 4 4 4 and teachers coordina and tors coordinat employe ors d employe d ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 800 5 300 3 800 5 600 4 600 4 21 teachers ECDE 2) and teachers coordina and tors coordinat trained ors trained Commu No. of SDG4(4. 35 1.7 35 1.7 35 1.7 35 1.7 35 1.7 8.75 nity sensitizat 2) 5 5 5 5 5 sensitize ion d on forums ECDE held program s Pre- Policy on SDG4(4. 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 primary pre- 2) school primary policy school develope develope d d Teaching Teachin No. of SDG4(4. 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 50 and g and schools 2) learning learning provided material material with teaching 96 |

|---|

| | Sector: Education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub- program | Sub- | | Key Output | | | Key Perform ance Indicato rs | | | Linkage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | program | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | Instructo | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 3and 4.4) | 70 | | 6 | | | 100 | | 7 | | | 120 | | 8 | | | 150 | | 10 | | | 80 | | 6.5 | | | 37.5 | 37.5 | |

| | | | | rs | | | instructor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | trained | | | s trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Program: Pre-primary Education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Program Objective: To enhance access to quality pre-primary education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Program Outcome: Enhanced access to quality pre-primary education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Infrastruc | | | ECDE | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 24a and 6.2) | 90 | | 47 5 | | | 90 | | 47 5 | | | 90 | | 47 5 | | | 90 | | 47 5 | | | 90 | | 47 5 | | | 2375 | 2375 | |

| | tural | | | centers | | | ECDE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | construc | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | developm | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ted, | | | construct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Equippe | | | ed and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | d | | | Equipped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Capacity building | Capacity | | ECDE teachers and coordina tors employe d | ECDE | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 2) | 305 | | 10 7 | | | 300 | | 10 4 | | | 300 | | 10 4 | | | 300 | | 10 4 | | | 300 | | 10 4 | | | 523 | | |

| | building | | | teachers | | | ECDE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | teachers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | coordina | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | tors | | | coordinat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | employe | | | ors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | d | | | employe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ECDE teachers and coordina tors trained | | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 2) | 800 | | 5 | | | 300 | | 3 | | | 800 | | 5 | | | 600 | | 4 | | | 600 | | 4 | | | 21 | | |

| | | | | | | | ECDE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | teachers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | coordinat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | ors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Commu | | No. of sensitizat ion forums held | No. of | | SDG4(4. 2) | 35 | | 1.7 5 | | | 35 | | 1.7 5 | | | 35 | | 1.7 5 | | | 35 | | 1.7 5 | | | 35 | | 1.7 5 | | | 8.75 | | |

| | | | | nity | | | sensitizat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | sensitize | | | ion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | d on | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ECDE | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Pre- | | | Policy on | | SDG4(4. 2) | 1 | | 2 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 2 | | |

| | | | | primary | | | pre- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | school | | | primary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | policy | | | school | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | develope | | | develope | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | d | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Teaching and learning material | | | Teachin g and learning material | Teachin | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 2) | 812 | | 10 | | | 812 | | 10 | | | 812 | | 10 | | | 812 | | 10 | | | 812 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | g and | | | schools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | learning | | | provided | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | material | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | teaching | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Perform |

| ance |

| Indicato |

| rs |

| Linkage |

|---|

| s to SDG |

| targets |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 3and 4.4) |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 24a and |

| 6.2) |

| 47 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 47 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 47 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 47 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 47 |

|---|

| 5 |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 2) |

| 10 |

|---|

| 7 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 4 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 4 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 4 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 4 |

| ECDE |

|---|

| teachers |

| and |

| coordina |

| tors |

| trained |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 2) |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 2) |

| 1.7 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 1.7 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 1.7 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 1.7 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 1.7 |

|---|

| 5 |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 2) |

| Teaching |

|---|

| and |

| learning |

| material |

| SDG4(4. |

|---|

| 2) |

Page 118

Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) s and provided learning materials School Feeding No. of SDG2(2. 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 500 health and program schools 1and 2.2) 0 0 0 0 0 nutrition introduc benefited ed from the feeding program Digital Digital No. of SDG9(9c 812 24 812 36 812 48 812 36 812 36 180 Literacy learning schools ) introduc offering ed in digital pre- learning schools Capitation ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 812 1 812 1 812 1 812 1 812 1 5 utility ECDE 2) funds centers and provided support with staff utility wages funds Provided and support staff wages 4.3.3 Education Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.7 presents the summary for the education sector. Table 4.7: Education Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Progra Linked Sector Cross-sector Impact Measures to Harness or mme Synergies Adverse impact Mitigate the Impact Name Pre- Health School health Unhealthy pupils, Malnutrition, Stunted Multi-sectorial coordination primary and nutrition growth, Poor sanitation and hygiene and collaboration through Educatio the Kilifi food and nutrition n security multi stakeholder platform (NSP) 97

| Sector: Education Sub- Key Key Linkage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota program Output Perform s to SDG Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l ance targets Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicato get get st get st get st get st get st rs Ksh. M) s and provided learning materials School Feeding No. of SDG2(2. 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 812 10 500 health and program schools 1and 2.2) 0 0 0 0 0 nutrition introduc benefited ed from the feeding program Digital Digital No. of SDG9(9c 812 24 812 36 812 48 812 36 812 36 180 Literacy learning schools ) introduc offering ed in digital pre- learning schools Capitation ECDE No. of SDG4(4. 812 1 812 1 812 1 812 1 812 1 5 utility ECDE 2) funds centers and provided support with staff utility wages funds Provided and support staff wages 4.3.3 Education Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.7 presents the summary for the education sector. Table 4.7: Education Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Progra Linked Sector Cross-sector Impact Measures to Harness or mme Synergies Adverse impact Mitigate the Impact Name Pre- Health School health Unhealthy pupils, Malnutrition, Stunted Multi-sectorial coordination primary and nutrition growth, Poor sanitation and hygiene and collaboration through Educatio the Kilifi food and nutrition n security multi stakeholder platform (NSP) 97 |

|---|

| | Sector: Education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub- program | Sub- | Key Output | | | Key Perform ance Indicato rs | | | Linkage s to SDG targets | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | program | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | s provided | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | learning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | materials | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| School health and nutrition | | Feeding program introduc ed | | | | No. of | | SDG2(2. 1and 2.2) | 812 | 10 0 | | | 812 | | 10 0 | | | 812 | | 10 0 | | | 812 | | 10 0 | | | 812 | | 10 0 | | | 500 | | |

| | | | | | | schools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | benefited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | from the | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | feeding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | program | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Digital Literacy | | | Digital | | No. of schools offering digital learning | No. of | | SDG9(9c ) | 812 | 24 | | | 812 | | 36 | | | 812 | | 48 | | | 812 | | 36 | | | 812 | | 36 | | | 180 | | |

| | | | learning | | | schools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | introduc | | | offering | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed in | | | digital | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | pre- | | | learning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | schools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Capitation | | ECDE utility funds and support staff wages Provided | ECDE | | | No. of | | SDG4(4. 2) | 812 | 1 | | | 812 | | 1 | | | 812 | | 1 | | | 812 | | 1 | | | 812 | | 1 | | | 5 | | |

| | | | utility | | | ECDE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | funds | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | provided | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | support | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | staff | | | utility | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | wages | | | funds | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Provided | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | support | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | staff | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | wages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Perform |

| ance |

| Indicato |

| rs |

| s |

|---|

| provided |

| School |

|---|

| health and |

| nutrition |

| Feeding |

|---|

| program |

| introduc |

| ed |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Digital |

|---|

| Literacy |

| | Progra | | Linked Sector | | Cross-sector Impact | | | Measures to Harness or Mitigate the Impact | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | mme | | | Synergies | | Adverse impact | | | | |

| | Name | | | | | | | | | |

| Pre- primary Educatio n | Pre- | | Health | School health and nutrition | | Unhealthy pupils, Malnutrition, Stunted growth, Poor sanitation and hygiene | | | Multi-sectorial coordination | |

| | primary | | | | | | | | and collaboration through | |

| | Educatio | | | | | | | | the Kilifi food and nutrition | |

| | n | | | | | | | | security multi stakeholder | |

| | | | | | | | | | platform (NSP) | |

| Measures to Harness or |

|---|

| Mitigate the Impact |

Page 119

Progra Linked Sector Cross-sector Impact Measures to Harness or mme Synergies Adverse impact Mitigate the Impact Name Roads and Infrastructural Delayed completion of projects Coordinated implementation public works development(con of projects between the struction of department of roads and the classrooms, department of education toilets hostels, dormitories) Finance Payments to Delayed payments to contractors and other Engage treasury in timely contractors service providers payments to contractors/service providers MOE Registration of Non complaint ECDE centres Collaboration in assessment ECDE centres of ECDE Centres Water, Tree planting in Environmental Degradation , Lack of Collaboration in enhancing Environment, ECDE centers, water in institutions, Poor sanitation and access to water Forest and Water supply to hygiene Natural ECDE centers Resources Vocation Trade Business hubs Low creativity and innovation, inadequate Training students on al and innovation entrepreneurial skills entrepreneurial skills, Training nurturing and providing Establish platforms to start ment of businesses, finding market demo for goods and services farms Agriculture Demo farms in Unskilled youth, Providing agricultural vocational Inadequate qualified agricultural personnel support to vocational training centres training students Roads and Infrastructural Delayed completion of projects Coordinated implementation public works development(con of projects between struction of department of roads and classrooms, department of education toilets hostels, dormitories) Finance Payments to Delayed payments to contractors and other Engage treasury in speedy contractors service providers payments of contractors/service providers 4.4. Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management This sector comprises of the following sub sectors: Water Resources and Sanitation Management; Sustainable Solid Waste Management; Sustainable Forestry Conservation and Management; and Sustainable Natural Resource Conservation Vision: Healthy environment for enhanced adaptive capacity and access to safe, adequate water. Mission: Promote, conserve and protect the environment and improve access to water and 98

| Progra Linked Sector Cross-sector Impact Measures to Harness or mme Synergies Adverse impact Mitigate the Impact Name Roads and Infrastructural Delayed completion of projects Coordinated implementation public works development(con of projects between the struction of department of roads and the classrooms, department of education toilets hostels, dormitories) Finance Payments to Delayed payments to contractors and other Engage treasury in timely contractors service providers payments to contractors/service providers MOE Registration of Non complaint ECDE centres Collaboration in assessment ECDE centres of ECDE Centres Water, Tree planting in Environmental Degradation , Lack of Collaboration in enhancing Environment, ECDE centers, water in institutions, Poor sanitation and access to water Forest and Water supply to hygiene Natural ECDE centers Resources Vocation Trade Business hubs Low creativity and innovation, inadequate Training students on al and innovation entrepreneurial skills entrepreneurial skills, Training nurturing and providing Establish platforms to start ment of businesses, finding market demo for goods and services farms Agriculture Demo farms in Unskilled youth, Providing agricultural vocational Inadequate qualified agricultural personnel support to vocational training centres training students Roads and Infrastructural Delayed completion of projects Coordinated implementation public works development(con of projects between struction of department of roads and classrooms, department of education toilets hostels, dormitories) Finance Payments to Delayed payments to contractors and other Engage treasury in speedy contractors service providers payments of contractors/service providers 4.4. Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management This sector comprises of the following sub sectors: Water Resources and Sanitation Management; Sustainable Solid Waste Management; Sustainable Forestry Conservation and Management; and Sustainable Natural Resource Conservation Vision: Healthy environment for enhanced adaptive capacity and access to safe, adequate water. Mission: Promote, conserve and protect the environment and improve access to water and 98 |

|---|

| | Progra | | Linked Sector | | | | Cross-sector Impact | | | | | Measures to Harness or Mitigate the Impact | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | mme | | | | | Synergies | Synergies | | Adverse impact | Adverse impact | | | | |

| | Name | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Roads and public works | | | | Infrastructural | | Delayed completion of projects | | | Coordinated implementation of projects between the department of roads and the department of education | | |

| | | | | | | | development(con | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | struction of | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | classrooms, | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | toilets hostels, | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | dormitories) | | | | | | | |

| | | | Finance | | | Payments to contractors | Payments to | | Delayed payments to contractors and other service providers | | | | Engage treasury in timely | |

| | | | | | | | contractors | | | | | | payments to | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | contractors/service | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | providers | |

| | | | MOE | | | Registration of ECDE centres | | | Non complaint ECDE centres | | | Collaboration in assessment of ECDE Centres | Collaboration in assessment | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | of ECDE Centres | |

| | | | | Water, | | Tree planting in ECDE centers, Water supply to ECDE centers | | | Environmental Degradation , Lack of water in institutions, Poor sanitation and hygiene | | | Collaboration in enhancing access to water | | |

| | | | | Environment, | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Forest and | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Natural | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Resources | | | | | | | | | | |

| Vocation al Training Establish ment of demo farms | | | Trade | Trade | | Business hubs and innovation | | | Low creativity and innovation, inadequate entrepreneurial skills | | | | Training students on | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | entrepreneurial skills, | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | nurturing and providing | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | platforms to start | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | businesses, finding market | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | for goods and services | |

| | | | Agriculture | | | Demo farms in vocational training centres | | | Unskilled youth, Inadequate qualified agricultural personnel | | | Providing agricultural support to vocational training students | Providing agricultural | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | support to vocational | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | training students | |

| | | | Roads and public works | | | | Infrastructural | | Delayed completion of projects | | | Coordinated implementation of projects between department of roads and department of education | | |

| | | | | | | | development(con | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | struction of | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | classrooms, | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | toilets hostels, | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | dormitories) | | | | | | | |

| | | | Finance | | | Payments to contractors | Payments to | | Delayed payments to contractors and other service providers | | | | Engage treasury in speedy | |

| | | | | | | | contractors | | | | | | payments of | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | contractors/service | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | providers | |

| Measures to Harness or |

|---|

| Mitigate the Impact |

| Roads and |

|---|

| public works |

| Coordinated implementation |

|---|

| of projects between the |

| department of roads and the |

| department of education |

| Delayed payments to contractors and other |

|---|

| service providers |

| Registration of |

|---|

| ECDE centres |

| Tree planting in |

|---|

| ECDE centers, |

| Water supply to |

| ECDE centers |

| Environmental Degradation , Lack of |

|---|

| water in institutions, Poor sanitation and |

| hygiene |

| Collaboration in enhancing |

|---|

| access to water |

| Vocation |

|---|

| al |

| Training |

| Establish |

| ment of |

| demo |

| farms |

| Business hubs |

|---|

| and innovation |

| Low creativity and innovation, inadequate |

|---|

| entrepreneurial skills |

| Demo farms in |

|---|

| vocational |

| training centres |

| Unskilled youth, |

|---|

| Inadequate qualified agricultural personnel |

| Roads and |

|---|

| public works |

| Coordinated implementation |

|---|

| of projects between |

| department of roads and |

| department of education |

| Delayed payments to contractors and other |

|---|

| service providers |

Page 120

sanitation services for sustainable development. Sector Goal(s): To sustainably conserve and protect the environment, increase access to adequate, safe water and sanitation services for sustainable development. 4.4.1. Water Sector Priorities and Strategies The strategies and priorities that the sector will employ to achieve its goals and objectives are summarized in Table 4.8. Table 4.8: Water Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector priorities Strategies To increase access to clean and safe water Develop of water infrastructure Strengthen water governance Enhance maintenance of water infrastructure Exploit new water sources Explore use of alternative energy sources To improve sanitation services Development of sanitation infrastructure Increase awareness on sanitation Strengthen policy and legal framework To enhance environmental conservation and Promote climate change mitigation and adaptation management Sustainable forest conservation and management Strengthen environmental governance Strengthen policy and legal framework Establish solid waste management infrastructure Increase environmental awareness 4.4.2 Water Sector Programmes The sector programmes and sub programmes are summarized in Table 4.9. Table 4.9: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Programmes Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Programme: Water Services Programme Objective: To increase access to clean and safe water Programme Outcome: Increased access to clean and safe water water Water Number 6.1 41 20 50 25 50 25 30 15 20 10 955 infrastru infrastructur of 5 0 0 0 0 cture e developed boreholes 99

| sanitation services for sustainable development. Sector Goal(s): To sustainably conserve and protect the environment, increase access to adequate, safe water and sanitation services for sustainable development. 4.4.1. Water Sector Priorities and Strategies The strategies and priorities that the sector will employ to achieve its goals and objectives are summarized in Table 4.8. Table 4.8: Water Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector priorities Strategies To increase access to clean and safe water Develop of water infrastructure Strengthen water governance Enhance maintenance of water infrastructure Exploit new water sources Explore use of alternative energy sources To improve sanitation services Development of sanitation infrastructure Increase awareness on sanitation Strengthen policy and legal framework To enhance environmental conservation and Promote climate change mitigation and adaptation management Sustainable forest conservation and management Strengthen environmental governance Strengthen policy and legal framework Establish solid waste management infrastructure Increase environmental awareness 4.4.2 Water Sector Programmes The sector programmes and sub programmes are summarized in Table 4.9. Table 4.9: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Programmes Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Programme: Water Services Programme Objective: To increase access to clean and safe water Programme Outcome: Increased access to clean and safe water water Water Number 6.1 41 20 50 25 50 25 30 15 20 10 955 infrastru infrastructur of 5 0 0 0 0 cture e developed boreholes 99 |

|---|

| | Sector priorities | | | Strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| To increase access to clean and safe water | To increase access to clean and safe water | | | Develop of water infrastructure | |

| | | | | Strengthen water governance | |

| | | | | Enhance maintenance of water infrastructure | |

| | | | | Exploit new water sources | |

| | | | | Explore use of alternative energy sources | |

| To improve sanitation services | | | | Development of sanitation infrastructure | |

| | | | | Increase awareness on sanitation | |

| | | | | Strengthen policy and legal framework | |

| To enhance environmental conservation and management | | | | Promote climate change mitigation and adaptation | |

| | | | | Sustainable forest conservation and management | |

| | | | | Strengthen environmental governance | |

| | | | | Strengthen policy and legal framework | |

| | | | | Establish solid waste management infrastructure | |

| | | | | Increase environmental awareness | |

| To enhance environmental conservation and |

|---|

| management |

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | | Key Output | | | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | Programme: Water Services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To increase access to clean and safe water | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Increased access to clean and safe water | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | water | | | Water | | | Number | | 6.1 | 41 | | 20 5 | | | 50 | | 25 0 | | | 50 | | 25 0 | | | 30 | | 15 0 | | | 20 | | 10 0 | | | 955 | 955 | |

| | infrastru | | | infrastructur | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | cture | | | e developed | | | boreholes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| 20 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 25 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 25 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 121

Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) constructe d Number 6.1 130 26 150 30 175 35 100 20 90 18 1291 of 1 0 0 0 0 Kilometer s of pipelines constructe d Number 6.1 60 20 69 23 81 27 75 25 54 18 1130 of 0 0 0 0 0 Storage tanks constructe d Number 6.1 21 14 23 16 29 20 24 17 19 13 807 of water 7 0 0 0 0 pans/ Earth dams constructe d Number 6.1 3 15 4 20 7 35 2 10 2 10 90 of water desalinati on facilities installed Community Number 6.5 245 14 245 14 245 14 245 14 245 14 70 communit based water of y based management committe water committees es managem established establishe ent d Programme: Sanitation services Programme Objective: To improve sanitation services Programme Outcome: Improved sanitation services Sanitation Sanitation Number 6.2 Pha 37 Pha 37 Pha 37 Pha 37 1500 Infrastruct infrastructur of se 1 5 se 2 5 se 1 5 se 2 5 ure es Sewerage developed treatment plants constructe d 100

| Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) constructe d Number 6.1 130 26 150 30 175 35 100 20 90 18 1291 of 1 0 0 0 0 Kilometer s of pipelines constructe d Number 6.1 60 20 69 23 81 27 75 25 54 18 1130 of 0 0 0 0 0 Storage tanks constructe d Number 6.1 21 14 23 16 29 20 24 17 19 13 807 of water 7 0 0 0 0 pans/ Earth dams constructe d Number 6.1 3 15 4 20 7 35 2 10 2 10 90 of water desalinati on facilities installed Community Number 6.5 245 14 245 14 245 14 245 14 245 14 70 communit based water of y based management committe water committees es managem established establishe ent d Programme: Sanitation services Programme Objective: To improve sanitation services Programme Outcome: Improved sanitation services Sanitation Sanitation Number 6.2 Pha 37 Pha 37 Pha 37 Pha 37 1500 Infrastruct infrastructur of se 1 5 se 2 5 se 1 5 se 2 5 ure es Sewerage developed treatment plants constructe d 100 |

|---|

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | | Key Output | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | constructe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Number | | 6.1 | 130 | | 26 1 | | | 150 | | 30 0 | | | 175 | | 35 0 | | | 100 | | 20 0 | | | 90 | | 18 0 | | | 1291 | | |

| | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Kilometer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | s of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | pipelines | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | constructe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Number | | 6.1 | 60 | | 20 0 | | | 69 | | 23 0 | | | 81 | | 27 0 | | | 75 | | 25 0 | | | 54 | | 18 0 | | | 1130 | | |

| | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Storage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | tanks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | constructe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Number | | 6.1 | 21 | | 14 7 | | | 23 | | 16 0 | | | 29 | | 20 0 | | | 24 | | 17 0 | | | 19 | | 13 0 | | | 807 | | |

| | | | | | of water | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | pans/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Earth | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | dams | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | constructe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Number | | 6.1 | 3 | | 15 | | | 4 | | 20 | | | 7 | | 35 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 90 | | |

| | | | | | of water | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | desalinati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | installed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Community based water management committees established | Number of committe es establishe d | Number | | 6.5 | 245 | | 14 | | | 245 | | 14 | | | 245 | | 14 | | | 245 | | 14 | | | 245 | | 14 | | | 70 | | |

| | communit | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | y based | | | | committe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | water | | | | es | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | managem | | | | establishe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ent | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Sanitation services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To improve sanitation services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Improved sanitation services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Sanitation Infrastruct ure | Sanitation | | Sanitation infrastructur es developed | | Number | | 6.2 | Pha se 1 | | 37 5 | | | Pha se 2 | | 37 5 | | | Pha se 1 | | 37 5 | | | Pha se 2 | | 37 5 | | | | | | | | 1500 | 1500 | |

| | Infrastruct | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ure | | | | Sewerage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | treatment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | plants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | constructe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| 26 |

|---|

| 1 |

| 30 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 35 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 18 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 23 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 27 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 25 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 18 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 14 |

|---|

| 7 |

| 16 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 17 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 13 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Community |

|---|

| based water |

| management |

| committees |

| established |

| Sanitation |

|---|

| infrastructur |

| es |

| developed |

| Pha |

|---|

| se 1 |

| 37 |

|---|

| 5 |

| Pha |

|---|

| se 2 |

| 37 |

|---|

| 5 |

| Pha |

|---|

| se 1 |

| 37 |

|---|

| 5 |

| Pha |

|---|

| se 2 |

| 37 |

|---|

| 5 |

Page 122

Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Number 6.2 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 250 of Public Toilets Construct ed Number 6.2 2 24 2 24 2 24 72 of exhauster trucks purchased Number 6.2 3 15 3 15 3 15 3 15 3 15 75 of Transfer Stations Construct ed Stakeholder Number 6.2 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 Sanitation s of awareness engagement stakehold er engageme nt meetings conducted Policy Sanitation Number 6b 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 and legal policies of framewor developed policy/bill k s developed Programme: Programme: Environmental conservation and management Programme: Objectives: To improve environmental conservation and management Programme Outcome: Improved environmental conservation and management Climate Establishme Number 13b & 1 10 1 10 1 5 1 5 1 5 125 Change nt of a of 13.3 0 Mitigatio Climate informati n and change on centers Adaptatio information formed n. center Operationali Number 13.3 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 zation of of climate Climate change Change Unit office equipped and 101

| Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Number 6.2 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 250 of Public Toilets Construct ed Number 6.2 2 24 2 24 2 24 72 of exhauster trucks purchased Number 6.2 3 15 3 15 3 15 3 15 3 15 75 of Transfer Stations Construct ed Stakeholder Number 6.2 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 0.8 4 Sanitation s of awareness engagement stakehold er engageme nt meetings conducted Policy Sanitation Number 6b 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 and legal policies of framewor developed policy/bill k s developed Programme: Programme: Environmental conservation and management Programme: Objectives: To improve environmental conservation and management Programme Outcome: Improved environmental conservation and management Climate Establishme Number 13b & 1 10 1 10 1 5 1 5 1 5 125 Change nt of a of 13.3 0 Mitigatio Climate informati n and change on centers Adaptatio information formed n. center Operationali Number 13.3 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 zation of of climate Climate change Change Unit office equipped and 101 |

|---|

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 6.2 | 10 | | 50 | | | 10 | | 50 | | | 10 | | 50 | | | 10 | | 50 | | | 10 | | 50 | | | 250 | 250 | |

| | | | | | | of Public | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Toilets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Construct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 6.2 | 2 | | 24 | | | | | | | | 2 | | 24 | | | | | | | | 2 | | 24 | | | 72 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | exhauster | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trucks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | purchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 6.2 | 3 | | 15 | | | 3 | | 15 | | | 3 | | 15 | | | 3 | | 15 | | | 3 | | 15 | | | 75 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Transfer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Stations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Construct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Sanitation awareness | | Stakeholder s engagement | | | | Number | | 6.2 | 4 | | 0.8 | | | 4 | | 0.8 | | | 4 | | 0.8 | | | 4 | | 0.8 | | | 4 | | 0.8 | | | 4 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | stakehold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | er | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | engageme | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | nt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | meetings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Policy and legal framewor k | | Sanitation policies developed | | | | Number | | 6b | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | policy/bill | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Programme: Environmental conservation and management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Objectives: To improve environmental conservation and management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Improved environmental conservation and management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Climate Change Mitigatio n and Adaptatio n. | Climate | | Establishme | | Number of informati on centers formed | | | 13b & 13.3 | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 125 | 125 | |

| | Change | | nt of a | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Mitigatio | | Climate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | n and | | change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Adaptatio | | information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | n. | | center | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Operationali zation of Climate Change Unit | Operationali | | | Number | | 13.3 | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | zation of | | | of climate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Climate | | | change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Change Unit | | | office | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | equipped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| Sanitation |

|---|

| awareness |

| Stakeholder |

|---|

| s |

| engagement |

| Policy |

|---|

| and legal |

| framewor |

| k |

| Sanitation |

|---|

| policies |

| developed |

| Number |

|---|

| of |

| informati |

| on centers |

| formed |

| 13b & |

|---|

| 13.3 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 123

Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) operation al Climate Number 13.1 7 10 7 10 7 10 7 10 7 10 50 change of action action plan plans developed Locally lead Number 13.1 35 10 35 10 35 10 35 10 35 10 500 climate of locally 0 0 0 0 0 Action lead climate actions establishe d. Community Number 13.1 & 200 5 200 5 200 5 200 5 200 5 25 members of 13.2 0 0 0 0 0 trained communit appropriatel y y on modern members technologies trained on communicat ing climate change issues Capacity Number 13.3 & 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 5 build of of Ward 13.b Climate Committe change es Ward Capacity committees built Main Number 13.3 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 25 streaming of of on climate County change in staff on planning mainstrea and ming of budgeting climate process change in planning and budgeting process. Developmen % 13.3 4% 10 4% 10 4% 10 4% 10 4% 10 50 t and Emission implementat 102

| Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) operation al Climate Number 13.1 7 10 7 10 7 10 7 10 7 10 50 change of action action plan plans developed Locally lead Number 13.1 35 10 35 10 35 10 35 10 35 10 500 climate of locally 0 0 0 0 0 Action lead climate actions establishe d. Community Number 13.1 & 200 5 200 5 200 5 200 5 200 5 25 members of 13.2 0 0 0 0 0 trained communit appropriatel y y on modern members technologies trained on communicat ing climate change issues Capacity Number 13.3 & 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 35 1 5 build of of Ward 13.b Climate Committe change es Ward Capacity committees built Main Number 13.3 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 25 streaming of of on climate County change in staff on planning mainstrea and ming of budgeting climate process change in planning and budgeting process. Developmen % 13.3 4% 10 4% 10 4% 10 4% 10 4% 10 50 t and Emission implementat 102 |

|---|

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | operation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | al | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Climate change action plan | | | | Number | | 13.1 | 7 | | 10 | | | 7 | | 10 | | | 7 | | 10 | | | 7 | | 10 | | | 7 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | | | of action | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Locally lead climate Action | | | | Number | | 13.1 | 35 | | 10 0 | | | 35 | | 10 0 | | | 35 | | 10 0 | | | 35 | | 10 0 | | | 35 | | 10 0 | | | 500 | | |

| | | | | | | of locally | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | lead | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | climate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | actions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | establishe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Community | | Number of communit y members trained | Number | | 13.1 & 13.2 | 200 0 | | 5 | | | 200 0 | | 5 | | | 200 0 | | 5 | | | 200 0 | | 5 | | | 200 0 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | members | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | trained | | | communit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | appropriatel | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | y on modern | | | members | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | technologies | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | communicat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ing climate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | issues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Capacity | | | Number | | 13.3 & 13.b | 35 | | 1 | | | 35 | | 1 | | | 35 | | 1 | | | 35 | | 1 | | | 35 | | 1 | | | 5 | | |

| | | | build of | | | of Ward | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Climate | | | Committe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | change | | | es | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Ward | | | Capacity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | committees | | | built | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Main streaming of climate change in planning and budgeting process | Main | | | Number | | 13.3 | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | streaming of | | | of on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | climate | | | County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | change in | | | staff on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | planning | | | mainstrea | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | ming of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | budgeting | | | climate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | process | | | change in | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | planning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | budgeting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | process. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Developmen | | % Emission | % | | 13.3 | 4% | | 10 | | | 4% | | 10 | | | 4% | | 10 | | | 4% | | 10 | | | 4% | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | t and | | | Emission | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | implementat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| Climate |

|---|

| change |

| action plan |

| Locally lead |

|---|

| climate |

| Action |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 13.1 & |

|---|

| 13.2 |

| 200 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 200 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 200 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 200 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 200 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 13.3 & |

|---|

| 13.b |

Page 124

Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) ion of the reduction County in BAU Determined Contribution plan Gazzetemen Number 13.3 21 5 21 5 21 5 21 5 21 5 25 t & training of of county gazzeted climate climate change change steering committe &planning e committees members Environm Training and Number 12.2 6 4 6 4 6 4 6 4 6 20 ental Equipping of Forest governanc of forest guards e guards. trained and Equipped. Training Number 15.2 & 20 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 staff on of 15.5 Environmen officers tal trained as Compliance Environm ental inspectors . Developmen Number 12.2 2 20 2 20 2 10 2 10 2 10 70 t of County of reports Environmen developed tal Action plan and Status of Environmen t report Monitoring Number 15.2 & 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 15 environment of noise 15.5 al meters compliance procured 103

| Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) ion of the reduction County in BAU Determined Contribution plan Gazzetemen Number 13.3 21 5 21 5 21 5 21 5 21 5 25 t & training of of county gazzeted climate climate change change steering committe &planning e committees members Environm Training and Number 12.2 6 4 6 4 6 4 6 4 6 20 ental Equipping of Forest governanc of forest guards e guards. trained and Equipped. Training Number 15.2 & 20 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 staff on of 15.5 Environmen officers tal trained as Compliance Environm ental inspectors . Developmen Number 12.2 2 20 2 20 2 10 2 10 2 10 70 t of County of reports Environmen developed tal Action plan and Status of Environmen t report Monitoring Number 15.2 & 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 15 environment of noise 15.5 al meters compliance procured 103 |

|---|

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | ion of the | | reduction in BAU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Determined | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Contribution | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | plan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Gazzetemen | | | Number | | 13.3 | 21 | | 5 | | | 21 | | 5 | | | 21 | | 5 | | | 21 | | 5 | | | 21 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | t & training | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | of county | | | gazzeted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | climate | | | climate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | change | | | change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | steering | | | committe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | &planning | | | e | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | committees | | | members | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Environm ental governanc e | | Training and Equipping of forest guards. | Training and | | | Number | | 12.2 | 6 | | 4 | | | 6 | | 4 | | | 6 | | 4 | | | 6 | | 4 | | | 6 | | | | | 20 | | |

| | | | Equipping | | | of Forest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | of forest | | | guards | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | guards. | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Equipped. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Training staff on Environmen tal Compliance | | | | Number | | 15.2 & 15.5 | 20 | | 1 | | | 5 | | 1 | | | 5 | | 1 | | | 5 | | 1 | | | 5 | | 1 | | | 5 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | officers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trained as | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Environm | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ental | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | inspectors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | . | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Developmen | | Number of reports developed | Number | | 12.2 | 2 | | 20 | | | 2 | | 20 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 70 | | |

| | | | t of County | | | of reports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Environmen | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | tal Action | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | plan and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Status of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Environmen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | t report | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Monitoring | | | Number | | 15.2 & 15.5 | 2 | | 3 | | | 2 | | 3 | | | 2 | | 3 | | | 2 | | 3 | | | 2 | | 3 | | | 15 | | |

| | | | environment | | | of noise | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | al | | | meters | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | compliance | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| reduction |

|---|

| in BAU |

| Environm |

|---|

| ental |

| governanc |

| e |

| 12.2 |

|---|

| Training |

|---|

| staff on |

| Environmen |

| tal |

| Compliance |

| 15.2 & |

|---|

| 15.5 |

| 15.2 & |

|---|

| 15.5 |

Page 125

Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Number 11.6 1 10 1 50 2 5 2 5 5 165 of Air 0 2 Quality monitorin g tools procured Number 15.2& 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 25 of 15.5 Surveillan ce and patrols done Mainstreami % of 11.6 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 ng ESIA/EA County % % % % % into county projects plans. compliant with ESIA/EA standards. Training of Number 11.6 & 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 County trainings 15.2 Environmen and tal reports Committee done members Solid Solid waste Number 12.5 1 30 1 20 1 10 1 10 1 10 800 waste infrastructur of Waste 0 0 0 0 0 managem e to energy ent developmen facility t installed Number 12.5 1 15 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 350 of Waste 0 recovery centers establishe d Number 12.5 1 15 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 350 of 0 Sanitary land fill constructe d 104

| Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Number 11.6 1 10 1 50 2 5 2 5 5 165 of Air 0 2 Quality monitorin g tools procured Number 15.2& 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 25 of 15.5 Surveillan ce and patrols done Mainstreami % of 11.6 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 ng ESIA/EA County % % % % % into county projects plans. compliant with ESIA/EA standards. Training of Number 11.6 & 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 County trainings 15.2 Environmen and tal reports Committee done members Solid Solid waste Number 12.5 1 30 1 20 1 10 1 10 1 10 800 waste infrastructur of Waste 0 0 0 0 0 managem e to energy ent developmen facility t installed Number 12.5 1 15 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 350 of Waste 0 recovery centers establishe d Number 12.5 1 15 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 350 of 0 Sanitary land fill constructe d 104 |

|---|

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 11.6 | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 165 | 165 | |

| | | | | | | of Air | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Quality | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | monitorin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | g tools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 15.2& 15.5 | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Surveillan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ce and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | patrols | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | done | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Mainstreami ng ESIA/EA into county plans. | | | | % of | | 11.6 | 100 % | | 20 | | | 100 % | | 20 | | | 100 % | | 20 | | | 100 % | | 20 | | | 100 % | | 20 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | | | | County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | projects | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | compliant | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ESIA/EA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | standards. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Training of | | Number trainings and reports done | Number | | 11.6 & 15.2 | 25 | | 5 | | | 25 | | 5 | | | 25 | | 5 | | | 25 | | 5 | | | 25 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | County | | | trainings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Environmen | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | tal | | | reports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Committee | | | done | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | members | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Solid waste managem ent | | Solid waste infrastructur e developmen t | Solid waste | | | Number | | 12.5 | 1 | | 30 0 | | | 1 | | 20 0 | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 800 | | |

| | | | infrastructur | | | of Waste | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | e | | | to energy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developmen | | | facility | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | t | | | installed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 12.5 | 1 | | 15 0 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 350 | | |

| | | | | | | of Waste | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | recovery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | establishe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 12.5 | 1 | | 15 0 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 1 | | 50 | | | 350 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Sanitary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | land fill | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | constructe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 2 |

|---|

| 15.2& |

|---|

| 15.5 |

| Mainstreami |

|---|

| ng ESIA/EA |

| into county |

| plans. |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 11.6 & |

|---|

| 15.2 |

| Solid |

|---|

| waste |

| managem |

| ent |

| 30 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 126

Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Number 12.5 2 40 2 40 2 40 2 40 2 40 200 of waste recycling centers establishe d. Number 12.5 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 of dumpsites fenced Number 12.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 500 of 0 0 0 0 0 specialize d waste equipmen t and machiner y purchased Policy Environmen Number 12.2 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 and legal tal policies of framewor developed policies k and acts developed Environm Sensitize No of 12.2 & 45 20 45 20 45 20 45 20 45 20 100 ental and communit 12.5& awareness empower y groups 13.1 community sensitized groups on and Environmen empower tal issues. ed Sustainabl Increasing % 13.1 3% 30 3% 20 1% 10 1% 10 1% 10 80 e forest forest cover increase conservati in forest on within the &Manage county ment Gazetted Number 15.2 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 150 County of County Forests forests gazette. Tree Number 15.2 2 10 2 10 1 5 1 5 1 5 35 Nursery of tree Establishme Nurseries nt Establishe d 105

| Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Number 12.5 2 40 2 40 2 40 2 40 2 40 200 of waste recycling centers establishe d. Number 12.5 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 of dumpsites fenced Number 12.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 500 of 0 0 0 0 0 specialize d waste equipmen t and machiner y purchased Policy Environmen Number 12.2 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 and legal tal policies of framewor developed policies k and acts developed Environm Sensitize No of 12.2 & 45 20 45 20 45 20 45 20 45 20 100 ental and communit 12.5& awareness empower y groups 13.1 community sensitized groups on and Environmen empower tal issues. ed Sustainabl Increasing % 13.1 3% 30 3% 20 1% 10 1% 10 1% 10 80 e forest forest cover increase conservati in forest on within the &Manage county ment Gazetted Number 15.2 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 150 County of County Forests forests gazette. Tree Number 15.2 2 10 2 10 1 5 1 5 1 5 35 Nursery of tree Establishme Nurseries nt Establishe d 105 |

|---|

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 12.5 | 2 | | 40 | | | 2 | | 40 | | | 2 | | 40 | | | 2 | | 40 | | | 2 | | 40 | | | 200 | 200 | |

| | | | | | | of waste | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | recycling | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | establishe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 12.5 | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | dumpsites | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | fenced | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Number | | 12.5 | 10 | | 10 0 | | | 10 | | 10 0 | | | 10 | | 10 0 | | | 10 | | 10 0 | | | 10 | | 10 0 | | | 500 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | specialize | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d waste | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | equipmen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | t and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | machiner | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | purchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Policy and legal framewor k | | Environmen tal policies developed | | | | Number | | 12.2 | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | policies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | and acts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Environm ental awareness | | | Sensitize | | | No of | | 12.2 & 12.5& 13.1 | 45 | | 20 | | | 45 | | 20 | | | 45 | | 20 | | | 45 | | 20 | | | 45 | | 20 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | and | | | communit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | empower | | | y groups | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | community | | | sensitized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | groups on | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Environmen | | | empower | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | tal issues. | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Sustainabl e forest conservati on &Manage ment | | Increasing forest cover | Increasing | | | % | | 13.1 | 3% | | 30 | | | 3% | | 20 | | | 1% | | 10 | | | 1% | | 10 | | | 1% | | 10 | | | 80 | | |

| | | | forest cover | | | increase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | in forest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | within the | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | county | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Gazetted County Forests | | | | Number | | 15.2 | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 150 | | |

| | | | | | | of County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | forests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | gazette. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Tree Nursery Establishme nt | | | | Number | | 15.2 | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 35 | | |

| | | | | | | of tree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Nurseries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Establishe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Policy |

|---|

| and legal |

| framewor |

| k |

| Environmen |

|---|

| tal policies |

| developed |

| Environm |

|---|

| ental |

| awareness |

| 12.2 & |

|---|

| 12.5& |

| 13.1 |

| Sustainabl |

|---|

| e forest |

| conservati |

| on |

| &Manage |

| ment |

| Gazetted |

|---|

| County |

| Forests |

| Tree |

|---|

| Nursery |

| Establishme |

| nt |

Page 127

Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Woodlot Size of 13.1 280 20 280 20 210 15 210 15 140 10 80 establishme land (Ha) nt under woodlots County Number 15.2 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 forest of Managemen Managem t Plans ent plans developed . Green Number 15.2 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 35 School of green Program schools Marine Eco No of HA 13.1 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 system mangrove protection restored Developmen Number 15.2 1 15 1 15 1 15 1 15 1 15 75 t of urban of urban forests forests developed Monitoring Number 12.5 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 25 of County of forests monitorin g patrols done Sustainabl Empowered Number SDG 3 5 3 5 3 5 3 5 2 5 25 e artisan of artisan 12.2 managem miners miners ent of empower natural ed resources Degraded No of 15.3 200 50 200 50 200 50 200 50 200 50 250 areas hectors rehabilitated rehabilitat ed 4.4.3 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Flagship Projects The sector flagship projects for implementation by both levels of Government and Development Partners in the county is presented in Table 4.10. 106

| Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sub Key Output Key Likage Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Program Performa s to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l me nce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicator targets get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Woodlot Size of 13.1 280 20 280 20 210 15 210 15 140 10 80 establishme land (Ha) nt under woodlots County Number 15.2 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 forest of Managemen Managem t Plans ent plans developed . Green Number 15.2 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 35 School of green Program schools Marine Eco No of HA 13.1 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 50 system mangrove protection restored Developmen Number 15.2 1 15 1 15 1 15 1 15 1 15 75 t of urban of urban forests forests developed Monitoring Number 12.5 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 96 5 25 of County of forests monitorin g patrols done Sustainabl Empowered Number SDG 3 5 3 5 3 5 3 5 2 5 25 e artisan of artisan 12.2 managem miners miners ent of empower natural ed resources Degraded No of 15.3 200 50 200 50 200 50 200 50 200 50 250 areas hectors rehabilitated rehabilitat ed 4.4.3 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Flagship Projects The sector flagship projects for implementation by both levels of Government and Development Partners in the county is presented in Table 4.10. 106 |

|---|

| | Sector: Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Program me | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performa nce Indicator s | | | Likage s to SDG targets | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Program | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | me | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | Woodlot establishme nt | | | | Size of | | 13.1 | 280 | | 20 | | | 280 | | 20 | | | 210 | | 15 | | | 210 | | 15 | | | 140 | | 10 | | | 80 | 80 | |

| | | | | | | land (Ha) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | under | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | woodlots | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | County forest Managemen t Plans | | | | Number | | 15.2 | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Managem | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ent plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | . | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Green | | | Number | | 15.2 | 7 | | 7 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 35 | | |

| | | | School | | | of green | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Program | | | schools | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Marine Eco | | | No of HA | | 13.1 | 50 | | 10 | | | 50 | | 10 | | | 50 | | 10 | | | 50 | | 10 | | | 50 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | system | | | mangrove | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | protection | | | restored | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Developmen t of urban forests | Developmen | | | Number | | 15.2 | 1 | | 15 | | | 1 | | 15 | | | 1 | | 15 | | | 1 | | 15 | | | 1 | | 15 | | | 75 | | |

| | | | t of urban | | | of urban | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | forests | | | forests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Monitoring of County forests | | | | Number | | 12.5 | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 96 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | monitorin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | g patrols | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | done | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Sustainabl e managem ent of natural resources | | Empowered artisan miners | | | | Number | | SDG 12.2 | 3 | | 5 | | | 3 | | 5 | | | 3 | | 5 | | | 3 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | of artisan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | miners | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | empower | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Degraded areas rehabilitated | | | | No of | | 15.3 | 200 | | 50 | | | 200 | | 50 | | | 200 | | 50 | | | 200 | | 50 | | | 200 | | 50 | | | 250 | | |

| | | | | | | hectors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | rehabilitat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicator |

| s |

| Likage |

|---|

| s to |

| SDG |

| targets |

| Woodlot |

|---|

| establishme |

| nt |

| County |

|---|

| forest |

| Managemen |

| t Plans |

| Monitoring |

|---|

| of County |

| forests |

| Sustainabl |

|---|

| e |

| managem |

| ent of |

| natural |

| resources |

| Empowered |

|---|

| artisan |

| miners |

| SDG |

|---|

| 12.2 |

| Degraded |

|---|

| areas |

| rehabilitated |

Page 128

Table 4.10: Water Sector Flagship Projects Environment and Natural Resources Management Project Locati Objecti Description of Key Key Time Estimated Source of Lead Name on ve Activities Output(s Frame* Cost (Ksh.) Funds Agency ) Commissi Kizing Sustaina EIA for the project, Efficient 2023- 800M PPP Departm oning of itini ble Facility energy 2027 ent of Waste to (Kilifi solid construction, source, Environ energy South) waste Operations reduce ment, project manage pollution, Energy, ment improved Kenya communit power, y health NEMA 4.4.4 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Cross- Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.11 presents the summary for the water, environment, natural resources and solid waste management sector. Table 4.11: Water Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Name Linked Sector(s)/sub- Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or sector Mitigate the Impact Synergies* Adverse Impact Water and Sanitation Environment Available water Decline in tree Increasing efforts for water services resources and survival rate catchment area conservation, catchment areas promoting conservation of water resources Agriculture Irrigation Food Insecurity Ensuring accessibility and availability of water by building dams can avail water for small- and large-scale irrigation Health Improved Health Water Borne Eradicating open defecation Outcomes Diseases to protect water sources, eradicating open defecation to reduce outbreak of diseases, ensuring that health facilities are connected with piped water, improving access and availability of domestic water to improve community health 107

| Table 4.10: Water Sector Flagship Projects Environment and Natural Resources Management Project Locati Objecti Description of Key Key Time Estimated Source of Lead Name on ve Activities Output(s Frame* Cost (Ksh.) Funds Agency ) Commissi Kizing Sustaina EIA for the project, Efficient 2023- 800M PPP Departm oning of itini ble Facility energy 2027 ent of Waste to (Kilifi solid construction, source, Environ energy South) waste Operations reduce ment, project manage pollution, Energy, ment improved Kenya communit power, y health NEMA 4.4.4 Water, Environment, Natural Resources and Solid Waste Management Sector Cross- Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.11 presents the summary for the water, environment, natural resources and solid waste management sector. Table 4.11: Water Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Name Linked Sector(s)/sub- Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or sector Mitigate the Impact Synergies* Adverse Impact Water and Sanitation Environment Available water Decline in tree Increasing efforts for water services resources and survival rate catchment area conservation, catchment areas promoting conservation of water resources Agriculture Irrigation Food Insecurity Ensuring accessibility and availability of water by building dams can avail water for small- and large-scale irrigation Health Improved Health Water Borne Eradicating open defecation Outcomes Diseases to protect water sources, eradicating open defecation to reduce outbreak of diseases, ensuring that health facilities are connected with piped water, improving access and availability of domestic water to improve community health 107 |

|---|

| Environment and Natural Resources Management | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Project Name | Locati on | Objecti ve | Description of Key Activities | | Key | | Time Frame* | Estimated Cost (Ksh.) | Source of Funds | Lead Agency | | |

| | | | | | Output(s | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | ) | | | | | | | |

| Commissi oning of Waste to energy project | Kizing itini (Kilifi South) | Sustaina ble solid waste manage ment | EIA for the project, Facility construction, Operations | | Efficient | | 2023- 2027 | 800M | PPP | | Departm | |

| | | | | | energy | | | | | | ent of | |

| | | | | | source, | | | | | | Environ | |

| | | | | | reduce | | | | | | ment, | |

| | | | | | pollution, | | | | | | Energy, | |

| | | | | | improved | | | | | | Kenya | |

| | | | | | communit | | | | | | power, | |

| | | | | | y health | | | | | | NEMA | |

| Project |

|---|

| Name |

| Description of Key |

|---|

| Activities |

| Time |

|---|

| Frame* |

| Estimated |

|---|

| Cost (Ksh.) |

| Source of |

|---|

| Funds |

| Lead |

|---|

| Agency |

| Commissi |

|---|

| oning of |

| Waste to |

| energy |

| project |

| EIA for the project, |

|---|

| Facility |

| construction, |

| Operations |

| 2023- |

|---|

| 2027 |

| Programme Name | Linked Sector(s)/sub- sector | Cross-Sector Impact | | Measures to Harness or Mitigate the Impact | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | Synergies* | Adverse Impact | | | |

| Water and Sanitation services | Environment | Available water resources and catchment areas | Decline in tree survival rate | | Increasing efforts for water | |

| | | | | | catchment area conservation, | |

| | | | | | promoting conservation of | |

| | | | | | water resources | |

| | Agriculture | Irrigation | Food Insecurity | Ensuring accessibility and availability of water by building dams can avail water for small- and large-scale irrigation | | |

| | Health | Improved Health Outcomes | Water Borne Diseases | | Eradicating open defecation | |

| | | | | | to protect water sources, | |

| | | | | | eradicating open defecation to | |

| | | | | | reduce outbreak of diseases, | |

| | | | | | ensuring that health facilities | |

| | | | | | are connected with piped | |

| | | | | | water, improving access and | |

| | | | | | availability of domestic water | |

| | | | | | to improve community health | |

| Measures to Harness or |

|---|

| Mitigate the Impact |

| Available water |

|---|

| resources and |

| catchment areas |

| Decline in tree |

|---|

| survival rate |

| Improved Health |

|---|

| Outcomes |

| Water Borne |

|---|

| Diseases |

Page 129

Programme Name Linked Sector(s)/sub- Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or sector Mitigate the Impact Synergies* Adverse Impact Education Inadequate and Increasing availability of inaccessible water water in schools to enhance supply in schools attendance rates, compliance and homes with WASH recommendations to improve the learning environments ICT and Energy Available Technology High costs of electric Use of smart meters to for Smart Services & energy to pump enhance efficiency in water adoption of renewable water billing, Sustainable and energy sources alternative energy sources to facilitate efficient water pumping and distribution Social Protection and Lack of sanitation Ensuring access and Public Health facilities in work availability of water in public places, Gender toilets, markets, public insensitive sanitation offices, Reducing the distance facilities covered by women and girls to access water Environmental Social Protection Gender Equity Economic empowerment of Conservation women groups to undertake tree planting business and agroforestry impacting on gender equity. Agriculture and Afforestation&Re- Food Insecurity Increasing tree planting Fisheries afforestation Degraded activities and sell of tree ecosystems seedlings so as to promote Loss of Biodervisity conservation of forests and trees, Using Mangrove forests to provide breeding zones for fish to boost the fishing industry and blue economy Trade and Tourism Nature Based Enterprise L o s s o f livelihoods Promoting nature-based Eco-tourism enterprise promoting trade in the County., Ensuring towns are clean as a means to promote Tourism PAIR CESS Revenue Unsustainable Collaboration on Collection exploitation of environmental compliance natural resources Environmental pollution. Land degradation Energy, Infrastructure Green Energy Providing cleaner energy and ICT Mechanisms mechanisms to reduce the use of charcoal Reduce the demand on wood fuel 108

| Programme Name Linked Sector(s)/sub- Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or sector Mitigate the Impact Synergies* Adverse Impact Education Inadequate and Increasing availability of inaccessible water water in schools to enhance supply in schools attendance rates, compliance and homes with WASH recommendations to improve the learning environments ICT and Energy Available Technology High costs of electric Use of smart meters to for Smart Services & energy to pump enhance efficiency in water adoption of renewable water billing, Sustainable and energy sources alternative energy sources to facilitate efficient water pumping and distribution Social Protection and Lack of sanitation Ensuring access and Public Health facilities in work availability of water in public places, Gender toilets, markets, public insensitive sanitation offices, Reducing the distance facilities covered by women and girls to access water Environmental Social Protection Gender Equity Economic empowerment of Conservation women groups to undertake tree planting business and agroforestry impacting on gender equity. Agriculture and Afforestation&Re- Food Insecurity Increasing tree planting Fisheries afforestation Degraded activities and sell of tree ecosystems seedlings so as to promote Loss of Biodervisity conservation of forests and trees, Using Mangrove forests to provide breeding zones for fish to boost the fishing industry and blue economy Trade and Tourism Nature Based Enterprise L o s s o f livelihoods Promoting nature-based Eco-tourism enterprise promoting trade in the County., Ensuring towns are clean as a means to promote Tourism PAIR CESS Revenue Unsustainable Collaboration on Collection exploitation of environmental compliance natural resources Environmental pollution. Land degradation Energy, Infrastructure Green Energy Providing cleaner energy and ICT Mechanisms mechanisms to reduce the use of charcoal Reduce the demand on wood fuel 108 |

|---|

| Programme Name | Linked Sector(s)/sub- sector | | Cross-Sector Impact | | | | Measures to Harness or Mitigate the Impact | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | Synergies* | Synergies* | Adverse Impact | Adverse Impact | | | | |

| | Education | | | Inadequate and inaccessible water supply in schools and homes | | | Increasing availability of water in schools to enhance attendance rates, compliance with WASH recommendations to improve the learning environments | | |

| | ICT and Energy | Available Technology for Smart Services & adoption of renewable energy sources | | High costs of electric energy to pump water | | | | Use of smart meters to | |

| | | | | | | | | enhance efficiency in water | |

| | | | | | | | | billing, Sustainable and | |

| | | | | | | | | alternative energy sources to | |

| | | | | | | | | facilitate efficient water | |

| | | | | | | | | pumping and distribution | |

| | Social Protection and Public Health | | | Lack of sanitation facilities in work places, Gender insensitive sanitation facilities | | | Ensuring access and availability of water in public toilets, markets, public offices, Reducing the distance covered by women and girls to access water | | |

| Environmental Conservation | Social Protection | Gender Equity | | | | | | Economic empowerment of | |

| | | | | | | | | women groups to undertake | |

| | | | | | | | | tree planting business and | |

| | | | | | | | | agroforestry impacting on | |

| | | | | | | | | gender equity. | |

| | Agriculture and Fisheries | Afforestation&Re- afforestation | | Food Insecurity Degraded ecosystems Loss of Biodervisity | | | Increasing tree planting activities and sell of tree seedlings so as to promote conservation of forests and trees, Using Mangrove forests to provide breeding zones for fish to boost the fishing industry and blue economy | | |

| | Trade and Tourism | Nature Based Enterprise Eco-tourism | | L o s s o f livelihoods | | | | Promoting nature-based | |

| | | | | | | | | enterprise promoting trade in | |

| | | | | | | | | the County., Ensuring towns | |

| | | | | | | | | are clean as a means to | |

| | | | | | | | | promote Tourism | |

| | PAIR | CESS Revenue Collection | | Unsustainable exploitation of natural resources | | | Collaboration on environmental compliance | | |

| | | | | Environmental pollution. | | | | | |

| | | | | Land degradation | | | | | |

| | Energy, Infrastructure and ICT | Green Energy Mechanisms | | | | | | Providing cleaner energy | |

| | | | | | | | | mechanisms to reduce the use | |

| | | | | | | | | of charcoal Reduce the | |

| | | | | | | | | demand on wood fuel | |

| Linked Sector(s)/sub- |

|---|

| sector |

| Measures to Harness or |

|---|

| Mitigate the Impact |

| Available Technology |

|---|

| for Smart Services & |

| adoption of renewable |

| energy sources |

| High costs of electric |

|---|

| energy to pump |

| water |

| Environmental |

|---|

| Conservation |

| Nature Based Enterprise |

|---|

| Eco-tourism |

| Environmental |

|---|

| pollution. |

| Energy, Infrastructure |

|---|

| and ICT |

| Green Energy |

|---|

| Mechanisms |

Page 130

Programme Name Linked Sector(s)/sub- Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or sector Mitigate the Impact Synergies* Adverse Impact All Sectors Forest Protection and Decrease in forest Assisting different Conservation cover departments to undertake Climate Change Adverse climate sensitization of the Waste Management change impacts community to create Poor waste awareness of forest protection Management and conservation in their functions Mainstreaming of climate change issues in sector policies &plans. Adoption of sustainable waste management Agriculture Climate smart Food Insecurity Adoption of climate smart Agriculture Agriculture,afforestation Agroforestery &SLM Sustainable land management 4.5 Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations This sector consists of the Office of the Governor and Deputy Governor, County Secretary, County Public Service Board, Office of the County Attorney, County Public Service Management and Devolution, County Assembly and Economic Planning and Finance. Vision: The sector vision is to become a leading sector in public policy formulation, coordination, supervision and prudent resource management. Mission: The mission is to provide overall leadership and policy direction in resource mobilization, management and accountability for quality public service delivery. Goal: To ensure prudent resource utilization of human and financial resources for effective and efficient service delivery 4.5.1 PAIR Sector Priorities and Strategies: The sector priorities and strategies drawn from the development issues are presented in Table 4.12. 109

| Programme Name Linked Sector(s)/sub- Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or sector Mitigate the Impact Synergies* Adverse Impact All Sectors Forest Protection and Decrease in forest Assisting different Conservation cover departments to undertake Climate Change Adverse climate sensitization of the Waste Management change impacts community to create Poor waste awareness of forest protection Management and conservation in their functions Mainstreaming of climate change issues in sector policies &plans. Adoption of sustainable waste management Agriculture Climate smart Food Insecurity Adoption of climate smart Agriculture Agriculture,afforestation Agroforestery &SLM Sustainable land management 4.5 Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations This sector consists of the Office of the Governor and Deputy Governor, County Secretary, County Public Service Board, Office of the County Attorney, County Public Service Management and Devolution, County Assembly and Economic Planning and Finance. Vision: The sector vision is to become a leading sector in public policy formulation, coordination, supervision and prudent resource management. Mission: The mission is to provide overall leadership and policy direction in resource mobilization, management and accountability for quality public service delivery. Goal: To ensure prudent resource utilization of human and financial resources for effective and efficient service delivery 4.5.1 PAIR Sector Priorities and Strategies: The sector priorities and strategies drawn from the development issues are presented in Table 4.12. 109 |

|---|

| Programme Name | Linked Sector(s)/sub- sector | | Cross-Sector Impact | | | | Measures to Harness or Mitigate the Impact |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | Synergies* | Synergies* | Adverse Impact | Adverse Impact | | |

| | All Sectors | Forest Protection and Conservation Climate Change Waste Management | | Decrease in forest cover Adverse climate change impacts Poor waste Management | | | Assisting different departments to undertake sensitization of the community to create awareness of forest protection and conservation in their functions Mainstreaming of climate change issues in sector policies &plans. Adoption of sustainable waste management |

| | Agriculture | Climate smart Agriculture Agroforestery Sustainable land management | | Food Insecurity | | | Adoption of climate smart Agriculture,afforestation &SLM |

| Linked Sector(s)/sub- |

|---|

| sector |

| Measures to Harness or |

|---|

| Mitigate the Impact |

| Climate smart |

|---|

| Agriculture |

| Agroforestery |

| Sustainable land |

| management |

| Adoption of climate smart |

|---|

| Agriculture,afforestation |

| &SLM |

Page 131

Table 4.12: PAIR Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To strengthen Public financial management Increase own source revenue Strengthen internal control systems Mapping of new revenue streams/ diversification to increase revenue collection Strengthen budget formulation capacity Capacity building on PFM To improve Policy planning, coordination and M & E Strengthen economic planning Strengthen M & E capacity Strengthen County Statistical capacity Developing Public Investment Management information management system To enhance Public service delivery Develop office infrastructure Increase ICT connectivity in all the county departments Strengthen Performance Management Strengthen Human Resource capacity Strengthen public participation Strengthen intergovernmental relations Enhance County legal services Strengthen legal framework the County Law Office 4.5.2 PAIR Sector Programmes This section provides sector programmes to be implemented within the planned period as presented in tables 4.13. Table 4.13: Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations Sector Programmes Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Programme: Public Financial Management Programme Objective: To improve public financial management Programme Outcome: Improved public financial management Resource revenue Proportion SDG1 30 20 50 20 70 20 75 20 100 10 90 mobilizatio streams (%) of 7.1 n automated revenue streams automated New No. of new SDG1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 10 revenue revenue 7.1 streams streams identified identified 110

| Table 4.12: PAIR Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To strengthen Public financial management Increase own source revenue Strengthen internal control systems Mapping of new revenue streams/ diversification to increase revenue collection Strengthen budget formulation capacity Capacity building on PFM To improve Policy planning, coordination and M & E Strengthen economic planning Strengthen M & E capacity Strengthen County Statistical capacity Developing Public Investment Management information management system To enhance Public service delivery Develop office infrastructure Increase ICT connectivity in all the county departments Strengthen Performance Management Strengthen Human Resource capacity Strengthen public participation Strengthen intergovernmental relations Enhance County legal services Strengthen legal framework the County Law Office 4.5.2 PAIR Sector Programmes This section provides sector programmes to be implemented within the planned period as presented in tables 4.13. Table 4.13: Public Administration and Intergovernmental Relations Sector Programmes Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Programme: Public Financial Management Programme Objective: To improve public financial management Programme Outcome: Improved public financial management Resource revenue Proportion SDG1 30 20 50 20 70 20 75 20 100 10 90 mobilizatio streams (%) of 7.1 n automated revenue streams automated New No. of new SDG1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 10 revenue revenue 7.1 streams streams identified identified 110 |

|---|

| | Sector Priorities | | | Strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| To strengthen Public financial management | To strengthen Public financial management | | | Increase own source revenue | |

| | | | | Strengthen internal control systems | |

| | | | | Mapping of new revenue streams/ diversification to increase | |

| | | | | revenue collection | |

| | | | | Strengthen budget formulation capacity | |

| | | | | Capacity building on PFM | |

| To improve Policy planning, coordination and M & E | | | | Strengthen economic planning | |

| | | | | Strengthen M & E capacity | |

| | | | | Strengthen County Statistical capacity | |

| | | | | Developing Public Investment Management information | |

| | | | | management system | |

| To enhance Public service delivery | | | | Develop office infrastructure | |

| | | | | Increase ICT connectivity in all the county departments | |

| | | | | Strengthen Performance Management | |

| | | | | Strengthen Human Resource capacity | |

| | | | | Strengthen public participation | |

| | | | | Strengthen intergovernmental relations | |

| | | | | Enhance County legal services | |

| | | | | Strengthen legal framework the County Law Office | |

| To enhance Public service delivery |

|---|

| | Sector: PAIR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Programm e | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performan ce Indicators | | | Linka ges to SDG target s | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Programm | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | e | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | Programme: Public Financial Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To improve public financial management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Improved public financial management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Resource mobilizatio n | Resource | revenue streams automated | | | | Proportion | | SDG1 7.1 | 30 | | 20 | | | 50 | | 20 | | | 70 | | 20 | | | 75 | | 20 | | | 100 | | 10 | | | 90 | 90 | |

| | mobilizatio | | | | | (%) of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | n | | | | | revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | streams | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | automated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | New | | | No. of new | | SDG1 7.1 | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | revenue | | | revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | streams | | | streams | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | identified | | | identified | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performan |

| ce |

| Indicators |

| Linka |

|---|

| ges to |

| SDG |

| target |

| s |

| revenue |

|---|

| streams |

| automated |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 7.1 |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 7.1 |

Page 132

Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Own source Amount of SDG1 100 52 11 52 12 52 13 42 42 240. revenue own source 7.1 0 .1 00 .1 10 .1 31 .1 .1 5 collected revenue collected Resource Resource SDG1 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 mobilizatio mobilizatio 7.1 n strategy n strategy developed Budget Statutory No. of PBB SDG1 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 150 formulation Budget prepared 7.2 documents No. of SDG1 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 prepared CBROPs 7.2 prepared No. of SDG1 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 CFSPs 7.2 prepared Internal financial No. of SDG1 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 25 control reports Financial 6.6 systems developed reports produced Trainings No. of SDG8 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 10 on PFM trainings on .10 conducted PFM conducted Asset Automated SDG1 100 20 20 managemen asset 6.6 % t register managemen automated t register Asset SDG1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 Register 6.6 maintained Risk Operational SDG1 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 Manageme Risk 6.6 nt systems Manageme established nt system Public Debt PDMO SDG1 1 10 10 Manageme established 6.6 nt Office established Programme: Economic Policy and Planning Programme Objective: To improve Policy planning, coordination and M & E Programme Outcome: Improved Policy planning, coordination and M & E Economic No. of SDG 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 100 Planning County 17.13 111

| Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) Own source Amount of SDG1 100 52 11 52 12 52 13 42 42 240. revenue own source 7.1 0 .1 00 .1 10 .1 31 .1 .1 5 collected revenue collected Resource Resource SDG1 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 mobilizatio mobilizatio 7.1 n strategy n strategy developed Budget Statutory No. of PBB SDG1 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 150 formulation Budget prepared 7.2 documents No. of SDG1 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 prepared CBROPs 7.2 prepared No. of SDG1 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 CFSPs 7.2 prepared Internal financial No. of SDG1 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 25 control reports Financial 6.6 systems developed reports produced Trainings No. of SDG8 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 10 on PFM trainings on .10 conducted PFM conducted Asset Automated SDG1 100 20 20 managemen asset 6.6 % t register managemen automated t register Asset SDG1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 Register 6.6 maintained Risk Operational SDG1 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 Manageme Risk 6.6 nt systems Manageme established nt system Public Debt PDMO SDG1 1 10 10 Manageme established 6.6 nt Office established Programme: Economic Policy and Planning Programme Objective: To improve Policy planning, coordination and M & E Programme Outcome: Improved Policy planning, coordination and M & E Economic No. of SDG 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 5 20 100 Planning County 17.13 111 |

|---|

| | Sector: PAIR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Programm e | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performan ce Indicators | | | Linka ges to SDG target s | | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Programm | | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | e | | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | Own source revenue collected | | | | Amount of | | SDG1 7.1 | | | 100 0 | | 52 .1 | | | 11 00 | | 52 .1 | | | 12 10 | | 52 .1 | | | 13 31 | | 42 .1 | | | | | 42 .1 | | | 240. 5 | 240. | |

| | | | | | | own source | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | |

| | | | | | | revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | collected | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Resource | | Resource mobilizatio n strategy | Resource | | SDG1 7.1 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | mobilizatio | | | mobilizatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | n strategy | | | n strategy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Budget formulation | | Statutory Budget documents prepared | Statutory | | | No. of PBB | | | SDG1 | | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 1 | | 30 | | | 150 | | |

| | | | Budget | | | prepared | | | 7.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | documents | | | No. of | | SDG1 7.2 | SDG1 | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | prepared | | | CBROPs | | | 7.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | prepared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | SDG1 7.2 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | | | CFSPs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | prepared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Internal control systems | | financial reports developed | | | | No. of | | SDG1 6.6 | | | 4 | | 4 | | | 5 | | 4 | | | 5 | | 4 | | | 5 | | 4 | | | 5 | | 4 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | Financial | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | reports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | produced | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Trainings on PFM conducted | | | | No. of | | SDG8 .10 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | | | | trainings on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | PFM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Asset managemen t register automated | | | | Automated | | SDG1 6.6 | | | 100 % | | 20 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 20 | | |

| | | | | | | asset | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | managemen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | t register | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Asset | | SDG1 6.6 | | | | | | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 8 | | |

| | | | | | | Register | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | maintained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Risk | | | Operational | | SDG1 6.6 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | Manageme | | | Risk | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | nt systems | | | Manageme | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | established | | | nt system | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Public Debt | | PDMO established | PDMO | | SDG1 6.6 | | | | | | | | 1 | | 10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10 | | |

| | | | Manageme | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | nt Office | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Economic Policy and Planning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To improve Policy planning, coordination and M & E | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Improved Policy planning, coordination and M & E | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Economic | | | No. of | | | SDG | | 5 | | 20 | | | 5 | | 20 | | | 5 | | 20 | | | 5 | | 20 | | | 5 | | 20 | | | 100 | 100 | |

| | | | Planning | | | County | | | 17.13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performan |

| ce |

| Indicators |

| Linka |

|---|

| ges to |

| SDG |

| target |

| s |

| Own source |

|---|

| revenue |

| collected |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 7.1 |

| 100 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 52 |

|---|

| .1 |

| 11 |

|---|

| 00 |

| 52 |

|---|

| .1 |

| 12 |

|---|

| 10 |

| 52 |

|---|

| .1 |

| 13 |

|---|

| 31 |

| 42 |

|---|

| .1 |

| 42 |

|---|

| .1 |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 7.1 |

| Budget |

|---|

| formulation |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 7.2 |

| Internal |

|---|

| control |

| systems |

| financial |

|---|

| reports |

| developed |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 6.6 |

| Trainings |

|---|

| on PFM |

| conducted |

| SDG8 |

|---|

| .10 |

| Asset |

|---|

| managemen |

| t register |

| automated |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 6.6 |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 6.6 |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 6.6 |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 6.6 |

Page 133

Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) County documents plans economic developed prepared planning County No. of SDG 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 20 Annual CAPRs 17.13 Progress prepared Reports (CAPR) prepared CIDP CIDP SDG 1 20 1 20 40 reviews performanc 17.13 conducted e review report developed Public Public SDG 1 5 5 investment investment 17.14 managemen managemen t t information information system system developed PIM policy Number of SDG 1 10 10 and PIM 17.13/ framework policies 14 developed developed County County County SDG 1 10 10 Monitoring M&E M&E 17.13/ and policy policy 14 Evaluation developed Projects No. of Field SDG 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 Field Monitoring 17.13/ Monitoring exercises 14 exercise conducted conducted Capacity on No. of e- 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 e-CIMES CIMES built trainings conducted M&E No. of 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 trainings M&E conducted trainings conducted County County No. of SDG 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 Statistical Statistical Statistical 9.5,9. Capacity System Abstracts b established Developed 112

| Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) County documents plans economic developed prepared planning County No. of SDG 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 20 Annual CAPRs 17.13 Progress prepared Reports (CAPR) prepared CIDP CIDP SDG 1 20 1 20 40 reviews performanc 17.13 conducted e review report developed Public Public SDG 1 5 5 investment investment 17.14 managemen managemen t t information information system system developed PIM policy Number of SDG 1 10 10 and PIM 17.13/ framework policies 14 developed developed County County County SDG 1 10 10 Monitoring M&E M&E 17.13/ and policy policy 14 Evaluation developed Projects No. of Field SDG 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 Field Monitoring 17.13/ Monitoring exercises 14 exercise conducted conducted Capacity on No. of e- 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 e-CIMES CIMES built trainings conducted M&E No. of 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 25 trainings M&E conducted trainings conducted County County No. of SDG 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 50 Statistical Statistical Statistical 9.5,9. Capacity System Abstracts b established Developed 112 |

|---|

| | Sector: PAIR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Programm e | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performan ce Indicators | | | Linka ges to SDG target s | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Programm | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | e | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| County economic planning | | | documents | | | plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | prepared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | County | | No. of CAPRs prepared | No. of | | SDG 17.13 | 1 | | 4 | | | 1 | | 4 | | | 1 | | 4 | | | 1 | | 4 | | | 1 | | 4 | | | 20 | | |

| | | | Annual | | | CAPRs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Progress | | | prepared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Reports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | (CAPR) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | prepared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | CIDP reviews conducted | CIDP | | | CIDP | | SDG 17.13 | | | | | | | | | | | 1 | | 20 | | | | | | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 40 | | |

| | | | reviews | | | performanc | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | conducted | | | e review | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | report | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Public | | Public investment managemen t information system | Public | | SDG 17.14 | 1 | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | |

| | | | investment | | | investment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | managemen | | | managemen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | t | | | t | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | information | | | information | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | system | | | system | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | PIM policy | | | Number of | | SDG 17.13/ 14 | 1 | | 10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10 | | |

| | | | and | | | PIM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | framework | | | policies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| County Monitoring and Evaluation | | | County | | County M&E policy | County | | SDG 17.13/ 14 | 1 | | 10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10 | | |

| | | | M&E | | | M&E | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | policy | | | policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Projects | | No. of Field Monitoring exercises conducted | | | SDG 17.13/ 14 | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | Field | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Monitoring | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | exercise | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Capacity on e-CIMES built | Capacity on | | | No. of e- | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | e-CIMES | | | CIMES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | built | | | trainings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | M&E trainings conducted | | | | No. of | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | M&E | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trainings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| County Statistical Capacity | | | County | | | No. of | | SDG 9.5,9. b | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | Statistical | | | Statistical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | System | | | Abstracts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | established | | | Developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performan |

| ce |

| Indicators |

| Linka |

|---|

| ges to |

| SDG |

| target |

| s |

| County |

|---|

| economic |

| planning |

| SDG |

|---|

| 17.13 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 17.13 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 17.14 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 17.13/ |

| 14 |

| County |

|---|

| Monitoring |

| and |

| Evaluation |

| SDG |

|---|

| 17.13/ |

| 14 |

| No. of Field |

|---|

| Monitoring |

| exercises |

| conducted |

| SDG |

|---|

| 17.13/ |

| 14 |

| M&E |

|---|

| trainings |

| conducted |

| County |

|---|

| Statistical |

| Capacity |

| SDG |

|---|

| 9.5,9. |

| b |

Page 134

Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) County SDG 1 20 20 statistical 9.5,9. data b Database No. of SDG 0 0 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 20 Economic 9.5,9. Surveys b conducted Programme: Public Service Delivery Programme Objective: To improve public service delivery Programme Outcome: Improved public service delivery Office Office No of SDG9 7 15 7 15 7 15 7 15 7 15 750 Infrastructu infrastructu Offices .1 0 0 0 0 0 re re constructed developme developed nt Intergovern Intergovern Number of SDG1 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 25 mental mental Intergovern 6.b relations forums mental conducted forums conducted Public Public No. of SDG1 2 10 2 10 2 10 2 10 2 10 50 participatio participatio public 6.7 n n forums participatio conducted n forums conducted Human Human % of Staff 100 30 100 30 100 30 100 30 100 30 150 Resource Resource trained % % % % % Manageme Practices (Capacity nt and systems building) strengthene d Staff Proportion 100 10 100 10 100 10 100 10 100 10 50 performanc of staff on % % % % % e analyzed Performanc e Contract Staff Proportion SDG3 100 35 100 35 100 35 100 35 100 35 1750 medical of staff .8 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 cover and provided WIBA with provided medical cover and WIBA ICT ICT No. of SDG9 10 50 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 70 Infrastructu infrastructu County .c 113

| Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) County SDG 1 20 20 statistical 9.5,9. data b Database No. of SDG 0 0 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 20 Economic 9.5,9. Surveys b conducted Programme: Public Service Delivery Programme Objective: To improve public service delivery Programme Outcome: Improved public service delivery Office Office No of SDG9 7 15 7 15 7 15 7 15 7 15 750 Infrastructu infrastructu Offices .1 0 0 0 0 0 re re constructed developme developed nt Intergovern Intergovern Number of SDG1 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 25 mental mental Intergovern 6.b relations forums mental conducted forums conducted Public Public No. of SDG1 2 10 2 10 2 10 2 10 2 10 50 participatio participatio public 6.7 n n forums participatio conducted n forums conducted Human Human % of Staff 100 30 100 30 100 30 100 30 100 30 150 Resource Resource trained % % % % % Manageme Practices (Capacity nt and systems building) strengthene d Staff Proportion 100 10 100 10 100 10 100 10 100 10 50 performanc of staff on % % % % % e analyzed Performanc e Contract Staff Proportion SDG3 100 35 100 35 100 35 100 35 100 35 1750 medical of staff .8 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 cover and provided WIBA with provided medical cover and WIBA ICT ICT No. of SDG9 10 50 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 70 Infrastructu infrastructu County .c 113 |

|---|

| | Sector: PAIR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Programm e | Sub | | Key Output | | | Key Performan ce Indicators | | | Linka ges to SDG target s | | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Programm | | | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | e | | | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | County | | SDG 9.5,9. b | | | 1 | | 20 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 20 | 20 | |

| | | | | | | | statistical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Database | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | No. of | | SDG 9.5,9. b | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 20 | | |

| | | | | | | | Economic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Surveys | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Public Service Delivery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To improve public service delivery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Improved public service delivery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Office | | Office infrastructu re developed | | | No of Offices constructed | | | SDG9 .1 | | | 7 | | 15 0 | | | 7 | | 15 0 | | | 7 | | 15 0 | | | 7 | | 15 0 | | | 7 | | 15 0 | | | 750 | 750 | |

| | Infrastructu | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | re | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | developme | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | nt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Intergovern mental relations | Intergovern | | Intergovern mental forums conducted | | | | Number of | | SDG1 6.b | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | mental | | | | | | Intergovern | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | relations | | | | | | mental | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Public participatio n | | | Public participatio n forums conducted | | | | No. of | | SDG1 6.7 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | | | | public | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | participatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | n forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Human Resource Manageme nt | | | | Human | | % of Staff trained (Capacity building) | % of Staff | | | | | 100 % | | 30 | | | 100 % | | 30 | | | 100 % | | 30 | | | 100 % | | 30 | | | 100 % | | 30 | | | 150 | | |

| | | | | Resource | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Practices | | | (Capacity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and systems | | | building) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | strengthene | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Staff performanc e analyzed | Staff | | | Proportion | | | | | 100 % | | 10 | | | 100 % | | 10 | | | 100 % | | 10 | | | 100 % | | 10 | | | 100 % | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | performanc | | | of staff on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | e analyzed | | | Performanc | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | e Contract | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Staff medical cover and WIBA provided | | | | Proportion | | SDG3 .8 | | | 100 % | | 35 0 | | | 100 % | | 35 0 | | | 100 % | | 35 0 | | | 100 % | | 35 0 | | | 100 % | | 35 0 | | | 1750 | | |

| | | | | | | | of staff | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | provided | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | medical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | cover and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | WIBA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ICT | | | ICT | | | No. of | | | SDG9 | | 10 | | 50 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 70 | | |

| | Infrastructu | | | infrastructu | | | County | | | .c | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performan |

| ce |

| Indicators |

| Linka |

|---|

| ges to |

| SDG |

| target |

| s |

| SDG |

|---|

| 9.5,9. |

| b |

| SDG |

|---|

| 9.5,9. |

| b |

| Office |

|---|

| infrastructu |

| re |

| developed |

| No of |

|---|

| Offices |

| constructed |

| SDG9 |

|---|

| .1 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 15 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Intergovern |

|---|

| mental |

| forums |

| conducted |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 6.b |

| 2 |

|---|

| Public |

|---|

| participatio |

| n |

| Public |

|---|

| participatio |

| n forums |

| conducted |

| SDG1 |

|---|

| 6.7 |

| Human |

|---|

| Resource |

| Manageme |

| nt |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| Staff |

|---|

| medical |

| cover and |

| WIBA |

| provided |

| SDG3 |

|---|

| .8 |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 35 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 35 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 35 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 35 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 100 |

|---|

| % |

| 35 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 135

Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) re and re department Connectivit developed s with ICT y connectivit y No. of sub SDG9 7 35 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 63 counties .c with LAN set up Digitization 1 30 30 of county assembly business County Strengthen No. of SDG 1 15 1 15 30 legal county arbitration 16.3 services legal and services mediation centers established 4.5.3 Public Administration and intergovernmental relations Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.14 presents the summary for the Public Administration and intergovernmental relations sector. 114

| Sector: PAIR Sub Key Key Linka Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tota Programm Output Performan ges to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 l e ce SDG Bud Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Tar Co Indicators target get get st get st get st get st get st s Ksh. M) re and re department Connectivit developed s with ICT y connectivit y No. of sub SDG9 7 35 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 63 counties .c with LAN set up Digitization 1 30 30 of county assembly business County Strengthen No. of SDG 1 15 1 15 30 legal county arbitration 16.3 services legal and services mediation centers established 4.5.3 Public Administration and intergovernmental relations Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.14 presents the summary for the Public Administration and intergovernmental relations sector. 114 |

|---|

| | Sector: PAIR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Programm e | Sub | Key Output | Key Performan ce Indicators | | | Linka ges to SDG target s | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tota | |

| | Programm | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | l | |

| | e | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | | Bud | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | |

| | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | get | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| re and Connectivit y | | re developed | | department | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | s with ICT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | connectivit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of sub | | SDG9 .c | 7 | | 35 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 7 | | 7 | | | 63 | | |

| | | | | counties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | LAN set up | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Digitization | | | | | | | | 1 | | 30 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 30 | | |

| | | | | of county | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | assembly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | business | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| County legal services | | Strengthen county legal services | | No. of | | SDG 16.3 | 1 | | 15 | | | 1 | | 15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 30 | | |

| | | | | arbitration | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | mediation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performan |

| ce |

| Indicators |

| Linka |

|---|

| ges to |

| SDG |

| target |

| s |

| re and |

|---|

| Connectivit |

| y |

| re |

|---|

| developed |

| SDG9 |

|---|

| .c |

| County |

|---|

| legal |

| services |

| Strengthen |

|---|

| county |

| legal |

| services |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.3 |

Page 136

Table 4.14: PAIR Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Name Linked Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Mitigate Sector(s) the Impact Synergies* Adverse impact Public Financial All sectors Increasing the financial Low own Automation of revenue collection management resources available for source streams to increase own source service delivery revenue revenue. collection Ensuring maximum utilization of resources by all the departments Low absorption rate Strengthening internal Weak Strong internal control system for control systems internal efficient management of financial control resources for service delivery. system Economic Policy All sectors Enhanced effective and nadequate Establishment of a county and Planning efficient utilization of statistical statistical database available resources data for planning Strengthening policy Strengthening the utilization of planning, coordination evidence-based information by and M & E for better various sectors. programmes and project outcomes Service Delivery All sectors Increasing the human Hiring of qualified staff for all capacity of public Inadequat sectors and training of staff for service e legal continuous development Effective public framewor Sensitizing the community on participation in k good governance and decision governance affairs making Improve Domestication of National intergovernmental Intergovernmental relations relations guidelines by all sectors. To improve policy and Establishment of policies and legislative framework for Laws to help in governance. effective governance 4.6 Social Protection and Recreation Sector This sector consists of Gender and Youth Affairs, Social Services, Culture, Arts and Heritage, Sports and Talent Development, Betting and Liquor Control and Disaster Management sub- sectors. 115

| Table 4.14: PAIR Sector Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Name Linked Cross-Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Mitigate Sector(s) the Impact Synergies* Adverse impact Public Financial All sectors Increasing the financial Low own Automation of revenue collection management resources available for source streams to increase own source service delivery revenue revenue. collection Ensuring maximum utilization of resources by all the departments Low absorption rate Strengthening internal Weak Strong internal control system for control systems internal efficient management of financial control resources for service delivery. system Economic Policy All sectors Enhanced effective and nadequate Establishment of a county and Planning efficient utilization of statistical statistical database available resources data for planning Strengthening policy Strengthening the utilization of planning, coordination evidence-based information by and M & E for better various sectors. programmes and project outcomes Service Delivery All sectors Increasing the human Hiring of qualified staff for all capacity of public Inadequat sectors and training of staff for service e legal continuous development Effective public framewor Sensitizing the community on participation in k good governance and decision governance affairs making Improve Domestication of National intergovernmental Intergovernmental relations relations guidelines by all sectors. To improve policy and Establishment of policies and legislative framework for Laws to help in governance. effective governance 4.6 Social Protection and Recreation Sector This sector consists of Gender and Youth Affairs, Social Services, Culture, Arts and Heritage, Sports and Talent Development, Betting and Liquor Control and Disaster Management sub- sectors. 115 |

|---|

| Programme Name | Linked Sector(s) | | Cross-Sector Impact | | | | Measures to Harness or Mitigate the Impact | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | | Synergies* | Synergies* | | Adverse impact | | | | |

| Public Financial management | All sectors | Increasing the financial resources available for service delivery | | | Low own source revenue collection Low absorption rate | | Automation of revenue collection streams to increase own source revenue. Ensuring maximum utilization of resources by all the departments | | |

| | | Strengthening internal control systems | | | Weak internal control system | | Strong internal control system for efficient management of financial resources for service delivery. | | |

| Economic Policy and Planning | All sectors | Enhanced effective and efficient utilization of available resources | | | nadequate statistical data for planning | | Establishment of a county statistical database | | |

| | | | Strengthening policy | | | | Strengthening the utilization of evidence-based information by various sectors. | | |

| | | | planning, coordination | | | | | | |

| | | | and M & E for better | | | | | | |

| | | | programmes and project | | | | | | |

| | | | outcomes | | | | | | |

| Service Delivery | All sectors | | Increasing the human | | Inadequat e legal framewor k | | | Hiring of qualified staff for all | |

| | | | capacity of public | | | | | sectors and training of staff for | |

| | | | service | | | | | continuous development | |

| | | Effective public participation in governance affairs | Effective public | | | | Sensitizing the community on good governance and decision making | Sensitizing the community on | |

| | | | participation in | | | | | good governance and decision | |

| | | | governance affairs | | | | | making | |

| | | Improve intergovernmental relations | | | | | Domestication of National Intergovernmental relations guidelines by all sectors. | | |

| | | | To improve policy and | | | | Establishment of policies and Laws to help in governance. | | |

| | | | legislative framework for | | | | | | |

| | | | effective governance | | | | | | |

| Linked |

|---|

| Sector(s) |

| Measures to Harness or Mitigate |

|---|

| the Impact |

| Public Financial |

|---|

| management |

| Increasing the financial |

|---|

| resources available for |

| service delivery |

| Automation of revenue collection |

|---|

| streams to increase own source |

| revenue. |

| Ensuring maximum utilization of |

| resources by all the departments |

| Strengthening internal |

|---|

| control systems |

| Strong internal control system for |

|---|

| efficient management of financial |

| resources for service delivery. |

| Economic Policy |

|---|

| and Planning |

| Enhanced effective and |

|---|

| efficient utilization of |

| available resources |

| Establishment of a county |

|---|

| statistical database |

| Strengthening the utilization of |

|---|

| evidence-based information by |

| various sectors. |

| Improve |

|---|

| intergovernmental |

| relations |

| Domestication of National |

|---|

| Intergovernmental relations |

| guidelines by all sectors. |

| Establishment of policies and |

|---|

| Laws to help in governance. |

Page 137

Vision: The vision for this sector is to promote sustainable and equitable socio-cultural and economic empowerment of all. Mission: The mission is to formulate and mainstream responsive policies through coordinated strategies for sustained and balanced socio-cultural and economic development of the county and empowerment of vulnerable and marginalized groups. Goal: To promote socio-cultural empowerment and access to equitable development opportunities in a society responsive to the needs of vulnerable and marginalized groups. 4.6.1 Social Protection Sector Development Priorities and Strategies The sector will employ the following strategies enumerated in table 4.15 to achieve its priorities during the plan period. Table 4.15: Social Protection Sector Priorities and Strategies Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Priorities Strategies To enhance social and child Strengthen child protection services protection services Strengthen social protection services Increase advocacy and awareness Develop of legal and policy framework Enhance GBV prevention, response and recovery services To increase youth Capacity building of youth empowerment/employment Increase employment opportunities Strengthen rehabilitation services Strengthen policy framework To enhance preservation of culture Enhance preservation of cultural sites and heritage Promote culture and heritage Increase advocacy and awareness creation Strengthen policy and legal framework To strengthen sports development Rehabilitate and establish standard sports facilities (sports complex, stadia) Strengthen sports development capacity Development of policy and legal framework Strengthening disaster risk Development of disaster risk management infrastructure management Strengthening human resource capacity Strengthening disaster risk governance Strengthening early warning systems Strengthening community awareness and understanding of disaster risks Strengthening disaster preparedness for effective response and recovery Strengthening community resilience through investment in DRM 4.6.2. Social Protection Sector Programmes This section provides sector programmes to be implemented within the planned period as presented in tables 4.16. 116

| Vision: The vision for this sector is to promote sustainable and equitable socio-cultural and economic empowerment of all. Mission: The mission is to formulate and mainstream responsive policies through coordinated strategies for sustained and balanced socio-cultural and economic development of the county and empowerment of vulnerable and marginalized groups. Goal: To promote socio-cultural empowerment and access to equitable development opportunities in a society responsive to the needs of vulnerable and marginalized groups. 4.6.1 Social Protection Sector Development Priorities and Strategies The sector will employ the following strategies enumerated in table 4.15 to achieve its priorities during the plan period. Table 4.15: Social Protection Sector Priorities and Strategies Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Priorities Strategies To enhance social and child Strengthen child protection services protection services Strengthen social protection services Increase advocacy and awareness Develop of legal and policy framework Enhance GBV prevention, response and recovery services To increase youth Capacity building of youth empowerment/employment Increase employment opportunities Strengthen rehabilitation services Strengthen policy framework To enhance preservation of culture Enhance preservation of cultural sites and heritage Promote culture and heritage Increase advocacy and awareness creation Strengthen policy and legal framework To strengthen sports development Rehabilitate and establish standard sports facilities (sports complex, stadia) Strengthen sports development capacity Development of policy and legal framework Strengthening disaster risk Development of disaster risk management infrastructure management Strengthening human resource capacity Strengthening disaster risk governance Strengthening early warning systems Strengthening community awareness and understanding of disaster risks Strengthening disaster preparedness for effective response and recovery Strengthening community resilience through investment in DRM 4.6.2. Social Protection Sector Programmes This section provides sector programmes to be implemented within the planned period as presented in tables 4.16. 116 |

|---|

| | Social Protection, Culture and Recreation | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Sector Priorities | | | Strategies | |

| To enhance social and child protection services | To enhance social and child | | | Strengthen child protection services | |

| | protection services | | | Strengthen social protection services | |

| | | | | Increase advocacy and awareness | |

| | | | | Develop of legal and policy framework | |

| | | | | Enhance GBV prevention, response and recovery services | |

| To increase youth empowerment/employment | | | | Capacity building of youth | |

| | | | | Increase employment opportunities | |

| | | | | Strengthen rehabilitation services | |

| | | | | Strengthen policy framework | |

| To enhance preservation of culture and heritage | | | | Enhance preservation of cultural sites | |

| | | | | Promote culture and heritage | |

| | | | | Increase advocacy and awareness creation | |

| | | | | Strengthen policy and legal framework | |

| To strengthen sports development | | | | Rehabilitate and establish standard sports facilities (sports complex, stadia) | |

| | | | | Strengthen sports development capacity | |

| | | | | Development of policy and legal framework | |

| Strengthening disaster risk management | | | | Development of disaster risk management infrastructure | |

| | | | | Strengthening human resource capacity | |

| | | | | Strengthening disaster risk governance | |

| | | | | Strengthening early warning systems | |

| | | | | Strengthening community awareness and understanding of disaster risks | |

| | | | | Strengthening disaster preparedness for effective response and recovery | |

| | | | | Strengthening community resilience through investment in DRM | |

| To increase youth |

|---|

| empowerment/employment |

| To enhance preservation of culture |

|---|

| and heritage |

| Strengthening disaster risk |

|---|

| management |

Page 138

Table 4.16: Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Programmes Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Programme: Social Protection Programme Objective: To enhance social and child protection services Programme Outcome: Enhanced social and child protection services Child Sensiti Number of SDG 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 25 Protecti zation forums 16.2 on forums held held Moder Establishe SDG 1 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 25 n child d child 16.2 rescue rescue centers center constru cted and operati onalize d Child Number of SDG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 particip channels 16.2 ation channel s/ platfor ms establis hed Mandat Policy SDG 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 ory 4.2 school enrollm ent and retentio n policy develo ped Kilifi Policy SDG 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 County 16.2 Child Protecti on Policy 117

| Table 4.16: Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Programmes Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Programme: Social Protection Programme Objective: To enhance social and child protection services Programme Outcome: Enhanced social and child protection services Child Sensiti Number of SDG 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 25 Protecti zation forums 16.2 on forums held held Moder Establishe SDG 1 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 25 n child d child 16.2 rescue rescue centers center constru cted and operati onalize d Child Number of SDG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 particip channels 16.2 ation channel s/ platfor ms establis hed Mandat Policy SDG 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 ory 4.2 school enrollm ent and retentio n policy develo ped Kilifi Policy SDG 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 County 16.2 Child Protecti on Policy 117 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Social Protection | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To enhance social and child protection services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Enhanced social and child protection services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Child Protecti on | Child | Sensiti zation forums held | | | | Number of | | SDG 16.2 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 25 | 25 | |

| | Protecti | | | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | on | | | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Moder | | Establishe d child rescue center | Establishe | | SDG 16.2 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 0 | | 5 | | | 0 | | 5 | | | 0 | | 5 | | | 0 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | n child | | | d child | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | rescue | | | rescue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | centers | | | center | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constru | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | cted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | operati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | onalize | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Child | | Number of channels | | | SDG 16.2 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 5 | | |

| | | | particip | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | channel | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | s/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | platfor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ms | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | establis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | hed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Mandat | | Policy | | | SDG 4.2 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 5 | | |

| | | | ory | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | school | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | enrollm | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ent and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | retentio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | develo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Kilifi | | Policy | | | SDG 16.2 | | | 1 | | 5 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 5 | | |

| | | | County | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Child | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Protecti | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| Sensiti |

|---|

| zation |

| forums |

| held |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.2 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.2 |

| Number of |

|---|

| channels |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.2 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 4.2 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.2 |

Page 139

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s develo ped Social Sensiti Number of SDG 50 30 50 30 50 30 50 30 50 30 150 Protecti zation forums 10.4 on forums held Services PWD PWD SDG 1 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 100 Empow Empower 10.2 erment ment Center Center constru cted and operati onalize d Cash Number of SDG 1,50 45 1,5 45 1,50 45 1,50 45 1,50 45 225 transfer beneficiari 10.4 0 00 0 0 0 s to es PWDs, Elderly Citizen s and OVCs and widow s provide d Capacit Number of SDG 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 25 y groups 10.4 buildin g on income generat ing activiti es Comm Number of SDG 3 30 3 30 3 30 3 30 3 30 150 unity communit 10.4 hubs y hubs/ and informatio inform n centers ation established centers operati 118

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s develo ped Social Sensiti Number of SDG 50 30 50 30 50 30 50 30 50 30 150 Protecti zation forums 10.4 on forums held Services PWD PWD SDG 1 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 100 Empow Empower 10.2 erment ment Center Center constru cted and operati onalize d Cash Number of SDG 1,50 45 1,5 45 1,50 45 1,50 45 1,50 45 225 transfer beneficiari 10.4 0 00 0 0 0 s to es PWDs, Elderly Citizen s and OVCs and widow s provide d Capacit Number of SDG 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 25 y groups 10.4 buildin g on income generat ing activiti es Comm Number of SDG 3 30 3 30 3 30 3 30 3 30 150 unity communit 10.4 hubs y hubs/ and informatio inform n centers ation established centers operati 118 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | develo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Social Protecti on Services | | | Sensiti | | | Number of | | SDG 10.4 | | | 50 | | 30 | | | 50 | | 30 | | | 50 | | 30 | | | 50 | | 30 | | | 50 | | 30 | | | 150 | | |

| | | | zation | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | forums | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | PWD | | PWD Empower ment Center | PWD | | SDG 10.2 | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 0 | | 20 | | | 0 | | 20 | | | 0 | | 20 | | | 0 | | 20 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | Empow | | | Empower | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | erment | | | ment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Center | | | Center | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constru | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | cted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | operati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | onalize | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Cash | | Number of beneficiari es | | | SDG 10.4 | | | 1,50 0 | | 45 | | | 1,5 00 | | 45 | | | 1,50 0 | | 45 | | | 1,50 0 | | 45 | | | 1,50 0 | | 45 | | | 225 | | |

| | | | transfer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | s to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | PWDs, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Elderly | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Citizen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | s and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | OVCs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | widow | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | provide | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Capacit | | Number of groups | | | SDG 10.4 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | buildin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | g on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | generat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | activiti | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | es | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Comm | | Number of communit y hubs/ informatio n centers established | | | SDG 10.4 | | | 3 | | 30 | | | 3 | | 30 | | | 3 | | 30 | | | 3 | | 30 | | | 3 | | 30 | | | 150 | | |

| | | | unity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | hubs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | inform | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | operati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| Social |

|---|

| Protecti |

| on |

| Services |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.4 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.2 |

| Number of |

|---|

| beneficiari |

| es |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.4 |

| 1,50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 1,5 |

|---|

| 00 |

| 1,50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 1,50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 1,50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Number of |

|---|

| groups |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.4 |

| Number of |

|---|

| communit |

| y hubs/ |

| informatio |

| n centers |

| established |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.4 |

Page 140

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s onalize d Social Number of SDG 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Welfar policies 10.4 e and developed Cash Transfe r Policy develo ped Advocac Sensiti No. of SDG 50 35 50 35 50 35 50 50 35 50 205 y and zation forums 10.4 awarene forums held ss held at the ward level legal Gender No .of SDG 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 and Policy policy 10.4 policy develo developed framewo ped rk GBV GBV No. of SDG 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 preventi prevent GBV 5.2 5 on, ion, prevention response respons , response and e and and recovery recover recovery services y centers centers constructe constru d cted Aware No. of SDG 35 1. 35 1.5 35 1.5 35 1. 35 1.5 7.5 ness on awareness 5.2 5 5 prevent campaigns ion, conducted respons e and recover y of GBV Created 119

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s onalize d Social Number of SDG 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Welfar policies 10.4 e and developed Cash Transfe r Policy develo ped Advocac Sensiti No. of SDG 50 35 50 35 50 35 50 50 35 50 205 y and zation forums 10.4 awarene forums held ss held at the ward level legal Gender No .of SDG 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 and Policy policy 10.4 policy develo developed framewo ped rk GBV GBV No. of SDG 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 preventi prevent GBV 5.2 5 on, ion, prevention response respons , response and e and and recovery recover recovery services y centers centers constructe constru d cted Aware No. of SDG 35 1. 35 1.5 35 1.5 35 1. 35 1.5 7.5 ness on awareness 5.2 5 5 prevent campaigns ion, conducted respons e and recover y of GBV Created 119 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | onalize d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Social | | Number of policies developed | SDG 10.4 | | | 3 | | 15 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 15 | | |

| | | | | Welfar | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | e and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Transfe | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | r | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | develo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Advocac y and awarene ss | | | | Sensiti | | No. of forums held | SDG 10.4 | | | 50 | | 35 | | | 50 | | 35 | | | 50 | | 35 | | | 50 | | 50 | | | 35 | | 50 | | | 205 | | |

| | | | | zation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | held at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | the | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ward | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | level | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | legal | | Gender Policy develo ped | Gender | | No .of policy developed | SDG 10.4 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 2 | | |

| | and | | | Policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | policy | | | develo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | framewo | | | ped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | rk | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| GBV preventi on, response and recovery services | GBV | | | GBV | | No. of GBV prevention , response and recovery centers constructe d | SDG 5.2 | | | 1 | | 12 5 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 125 | | |

| | preventi | | | prevent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | on, | | | ion, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | response | | | respons | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | and | | | e and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | recovery | | | recover | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | services | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | constru | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | cted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Aware | | No. of awareness campaigns conducted | SDG 5.2 | | | 35 | | 1. 5 | | | 35 | | 1.5 | | | 35 | | 1.5 | | | 35 | | 1. 5 | | | 35 | | 1.5 | | | 7.5 | | |

| | | | | ness on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | prevent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ion, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | respons | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | e and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | recover | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | y of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | GBV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Created | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| onalize |

|---|

| d |

| Number of |

|---|

| policies |

| developed |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.4 |

| Advocac |

|---|

| y and |

| awarene |

| ss |

| No. of |

|---|

| forums |

| held |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.4 |

| No .of |

|---|

| policy |

| developed |

| SDG |

|---|

| 10.4 |

| No. of |

|---|

| GBV |

| prevention |

| , response |

| and |

| recovery |

| centers |

| constructe |

| d |

| SDG |

|---|

| 5.2 |

| 12 |

|---|

| 5 |

| No. of |

|---|

| awareness |

| campaigns |

| conducted |

| SDG |

|---|

| 5.2 |

| 1. |

|---|

| 5 |

| 1. |

|---|

| 5 |

Page 141

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Programme: Youth Development Programme Objective: To increase youth empowerment/employment Programme Outcome: Increased youth empowerment/employment Capacity Capacit No. of SDG 3 0 building y Capacity 8.3 buildin building g forums forums conducted conduc ted Increase Short No. of SDG 50 25 50 25 50 25 50 25 50 25 125 employ and Short and 8.5 ment labor- labor- opportu intensi intensive nities ve employme employ nt ment opportuniti opportu es Offered nities Offered Strength Rehabil Number of SDG 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 en itation rehabilitati 8.6 0 rehabilit centers on centers ation constru constructe services cted d and and operational operati ized onalize d Enhanc Number of SDG 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 25 ed campaigns 8.6 campai against gns social- against interruptiv social- e activities interru conducted( ptive gambling)/ activiti es (gambli ng)/ betting and control regulati on) 120

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Programme: Youth Development Programme Objective: To increase youth empowerment/employment Programme Outcome: Increased youth empowerment/employment Capacity Capacit No. of SDG 3 0 building y Capacity 8.3 buildin building g forums forums conducted conduc ted Increase Short No. of SDG 50 25 50 25 50 25 50 25 50 25 125 employ and Short and 8.5 ment labor- labor- opportu intensi intensive nities ve employme employ nt ment opportuniti opportu es Offered nities Offered Strength Rehabil Number of SDG 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 en itation rehabilitati 8.6 0 rehabilit centers on centers ation constru constructe services cted d and and operational operati ized onalize d Enhanc Number of SDG 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 25 ed campaigns 8.6 campai against gns social- against interruptiv social- e activities interru conducted( ptive gambling)/ activiti es (gambli ng)/ betting and control regulati on) 120 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Youth Development | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To increase youth empowerment/employment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Increased youth empowerment/employment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Capacity building | Capacity | | Capacit | | No. of Capacity building forums conducted | SDG 8.3 | | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0 | |

| | building | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | buildin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | g | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | conduc | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Increase employ ment opportu nities | | | Short | | No. of Short and labor- intensive employme nt opportuniti es Offered | SDG 8.5 | | | 50 | | 25 | | | 50 | | 25 | | | 50 | | 25 | | | 50 | | 25 | | | 50 | | 25 | | | 125 | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | labor- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | intensi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ve | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | employ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | opportu | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | nities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Offered | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength en rehabilit ation services | | | Rehabil | | Number of rehabilitati on centers constructe d and operational ized | SDG 8.6 | | | 1 | | 18 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 180 | | |

| | | | itation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | constru | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | cted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | operati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | onalize | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Enhanc | | Number of campaigns against social- interruptiv e activities conducted( gambling)/ | SDG 8.6 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 10 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | campai | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | gns | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | against | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | social- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | interru | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ptive | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | activiti | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | es | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | (gambli | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ng)/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | betting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | control | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | regulati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | on) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| No. of |

|---|

| Capacity |

| building |

| forums |

| conducted |

| SDG |

|---|

| 8.3 |

| Increase |

|---|

| employ |

| ment |

| opportu |

| nities |

| No. of |

|---|

| Short and |

| labor- |

| intensive |

| employme |

| nt |

| opportuniti |

| es Offered |

| SDG |

|---|

| 8.5 |

| Strength |

|---|

| en |

| rehabilit |

| ation |

| services |

| Number of |

|---|

| rehabilitati |

| on centers |

| constructe |

| d and |

| operational |

| ized |

| SDG |

|---|

| 8.6 |

| 18 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Number of |

|---|

| campaigns |

| against |

| social- |

| interruptiv |

| e activities |

| conducted( |

| gambling)/ |

| SDG |

|---|

| 8.6 |

Page 142

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Strength Domest Kenya SDG 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 en icate Youth 8.6 policy Kenya Developm framewo Youth ent Policy rk Develo domesticat pment ed Policy Develo Kilifi SDG 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 pment county 8.6 of a local brew local policy brew policy Programme: Culture and Arts Programme Objective: To enhance preservation of culture and heritage Programme Outcome: Enhanced preservation of culture and heritage Enhance Cultura Number of SDG 3 45 3 50 3 53 3 55 3 57 260 preserva l cultural 11.4 tion of heritag heritage cultural e sites sites sites restore restored, d, upgraded upgrad and ed and gazetted gazette Promote Cultura Number of SDG 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 125 culture l days cultural 11.4 and and days and heritage events events celebra marked ted County Number of SDG 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 Databa County IK 11.4 0 se of database Indigen established ous Knowl edge (IK) associa ted genetic resourc e 121

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Strength Domest Kenya SDG 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 en icate Youth 8.6 policy Kenya Developm framewo Youth ent Policy rk Develo domesticat pment ed Policy Develo Kilifi SDG 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 pment county 8.6 of a local brew local policy brew policy Programme: Culture and Arts Programme Objective: To enhance preservation of culture and heritage Programme Outcome: Enhanced preservation of culture and heritage Enhance Cultura Number of SDG 3 45 3 50 3 53 3 55 3 57 260 preserva l cultural 11.4 tion of heritag heritage cultural e sites sites sites restore restored, d, upgraded upgrad and ed and gazetted gazette Promote Cultura Number of SDG 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 125 culture l days cultural 11.4 and and days and heritage events events celebra marked ted County Number of SDG 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 Databa County IK 11.4 0 se of database Indigen established ous Knowl edge (IK) associa ted genetic resourc e 121 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength en policy framewo rk | | | Domest | | Kenya Youth Developm ent Policy domesticat ed | SDG 8.6 | SDG | | 1 | | 3 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 3 | | |

| | | | icate | | | | 8.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Kenya | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Youth | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Develo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | pment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Develo | | Kilifi county local brew policy | SDG 8.6 | | | 1 | | 4 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 4 | | |

| | | | pment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | of a | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | local | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | brew | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | policy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Culture and Arts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To enhance preservation of culture and heritage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Enhanced preservation of culture and heritage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Enhance preserva tion of cultural sites | Enhance | | Cultura | | Number of cultural heritage sites restored, upgraded and gazetted | SDG 11.4 | | | 3 | | 45 | | | 3 | | 50 | | | 3 | | 53 | | | 3 | | 55 | | | 3 | | 57 | | | 260 | 260 | |

| | preserva | | l | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | tion of | | heritag | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | cultural | | e sites | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | sites | | restore | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | upgrad | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ed and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | gazette | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Promote culture and heritage | | | Cultura | | Number of cultural days and events marked | SDG 11.4 | | | 5 | | 25 | | | 5 | | 25 | | | 5 | | 25 | | | 5 | | 25 | | | 5 | | 25 | | | 125 | | |

| | | | l days | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | events | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | celebra | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | County | | Number of County IK database established | SDG 11.4 | | | 1 | | 25 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 250 | | |

| | | | Databa | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | se of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Indigen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ous | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Knowl | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | edge | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | (IK) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | associa | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | genetic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | resourc | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | e | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| Strength |

|---|

| en |

| policy |

| framewo |

| rk |

| Kenya |

|---|

| Youth |

| Developm |

| ent Policy |

| domesticat |

| ed |

| Kilifi |

|---|

| county |

| local brew |

| policy |

| SDG |

|---|

| 8.6 |

| Number of |

|---|

| cultural |

| heritage |

| sites |

| restored, |

| upgraded |

| and |

| gazetted |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| Promote |

|---|

| culture |

| and |

| heritage |

| Number of |

|---|

| cultural |

| days and |

| events |

| marked |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| Number of |

|---|

| County IK |

| database |

| established |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| 25 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 143

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Establi Number of SDG 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 shment centers 11.4 of art established and cultural researc h center Protecti Number of SDG 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 on and sacred 11.4 Promot kaya ion of forests sacred protected Kaya and Forests promoted Increase Advoca Number of SDG 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 20 advocac cy and Advocacy 11.4 y and awaren and awarene ess awareness ss created forums creation held Cultura Number of SDG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 l exhibitions 11.4 exhibiti held ons held Strength Policy No. of SDG 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 en and Policy and 11.4 policy legal legal and framew framework legal orks s framewo develo developed rk ped Establi Number of SDG 1 20 1 20 1 20 1 20 1 20 100 shment centers 11.4 of art established and cultural researc h center Cultura Number of SDG 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 l music groups 11.4 groups formed formed 122

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Establi Number of SDG 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 shment centers 11.4 of art established and cultural researc h center Protecti Number of SDG 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 on and sacred 11.4 Promot kaya ion of forests sacred protected Kaya and Forests promoted Increase Advoca Number of SDG 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 20 advocac cy and Advocacy 11.4 y and awaren and awarene ess awareness ss created forums creation held Cultura Number of SDG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 l exhibitions 11.4 exhibiti held ons held Strength Policy No. of SDG 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 en and Policy and 11.4 policy legal legal and framew framework legal orks s framewo develo developed rk ped Establi Number of SDG 1 20 1 20 1 20 1 20 1 20 100 shment centers 11.4 of art established and cultural researc h center Cultura Number of SDG 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 l music groups 11.4 groups formed formed 122 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Establi | | Number of centers established | | | SDG 11.4 | SDG | | 1 | | 20 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 20 | | |

| | | | shment | | | | | | 11.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | of art | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | cultural | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | researc | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | h | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | center | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Protecti | | | Number of | | SDG 11.4 | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 20 | | |

| | | | on and | | | sacred | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Promot | | | kaya | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ion of | | | forests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | sacred | | | protected | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Kaya | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Forests | | | promoted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Increase advocac y and awarene ss creation | | | Advoca | | | Number of | | SDG 11.4 | | | 4 | | 4 | | | 4 | | 4 | | | 4 | | 4 | | | 4 | | 4 | | | 4 | | 4 | | | 20 | | |

| | | | cy and | | | Advocacy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | awaren | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ess | | | awareness | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | created | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Cultura | | Number of exhibitions held | Number of | | SDG 11.4 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | | | 5 | | |

| | | | l | | | exhibitions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | exhibiti | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ons | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength en policy and legal framewo rk | | | Policy | | No. of Policy and legal framework s developed | | | SDG 11.4 | | | 3 | | 6 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 6 | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | legal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | framew | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | orks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | develo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Establi | | Number of centers established | | | SDG 11.4 | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 1 | | 20 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | shment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | of art | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | cultural | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | researc | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | h | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | center | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Cultura | | Number of groups formed | | | SDG 11.4 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | l music | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | groups | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | formed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| Number of |

|---|

| centers |

| established |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| Increase |

|---|

| advocac |

| y and |

| awarene |

| ss |

| creation |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| Strength |

|---|

| en |

| policy |

| and |

| legal |

| framewo |

| rk |

| No. of |

|---|

| Policy and |

| legal |

| framework |

| s |

| developed |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| Number of |

|---|

| centers |

| established |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

| Number of |

|---|

| groups |

| formed |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.4 |

Page 144

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s and trained Programme: Sports Development Programme Objective: To strengthen sports development Programme Outcome: Strengthened sports development Moder Number of SDG 10 10 4 100 5 12 3 30 5 600 1875 Rehabili n sports 16.6 20 5 tate and sports facilities establish facilitie rehabilitate standard s d and sports rehabili established facilities tated (sports and complex establis , stadia) hed Strength Operati No. of SDG 2 30 0 0 2 30 0 0 0 0 60 en onal Operationa 16.6 sports talent l talent develop academ academy ment y capacity Talent Number of SDG 50 3 50 3 50 3 50 3 50 3 15 manage talented 16.6 ment sports framew persons ork identified develo and ped recruited Number of SDG 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 25 talented 16.6 sports persons identified and trained No.of SDG 300 30 320 35 350 40 350 45 350 50 200 sports 16.6 teams equipped No. of SDG 70 4 70 4 70 4 70 4 70 4 20 sports 16.6 personnel trained Number of SDG 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 25 talented 16.6 sports persons 123

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s and trained Programme: Sports Development Programme Objective: To strengthen sports development Programme Outcome: Strengthened sports development Moder Number of SDG 10 10 4 100 5 12 3 30 5 600 1875 Rehabili n sports 16.6 20 5 tate and sports facilities establish facilitie rehabilitate standard s d and sports rehabili established facilities tated (sports and complex establis , stadia) hed Strength Operati No. of SDG 2 30 0 0 2 30 0 0 0 0 60 en onal Operationa 16.6 sports talent l talent develop academ academy ment y capacity Talent Number of SDG 50 3 50 3 50 3 50 3 50 3 15 manage talented 16.6 ment sports framew persons ork identified develo and ped recruited Number of SDG 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 50 5 25 talented 16.6 sports persons identified and trained No.of SDG 300 30 320 35 350 40 350 45 350 50 200 sports 16.6 teams equipped No. of SDG 70 4 70 4 70 4 70 4 70 4 20 sports 16.6 personnel trained Number of SDG 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 5 25 talented 16.6 sports persons 123 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Sports Development | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To strengthen sports development | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Strengthened sports development | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Moder | | Number of sports facilities rehabilitate d and established | | | SDG 16.6 | | | 10 | | 10 20 | | | 4 | | 100 | | | 5 | | 12 5 | | | 3 | | 30 | | | 5 | | 600 | | | 1875 | 1875 | |

| | Rehabili | | | n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | tate and | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | establish | | | facilitie | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | standard | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | sports | | | rehabili | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | facilities | | | tated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | (sports | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | complex | | | establis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | , stadia) | | | hed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength en sports develop ment capacity | Strength | | | Operati | | No. of Operationa l talent academy | | | SDG 16.6 | | | 2 | | 30 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 2 | | 30 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 60 | | |

| | en | | | onal | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | sports | | | talent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | develop | | | academ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ment | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | capacity | | Talent manage ment framew ork develo ped | Talent | | | Number of | | SDG 16.6 | | | 50 | | 3 | | | 50 | | 3 | | | 50 | | 3 | | | 50 | | 3 | | | 50 | | 3 | | | 15 | | |

| | | | | manage | | | talented | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ment | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | framew | | | persons | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ork | | | identified | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | develo | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ped | | | recruited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Number of | | SDG 16.6 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 50 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | | talented | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | persons | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | identified | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | and trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | No.of | | SDG 16.6 | | | 300 | | 30 | | | 320 | | 35 | | | 350 | | 40 | | | 350 | | 45 | | | 350 | | 50 | | | 200 | | |

| | | | | | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | teams | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | equipped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | No. of | | SDG 16.6 | | | 70 | | 4 | | | 70 | | 4 | | | 70 | | 4 | | | 70 | | 4 | | | 70 | | 4 | | | 20 | | |

| | | | | | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | personnel | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Number of | | SDG 16.6 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 100 | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | | talented | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | persons | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| Number of |

|---|

| sports |

| facilities |

| rehabilitate |

| d and |

| established |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 20 |

| 12 |

|---|

| 5 |

| No. of |

|---|

| Operationa |

| l talent |

| academy |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

Page 145

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s recognized and rewarded Number of SDG 400 20 400 20 400 20 400 20 400 20 100 sports 16.6 persons participati ng in tournamen ts/champio nships Develop Sports No. of SDG 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ment of policy sports 16.6 policy and policies and frame developed legal work framewo develo rk ped Programme: Disaster Strengthening disaster risk management Programme Objective: To enhance disaster risk management Programme Outcome: Enhanced disaster risk management Develop disaster Number of SDG 4 58 2 36 2 28 0 0 0 0 122 ment of risk disaster 11.5 disaster manage response risk ment equipment manage infrastr acquired ment ucture infrastru develo Number of 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 cture ped early 0 warning system infrastruct ure developed Number of 1 20 1 200 1 20 0 0 0 0 600 hazard 0 0 specific mitigation structures developed Strength Human Number of 4 10 7 12 35 15 0 0 0 0 37 ening resourc DRM human e personnel resource capacit employed capacity y Number of 10 4 15 6 25 10 40 10 40 10 40 DRM 124

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s recognized and rewarded Number of SDG 400 20 400 20 400 20 400 20 400 20 100 sports 16.6 persons participati ng in tournamen ts/champio nships Develop Sports No. of SDG 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ment of policy sports 16.6 policy and policies and frame developed legal work framewo develo rk ped Programme: Disaster Strengthening disaster risk management Programme Objective: To enhance disaster risk management Programme Outcome: Enhanced disaster risk management Develop disaster Number of SDG 4 58 2 36 2 28 0 0 0 0 122 ment of risk disaster 11.5 disaster manage response risk ment equipment manage infrastr acquired ment ucture infrastru develo Number of 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 cture ped early 0 warning system infrastruct ure developed Number of 1 20 1 200 1 20 0 0 0 0 600 hazard 0 0 specific mitigation structures developed Strength Human Number of 4 10 7 12 35 15 0 0 0 0 37 ening resourc DRM human e personnel resource capacit employed capacity y Number of 10 4 15 6 25 10 40 10 40 10 40 DRM 124 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | | Key Outpu t | | | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | recognized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | rewarded | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Number of | | SDG 16.6 | | | 400 | | 20 | | | 400 | | 20 | | | 400 | | 20 | | | 400 | | 20 | | | 400 | | 20 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | | | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | persons | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | participati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | ng in | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | tournamen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | ts/champio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | nships | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Develop | | | Sports | | No. of sports policies developed | No. of | | SDG 16.6 | | | 1 | | 6 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 6 | | |

| | ment of | | | policy | | | sports | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | policy | | | and | | | policies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | and | | | frame | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | legal | | | work | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | framewo | | | develo | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | rk | | | ped | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Disaster Strengthening disaster risk management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To enhance disaster risk management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: Enhanced disaster risk management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Develop ment of disaster risk manage ment infrastru cture | Develop | | disaster risk manage ment infrastr ucture develo ped | | | | Number of | | SDG 11.5 | | | 4 | | 58 | | | 2 | | 36 | | | 2 | | 28 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 122 | 122 | |

| | ment of | | | | | | disaster | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | disaster | | | | | | response | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | risk | | | | | | equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | manage | | | | | | acquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | infrastru | | | | | | Number of | | | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 100 | | |

| | cture | | | | | | early | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | warning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | system | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | infrastruct | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | ure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | 1 | | 20 0 | | | 1 | | 200 | | | 1 | | 20 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 600 | | |

| | | | | | | | hazard | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | specific | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | mitigation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | structures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength ening human resource capacity | | | Human resourc e capacit y | | | | Number of | | | | | 4 | | 10 | | | 7 | | 12 | | | 35 | | 15 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 37 | | |

| | | | | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | personnel | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | employed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | 10 | | 4 | | | 15 | | 6 | | | 25 | | 10 | | | 40 | | 10 | | | 40 | | 10 | | | 40 | | |

| | | | | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 16.6 |

| disaster |

|---|

| risk |

| manage |

| ment |

| infrastr |

| ucture |

| develo |

| ped |

| SDG |

|---|

| 11.5 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Strength |

|---|

| ening |

| human |

| resource |

| capacity |

| Human |

|---|

| resourc |

| e |

| capacit |

| y |

Page 146

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s strengt personnel hened trained Number of 30 10 0 0 60 20 0 0 0 0 30 personnel protective equipment procured Strength Disaste Number of 1 4 1 4 1 6 1 6 1 6 26 ening r risk DRM disaster govern coordinati risk ance on governa strengt structures nce hened established and managed Number of 10 20 10 20 15 30 15 30 10 20 120 DRM trainings conducted on communiti es and institutions Operationa 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 l disaster risk manageme nt informatio n systems developed Number of 2 15 2 15 3 25 3 25 4 35 115 DRM policies and plans developed Number of 4 2 4 2 6 3 6 3 6 3 13 sectors, plans, policies, budgets mainstrea med and integrated with DRM Number of 10 2 10 2 15 3 15 3 15 3 13 125

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s strengt personnel hened trained Number of 30 10 0 0 60 20 0 0 0 0 30 personnel protective equipment procured Strength Disaste Number of 1 4 1 4 1 6 1 6 1 6 26 ening r risk DRM disaster govern coordinati risk ance on governa strengt structures nce hened established and managed Number of 10 20 10 20 15 30 15 30 10 20 120 DRM trainings conducted on communiti es and institutions Operationa 1 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 l disaster risk manageme nt informatio n systems developed Number of 2 15 2 15 3 25 3 25 4 35 115 DRM policies and plans developed Number of 4 2 4 2 6 3 6 3 6 3 13 sectors, plans, policies, budgets mainstrea med and integrated with DRM Number of 10 2 10 2 15 3 15 3 15 3 13 125 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | et | | | st | | | get | | | t | | | et | | | st | | | et | | | st | | | et | | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | strengt hened | | personnel | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | trained | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 30 | | | 10 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 60 | | | 20 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 30 | | |

| | | | | personnel | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | protective | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength ening disaster risk governa nce | | Disaste r risk govern ance strengt hened | | Number of | | | | | 1 | | | 4 | | | 1 | | | 4 | | | 1 | | | 6 | | | 1 | | | 6 | | | 1 | | | 6 | | | 26 | | |

| | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | coordinati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | structures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | managed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 10 | | | 20 | | | 10 | | | 20 | | | 15 | | | 30 | | | 15 | | | 30 | | | 10 | | | 20 | | | 120 | | |

| | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | trainings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | communiti | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | es and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | institutions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Operationa | | | | | 1 | | | 50 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | l disaster | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | risk | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | manageme | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | nt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | informatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | n systems | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 2 | | | 15 | | | 2 | | | 15 | | | 3 | | | 25 | | | 3 | | | 25 | | | 4 | | | 35 | | | 115 | | |

| | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | policies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 3 | | | 6 | | | 3 | | | 6 | | | 3 | | | 13 | | |

| | | | | sectors, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | plans, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | policies, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | budgets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | mainstrea | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | med and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | integrated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | | 10 | | | 2 | | | 10 | | | 2 | | | 15 | | | 3 | | | 15 | | | 3 | | | 15 | | | 3 | | | 13 | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| strengt |

|---|

| hened |

| Strength |

|---|

| ening |

| disaster |

| risk |

| governa |

| nce |

| Disaste |

|---|

| r risk |

| govern |

| ance |

| strengt |

| hened |

Page 147

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s laws and regulations that enhance safety complied with Number of 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 12 1 12 541 DRM forums held Number of 1 10 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 18 M&E structures developed and managed Number of 4 20 6 30 6 30 6 30 6 30 140 disaster risk assessment s and mapping conducted Number of 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 25 10 25 110 DRM publication s and report produced and disseminat ed Strength Early Number of 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 ening warnin early 0 early g warning warning system systems systems s developed strengt Number of 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 100 hened EWS informatio n produced and disseminat ed 126

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s laws and regulations that enhance safety complied with Number of 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 12 1 12 541 DRM forums held Number of 1 10 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 18 M&E structures developed and managed Number of 4 20 6 30 6 30 6 30 6 30 140 disaster risk assessment s and mapping conducted Number of 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 25 10 25 110 DRM publication s and report produced and disseminat ed Strength Early Number of 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 ening warnin early 0 early g warning warning system systems systems s developed strengt Number of 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 10 20 100 hened EWS informatio n produced and disseminat ed 126 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | laws and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | regulations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | that | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | enhance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | safety | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | complied | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 12 | | | 1 | | 12 | | | 541 | | |

| | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | forums | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 18 | | |

| | | | | M&E | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | structures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | managed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 4 | | 20 | | | 6 | | 30 | | | 6 | | 30 | | | 6 | | 30 | | | 6 | | 30 | | | 140 | | |

| | | | | disaster | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | risk | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | assessment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | s and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | mapping | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 10 | | 25 | | | 10 | | 25 | | | 110 | | |

| | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | publication | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | s and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | report | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | produced | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | disseminat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength ening early warning systems | | Early warnin g system s strengt hened | | Number of | | | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | | early | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | warning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | systems | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 10 | | 20 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | | EWS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | informatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | n produced | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | disseminat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| Strength |

|---|

| ening |

| early |

| warning |

| systems |

| Early |

|---|

| warnin |

| g |

| system |

| s |

| strengt |

| hened |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 148

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Number of 10,0 0 15, 0 20,0 0 25,0 0 30,0 0 0 communiti 00 000 00 00 00 es, institutions reached with EWS informatio n Strength Comm Number of 10 10 10 10 15 30 15 30 15 30 110 ening unity communit commun awaren y ity ess on awareness awarene disaster programs ss on risks conducted disaster Strengt Number of 8 6 8 6 10 8 10 8 10 8 36 risks hened DRM informatio n packages developed and disseminat ed Number of 4 6 4 6 6 8 6 8 6 8 36 disaster risk assessment s conducted Strength Disaste Number of 4 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 40 ening r disaster disaster prepare emergency prepared dness readiness ness for for exercises effective effectiv conducted response e (drills, and respons evacuation recovery e and routes, recover Amount of 2.1 900 20 100 250 1000 25 800 20 600 150 y food items MT 0 0M MT 0 MT 0 MT strengt procured/ T hened pre- positioned Number of 1,50 30 1,5 30 2,00 50 2,00 50 2,00 50 210 non-food 0 00 0 0 0 items procured/ 127

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s Number of 10,0 0 15, 0 20,0 0 25,0 0 30,0 0 0 communiti 00 000 00 00 00 es, institutions reached with EWS informatio n Strength Comm Number of 10 10 10 10 15 30 15 30 15 30 110 ening unity communit commun awaren y ity ess on awareness awarene disaster programs ss on risks conducted disaster Strengt Number of 8 6 8 6 10 8 10 8 10 8 36 risks hened DRM informatio n packages developed and disseminat ed Number of 4 6 4 6 6 8 6 8 6 8 36 disaster risk assessment s conducted Strength Disaste Number of 4 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 4 8 40 ening r disaster disaster prepare emergency prepared dness readiness ness for for exercises effective effectiv conducted response e (drills, and respons evacuation recovery e and routes, recover Amount of 2.1 900 20 100 250 1000 25 800 20 600 150 y food items MT 0 0M MT 0 MT 0 MT strengt procured/ T hened pre- positioned Number of 1,50 30 1,5 30 2,00 50 2,00 50 2,00 50 210 non-food 0 00 0 0 0 items procured/ 127 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 10,0 00 | | 0 | | | 15, 000 | | 0 | | | 20,0 00 | | 0 | | | 25,0 00 | | 0 | | | 30,0 00 | | 0 | | | 0 | | |

| | | | | communiti | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | es, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | institutions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | reached | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | with EWS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | informatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength ening commun ity awarene ss on disaster risks | | Comm unity awaren ess on disaster risks Strengt hened | | Number of | | | | | 10 | | 10 | | | 10 | | 10 | | | 15 | | 30 | | | 15 | | 30 | | | 15 | | 30 | | | 110 | | |

| | | | | communit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | awareness | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | programs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 8 | | 6 | | | 8 | | 6 | | | 10 | | 8 | | | 10 | | 8 | | | 10 | | 8 | | | 36 | | |

| | | | | DRM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | informatio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | n packages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | disseminat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | ed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 4 | | 6 | | | 4 | | 6 | | | 6 | | 8 | | | 6 | | 8 | | | 6 | | 8 | | | 36 | | |

| | | | | disaster | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | risk | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | assessment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength ening disaster prepared ness for effective response and recovery | | Disaste r prepare dness for effectiv e respons e and recover y strengt hened | | Number of | | | | | 4 | | 8 | | | 4 | | 8 | | | 4 | | 8 | | | 4 | | 8 | | | 4 | | 8 | | | 40 | | |

| | | | | disaster | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | emergency | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | readiness | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | exercises | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | (drills, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | evacuation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | routes, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Amount of | | 2.1 | | | 900 MT | | 20 0 | | | 100 0M T | | 250 | | | 1000 MT | | 25 0 | | | 800 MT | | 20 0 | | | 600 MT | | 150 | | | | | |

| | | | | food items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | pre- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | positioned | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 1,50 0 | | 30 | | | 1,5 00 | | 30 | | | 2,00 0 | | 50 | | | 2,00 0 | | 50 | | | 2,00 0 | | 50 | | | 210 | | |

| | | | | non-food | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | items | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | procured/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| 10,0 |

|---|

| 00 |

| 15, |

|---|

| 000 |

| 20,0 |

|---|

| 00 |

| 25,0 |

|---|

| 00 |

| 30,0 |

|---|

| 00 |

| Strength |

|---|

| ening |

| commun |

| ity |

| awarene |

| ss on |

| disaster |

| risks |

| Comm |

|---|

| unity |

| awaren |

| ess on |

| disaster |

| risks |

| Strengt |

| hened |

| Strength |

|---|

| ening |

| disaster |

| prepared |

| ness for |

| effective |

| response |

| and |

| recovery |

| Disaste |

|---|

| r |

| prepare |

| dness |

| for |

| effectiv |

| e |

| respons |

| e and |

| recover |

| y |

| strengt |

| hened |

| 900 |

|---|

| MT |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 100 |

|---|

| 0M |

| T |

| 1000 |

|---|

| MT |

| 25 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 800 |

|---|

| MT |

| 20 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 600 |

|---|

| MT |

| 1,50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 1,5 |

|---|

| 00 |

| 2,00 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 2,00 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 2,00 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 149

Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s pre- positioned Number of 1 10 1 100 1 10 1 10 1 100 500 disaster 0 0 0 recovery and rehabilitati on schemes developed Strength Comm Number of 1.3, 4 80 4 80 6 10 6 10 6 100 460 ening unity communit 1.5 0 0 commun resilien y ity ce resilience resilienc through and special e invest programs through ment in developed investm DRM Number of 1.3, 2 60 2 60 2 60 2 60 2 60 300 ent in strengt social 1.5 DRM hened safety net programs developed 4.6.3 Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.17 presents the summary for the Social Protection, Culture and Recreation sector. Table 4.17: Social Protection Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Linked Cross Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Name Sector(s) Synergies Adverse Impact Mitigate the impact Social Protection Education Child protection Child labour, Early Back to school campaigns, marriades ,GBV Sesitization on children rights,GBv,Teenage pregnancies, Health Child protection GBV,teenage Sesitization on children pregnancies. rights,GBv,Teenage pregnancies, Ministry of Child protection, Cash Child labour,GBv. Enforcement,Implementation of interior transfer to OVC,eldely Teenage pregnancies the probono courts. Youth Education Vocational training Unskilled labour, drug Youth trainings and Development and substance abuse development 128

| Sector: Sub Key Key Links Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Total Progra Outpu Performa to Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Budget mme t nce SDG Ksh. Targ Co Tar Cos Targ Co Targ Co Targ Co Indicators target M) et st get t et st et st et st s pre- positioned Number of 1 10 1 100 1 10 1 10 1 100 500 disaster 0 0 0 recovery and rehabilitati on schemes developed Strength Comm Number of 1.3, 4 80 4 80 6 10 6 10 6 100 460 ening unity communit 1.5 0 0 commun resilien y ity ce resilience resilienc through and special e invest programs through ment in developed investm DRM Number of 1.3, 2 60 2 60 2 60 2 60 2 60 300 ent in strengt social 1.5 DRM hened safety net programs developed 4.6.3 Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector Cross-Sectoral Linkages This section presents the cross-sectoral impacts of each sectoral programme and appropriate actions to harness cross-sector synergies or mitigate adverse cross-sector impacts. Table 4.17 presents the summary for the Social Protection, Culture and Recreation sector. Table 4.17: Social Protection Cross-sectoral impacts Programme Linked Cross Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Name Sector(s) Synergies Adverse Impact Mitigate the impact Social Protection Education Child protection Child labour, Early Back to school campaigns, marriades ,GBV Sesitization on children rights,GBv,Teenage pregnancies, Health Child protection GBV,teenage Sesitization on children pregnancies. rights,GBv,Teenage pregnancies, Ministry of Child protection, Cash Child labour,GBv. Enforcement,Implementation of interior transfer to OVC,eldely Teenage pregnancies the probono courts. Youth Education Vocational training Unskilled labour, drug Youth trainings and Development and substance abuse development 128 |

|---|

| | Sector: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Outpu t | Key Performa nce Indicators | | | | Links | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Budget Ksh. M) | Total | |

| | Progra | | | | | | to | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | Budget | |

| | mme | | | | | | SDG | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | Cos t | Cos | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | Targ et | Targ | Co st | Co | | | Ksh. | |

| | | | | | | | target | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | | | | et | | st | | | get | | t | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | et | | st | | | | |

| | | | | | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | pre- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | positioned | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 1 | | 100 | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 1 | | 10 0 | | | 1 | | 100 | | | 500 | | |

| | | | | disaster | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | recovery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | rehabilitati | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | on | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | schemes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Strength ening commun ity resilienc e through investm ent in DRM | | Comm unity resilien ce through invest ment in DRM strengt hened | | Number of | | 1.3, 1.5 | | | 4 | | 80 | | | 4 | | 80 | | | 6 | | 10 0 | | | 6 | | 10 0 | | | 6 | | 100 | | | 460 | | |

| | | | | communit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | resilience | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and special | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | programs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | 1.3, 1.5 | | | 2 | | 60 | | | 2 | | 60 | | | 2 | | 60 | | | 2 | | 60 | | | 2 | | 60 | | | 300 | | |

| | | | | social | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | safety net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | programs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Outpu |

| t |

| Key |

|---|

| Performa |

| nce |

| Indicators |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Strength |

|---|

| ening |

| commun |

| ity |

| resilienc |

| e |

| through |

| investm |

| ent in |

| DRM |

| Comm |

|---|

| unity |

| resilien |

| ce |

| through |

| invest |

| ment in |

| DRM |

| strengt |

| hened |

| 1.3, |

|---|

| 1.5 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 1.3, |

|---|

| 1.5 |

| | Programme | | | Linked | | | Cross Sector Impact | | | | | | Measures to Harness or | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Name | | | Sector(s) | | | Synergies | | | Adverse Impact | | | Mitigate the impact | |

| Social Protection | Social Protection | | Education | Education | | Child protection | Child protection | | Child labour, Early marriades ,GBV | Child labour, Early | | | Back to school campaigns, | |

| | | | | | | | | | | marriades ,GBV | | | Sesitization on children | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | rights,GBv,Teenage | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | pregnancies, | |

| | | | Health | | | Child protection | | | GBV,teenage pregnancies. | | | | Sesitization on children | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | rights,GBv,Teenage | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | pregnancies, | |

| | | | Ministry of interior | | | Child protection, Cash transfer to OVC,eldely | | | Child labour,GBv. Teenage pregnancies | | | | Enforcement,Implementation of | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | the probono courts. | |

| | Youth | | Education | | | Vocational training | | | | Unskilled labour, drug | | | Youth trainings and | |

| | Development | | | | | | | | | and substance abuse | | | development | |

| GBV,teenage |

|---|

| pregnancies. |

| Ministry of |

|---|

| interior |

| Child protection, Cash |

|---|

| transfer to OVC,eldely |

| Child labour,GBv. |

|---|

| Teenage pregnancies |

Page 150

Programme Linked Cross Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Name Sector(s) Synergies Adverse Impact Mitigate the impact Health Rehabilitation, menstral Teeanage Establishement of rehabilitation hygene talks,reproductive pregnancies.drug centres. health talk, and substance Establishment of counseling abuse, high crime centres rate,un safe arbotion Sensitization on reproductive health,Menstral hygene Culture and Arts Environment Preservation of culture Endangered cultural Establishment of cultural and and natural and heritage sites and resources heritage policy, Conservation resources of forest, a forestation and enforcement Tourism Preservation of culture Reduced tourists, Preservation of culture and and heritage revenue collection and heritage high un employment rate Sports Education School sports days Wasted talent, Drug Talent identification and Development and substance nurturing, establishment of abuse,life style sports centres,Training of diseases sports perssonel. Disaster risk Agriculture promotion of food Over reliance on -multi-sectoral disaster risk management security- drought food aid planning, food security and mitigation measures nutrition assessment and intervention (KFSSG) Health bio-medical emergencies - enhance coordination of coordination information via EOC, CSG; provision of health related items and equipment during emergencies e.g. supply of necessary commodities to IDP camps Water provision of clean water -provision of safe water, and and storage facilities other related items to IDP during emergencies camps ICT Early Warning System Ensure use of technology in software installations management of early warning information systems Roads and Construction of Compliance to laws and Public works climate smart and regulations e.g. adherence to resilient building and road construction infrastructure codes, conducting proper feasibility studies on hazard prone areas Education Disaster risk Target learning institutions in information disaster risk information dissemination and dissemination and awareness awareness creation creation in learning institutions 129

| Programme Linked Cross Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Name Sector(s) Synergies Adverse Impact Mitigate the impact Health Rehabilitation, menstral Teeanage Establishement of rehabilitation hygene talks,reproductive pregnancies.drug centres. health talk, and substance Establishment of counseling abuse, high crime centres rate,un safe arbotion Sensitization on reproductive health,Menstral hygene Culture and Arts Environment Preservation of culture Endangered cultural Establishment of cultural and and natural and heritage sites and resources heritage policy, Conservation resources of forest, a forestation and enforcement Tourism Preservation of culture Reduced tourists, Preservation of culture and and heritage revenue collection and heritage high un employment rate Sports Education School sports days Wasted talent, Drug Talent identification and Development and substance nurturing, establishment of abuse,life style sports centres,Training of diseases sports perssonel. Disaster risk Agriculture promotion of food Over reliance on -multi-sectoral disaster risk management security- drought food aid planning, food security and mitigation measures nutrition assessment and intervention (KFSSG) Health bio-medical emergencies - enhance coordination of coordination information via EOC, CSG; provision of health related items and equipment during emergencies e.g. supply of necessary commodities to IDP camps Water provision of clean water -provision of safe water, and and storage facilities other related items to IDP during emergencies camps ICT Early Warning System Ensure use of technology in software installations management of early warning information systems Roads and Construction of Compliance to laws and Public works climate smart and regulations e.g. adherence to resilient building and road construction infrastructure codes, conducting proper feasibility studies on hazard prone areas Education Disaster risk Target learning institutions in information disaster risk information dissemination and dissemination and awareness awareness creation creation in learning institutions 129 |

|---|

| | Programme | | | Linked | | | Cross Sector Impact | | | | | | Measures to Harness or | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Name | | | Sector(s) | | | Synergies | | | Adverse Impact | | | Mitigate the impact | |

| | | | Health | Health | | Rehabilitation, menstral hygene talks,reproductive health talk, | Rehabilitation, menstral | | Teeanage pregnancies.drug and substance abuse, high crime rate,un safe arbotion | Teeanage | | | Establishement of rehabilitation | |

| | | | | | | | hygene talks,reproductive | | | pregnancies.drug | | | centres. | |

| | | | | | | | health talk, | | | and substance | | | Establishment of counseling | |

| | | | | | | | | | | abuse, high crime | | | centres | |

| | | | | | | | | | | rate,un safe | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | arbotion | | | Sensitization on reproductive | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | health,Menstral hygene | |

| Culture and Arts | | | Environment and natural resources | | | Preservation of culture and heritage | | | Endangered cultural sites and resources | | | | Establishment of cultural and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | heritage policy, Conservation | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | of forest, a forestation and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | enforcement | |

| | | | Tourism | | | Preservation of culture and heritage | | | | Reduced tourists, | | Preservation of culture and heritage | Preservation of culture and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | revenue collection and | | | heritage | |

| | | | | | | | | | | high un employment | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | rate | | | | |

| Sports Development | | | Education | | | School sports days | | | | Wasted talent, Drug | | | Talent identification and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | and substance | | | nurturing, establishment of | |

| | | | | | | | | | | abuse,life style | | | sports centres,Training of | |

| | | | | | | | | | | diseases | | | sports perssonel. | |

| Disaster risk management | | | Agriculture | | | promotion of food security- drought mitigation measures | | | Over reliance on food aid | Over reliance on | | | -multi-sectoral disaster risk | |

| | | | | | | | | | | food aid | | | planning, food security and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | nutrition assessment and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | intervention (KFSSG) | |

| | | | Health | | | bio-medical emergencies coordination | | | | | | | - enhance coordination of | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | information via EOC, CSG; | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | provision of health related | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | items and equipment during | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | emergencies e.g. supply of | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | necessary commodities to IDP | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | camps | |

| | | | Water | | | | provision of clean water | | | | | | -provision of safe water, and | |

| | | | | | | | and storage facilities | | | | | | other related items to IDP | |

| | | | | | | | during emergencies | | | | | | camps | |

| | | | ICT | | | Early Warning System software installations | Early Warning System | | | | | | Ensure use of technology in | |

| | | | | | | | software installations | | | | | | management of early warning | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | information systems | |

| | | | Roads and Public works | | | Construction of climate smart and resilient infrastructure | | | | | | | Compliance to laws and | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | regulations e.g. adherence to | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | building and road construction | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | codes, conducting proper | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | feasibility studies on hazard | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | prone areas | |

| | | | Education | | | | Disaster risk | | | | | Target learning institutions in disaster risk information dissemination and awareness creation | Target learning institutions in | |

| | | | | | | | information | | | | | | disaster risk information | |

| | | | | | | | dissemination and | | | | | | dissemination and awareness | |

| | | | | | | | awareness creation | | | | | | creation | |

| | | | | | | | in learning | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | institutions | | | | | | | |

| Environment |

|---|

| and natural |

| resources |

| Preservation of culture |

|---|

| and heritage |

| Endangered cultural |

|---|

| sites and resources |

| Preservation of culture |

|---|

| and heritage |

| Sports |

|---|

| Development |

| Disaster risk |

|---|

| management |

| promotion of food |

|---|

| security- drought |

| mitigation measures |

| bio-medical emergencies |

|---|

| coordination |

| Roads and |

|---|

| Public works |

| Construction of |

|---|

| climate smart and |

| resilient |

| infrastructure |

Page 151

Programme Linked Cross Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Name Sector(s) Synergies Adverse Impact Mitigate the impact Environment Mitigation of Develop mitigation strategies to climate related combat climate-related disaster/ disasters hazards (joint programming) 4.7. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries This sector comprises of three sub-sectors: Agriculture; Livestock Development; and Fisheries. Vision: A modern, Responsive, innovative and commercially-oriented Agriculture, Rural and urban Development Sector. Mission: To improve livelihoods of the people through promotion of innovative research, equitable distribution and sustainable management of land resources and sustainable urban development and human settlement. Sector Goal: To ensure an environment supportive of sustainable rural and urban development. 4.7.1 Agriculture Sector Priorities and Strategies Strategies to achieve sector priorities s proposed in relation to root causes of development issues. Information in this section are presented in Table 4.18. 130

| Programme Linked Cross Sector Impact Measures to Harness or Name Sector(s) Synergies Adverse Impact Mitigate the impact Environment Mitigation of Develop mitigation strategies to climate related combat climate-related disaster/ disasters hazards (joint programming) 4.7. Agriculture, Livestock Development and Fisheries This sector comprises of three sub-sectors: Agriculture; Livestock Development; and Fisheries. Vision: A modern, Responsive, innovative and commercially-oriented Agriculture, Rural and urban Development Sector. Mission: To improve livelihoods of the people through promotion of innovative research, equitable distribution and sustainable management of land resources and sustainable urban development and human settlement. Sector Goal: To ensure an environment supportive of sustainable rural and urban development. 4.7.1 Agriculture Sector Priorities and Strategies Strategies to achieve sector priorities s proposed in relation to root causes of development issues. Information in this section are presented in Table 4.18. 130 |

|---|

| | Programme | | | Linked | | | Cross Sector Impact | | | | | | Measures to Harness or | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| | Name | | | Sector(s) | | | Synergies | | | Adverse Impact | | | Mitigate the impact | |

| | | | Environment | Environment | | | Mitigation of | | | | | | Develop mitigation strategies to | |

| | | | | | | | climate related | | | | | | combat climate-related disaster/ | |

| | | | | | | | disasters | | | | | | hazards (joint programming) | |

Page 152

Table 4.18: Agriculture Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To Improve crop production Promote crop diversification Promote modern farming technologies Promote irrigation Enhance access to affordable quality farm inputs Promote soil fertility management practices Promote post-harvest management Enhance extension services Strengthen pest and disease control Increase market Access Promote value addition of agricultural produce Strengthen legal/Policy framework Promote farmers access to affordable credit facilities Promote agro-marketing cooperatives To Improve Livestock production Promote fodder and pasture development Promote appropriate water harvesting techniques for livestock use Promote breed improvement Diversified livestock production Farm input subsidies e.g. vaccines, mineral licks Enhanced extension services Pest and Disease control and management Promote Market Access Promote Value Addition Promote agro-marketing cooperatives To improve fisheries production Promote marine and aquaculture fish production Promote use of modern fishing and storage technologies Enhanced extension services Promote diversified farming of other marine products Promote input subsidies Promote market access Promote sustainable fisheries governance Promote fisher-marketing cooperatives Legal/Policy framework 131

| Table 4.18: Agriculture Sector Priorities and Strategies Sector Priorities Strategies To Improve crop production Promote crop diversification Promote modern farming technologies Promote irrigation Enhance access to affordable quality farm inputs Promote soil fertility management practices Promote post-harvest management Enhance extension services Strengthen pest and disease control Increase market Access Promote value addition of agricultural produce Strengthen legal/Policy framework Promote farmers access to affordable credit facilities Promote agro-marketing cooperatives To Improve Livestock production Promote fodder and pasture development Promote appropriate water harvesting techniques for livestock use Promote breed improvement Diversified livestock production Farm input subsidies e.g. vaccines, mineral licks Enhanced extension services Pest and Disease control and management Promote Market Access Promote Value Addition Promote agro-marketing cooperatives To improve fisheries production Promote marine and aquaculture fish production Promote use of modern fishing and storage technologies Enhanced extension services Promote diversified farming of other marine products Promote input subsidies Promote market access Promote sustainable fisheries governance Promote fisher-marketing cooperatives Legal/Policy framework 131 |

|---|

| | Sector Priorities | | | Strategies | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| To Improve crop production | To Improve crop production | | | Promote crop diversification | |

| | | | | Promote modern farming technologies | |

| | | | | Promote irrigation | |

| | | | | Enhance access to affordable quality farm inputs | |

| | | | | Promote soil fertility management practices | |

| | | | | Promote post-harvest management | |

| | | | | Enhance extension services | |

| | | | | Strengthen pest and disease control | |

| | | | | Increase market Access | |

| | | | | Promote value addition of agricultural produce | |

| | | | | Strengthen legal/Policy framework | |

| | | | | Promote farmers access to affordable credit | |

| | | | | facilities | |

| | | | | Promote agro-marketing cooperatives | |

| To Improve Livestock production | | | | Promote fodder and pasture development | |

| | | | | Promote appropriate water harvesting techniques for livestock | |

| | | | | use | |

| | | | | Promote breed improvement | |

| | | | | Diversified livestock production | |

| | | | | Farm input subsidies e.g. vaccines, mineral licks | |

| | | | | Enhanced extension services | |

| | | | | Pest and Disease control and management | |

| | | | | Promote Market Access | |

| | | | | Promote Value Addition | |

| | | | | Promote agro-marketing cooperatives | |

| To improve fisheries production | | | Promote marine and aquaculture fish production Promote use of modern fishing and storage technologies Enhanced extension services Promote diversified farming of other marine products Promote input subsidies Promote market access Promote sustainable fisheries governance Promote fisher-marketing cooperatives Legal/Policy framework | Promote marine and aquaculture fish production | |

| | | | | Promote use of modern fishing and storage technologies | |

| | | | | Enhanced extension services | |

| | | | | Promote diversified farming of other marine products | |

| | | | | Promote input subsidies | |

| | | | | Promote market access | |

| | | | | Promote sustainable fisheries governance | |

| | | | | Promote fisher-marketing cooperatives | |

| | | | | Legal/Policy framework | |

| To improve fisheries production |

|---|

Page 153

4.7.2 Agriculture Sector Programmes This section provides sector programmes to be implemented within the planned period as presented 4.19. Table 4.19: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sector Programme Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) Programme: Crop Production Programme Objective: To increase crop production Programme Outcome: increased crop production Irrigatio Irrigation No. of Irrigation SDG 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 115 n schemes schemes 1.5, 0 0 0 0 0 0 Develop developed/ development 2.4 ment Rehabilitate No. of irrigation 4 64 4 64 3 48 4 74 0 0 250 d schemes rehabilitated Number of acres 100 10 300 30 300 30 200 20 100 10 100 under irrigation(new) Number of 0 0 5 10 7 14 7 14 0 0 38 model irrigation schemes established Water No. of water 1 5 210 90 110 70 110 70 110 70 305 harvesting harvesting structures structures for developed Irrigation No. of water 2 6 5 15 5 15 5 15 5 15 66 Developed harvesting structures rehabilitated Input Input No. of farmers SDG 700 0 700 0 700 0 700 0 700 0 0 subsidie subsidies reached through 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 s for farmers input subsidies provided Quantities of inputs distributed to farmers Seeds (tons) 89 16 93 11 93 11 93 11 93 11 114 1 4 4 4 4 0 fertilizer(tons) 350 70 350 70 350 70 350 70 350 70 132

| 4.7.2 Agriculture Sector Programmes This section provides sector programmes to be implemented within the planned period as presented 4.19. Table 4.19: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sector Programme Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) Programme: Crop Production Programme Objective: To increase crop production Programme Outcome: increased crop production Irrigatio Irrigation No. of Irrigation SDG 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 1 23 115 n schemes schemes 1.5, 0 0 0 0 0 0 Develop developed/ development 2.4 ment Rehabilitate No. of irrigation 4 64 4 64 3 48 4 74 0 0 250 d schemes rehabilitated Number of acres 100 10 300 30 300 30 200 20 100 10 100 under irrigation(new) Number of 0 0 5 10 7 14 7 14 0 0 38 model irrigation schemes established Water No. of water 1 5 210 90 110 70 110 70 110 70 305 harvesting harvesting structures structures for developed Irrigation No. of water 2 6 5 15 5 15 5 15 5 15 66 Developed harvesting structures rehabilitated Input Input No. of farmers SDG 700 0 700 0 700 0 700 0 700 0 0 subsidie subsidies reached through 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 s for farmers input subsidies provided Quantities of inputs distributed to farmers Seeds (tons) 89 16 93 11 93 11 93 11 93 11 114 1 4 4 4 4 0 fertilizer(tons) 350 70 350 70 350 70 350 70 350 70 132 |

|---|

| | Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | Key Performance Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tot | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | | al | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | | Bu | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dge | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | | st | | | get | | | os | | | get | | | st | | | get | | | os | | | get | | | os | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | t | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | Programme: Crop Production | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To increase crop production | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: increased crop production | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Irrigatio n Develop ment | Irrigatio | Irrigation schemes developed/ Rehabilitate d | | No. of Irrigation | | | SDG | | 1 | | | 23 0 | | | 1 | | | 23 0 | | | 1 | | | 23 0 | | | 1 | | | 23 0 | | | 1 | | | 23 0 | | | 115 0 | 115 | |

| | n | | | schemes | | | 1.5, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | |

| | Develop | | | development | | | 2.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ment | | | No. of irrigation | | | | | 4 | | | 64 | | | 4 | | | 64 | | | 3 | | | 48 | | | 4 | | | 74 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 250 | | |

| | | | | schemes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | rehabilitated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of acres | | | | | 100 | | | 10 | | | 300 | | | 30 | | | 300 | | | 30 | | | 200 | | | 20 | | | 100 | | | 10 | | | 100 | | |

| | | | | under | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | irrigation(new) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Number of | | | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 10 | | | 7 | | | 14 | | | 7 | | | 14 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 38 | | |

| | | | | model irrigation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | schemes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Water harvesting structures for Irrigation Developed | | No. of water | | | | | 1 | | | 5 | | | 210 | | | 90 | | | 110 | | | 70 | | | 110 | | | 70 | | | 110 | | | 70 | | | 305 | | |

| | | | | harvesting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | structures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | No. of water | | | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 5 | | | 15 | | | 5 | | | 15 | | | 5 | | | 15 | | | 5 | | | 15 | | | 66 | | |

| | | | | harvesting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | structures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | rehabilitated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Input subsidie s | | Input subsidies for farmers provided | No. of farmers reached through input subsidies | No. of farmers | | SDG 2.3 | | | 700 0 | | | 0 | | | 700 0 | | | 0 | | | 700 0 | | | 0 | | | 700 0 | | | 0 | | | 700 0 | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |

| | | | | reached through | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | input subsidies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Quantities of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | inputs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | distributed to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | farmers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Seeds (tons) | Seeds (tons) | | | | | 89 | | | | 16 | | 93 | | | | 11 | | 93 | | | | 11 | | 93 | | | | 11 | | 93 | | | | 11 | | | 114 | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | 4 | | | 0 | |

| | | | | fertilizer(tons) | | | | | | 350 | | | 70 | | | 350 | | | 70 | | | 350 | | | 70 | | | 350 | | | 70 | | | 350 | | | 70 | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performance |

| Indicators |

| Link |

|---|

| ages |

| to |

| SDG |

| targe |

| ts |

| Irrigation |

|---|

| schemes |

| developed/ |

| Rehabilitate |

| d |

| 23 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 23 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 23 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 23 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 23 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Water |

|---|

| harvesting |

| structures |

| for |

| Irrigation |

| Developed |

| Input |

|---|

| subsidie |

| s |

| Input |

|---|

| subsidies |

| for farmers |

| provided |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

Page 154

Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) Agrochemicals(l 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 trs) 3M 24 3M 24 3M 24 3M 24 3M 24 Cutting/suckers( no. in millions) Extensi Extension No. of technical SDG 30 30 30 30 30 150 on service staff recruited 2.4 services staff recruited Extension No. of extension SDG 110 140 170 200 230 staff trained staff trained 2.4 Career 15 1 15 1 15 progression 5 5 Other trainings 15 15 15 15 15 Farmers No. of farmers SDG 700 24 700 24 700 24 700 24 700 24 120 reached reached through 2.4 00 00 00 00 00 through extension extension No. of farmers SDG 350 5 350 5 350 5 350 5 350 5 25 reached through 2.4 0 0 0 0 0 FFS Model Equipment No. of SDG 70 7 70 12 70 12 70 12 70 12 55 distributed equipment 2.3, distributed for 2.4 extension service delivery No. of SDG 15 10 15 10 15 10 15 10 15 10 50 vehicles/motorbi 2.3 kes distributed for extension services Weather Number of SDG 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 15 advisories weather 2.4 disseminate advisories d developed and disseminated Coordinatio No. of SDG 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 10 n forums coordination 2.4 held forums held Agricultura ATC operational SDG 1 54. 1 88 1 18 1 19 1 12 647 l training in Competency 2.4 85 8.5 6 0 .35 center Based education operational and training 133

| Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) Agrochemicals(l 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 trs) 3M 24 3M 24 3M 24 3M 24 3M 24 Cutting/suckers( no. in millions) Extensi Extension No. of technical SDG 30 30 30 30 30 150 on service staff recruited 2.4 services staff recruited Extension No. of extension SDG 110 140 170 200 230 staff trained staff trained 2.4 Career 15 1 15 1 15 progression 5 5 Other trainings 15 15 15 15 15 Farmers No. of farmers SDG 700 24 700 24 700 24 700 24 700 24 120 reached reached through 2.4 00 00 00 00 00 through extension extension No. of farmers SDG 350 5 350 5 350 5 350 5 350 5 25 reached through 2.4 0 0 0 0 0 FFS Model Equipment No. of SDG 70 7 70 12 70 12 70 12 70 12 55 distributed equipment 2.3, distributed for 2.4 extension service delivery No. of SDG 15 10 15 10 15 10 15 10 15 10 50 vehicles/motorbi 2.3 kes distributed for extension services Weather Number of SDG 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 15 advisories weather 2.4 disseminate advisories d developed and disseminated Coordinatio No. of SDG 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 10 n forums coordination 2.4 held forums held Agricultura ATC operational SDG 1 54. 1 88 1 18 1 19 1 12 647 l training in Competency 2.4 85 8.5 6 0 .35 center Based education operational and training 133 |

|---|

| | Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performance Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tot | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | | al | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | | Bu | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dge | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | get | | | st | | | get | | | os | | | get | | | st | | | get | | | os | | | get | | | os | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | t | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | Agrochemicals(l | | | | | 100 | | | 20 | | | 100 | | | 20 | | | 100 | | | 20 | | | 100 | | | 20 | | | 100 | | | 20 | | | | | |

| | | | | | | trs) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | 3M | | | 24 | | | 3M | | | 24 | | | 3M | | | 24 | | | 3M | | | 24 | | | 3M | | | 24 | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Cutting/suckers( | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | no. in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Extensi on services | | | Extension | | No. of technical staff recruited | No. of technical | | SDG 2.4 | | | 30 | | | | | | 30 | | | | | | 30 | | | | | | 30 | | | | | | 30 | | | | | | 150 | | |

| | | | service | | | staff recruited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | staff | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | recruited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Extension staff trained | Extension | | | No. of extension | | | SDG | | 110 | | | | | | 140 | | | | | | 170 | | | | | | 200 | | | | | | 230 | | | | | | | | |

| | | | staff trained | | | staff trained | | | 2.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Career | | | | | | | | 15 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | | 15 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | | | 15 | | | | |

| | | | | | | progression | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Other trainings | | | | | | | | | 15 | | | | | | 15 | | | | | | 15 | | | | | | 15 | | | | | | 15 | | | | |

| | | Farmers reached through extension | | | | No. of farmers | | SDG 2.4 | SDG | | 700 00 | 700 | | 24 | 24 | | 700 00 | 700 | | 24 | 24 | | 700 00 | 700 | | 24 | 24 | | 700 00 | 700 | | 24 | 24 | | 700 00 | 700 | | 24 | 24 | | 120 | 120 | |

| | | | | | | reached through | | | 2.4 | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | extension | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of farmers | | SDG 2.4 | | | 350 0 | | | 5 | | | 350 0 | | | 5 | | | 350 0 | | | 5 | | | 350 0 | | | 5 | | | 350 0 | | | 5 | | | 25 | | |

| | | | | | | reached through | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | FFS Model | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Equipment distributed | | | | No. of | | SDG 2.3, 2.4 | | | 70 | | | 7 | | | 70 | | | 12 | | | 70 | | | 12 | | | 70 | | | 12 | | | 70 | | | 12 | | | 55 | | |

| | | | | | | equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | distributed for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | extension | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | service delivery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of | | SDG 2.3 | | | 15 | | | 10 | | | 15 | | | 10 | | | 15 | | | 10 | | | 15 | | | 10 | | | 15 | | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | | | | vehicles/motorbi | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | kes distributed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | for extension | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Weather advisories disseminate d | | | | Number of | | SDG 2.4 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 2 | | | 3 | | | 15 | | |

| | | | | | | weather | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | advisories | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | developed and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | disseminated | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Coordinatio | | | No. of | | SDG 2.4 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 4 | | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | n forums | | | coordination | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | held | | | forums held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Agricultura | | | ATC operational | | SDG 2.4 | | | 1 | | | 54. 85 | | | 1 | | | 88 | | | 1 | | | 18 8.5 | | | 1 | | | 19 6 | | | 1 | | | 12 0 | | | 647 .35 | | |

| | | | l training | | | in Competency | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | center | | | Based education | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | operational | | | and training | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performance |

| Indicators |

| Link |

|---|

| ages |

| to |

| SDG |

| targe |

| ts |

| Extensi |

|---|

| on |

| services |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4 |

| Farmers |

|---|

| reached |

| through |

| extension |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Equipment |

|---|

| distributed |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3, |

| 2.4 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3 |

| Weather |

|---|

| advisories |

| disseminate |

| d |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4 |

| 54. |

|---|

| 85 |

| 18 |

|---|

| 8.5 |

| 19 |

|---|

| 6 |

| 12 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 647 |

|---|

| .35 |

Page 155

Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) An Operational SDG 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 10 agricultural research center 2a , livestock Number of SDG 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 10 & maritime research 2a research extension liaison institute meetings held research center in collaboratio n with higher institutions of learning established Acts/ No. of acts/ SDG 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 10 policies/ policies/strategie 2a strategies/re s/regulations gulations and action plans and action domesticated/ plans developed developed Soil Soil No. of SDG 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 quality fertility technologies 2.4, manage managemen disseminated for 2a ment t soil fertility technologie management s disseminate d Farms with No. of farms SDG 0 0 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 4 terraces with Terraces 2.4 done Mechan Farmers No. of farmers SDG 350 10 350 10 350 10 350 10 350 10 500 ization accessing accessing 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agricultura Agricultural l Mechanization Mechanizat services ion services Diversif Tree No. of tree SDG 360, 65 920, 13 450, 10 450, 10 450, 10 505 ied crop seedlings seedlings 2a 000 000 4 000 2 000 2 000 2 producti planted planted by type on Traditional Quantity in tons SDG 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 High value of Traditional 2a 134

| Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) An Operational SDG 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 10 agricultural research center 2a , livestock Number of SDG 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 10 & maritime research 2a research extension liaison institute meetings held research center in collaboratio n with higher institutions of learning established Acts/ No. of acts/ SDG 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 10 policies/ policies/strategie 2a strategies/re s/regulations gulations and action plans and action domesticated/ plans developed developed Soil Soil No. of SDG 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 quality fertility technologies 2.4, manage managemen disseminated for 2a ment t soil fertility technologie management s disseminate d Farms with No. of farms SDG 0 0 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 4 terraces with Terraces 2.4 done Mechan Farmers No. of farmers SDG 350 10 350 10 350 10 350 10 350 10 500 ization accessing accessing 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agricultura Agricultural l Mechanization Mechanizat services ion services Diversif Tree No. of tree SDG 360, 65 920, 13 450, 10 450, 10 450, 10 505 ied crop seedlings seedlings 2a 000 000 4 000 2 000 2 000 2 producti planted planted by type on Traditional Quantity in tons SDG 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 High value of Traditional 2a 134 |

|---|

| | Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performance Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tot | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | al | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | C os t | C | | | Bu | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dge | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | os | | | get | | st | | | get | | os | | | get | | os | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | t | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | An | | | Operational | | | SDG | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 1 | | 10 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 10 | 10 | |

| | | | agricultural | | | research center | | | 2a | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | , livestock | | Number of research extension liaison meetings held | Number of | | SDG 2a | SDG | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | & maritime | | | research | | | 2a | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | research | | | extension liaison | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | institute | | | meetings held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | research | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | center in | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | collaboratio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | n with | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | higher | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | institutions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | of learning | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Acts/ | | No. of acts/ policies/strategie s/regulations and action plans domesticated/ developed | | | SDG 2a | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | policies/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | strategies/re | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | gulations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | and action | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Soil quality manage ment | | | Soil | | No. of technologies disseminated for soil fertility management | | | SDG 2.4, 2a | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | fertility | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | managemen | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | t | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | technologie | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | disseminate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | d | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Farms with | | No. of farms with Terraces | | | SDG 2.4 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 50 | | 1 | | | 50 | | 1 | | | 50 | | 1 | | | 50 | | 1 | | | 4 | | |

| | | | terraces | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | done | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Mechan ization | | | Farmers | | No. of farmers accessing Agricultural Mechanization services | | | SDG 2.3 | | | 350 0 | | 10 0 | | | 350 0 | | 10 0 | | | 350 0 | | 10 0 | | | 350 0 | | 10 0 | | | 350 0 | | 10 0 | | | 500 | | |

| | | | accessing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Agricultura | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | l | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Mechanizat | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ion services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Diversif ied crop producti on | | | Tree | | | No. of tree | | SDG 2a | | | 360, 000 | | 65 | | | 920, 000 | | 13 4 | | | 450, 000 | | 10 2 | | | 450, 000 | | 10 2 | | | 450, 000 | | 10 2 | | | 505 | | |

| | | | seedlings | | | seedlings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | planted | | | planted by type | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Traditional | | | Quantity in tons | | | SDG | | 10 | | 10 | | | 10 | | 10 | | | 10 | | 10 | | | 10 | | 10 | | | 10 | | 10 | | | 50 | | |

| | | | High value | | | of Traditional | | | 2a | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performance |

| Indicators |

| Link |

|---|

| ages |

| to |

| SDG |

| targe |

| ts |

| No. of acts/ |

|---|

| policies/strategie |

| s/regulations |

| and action plans |

| domesticated/ |

| developed |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2a |

| Soil |

|---|

| quality |

| manage |

| ment |

| No. of |

|---|

| technologies |

| disseminated for |

| soil fertility |

| management |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4, |

| 2a |

| No. of farms |

|---|

| with Terraces |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4 |

| Mechan |

|---|

| ization |

| No. of farmers |

|---|

| accessing |

| Agricultural |

| Mechanization |

| services |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Diversif |

|---|

| ied crop |

| producti |

| on |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2a |

| 360, |

|---|

| 000 |

| 920, |

|---|

| 000 |

| 13 |

|---|

| 4 |

| 450, |

|---|

| 000 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 2 |

| 450, |

|---|

| 000 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 2 |

| 450, |

|---|

| 000 |

| 10 |

|---|

| 2 |

Page 156

Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) crops High Value seeds/cuttin crops gs/vines seeds/vines/plan planted ting material distributed to farmers No. of farmers SDG 350 350 350 350 350 growing 2a 0 0 0 0 0 traditional high value crops Cashew nut No. of acreage SDG 800 5 200 7 410 10 410 10 410 10 42 and under cashew 2a 0 0 0 0 coconut nut and coconut trees planted Market Marketing No. of SDG 35 7 35 7 35 7 35 7 35 7 35 access infrastructu marketing 2b, re infrastructure 2c developed developed (cottage processing plants Farmers No. of farmers SDG 175 2 175 2 175 2 175 2 175 2 10 accessing accessing 2b, 0 0 0 0 0 markets for market 2c their products Value chain No. of Value SDG 0 0 10 3 10 3 10 3 10 3 12 coordinatio chain 2b, n forums coordination 2c Held forums held Agro- No. of Agro- SDG 0 0 1 50 1 50 1 50 0 0 150 processing processing 2b, 0 0 0 0 plants plants 2c functional operationalized Value No. of value SDG 70 14 70 14 70 14 70 14 70 14 70 addition addition 2.3 equipment equipment purchased purchased Marketing Number of SDG 5 1 30 2 15 3 10 2 10 2 14 organizatio marketing 2c ns organizations functional 135

| Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) crops High Value seeds/cuttin crops gs/vines seeds/vines/plan planted ting material distributed to farmers No. of farmers SDG 350 350 350 350 350 growing 2a 0 0 0 0 0 traditional high value crops Cashew nut No. of acreage SDG 800 5 200 7 410 10 410 10 410 10 42 and under cashew 2a 0 0 0 0 coconut nut and coconut trees planted Market Marketing No. of SDG 35 7 35 7 35 7 35 7 35 7 35 access infrastructu marketing 2b, re infrastructure 2c developed developed (cottage processing plants Farmers No. of farmers SDG 175 2 175 2 175 2 175 2 175 2 10 accessing accessing 2b, 0 0 0 0 0 markets for market 2c their products Value chain No. of Value SDG 0 0 10 3 10 3 10 3 10 3 12 coordinatio chain 2b, n forums coordination 2c Held forums held Agro- No. of Agro- SDG 0 0 1 50 1 50 1 50 0 0 150 processing processing 2b, 0 0 0 0 plants plants 2c functional operationalized Value No. of value SDG 70 14 70 14 70 14 70 14 70 14 70 addition addition 2.3 equipment equipment purchased purchased Marketing Number of SDG 5 1 30 2 15 3 10 2 10 2 14 organizatio marketing 2c ns organizations functional 135 |

|---|

| | Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performance Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tot | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | al | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | C os t | C | | | Bu | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dge | |

| | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | os | | | get | | st | | | get | | os | | | get | | os | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | t | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | crops seeds/cuttin gs/vines planted | | | | High Value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | crops | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | seeds/vines/plan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | ting material | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | distributed to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | farmers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | No. of farmers | | SDG 2a | 350 0 | | | | | 350 0 | | | | | 350 0 | | | | | 350 0 | | | | | 350 0 | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | growing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | traditional high | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | value crops | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Cashew nut | | No. of acreage under cashew nut and coconut | No. of acreage | | SDG 2a | 800 | | 5 | | | 200 0 | | 7 | | | 410 0 | | 10 | | | 410 0 | | 10 | | | 410 0 | | 10 | | | 42 | | |

| | | | and | | | under cashew | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | coconut | | | nut and coconut | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | trees | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | planted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Market access | | Marketing infrastructu re developed | Marketing | | | No. of | | SDG 2b, 2c | 35 | | 7 | | | 35 | | 7 | | | 35 | | 7 | | | 35 | | 7 | | | 35 | | 7 | | | 35 | | |

| | | | infrastructu | | | marketing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | re | | | infrastructure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | developed | | | developed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | (cottage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | processing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | plants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Farmers | | No. of farmers accessing market | No. of farmers | | SDG 2b, 2c | 175 0 | | 2 | | | 175 0 | | 2 | | | 175 0 | | 2 | | | 175 0 | | 2 | | | 175 0 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | accessing | | | accessing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | markets for | | | market | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | their | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | products | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Value chain | | | No. of Value | | SDG 2b, 2c | 0 | | 0 | | | 10 | | 3 | | | 10 | | 3 | | | 10 | | 3 | | | 10 | | 3 | | | 12 | | |

| | | | coordinatio | | | chain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | n forums | | | coordination | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Held | | | forums held | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Agro- | | | No. of Agro- | | SDG 2b, 2c | 0 | | 0 | | | 1 | | 50 0 | | | 1 | | 50 0 | | | 1 | | 50 0 | | | 0 | | 0 | | | 150 0 | | |

| | | | processing | | | processing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | plants | | | plants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | functional | | | operationalized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Value | | | No. of value | | SDG 2.3 | 70 | | 14 | | | 70 | | 14 | | | 70 | | 14 | | | 70 | | 14 | | | 70 | | 14 | | | 70 | | |

| | | | addition | | | addition | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | equipment | | | equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | purchased | | | purchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Marketing | | Number of marketing organizations | Number of | | SDG 2c | 5 | | 1 | | | 30 | | 2 | | | 15 | | 3 | | | 10 | | 2 | | | 10 | | 2 | | | 14 | | |

| | | | organizatio | | | marketing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | ns | | | organizations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | functional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performance |

| Indicators |

| Link |

|---|

| ages |

| to |

| SDG |

| targe |

| ts |

| crops |

|---|

| seeds/cuttin |

| gs/vines |

| planted |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2a |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 350 |

|---|

| 0 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2a |

| 200 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 410 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 410 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 410 |

|---|

| 0 |

| Market |

|---|

| access |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2b, |

| 2c |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2b, |

| 2c |

| 175 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 175 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 175 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 175 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 175 |

|---|

| 0 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2b, |

| 2c |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2b, |

| 2c |

| 50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 50 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 150 |

|---|

| 0 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2c |

Page 157

Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) organized and functional Financi Farmers No. of farmers SDG 0 700 2 700 2 700 2 700 2 8 al accessing accessing 1.5, 0 0 0 0 services affordable affordable 2c financial financial services services Programme: Livestock Production Programme Objective: To increase livestock production Programme Outcome: increased livestock production Fodder Acreage of No. of acres SDG 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 35 and Pasture and under pasture 2.3 pasture fodder and fodder develop established ment Production No. of SDG 35 0.7 35 0. 35 0.7 35 0. 35 0. 3.5 equipment production 2.3 7 7 7 used Equipment distributed and in use Mechanizat No. of SDG 35 0.3 35 0. 35 0.3 35 0. 35 0. 1.7 ion mechanized 2.3, 5 35 5 35 35 5 equipment Equipment 2a used distributed and in use Storage No. of storage SDG 70 7 70 7 70 7 70 7 70 7 35 facilities facilities 2a constructed constructed and and in use in use Water Water No. of water SDG 35 17 35 17 35 17 35 17 35 17 875 Harvesti harvesting harvesting 2.4, 5 5 5 5 5 ng structures structures 2a techniq developed developed and ues and in use in use Breed Artificial No. of Artificial SDG 800 6.4 800 6. 100 6.4 100 6. 100 6. 32 improve Inseminatio Insemination 2a, 4 0 0 4 0 4 ment n done 2.5 conducted Improved No. of improved breeds breeds distributed distributed Dairy heifers, SDG 600 90 900 13 900 13 1,20 18 1,20 18 720 2.5 5 5 0 0 0 0 136

| Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) organized and functional Financi Farmers No. of farmers SDG 0 700 2 700 2 700 2 700 2 8 al accessing accessing 1.5, 0 0 0 0 services affordable affordable 2c financial financial services services Programme: Livestock Production Programme Objective: To increase livestock production Programme Outcome: increased livestock production Fodder Acreage of No. of acres SDG 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 700 7 35 and Pasture and under pasture 2.3 pasture fodder and fodder develop established ment Production No. of SDG 35 0.7 35 0. 35 0.7 35 0. 35 0. 3.5 equipment production 2.3 7 7 7 used Equipment distributed and in use Mechanizat No. of SDG 35 0.3 35 0. 35 0.3 35 0. 35 0. 1.7 ion mechanized 2.3, 5 35 5 35 35 5 equipment Equipment 2a used distributed and in use Storage No. of storage SDG 70 7 70 7 70 7 70 7 70 7 35 facilities facilities 2a constructed constructed and and in use in use Water Water No. of water SDG 35 17 35 17 35 17 35 17 35 17 875 Harvesti harvesting harvesting 2.4, 5 5 5 5 5 ng structures structures 2a techniq developed developed and ues and in use in use Breed Artificial No. of Artificial SDG 800 6.4 800 6. 100 6.4 100 6. 100 6. 32 improve Inseminatio Insemination 2a, 4 0 0 4 0 4 ment n done 2.5 conducted Improved No. of improved breeds breeds distributed distributed Dairy heifers, SDG 600 90 900 13 900 13 1,20 18 1,20 18 720 2.5 5 5 0 0 0 0 136 |

|---|

| | Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | | Key Output | | | Key Performance Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tot | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | | al | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | | Bu | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dge | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | get | | st | | | get | | os | | | get | | st | | | get | | | os | | | get | | | os | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | t | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | | | organized and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | functional | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Financi al services | | | | Farmers | | | No. of farmers | | SDG 1.5, 2c | | | 0 | | | | | 700 0 | | 2 | | | 700 0 | | 2 | | | 700 0 | | | 2 | | | 700 0 | | | 2 | | | 8 | | |

| | | | | accessing | | | accessing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | affordable | | | affordable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | financial | | | financial | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | services | | | services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme: Livestock Production | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Objective: To increase livestock production | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Programme Outcome: increased livestock production | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Fodder and pasture develop ment | Fodder | | | Acreage of | | No. of acres under pasture and fodder | | | SDG 2.3 | | | 700 | | 7 | | | 700 | | 7 | | | 700 | | 7 | | | 700 | | | 7 | | | 700 | | | 7 | | | 35 | 35 | |

| | and | | | Pasture and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | pasture | | | fodder | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | develop | | | established | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ment | | Production equipment used | Production | | | No. of | | SDG 2.3 | | | 35 | | 0.7 | | | 35 | | 0. 7 | | | 35 | | 0.7 | | | 35 | | | 0. 7 | | | 35 | | | 0. 7 | | | 3.5 | | |

| | | | | equipment | | | production | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | used | | | Equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | distributed and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | in use | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Mechanizat ion equipment used | | | | No. of | | SDG 2.3, 2a | | | 35 | | 0.3 5 | | | 35 | | 0. 35 | | | 35 | | 0.3 5 | | | 35 | | | 0. 35 | | | 35 | | | 0. 35 | | | 1.7 5 | | |

| | | | | | | | mechanized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | Equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | distributed and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | | in use | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Storage | | | No. of storage | | SDG 2a | | | 70 | | 7 | | | 70 | | 7 | | | 70 | | 7 | | | 70 | | | 7 | | | 70 | | | 7 | | | 35 | | |

| | | | | facilities | | | facilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | constructed | | | constructed and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | and in use | | | in use | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | Water | | | Water | | | No. of water | | SDG 2.4, 2a | | | 35 | | 17 5 | | | 35 | | 17 5 | | | 35 | | 17 5 | | | 35 | | | 17 5 | | | 35 | | | 17 5 | | | 875 | | |

| | Harvesti | | | harvesting | | | harvesting | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ng | | | structures | | | structures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | techniq | | | developed | | | developed and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ues | | | and in use | | | in use | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Breed improve ment | Breed | | | Artificial | | No. of Artificial Insemination done | No. of Artificial | | SDG 2a, 2.5 | | | 800 | | 6.4 | | | 800 | | 6. 4 | | | 100 0 | | 6.4 | | | 100 0 | | | 6. 4 | | | 100 0 | | | 6. 4 | | | 32 | | |

| | improve | | | Inseminatio | | | Insemination | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | ment | | | n | | | done | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | conducted | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | Improved | | | No. of improved | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | breeds | | | breeds | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | distributed | | | distributed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | Dairy heifers, | Dairy heifers, | | | SDG | | 600 | | 90 | | | 900 | | | 13 | | 900 | | | 13 | | | 1,20 | | | 18 | | | 1,20 | | | 18 | | 720 | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | 2.5 | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performance |

| Indicators |

| Link |

|---|

| ages |

| to |

| SDG |

| targe |

| ts |

| Financi |

|---|

| al |

| services |

| SDG |

|---|

| 1.5, |

| 2c |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 700 |

|---|

| 0 |

| No. of acres |

|---|

| under pasture |

| and fodder |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3 |

| 0. |

|---|

| 7 |

| 0. |

|---|

| 7 |

| 0. |

|---|

| 7 |

| Mechanizat |

|---|

| ion |

| equipment |

| used |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.3, |

| 2a |

| 0.3 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 0. |

|---|

| 35 |

| 0.3 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 0. |

|---|

| 35 |

| 0. |

|---|

| 35 |

| 1.7 |

|---|

| 5 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2a |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2.4, |

| 2a |

| 17 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 17 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 17 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 17 |

|---|

| 5 |

| 17 |

|---|

| 5 |

| SDG |

|---|

| 2a, |

| 2.5 |

| 6. |

|---|

| 4 |

| 100 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 100 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 6. |

|---|

| 4 |

| 100 |

|---|

| 0 |

| 6. |

|---|

| 4 |

Page 158

Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) Beef bulls, SDG 35 4.2 35 4. 70 8.4 70 8. 70 8. 33. 2.5 2 4 4 6 Galla goats, SDG 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7. 37. 2.5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 Improved Local SDG 12,0 2.5 12,0 2. 12,0 2.5 15,0 3 15,0 3 13. Chicken, 2.5 00 00 5 00 00 00 5 Diversif Livestock No. of livestock ied enterprises/ breeds/enterpris livestoc breeds es introduced to k introduced farmers producti Dairy heifers, SDG 600 90 900 13 900 13 1,20 18 1,20 18 720 on 2a 5 5 0 0 0 0 Beef bulls, SDG 35 4.2 35 4. 70 8.4 70 8. 70 8. 33. 2a 2 4 4 6 Galla goats, SDG 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7. 37. 2a 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 Improved Local SDG 12,0 2.5 12,0 2. 12,0 2.5 15,0 3 15,0 3 13. Chicken, 2a 00 00 5 00 00 00 5 No. of farmers SDG 105 9 105 9 125 9 125 9 125 9 45 reached 2a 00 00 00 00 00 Input Farmers No. of farmers SDG 800 0.4 800 0. 800 0.4 800 0. 800 0. 2 subsidie reached reached through 2.3 4 4 4 s through input subsidies input subsidies Inputs Quantities of SDG 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 0 distributed inputs 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 to farmers distributed to farmers Livesto Extension No. of technical SDG 10 0.5 10 0. 10 0.5 10 0. 10 0. 2.5 ck service staff recruited 2.3 5 5 5 Extensi staff on recruited services Extension No. of extension SDG 45 2.5 60 2. 75 3 75 3 75 3 14 staff trained staff trained 2.3 5 Farmers No. of farmers SDG 10,0 2 10,0 2 10 2 12,0 2 12,0 2 10 reached reached 2.3 00 00 00 00 Equipment No. of SDG 10 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 20 distributed equipment 2.3 for distributed for extension extension service service delivery delivery 137

| Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries Sub Key Key Link Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) Tot Progra Output Performance ages Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 al mme Indicators to Bu Tar Co Tar C Tar Co Tar C Tar C SDG dge get st get os get st get os get os targe t t t t ts Ksh . M) Beef bulls, SDG 35 4.2 35 4. 70 8.4 70 8. 70 8. 33. 2.5 2 4 4 6 Galla goats, SDG 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7. 37. 2.5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 Improved Local SDG 12,0 2.5 12,0 2. 12,0 2.5 15,0 3 15,0 3 13. Chicken, 2.5 00 00 5 00 00 00 5 Diversif Livestock No. of livestock ied enterprises/ breeds/enterpris livestoc breeds es introduced to k introduced farmers producti Dairy heifers, SDG 600 90 900 13 900 13 1,20 18 1,20 18 720 on 2a 5 5 0 0 0 0 Beef bulls, SDG 35 4.2 35 4. 70 8.4 70 8. 70 8. 33. 2a 2 4 4 6 Galla goats, SDG 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7.5 1,50 7. 1,50 7. 37. 2a 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 Improved Local SDG 12,0 2.5 12,0 2. 12,0 2.5 15,0 3 15,0 3 13. Chicken, 2a 00 00 5 00 00 00 5 No. of farmers SDG 105 9 105 9 125 9 125 9 125 9 45 reached 2a 00 00 00 00 00 Input Farmers No. of farmers SDG 800 0.4 800 0. 800 0.4 800 0. 800 0. 2 subsidie reached reached through 2.3 4 4 4 s through input subsidies input subsidies Inputs Quantities of SDG 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 0 distributed inputs 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 to farmers distributed to farmers Livesto Extension No. of technical SDG 10 0.5 10 0. 10 0.5 10 0. 10 0. 2.5 ck service staff recruited 2.3 5 5 5 Extensi staff on recruited services Extension No. of extension SDG 45 2.5 60 2. 75 3 75 3 75 3 14 staff trained staff trained 2.3 5 Farmers No. of farmers SDG 10,0 2 10,0 2 10 2 12,0 2 12,0 2 10 reached reached 2.3 00 00 00 00 Equipment No. of SDG 10 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 10 4 20 distributed equipment 2.3 for distributed for extension extension service service delivery delivery 137 |

|---|

| | Sector: Agriculture, Livestock Development And Fisheries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| Sub Progra mme | Sub | Key Output | | | Key Performance Indicators | | | Link ages to SDG targe ts | | | | Planned Targets and Indicative Budget (Ksh. M) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tot | |

| | Progra | | | | | | | | | | | Year 1 | | | | | | Year 2 | | | | | | Year 3 | | | | | | Year 4 | | | | | | Year 5 | | | | | | al | |

| | mme | | | | | | | | | | Tar get | Tar | | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | | Co st | Co | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | Tar get | Tar | | C os t | C | | | Bu | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | dge | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | get | | | st | | | get | | | os | | | get | | | st | | | get | | | os | | | get | | | os | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | | | | | | | t | | | | | | t | | | | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ksh | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | |

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | M) | |

| | | | | | Beef bulls, | | | | SDG | | 35 | | | 4.2 | | | 35 | | | | 4. | | 70 | | | 8.4 | | | 70 | | | | 8. | | 70 | | | | 8. | | | 33. | |

| | | | | | | | | | 2.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | 4 | | | 6 | |

| | | | | | Galla goats, | | | | SDG | | | 1,50 | | 7.5 | | | | 1,50 | | | 7. | | | 1,50 | | 7.5 | | | | 1,50 | | | 7. | | | 1,50 | | | 7. | | | 37. | |

| | | | | | | | | | 2.5 | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 5 | |

| | | | | | | Improved Local | | | SDG | | | 12,0 | | 2.5 | | | | 12,0 | | | 2. | | | 12,0 | | 2.5 | | | | 15,0 | | 3 | 3 | | | 15,0 | | 3 | 3 | | | 13. | |

| | | | | | | Chicken, | | | 2.5 | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | 5 | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 5 | |

| Diversif ied livestoc k producti on | | Livestock enterprises/ breeds introduced | | | | No. of livestock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | breeds/enterpris | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | es introduced to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | farmers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | Dairy heifers, | Dairy heifers, | | | SDG | | 600 | | | 90 | | | 900 | | | | 13 | | 900 | | | | 13 | | | 1,20 | | | 18 | | | 1,20 | | | 18 | | 720 | | |

| | | | | | | | | | 2a | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | |

| | | | | | Beef bulls, | | | | SDG | | 35 | | | 4.2 | | | 35 | | | | 4. | | 70 | | | 8.4 | 8.4 | | 70 | 70 | | | 8. | | 70 | 70 | | | 8. | | | 33. | |

| | | | | | | | | | 2a | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | 4 | | | 6 | |

| | | | | | Galla goats, | | | | SDG | | | 1,50 | | 7.5 | | | | 1,50 | | | 7. | | | 1,50 | | 7.5 | | | | 1,50 | | | 7. | | | 1,50 | | | 7. | | | 37. | |

| | | | | | | | | | 2a | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 5 | |

| | | | | | | Improved Local | | | SDG | | | 12,0 | | 2.5 | | | | 12,0 | | | 2. | | | 12,0 | | 2.5 | | | | 15,0 | | 3 | 3 | | | 15,0 | | 3 | 3 | | | 13. | |

| | | | | | | Chicken, | | | 2a | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | 5 | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 5 | |

| | | | | | | No. of farmers | | | SDG | | | 105 | | 9 | | | | 105 | | 9 | 9 | | | 125 | | 9 | | | | 125 | | 9 | | | | 125 | | 9 | | | 45 | 45 | |

| | | | | | | reached | | | 2a | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | | |

| Input subsidie s | | | Farmers | | No. of farmers reached through input subsidies | No. of farmers | | SDG 2.3 | SDG | | 800 | 800 | | 0.4 | | | 800 | 800 | | 0. 4 | | | 800 | 800 | | 0.4 | | | 800 | 800 | | 0. 4 | | | 800 | 800 | | 0. 4 | | | 2 | | |

| | | | reached | | | reached through | | | 2.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | through | | | input subsidies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | input | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | subsidies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | Inputs distributed to farmers | Inputs | | | Quantities of | | SDG 2.3 | | | 100 0 | | | 0 | | | 100 0 | | | 0 | | | 100 0 | | | 0 | | | 100 0 | | | 0 | | | 100 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |

| | | | distributed | | | inputs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | to farmers | | | distributed to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | farmers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Livesto ck Extensi on services | | | Extension | | No. of technical staff recruited | No. of technical | | SDG 2.3 | | | 10 | | | 0.5 | | | 10 | | | 0. 5 | | | 10 | | | 0.5 | | | 10 | | | 0. 5 | | | 10 | | | 0. 5 | | | 2.5 | | |

| | | | service | | | staff recruited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | staff | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | recruited | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Extension | | | No. of extension | | | SDG | | 45 | | | 2.5 | | | 60 | | | | 2. | | 75 | | | 3 | | | 75 | | | 3 | | | 75 | | | 3 | | | 14 | | |

| | | | staff trained | | | staff trained | | | 2.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | Farmers | | | No. of farmers | | | SDG | | | 10,0 | | 2 | | | | 10,0 | | 2 | 2 | | 10 | | | 2 | | | | 12,0 | | 2 | | | | 12,0 | | 2 | | | 10 | | |

| | | | reached | | | reached | | | 2.3 | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | 00 | | | | | | | |

| | | | Equipment | | No. of equipment distributed for extension service delivery | No. of | | SDG 2.3 | SDG | | 10 | 10 | | 4 | | | 10 | 10 | | 4 | | | 10 | | | 4 | | | 10 | 10 | | 4 | | | 10 | 10 | | 4 | | | 20 | | |

| | | | distributed | | | equipment | | | 2.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | for | | | distributed for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | extension | | | extension | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | service | | | service delivery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| | | | delivery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

| Key |

|---|

| Output |

| Key |

|---|

| Performance |

| Indicators |

| Link |

|---|

| ages |

| to |

| SDG |

| targe |

| ts |

| Diversif |

|---|

| ied |

| livestoc |

| k |

| producti |

| on |

| Livestock |

|---|

| enterprises/ |

| breeds |

| introduced |

| Input |

|---|

| subsidie |

| s |

| 0. |